Search results for 'G. E. Mead' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. George Mead, Various G.H. Mead Texts.
    The shift in focus has changed the nature of the Project in a way which we hadn't expected and didn't really notice until this revision. Back in the late 1980s, we started the project as a "work around" for a situation that we found personally frustrating. We believed that widely-held beliefs about Mead's ideas were misinterpretations. But his published statements were often difficult to obtain. It was easier for scholars to rely from the secondary literature about Mead than (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. George Herbert Mead (2011). G.H. Mead: A Reader. Routledge.
    Mead is an exceptional case amongst sociological classics in that, until now, there has been no comprehensive reader of his work. As the first one-volume, comprehensive edited collection of Mead’s published and unpublished writing, this book fills this gap. It is the first to critically assess all of Mead's writings and draw out the aspects that are central to his system of thought. The book is divided into three parts (social psychology, science and epistemology, and democratic politics), (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  19
    J. J. E. (1970). The Epistemology of G. E. Moore. Review of Metaphysics 23 (3):558-558.
  4. G. R. S. Mead (1896). "Pistis Sophia. A Gnostic Gospel." G. R. S. Mead. [REVIEW] Ancient Philosophy 7:617.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  11
    C. G. (1977). Niermeyer J. F., Mediae Latinitatis lexicon minus. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976. Pp. xviii, 1138. 280 Glds. van de Kieft C., Lake-Schoonebeek G. S. M. M., Abbreviationes et index fontium [to Niermeyer's Lexicon]. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1976. Pp. xix, 78. [REVIEW] Speculum 52 (4):1081.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. C. E. C. E. (1912). CALÒ G. Fatti e problami del mondo educativo. [REVIEW] Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 4:II:298.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. G. G. G. G. (1922). Corrado Barbagallo e G. Pasquali. [REVIEW] Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 3:417.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. M. G. M. G. (1991). Della Volpe G., "le origini E la formazione Della dialettica hegeliana". Giornale Critico Della Filosofia Italiana 11:333.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Ella Welby & H. T. E. (1895). Every Day, Thoughts on the G.F.S. Ruler of Life [by E. Welby, Ed by E.H.T.].
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  13
    Glenn R. Negley (1943). Social Philosophy and the Social Mind: A Study of the Genetic Methods of J. M. Baldwin, G. H. Mead and J. E. Boodin. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 40 (24):669-670.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    Eugene Clay Holmes (1942). Social Philosophy and the Social Mind: A Study of the Genetic Methods of J. M. Baldwin, G. H. Mead and J. E. Boodin. New York.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Charles Pigden (2007). Desiring to Desire: Russell, Lewis and G.E.Moore. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes from G.E.Moore. Oxford University Press 244-260.
    I have two aims in this paper. In §§2-4 I contend that Moore has two arguments (not one) for the view that that ‘good’ denotes a non-natural property not to be identified with the naturalistic properties of science and common sense (or, for that matter, the more exotic properties posited by metaphysicians and theologians). The first argument, the Barren Tautology Argument (or the BTA), is derived, via Sidgwick, from a long tradition of anti-naturalist polemic. But the second argument, the Open (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. G. E. M. Anscombe, Jenny Teichman & Cora Diamond (1979). Intention and Intentionality Essays for G. E. M. Anscombe. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. Constantine Cavarnos & G. E. Moore (1979). A Dialogue on G. E. Moore's Ethical Philosophy, Together with an Account of Three Talks with G. E. Moore on Diverse Philosophical Questions. [REVIEW]
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  1
    T. E. Jessop (1939). The Philosophy of the Act. By G. H. Mead . Edited, with Introduction, by C. W. Morris in Collaboration with J. M. Brewster, A. M. Dunham, and D. L. Miller . (Chicago: Univ. Of Chicago Press; London: Cambridge Univ. Press. 1938. Pp. Lxxxiv + 696. Price $5; 22s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 14 (53):105-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. G. E. Moore (1993). G.E. Moore: Selected Writings. Routledge.
    G.E. Moore, more than either Bertrand Russell or Ludwig Wittgenstein, was chiefly responsible for the rise of the analytic method in twentieth-century philosophy. This selection of his writings shows Moore at his very best. The classic essays are crucial to major philosophical debates that still resonate today. Amongst those included are: * A Defense of Common Sense * Certainty * Sense-Data * External and Internal Relations * Hume's Theory Explained * Is Existence a Predicate? * Proof of an External World (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  17.  3
    Nancy G. Slack (2003). Are Research Schools Necessary? Contrasting Models of 20th Century Research at Yale Led by Ross Granville Harrison, Grace E. Pickford and G. Evelyn Hutchinson. Journal of the History of Biology 36 (3):501 - 529.
    This paper compares and contrasts three groups that conducted biological research at Yale University during overlapping periods between 1910 and 1970. Yale University proved important as a site for this research. The leaders of these groups were Ross Granville Harrison, Grace E. Pickford, and G. Evelyn Hutchinson, and their members included both graduate students and more experienced scientists. All produced innovative research, including the opening of new subfields in embryology, endocrinology and ecology respectively, over a long period of time. Harrison's (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  23
    Thomas Baldwin (1990). G.E. Moore. Routledge.
    This book is available either individually, or as part of the specially-priced Arguments of the Philosphers Collection.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  19. Paul Levy (1989). Moore G. E. Moore and the Cambridge Apostles. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  20.  3
    Laurence Perbal (2013). G×E Interaction and Pluralism in the Postgenomic Era. Biological Theory 7 (3):266-274.
    Genetics is in a postgenomic era, and this article illustrates this epistemological evolution using the debate between developmental criticism and traditional biometric genetics about gene × environment interaction. Quantitative geneticists are blamed for failing to respect the complexity of development; as a response, they claim a defensive position, called isolationist pluralism, which supports the idea that studying development is not their problem. But postgenomics seems to have accepted and integrated some developmental criticisms and the isolationist perspective has been challenged during (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  7
    David O'Connor (1982). The Metaphysics of G.~E.~Moore. D.~Reidel.
    INTRODUCTION: MOORE AND METAPHYSICS In the course of this book I will make frequent use of the word 'metaphysics'. Indeed I will maintain that that word ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. A. J. Ayer (2004). Bertrand Russell and G.E. Moore the Analytical Heritage. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Teddy Brunius (1964). G. E. Moore's Analyses of Beauty an Impasse and a Way Out. [Printed by Almqvist & Wiksells].
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  12
    G. E. L. Owen, Malcolm Schofield & Martha Craven Nussbaum (eds.) (1982). Language and Logos: Studies in Ancient Greek Pgilosophy Presented to G.E.L. Owen. Cambridge University Press.
    The essays in this volume were written to celebrate the sixtieth birthday of G. E. L. Owen, who by his essays and seminars on ancient Greek philosophy has made a contribution to its study that is second to none. The authors, from both sides of the Atlantic, include not only scholars whose main research interests lie in Greek philosophy, but others best known for their work in general philosophy. All are pupils or younger colleagues of Professor Owen who are indebted (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Dennis A. Rohatyn (1987). The Reluctant Naturalist a Study of G.E. Moore's Principia Ethica. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. William H. Shaw (1995). Moore on Right and Wrong the Normative Ethics of G.E. Moore.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  7
    Timothy J. Gallagher (2012). G.H. Mead's Understanding of the Nature of Speech in the Light of Contemporary Research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 42 (1):40-62.
    The following analysis demonstrates that G.H. Mead's understanding of human speech is remarkably consistent with today's interdisciplinary field that studies speech as a natural behavior with an evolutionary history. Mead seems to have captured major empirical and theoretical insights more than half a century before the contemporary field began to take shape. In that field the framework known as “Tinbergen's Four Questions,” developed in ecology to study naturally occurring behavior in nonhuman animals, has been an effective organizing framework (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. David G. Stern, Brian Rogers & Gabriel Citron (eds.) (2016). Wittgenstein: Lectures, Cambridge 1930–1933: From the Notes of G. E. Moore. Cambridge University Press.
    This edition of G. E. Moore's notes taken at Wittgenstein's seminal Cambridge lectures in the early 1930s provides, for the first time, an almost verbatim record of those classes. The presentation of the notes is both accessible and faithful to their original manuscripts, and a comprehensive introduction and synoptic table of contents provide the reader with essential contextual information and summaries of the topics in each lecture. The lectures form an excellent introduction to Wittgenstein's middle-period thought, covering a broad range (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Thomas Baldwin (ed.) (2013). G.E. Moore: Selected Writings. Routledge.
    G.E. Moore, more than either Bertrand Russell or Ludwig Wittgenstein, was chiefly responsible for the rise of the analytic method in twentieth-century philosophy. This selection of his writings shows Moore at his very best. The classic essays are crucial to major philosophical debates that still resonate today. Amongst those included are: * _A Defense of Common Sense * Certainty * Sense-Data * External and Internal Relations * Hume's Theory Explained * Is Existence a Predicate? * Proof of an External World (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  30.  14
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  46
    Paul Arthur Schilpp (1952). The Philosophy of G. E. Moore. New York, Tudor Pub. Co..
    --Moore's autobiography.--Descriptive and critical essays on the philosophy of G. E. Moore.--The philosopher replies.--Bibliography of the writings of G. E. Moore (to July, 1952) compiled by Emerson Buchanan and G. E. Moore (p. [689]-699).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  32. Nikolay Milkov (2004). G. E. Moore and the Greifswald Objectivists on the Given and the Beginning of Analytic Philosophy. Axiomathes 14 (4):361-379.
    Shortly before G. E. Moore wrote down the formative for the early analytic philosophy lectures on Some Main Problems of Philosophy (1910–1911), he had become acquainted with two books which influenced his thought: (1) a book by Husserl's pupil August Messer and (2) a book by the Greifswald objectivist Dimitri Michaltschew. Central to Michaltschew's book was the concept of the given. In Part I, I argue that Moore elaborated his concept of sense-data in the wake of the Greifswald concept. Carnap (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  33. Andrew Altman (2004). Breathing Life Into a Dead Argument: G.E. Moore and the Open Question. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 117 (3):395-408.
    A century after its publication, G.E. Moore''sPrincipia Ethica stands as one of theclassic statements of anti-naturalism inethics. Moore claimed that the most basic ethicalproperties were denoted by `good'' and `bad'' andthat all naturalist accounts of thoseproperties were inadequate. His open-questionargument aimed to refute any proposedidentification of good with some naturalproperty, and Moore concluded from theargument that good must be a nonnaturalproperty.The received view is that the open-questionargument is a failure. In this paper,my aim is to breathe some life back intoMoore''s (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  64
    Jonas Olson (2006). G. E. Moore on Goodness and Reasons. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):525 – 534.
    Several proponents of the 'buck-passing' account of value have recently attributed to G. E. Moore the implausible view that goodness is reason-providing. I argue that this attribution is unjustified. In addition to its historical significance, the discussion has an important implication for the contemporary value-theoretical debate: the plausible observation that goodness is not reason-providing does not give decisive support to the buck-passing account over its Moorean rivals. The final section of the paper is a survey of what can be said (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  35.  64
    Susana Nuccetelli (ed.) (2007). Themes From G.E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics. Oxford University Press.
    These thirteen original essays, whose authors include some of the world's leading philosophers, examine themes from the work of the Cambridge philosopher G. E. Moore, and demonstrate his considerable continuing influence on philosophical debate. Part I bears on epistemological topics, such as skepticism about the external world, the significance of common sense, and theories of perception. Part II is devoted to themes in ethics, such as Moore's open question argument, his non-naturalism, utilitarianism, and his notion of organic unities.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  36.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2):n/a-n/a.
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  1
    James Owen Weatherall (2015). On G.E. Moore’s ‘Proof of an External World’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (2).
    A new reading of G.E. Moore's ‘Proof of an External World’ is offered, on which the Proof is understood as a unique and essential part of an anti-sceptical strategy that Moore worked out early in his career and developed in various forms, from 1909 until his death in 1958. I begin by ignoring the Proof and by developing a reading of Moore's broader response to scepticism. The bulk of the article is then devoted to understanding what role the Proof plays (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Paul Snowdon (2007). G. E. Moore on Sense Data and Perception. In Susana Nuccetelli & Gary Seay (eds.), Themes From G. E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics. Clarendon Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  61
    G. E. Moore (1959). G. E. Moore. Mind 68 (269):1-1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  62
    Anthony Coleman (2012). G. E. Moore and Bad Faith. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (3):347-365.
    Abstract: G. E. Moore claimed to know a variety of commonsense propositions. He is often accused of being dogmatic or of begging the question against philosophers who deny that he knows such things. In this paper, I argue that this accusation is mistaken. I argue that Moore is instead guilty of answering questions of the form ‘Do I know p?’ in bad faith.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  45
    Consuelo Preti (2008). On the Origins of the Contemporary Notion of Propositional Content: Anti-Psychologism in Nineteenth-Century Psychology and G.E. Moore's Early Theory of Judgment. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (2):176-185.
    I argue that the familiar picture of the rise of analytic philosophy through the early work of G. E. Moore and Bertrand Russell is incomplete and to some degree erroneous. Archival evidence suggests that a considerable influence on Moore, especially evident in his 1899 paper ‘The nature of judgment,’ comes from the literature in nineteenth-century empirical psychology rather than nineteenth-century neo-Hegelianism, as is widely believed. I argue that the conceptual influences of Moore’s paper are more likely to have had their (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  66
    Terence Cuneo (2009). Themes From G.E. Moore: New Essays in Epistemology and Ethics • by Susana Nuccetelli and Gary Seay. Analysis 69 (1):167-169.
    G.E. Moore's philosophical legacy is ambiguous. On the one hand, Moore has a special place in the hearts of many contemporary analytic philosophers. He is, after all, one of the fathers of the movement, his broadly commonsensical methodology informing how many contemporary analytic philosophers practise their craft. On the other hand, many contemporary philosophers keep Moore's own substantive positions at arm's distance. According to many epistemologists, one can find no finer example of how to beg the question than Moore's case (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  5
    Federico Burdman (2015). Escepticismo e idealismo en la “Prueba del mundo exterior” de G.E. Moore. Areté. Revista de Filosofía 27 (1):45-67.
    G.E. Moore’s argument in “Proof of an External World” seems to beg the question against the skeptic and to miss the point of the challenge posed by skeptical hypotheses. I propose an interpretation that frees the argument from both charges. Starting from a distinction between the way Moore understood his dialectical position against the idealist and the skeptic, I attempt to illuminate the conception of skepticism that lies behind his argument. I propose that the argument’s core is found in a (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  20
    Jack Martin (2007). Interpreting and Extending G. H. Mead's "Metaphysics" of Selfhood and Agency. Philosophical Psychology 20 (4):441 – 456.
    G. H. Mead developed an alternative "metaphysics" of selfhood and agency that underlies, but is seldom made explicit in discussions of, his social developmental psychology. This is an alternative metaphysics that rejects any pregiven, fixed foundations for being and knowing. It assumes the emergence of social psychological phenomena such as mind, self, and deliberative agency through the activity of human actors and interactors within their biophysical and sociocultural world. Of central importance to the emergence of self-consciousness and deliberative forms (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  9
    Filipe Carreira da Silva (2007). G. H. Mead: A System in a State of Flux. History of the Human Sciences 20 (1):45-65.
    This article offers an original, intellectual portrait of G. H. Mead. My reassessment of Mead’s thinking is founded, in methodological terms, upon a historically minded yet theoretically oriented strategy. Mead’s system of thought is submitted to a historical reconstruction in order to grasp the evolution of his ideas over time, and to a thematic reconstruction organized around three major research areas or pillars: science, social psychology and politics. If one re-examines the entirety of Mead’s published and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  20
    Mike Lukich (2002). “Non-Natural” Qualities in G.E. Moore: Inherent or Contingent? Philosophical Studies 108 (1-2):15 - 21.
    G.E. Moore's theory of the nature of the quality referred to by the word good asserts that this quality is non-natural. If it is, further, supposed that this non-natural quality belongs necessarily and exclusively to those events, human acts, entities, etc., which possess certain strictly determined natural qualities, and those qualities only, then it becomes difficult to explain the relation and the supposed interdependence allegedly existing between the two so disparate categories of qualities. This paper purports to show that, in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000