5 found
G. K. Vemulapalli [3]G. Krishna Vemulapalli [2]
  1.  88
    G. K. Vemulapalli (2010). Thermodynamics and Chemistry: How Does a Theory Formulated Without Reference to Matter Explain the Properties of Matter? Philosophy of Science 77 (5):911-920.
  2. G. Krishna Vemulapalli & Henry Byerly (1999). Remnants of Reductionism. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (1):17-41.
    Central to many issues surrounding reduction in science is the relation between a physical system and its components. In this article we examine how thermodynamic theory relates properties of whole systems to properties of their components. In order to keep the analysis general, we focus our study on universal properties like volume, heat capacity, energy and temperature. In the cases examined we find that scientific explanation requires appeal to properties of components that are spatially as extensive as the whole system. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. B. G. Malmström, L. McIntyre, P. H. Plesch, R. M. Richman, D. Rothbart, E. R. Scerri, R. Strand, J. Van Brakel, H. Vancik & G. K. Vemulapalli (1999). Authors Index Volume. Foundations of Chemistry 1 (313).
    Export citation  
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  24
    G. K. Vemulapalli (2008). Theories of the Chemical Bond and its True Nature. Foundations of Chemistry 10 (3):167-176.
    Two different models for chemical bond were developed almost simultaneously after the Schrödinger formulation of quantum theory. These are known as the valence bond (VB) and molecular orbital (MO) theories. Initially chemists preferred the VB theory and ignored the MO theory. Now the VB theory is almost dropped out of currency. The context of discovery and Linus Pauling’s overpowering influence gave the VB theory its initial advantage. The current universal acceptance of the MO theory is due to its ability to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography  
  5.  4
    G. Krishna Vemulapalli & Henry C. Byerly (2004). Carl Hempel's Philosophy of Science: How to Avoid Epistemic Discontinuity and Pedagogical Pitfalls. Science and Education 13 (1-2):85-98.
    No categories
    Direct download  
    Export citation  
    My bibliography