9 found
Sort by:
  1. Gary Edmond (2013). Just Truth? Carefully Applying History, Philosophy and Sociology of Science to the Forensic Use of CCTV Images. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):80-91.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gary Edmond & David Hamer (2010). Evidence Law. In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gary Edmond (2008). Judging the Scientific and Medical Literature: Some Legal Implications of Changes to Biomedical Research and Publication. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 28 (3):523-561.
    Over the last two decades judges (and regulators) in all common law jurisdictions have increased their reliance on published medical and scientific literature. During the same period biomedical research has undergone fundamental and unprecedented change. This article explores some of the changes to the location, organization and funding of biomedical research in order to assess their implications for liability and proof. Focusing on peer review and publication, along with reforms promoted by the editors of some of the world's pre-eminent general (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gary Edmond (2002). Constructing Miscarriages of Justice: Misunderstanding Scientific Evidence in High Profile Criminal Appeals. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22 (1):53-89.
    In recent decades a number of criminal convictions have been reversed on appeal, partially on the basis of problems associated with the use of scientific evidence adduced by the prosecution during the trial. These miscarriage of justice cases have received considerable attention from news media, legal commentators, criminologists and in formal public inquiries. Most responses to these cases have been critical of the scientific evidence originally relied upon at trial. Few commentators have been critical of, or even reflective about, the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gary Edmond (2002). Misunderstanding the Uses of Scientific Evidence in High Profile Criminal Appeals: The Social Construction of Miscarriages of Justice'(2002). Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 22:53.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gary Edmond & David Mercer (1999). Juggling Science: From Polemic to Pastiche. Social Epistemology 13 (2):215 – 233.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gary Edmond & David Mercer (1996). Manifest Destiny: Law and Science in America'. Metascience 10:40-58.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gary Edmond & David Mercer (1996). Survey Review. Metascience 5 (2):40-58.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation