Search results for 'Geoff Danaher' (try it on Scholar)

222 found
Sort by:
  1. Geoff Danaher (2000). Understanding Foucault. Sage Publications.score: 240.0
    Derided and disregarded by many of his contemporaries, Michel Foucault is now regarded as probably the most influential thinker of the twentieth century, his work is studied across the humanities and social sciences. Reading Foucault, however, can be a challenge, as can writing about him, but in Understanding Foucault, the authors offer an entertaining and informative introduction to his thinking. They cover all the issues Foucault dealt with, including power, knowledge, subjectivity and sexuality and discuss the development of his analysis (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. John Danaher (2013). Kramer's Purgative Rationale for Capital Punishment: A Critique. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-20.score: 30.0
    Matthew Kramer has recently defended a novel justification for the death penalty, something he calls the purgative rationale. According to this rationale, the death penalty can be justifiably implemented if it is necessary in order to purge defilingly evil offenders from a moral community. Kramer claims that this rationale overcomes the problems associated with traditional rationales for the death penalty. Although Kramer is to be commended for carving out a novel niche in a well-worn dialectical space, I argue that his (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Danaher (forthcoming). Necessary Moral Truths and Theistic Metaethics. Sophia:1-22.score: 30.0
    Theistic metaethics usually places one key restriction on the explanation of moral facts, namely: every moral fact must ultimately be explained by some fact about God. But the widely held belief that moral truths are necessary truths seems to undermine this claim. If a moral truth is necessary, then it seems like it neither needs nor has an explanation. Or so the objection typically goes. Recently, two proponents of theistic metaethics — William Lane Craig and Mark Murphy — have argued (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. John Danaher (2013). Skeptical Theism and Divine Permission - A Reply to Anderson. [REVIEW] International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion DOI 10.1007/S11153-013-9429-Y (2):1-18.score: 30.0
    Skeptical theism (ST) may undercut the key inference in the evidential argument from evil, but it does so at a cost. If ST is true, then we lose our ability to assess the all things considered (ATC) value of natural events and states of affairs. And if we lose that ability, a whole slew of undesirable consequences follow. So goes a common consequential critique of ST. In a recent article, Anderson has argued that this consequential critique is flawed. Anderson claims (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. James Danaher (2004). Substance, Relation, and Identity. Sophia 43 (1):73-81.score: 30.0
    One of the great insights of postmodern thought is that our understanding is perspectival, and that we have the perspectives we do because we have privileged one element of certain important binaries over others. Western civilization, or our understanding of it, is based upon our privileging of the male perspective over the female, the rich over the poor, and the white over the black. If that order were reversed and we privileged the perspective of those who had been marginalized, we (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. John Danaher (2013). The Vice of In-Principlism and the Harmfulness of Love. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):19-21.score: 30.0
    This is a response to Earp and colleagues' target article "If I could just stop loving you: Anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical break-up". I argue that the authors may indulge in the vice of in-principlism when presenting their ethical framework for dealing with anti-love biotechnology, and that they mis-apply the concept of harm.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James P. Danaher (2001). David Hume and Jonathan Edwards on Miracles and Religious Faith. Southwest Philosophy Review 17 (2):13-24.score: 30.0
    David Hume (1711-1776) and Jonathan Edwards (1703- 1758) had very different reputations concerning the Christian faith. In spite of this, they both had very similar positions concerning miracles and the supernatural. It is argued that although Hume rejects one type of miracle, he acknowledges another type. Edwards does essentially the same thing and rejects the same kind of miracle that Hume rejects, while acknowledging the kind of miracles that Hume acknowledges.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James Danaher (2012). David Hume and Jonathan Edwards On Reason, Miracles, and Religious Faith. Philosophical Inquiry 23 (3/4):141-152.score: 30.0
  9. James P. Danaher (2000). Is There a Place for Berkeley's Ideas? Southwest Philosophy Review 16 (2):59-71.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James P. Danaher (2002). Is Berkeley's World a Divine Language? Modern Theology 18 (3):361-373.score: 30.0
    George Berkeley (1685–1753) believed that the visible world was a series of signs that constituted a divine language through which God was speaking to us. Given the nature of language and the nature of the visual world, this paper examines to what extent the visual world could be a divine language and to what extent God could speak to us through it.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James Danaher (2002). Toward a Postmodern Correspondence Theory of Truth. Sophia 41 (2):55-62.score: 30.0
    The correspondence theory of truth no longer holds the privileged place it once held. In a postmodern world there simply does not appear to be any objective reality to which our ideas might correspond in order to be true. Thus, today other theories of truth have become popular. Most theists bemoan the loss of correspondence and muster arguments to oppose the postmodern perspective. This paper argues that even given the postmodern perspective of our age a correspondence theory of truth is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. James P. Danaher (2001). A Note on the Law of Contradiction and Human Freedom. Sophia 40 (1):1-5.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Warren Midgley, Patrick Alan Danaher & Margaret Baguley (eds.) (2012). The Role of Participants in Education Research: Ethics, Epistemologies, and Methods. Routledge.score: 30.0
    This book explores different perspectives on the role, influence and importance of participants in education research.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. William J. Danaher (1993). Australian Lonergan Workshop. University Press of America.score: 30.0
    Contains papers presented at the 1985, 1987, and 1989 Workshops.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. James P. Danaher (2002). Language and Reality: A Reply to Crouch. Locke Studies 2:137-143.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. James Danaher (2011). The Laws of Thought. The Philosopher 92 (1).score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. P. Danaher (2000). The Place of Berkeley's Ideas. Philosophical Inquiry 22 (3):71-82.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Norman Geoff (2003). The Paradox of Evidence-Based Medicine. Commentary on Gupta (2003), a Critical Appraisal of Evidence-Based Medicine: Some Ethical Considerations. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2).score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Moore Geoff (1999). Tinged Shareholders Theory: Or What's so Special About Stakeholders. Business Ethics: A European Review 8 (2).score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Matthew H. Kramer (2013). The Purgative Rationale for the Death Penalty: Replies to Steiker and Danaher. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-16.score: 18.0
    This article defends my 2011 book “The Ethics of Capital Punishment” against the thoughtful critiques written by Carol Steiker and John Danaher respectively. It does not attempt to respond to every point of contention in the two critiques, but concentrates instead on a few of the main points from each of them.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Camilla Flodin (2014). Geoff Boucher, Adorno Reframed. Estetika: The Central European Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):146-148.score: 18.0
    A review of Geoff Boucher´s Adorno Reframed (London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2013, 166 pp. ISBN 978-1-84885-947-0).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Geoff Boucher (2007). Chapter Three From the Desire for Recognition to a Politics of Resistance Geoff Boucher. In Julie Connolly, Michael Leach & Lucas Walsh (eds.), Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars. 50.score: 18.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Marcus Pound (2007). Traversing the Fantasy: Critical Responses to Slavoj Žižek. By Geoff Boucher, Jason Glynos and Matthew Sharpe. Heythrop Journal 48 (4):667–669.score: 15.0
  24. Bruce Krajewski (1999). Nietzsche's Corpsle: Aesthetics, Politics, Prophecy, or, the Spectacular Technoculture of Everyday Life Geoff Waite Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1996, 564 Pp., US $24.95. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (01):178-.score: 15.0
  25. John Bleasdale (2011). Claire Molloy (2010) Memento ; Geoff King (2010) Lost in Translation ; Gary Needham (2010) Brokeback Mountain . American Indies Series. [REVIEW] Film-Philosophy 15 (1):255-261.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mervyn Hartwig (2007). Charging at Red Flags? Blind Spots in Geoff Hodgson's 'Promised Land'. Journal of Critical Realism 3 (1).score: 15.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Sambit Mallick (2009). Geoff Tansey and Tasmin Rajotte (Eds.), The Future Control of Food: A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 26 (3):245-246.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jeremy Black (2013). Wallenstein: The Enigma of the Thirty Years War. By Geoff Mortimer. The European Legacy 18 (1):94-94.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Trevor Hogan (1994). Reviews : Robyn Eckersley, Environmentalism and Political Theory: Toward an Ecocentric Approach (State University of New York/UCL Press, 1992); Robert E. Goodin, Green Political Theory (Polity Press, 1992); Peter Hay and Robyn Eckersley (Eds), Ecopolitical Theory: Essaysfrom Australia, (Board of Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, 1992); Peter Hay, Robyn Eckersley and Geoff Holloway (Eds) Environmental Politics in Australia and New Zealand (Board of Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, 1989); Drew Hutton (Ed.), Green Politics in Australia (Angus and Robertson, 1987); Michael Muetzelfeldt (Ed.), Society, State and Politics in Australia (Pluto Press, 1992). [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 38 (1):165-177.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Janet Snyder (2003). Francis Grew and Margrethe de Neergaard, Shoes and Pattens. 2nd Ed. Illustrations by Susan Mitford. (Medieval Finds From Excavations in London, 2.) Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, 2001. Pp. X, 145; 165 Black-and-White Figures and 22 Tables. $39.95. First Ed. Published in 1988 by Her Majesty's Stationery Office.Geoff Egan and Frances Pritchard, with Justine Bayley, Mike Heyworth, Rose Johnson, Peter Stott, Et Al., Dress Accessories, C.1150–C.1450. New Ed. Principal Illustrators: Susan Mitford and Nick Griffiths. (Medieval Finds From Excavations in London, 3.) Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, for the Museum of London, 2002. Pp. Xvi, 410 Plus 12 Color Plates; 269 Black-and-White Figures and Tables. $60. First Published in 1991 by Her Majesty's Stationery Office. [REVIEW] Speculum 78 (4):1301-1303.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Janet Snyder (2003). Francis Grew and Margrethe de Neergaard, Shoes and Pattens. Illustrations by Susan Mitford.(Medieval Finds From Excavations in London, 2.) Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, NY: Boydell and Brewer, 2001. Pp. X, 145; 165 Black-and-White Figures and 22 Tables. $39.95. Published in 1988 by Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Geoff Egan and Frances Pritchard, with Justine Bayley, Mike Heyworth, Rose Johnson, Peter Stott, Et Al., Dress Accessories, C. 1150–C. 1450. New Ed. Principal Illustrators: Susan Mitford ... [REVIEW] Speculum 78 (4):1301-1303.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Marisa L. Wilson (2010). The Future Control of Food. A Guide to International Negotiations and Rules on Intellectual Property, Biodiversity and Food Security. Edited by Geoff Tansey & Tasmin Rajotte. Pp. 266. (Earthscan, London, 2008.) £19.99, ISBN 978-1-84407-429-7, Paperback. [REVIEW] Journal of Biosocial Science 42 (1):141-142.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Francis Jeffry Pelletier, Geoff Sutcliffe.score: 15.0
    (although the FOF, unlike the CNF, is still a theorem). The correct version of Problem 62 is (following the format of (Pelletier, 1986)): Natural FOF Negated Conclusion CNF (Ax)r(Pet~(Px m Pf(x))) m Pf(f(x))] Pet Px+ P f(f(x)) + -Pa..
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Bill Sullivan & John Heng (1994). William J. Danaher, Ed., Australian Lonergan Workshop Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 14 (6):384-386.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Andrew Vandenberg (2007). Chapter Seven Postmodern Conservatism and Reactionary Recognition Andrew Vandenberg, Matthew Sharpe and Geoff Boucher. In Julie Connolly, Michael Leach & Lucas Walsh (eds.), Recognition in Politics: Theory, Policy and Practice. Cambridge Scholars. 116.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Geoff Cockfield, Ann Firth & John Laurent (eds.) (2007). New Perspectives on Adam Smith's the Theory of Moral Sentiments. Edward Elgar.score: 6.0
    1. Introduction Geoff Cockfield, Ann Firth and John Laurent -/- 2. The Role of Thumos in Adam Smith’s System Lisa Hill -/- 3. Adam Smith’s Treatment of the Greeks in The Theory of Moral Sentiments: The Case of Aristotle Richard Temple-Smith -/- 4. Adam Smith, Religion and the Scottish Enlightenment Pete Clarke -/- 5. The ‘New View’ of Adam Smith and the Development of his Views Over Time James E. Alvey -/- 6. The Moon Before the Dawn: A Seventeenth-Century (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Geoff Pfeifer (2012). Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman (Eds): The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 35 (3):465-469.score: 6.0
    Levi Bryant, Nick Srnicek, and Graham Harman (eds): The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-5 DOI 10.1007/s10746-012-9218-0 Authors Geoff Pfeifer, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA Journal Human Studies Online ISSN 1572-851X Print ISSN 0163-8548.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Marelene Rayner-Canham & Geoff Rayner-Canham (2011). Anne-Marie Weidler Kubanek: Nothing Less Than an Adventure: Ellen Gleditsch and Her Life in Science. [REVIEW] Foundations of Chemistry 13 (3):251-252.score: 6.0
    Anne-Marie Weidler Kubanek: Nothing less than an adventure: Ellen Gleditsch and her life in science Content Type Journal Article Category Book Review Pages 1-2 DOI 10.1007/s10698-011-9119-8 Authors Marelene Rayner-Canham, Memorial University, Grenfell Campus, Corner Brook, NL, Canada Geoff Rayner-Canham, Memorial University, Grenfell Campus, Corner Brook, NL, Canada Journal Foundations of Chemistry Online ISSN 1572-8463 Print ISSN 1386-4238.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Geoff Allshorn (2014). Humanism and the Future: A Personal Perspective. Australian Humanist, The 113:1.score: 6.0
    Allshorn, Geoff I believe the year in which I was born to be a very important year, perhaps not surprisingly, but particularly because of other events which would ultimately become significant in my own life.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. D. T. Ogilvie (1999). Reviews: ReWiring the Corporate Brain: Using the New Science to Rethink How We Structure and Lead Organizations, Danah Zohar. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):187-190.score: 6.0
    (1999). Reviews: ReWiring the Corporate Brain: Using the New Science to Rethink How We Structure and Lead Organizations, Danah Zohar. Emergence: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 187-190.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Geoff Childers (2011). What's Wrong with the Evolutionary Argument Against Naturalism? International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 69 (3):193-204.score: 3.0
    Alvin Plantinga has argued that evolutionary naturalism (the idea that God does not tinker with evolution) undermines its own rationality. Natural selection is concerned with survival and reproduction, and false beliefs conjoined with complementary motivational drives could serve the same aims as true beliefs. Thus, argues Plantinga, if we believe we evolved naturally, we should not think our beliefs are, on average, likely to be true, including our beliefs in evolution and naturalism. I argue herein that our cognitive faculties are (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Paul Richard Blum (2010). MICHAEL POLANYI: CAN THE MIND BE REPRESENTED BY A MACHINE? Polanyiana 19 (1-2):35-60.score: 3.0
    In 1949, the Department of Philosophy at the University of Manchester organized a symposium “Mind and Machine” with Michael Polanyi, the mathematicians Alan Turing and Max Newman, the neurologists Geoff rey Jeff erson and J. Z. Young, and others as participants. Th is event is known among Turing scholars, because it laid the seed for Turing’s famous paper on “Computing Machinery and Intelligence”, but it is scarcely documented. Here, the transcript of this event, together with Polanyi’s original statement and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Geoff Stokes (1997). Karl Popper's Political Philosophy of Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.score: 3.0
    This article examines critically Popper's arguments for a "unity of method" between natural science and social science. It discusses Popper's writings on the goals of science, the objects of scientific inquiry, the logic of scientific method, and the value of objectivity The major argument is that, despite his unifying intention, Popper himself provides good reasons for treating the two sciences differently. Popper proposes that social scientists follow a number of rules that are not required for, and that have no direct (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Geoff Pynn (2013). The Bayesian Explanation of Transmission Failure. Synthese 190 (9):1519-1531.score: 3.0
    Even if our justified beliefs are closed under known entailment, there may still be instances of transmission failure. Transmission failure occurs when P entails Q, but a subject cannot acquire a justified belief that Q by deducing it from P. Paradigm cases of transmission failure involve inferences from mundane beliefs (e.g., that the wall in front of you is red) to the denials of skeptical hypotheses relative to those beliefs (e.g., that the wall in front of you is not white (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Geoff Moore (2004). The Fair Trade Movement: Parameters, Issues and Future Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (1-2):73-86.score: 3.0
    Although Fair Trade has been in existence for more than 40 years, discussion in the business and business ethics literature of this unique trading and campaigning movement between Southern producers and Northern buyers and consumers has been limited. This paper seeks to redress this deficit by providing a description of the characteristics of Fair Trade, including definitional issues, market size and segmentation and the key organizations. It discusses Fair Trade from Southern producer and Northern trader and consumer perspectives and highlights (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Aaron Smuts (2003). Film Theory Meets Video Games: An Analysis of the Issues and Methodologies in 'ScreenPlay'. [REVIEW] Film-Philosophy 7 (54).score: 3.0
    "ScreenPlay" is the first collection of essays devoted to exploring the relationship between cinema and video games. It attempts to introduce the field of video game studies while also increasing our understanding of the two artforms. Although not all of the essays are models of clear thinking on the subject, the volume will be a valuable resource for those working in film, philosophy, new media, and video game studies. Geoff King and Tanya Krzywinska have brought together a diverse collection (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Geoff Moore (1999). Corporate Moral Agency: Review and Implications. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 21 (4):329 - 343.score: 3.0
    The debate concerning corporate moral agency is normally conducted through philosophical arguments in articles which argue from only one point of view. This paper summarises both the arguments for and against corporate moral agency and concludes from this that the arguments in favour have more weight. The paper also addresses the way in which the law in the U.K. and the U.S.A. currently views this issue and shows how it is supportive of the concept of corporate moral agency. The paper (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Geoff Moore (1999). Tinged Shareholder Theory: Or What's so Special About Stakeholders? Business Ethics 8 (2):117–127.score: 3.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Benj Hellie (forthcoming). On Tests of Context. Inquiry.score: 3.0
    Assume a 'Stalnakean' conception of contexts as mental states. A /test of context/ is a context-dependent sentence with semantic values limited to the /trivial/ and /vacuous/ propositions: perhaps 'I believe that P' is trivial if I do believe that P, vacuous if I don't. Tests of context solve the 'Frege-Geach' problem for expressivism (see my 'There it is' and 'How we do'; also seminal work by Seth Yalcin and Nate Charlow): kind of a big deal. But Cian Dorr and (...) Lee have each objected that this makes 'I believe that P' /metaphysically necessary a posteriori/. To assess this, we play out Kaplan's 'Demonstratives' system hacked with contexts as Stalnakean sets rather than Kaplanean points. On this 'mindset semantics': tests are /rigidified/ sentences like 'actually P'; 'metaphysical' modality is instead about cross-comparison of perspectives; on the 'diagonal', a fundamental distinction between sets and points adds a category /a praesente/ to the a priori/a posteriori dichotomy. Contra Dorr and Lee, then, the view makes 'I believe that P' /first-person revelatory a praesente/. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 222