Works by Geoffrey Underwood ( view other items matching `Geoffrey Underwood`, view all matches )

5 found
Sort by:
  1. Geoffrey Underwood (2003). Where to Look Next? The Missing Landing Position Effect. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):505-506.
    The E-Z Reader 7 model is powerful but incomplete. When programming the saccade to the next word, we take into account the familiarity of the letter sequences at the beginning of that word. This landing position effect is well established, but is neglected in the model. A possible locus for the effect is suggested within the E-Z Reader framework.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Peter Chapman & Geoffrey Underwood (2000). Mental States During Dreaming and Daydreaming: Some Methodological Loopholes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (6):917-918.
    Relatively poor memory for dreams is important evidence for Hobson et al.'s model of conscious states. We describe the time-gap experience as evidence that everyday memory for waking states may not be as good as they assume. As well as being surprisingly sparse, everyday memories may themselves be systematically distorted in the same manner that Revonsuo attributes uniquely to dreams. [Hobson et al.; Revonsuo].
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Peter A. Bibby & Geoffrey Underwood (1999). Volitional Control in the Learning of Artificial Grammars. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):757-758.
    Dienes & Perner argue that volitional control in artificial grammar learning is best understood in terms of the distinction between implicit and explicit knowledge representations. We maintain that direct, explicit access to knowledge organised in a hierarchy of implicitness/explicitness is neither necessary nor sufficient to explain volitional control. People can invoke volitional control when their knowledge is implicit, as in the case of artificial grammar learning, and they can invoke volitional control when any part of their knowledge representation is implicit, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Crundall & Geoffrey Underwood (1999). Is Attention Required in a Model of Saccade Generation? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):679-680.
    Removing attention from the saccade generation system should also remove the paradoxical loops that can occur with attention terminology. At least one such loop is still apparent in the current model, however. The benefits of an attention-free approach are assessed through comparison with a recent theory of attention (Logan 1996).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Geoffrey Underwood & Robin Stevens (eds.) (1979). Aspects of Consciousness. Academic Press.
    v. 1. Psychological issues.--v. 2. Structural issues.--v. 3. Awareness and self-awareness.--v. 4. Clinical issues.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation