73 found
Order:
  1. George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.) (1978). Essays on Knowledge and Justification. Cornell University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  2.  25
    George Sotiros Pappas (2000). Berkeley's Thought. Cornell University Press.
    He assesses the validity of this self-description and considers why Berkeley might have chosen to align himself with a commonsense position.Pappas shows how ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3. William G. Lycan & George S. Pappas (1972). What is Eliminative Materialism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (August):149-59.
    In 19651 Richard Rorty defended a theory of mind which has since come to be called' eliminative materialism'. The theory has attained some status as a distinct, autonomous brand of materialism; and it has been criticized at length in the literature, ... \n.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. George S. Pappas (1976). Seeinge and Seeingn. Mind 85 (338):171-188.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  53
    George Pappas, Internalist Vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  6. George Pappas (1999). Berkeley and Scepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):133 - 149.
    In both the Principles and the Three Dialogues, Berkeley claims that he wants to uncover those principles which lead to scepticism; to refute those principles; and to refute scepticism itself. This paper examines the principles Berkeley says have scepticial consequences, and contends that only one of them implies scepticism. It is also argued that Berkeley's attempted refutation of scepticism rests not on his acceptance of the esse est percipi principle, but rather on the thesis that physical objects and their sensible (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Laurence Bonjour, Earl Conee, Richard Feldman, Richard Foley, Peter Klein, Jonathan Kvanvig, Keith Lehrer, William Lycan, Peter Markie, George Pappas, Alvin Plantinga, Ernest Sosa, Marshall Swain & Bas van Fraassen (1996). Warrant in Contemporary Epistemology: Essays in Honor of Plantinga's Theory of Knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    In his widely influential two-volume work, Warrant: The Current Debate and Warrant and Proper Function, Alvin Plantinga argued that warrant is that which explains the difference between knowledge and true belief. Plantinga not only developed his own account of warrant but also mapped the terrain of epistemology. Motivated by Plantinga's work, fourteen prominent philosophers have written new essays investigating Plantingian warrant and its contribution to contemporary epistemology. The resulting collection, representing a broad array of views, not only gives readers a (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  8. M. R. Ayers, Phillip D. Cummins, Robert Fogelin, Don Garrett, Edwin McCann, Charles J. McCracken, George Pappas, G. A. J. Rogers, Barry Stroud, Ian Tipton, Margaret D. Wilson & Kenneth Winkler (1998). The Empiricists: Critical Essays on Locke, Berkeley, and Hume. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This collection of essays on themes in the work of John Locke , George Berkeley , and David Hume , provides a deepened understanding of major issues raised in the Empiricist tradition. In exploring their shared belief in the experiential nature of mental constructs, The Empiricists illuminates the different methodologies of these great Enlightenment philosophers and introduces students to important metaphysical and epistemological issues including the theory of ideas, personal identity, and skepticism. It will be especially useful in courses devoted (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  38
    George S. Pappas (1989). Symposiums Papers: Sensation and Perception in Reid. Noûs 23 (2):155-167.
  10.  91
    George S. Pappas (2007). Review: Berkeley's World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (463):779-781.
  11.  37
    George Pappas (ed.) (1979). Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel.
    Many epistemologists have been interested in justification because of its presumed close relationship to knowledge. This relationship is intended to be ...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  12.  75
    George S. Pappas (1990). Causation and Perception in Reid. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):763-766.
  13. George S. Pappas (2000). Epistemic Deference. Acta Analytica 24:113-126.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  52
    George S. Pappas (1995). God and the Burden of Proof. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):298-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  30
    George Pappas (2006). Access Internalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):159-169.
    Access internalism about epistemic justification is the thesis that a person’s justification for a belief is directly accessible to that person, in the sense that the person can have direct awareness of whatever is functioning as the actual justification for the belief. This thesis is distinguished into a weak and a strong version, and a number of arguments in favor of the access internalist position are assessed. It is concluded that none of the arguments in support of access internalism is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  60
    George S. Pappas (1982). Non-Inferential Knowledge. Philosophia 12 (December):81-98.
  17.  23
    George S. Pappas (1991). A Second Copy Thesis in Hume? Hume Studies 17 (1):51-59.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  23
    George S. Pappas (1992). Perception of the Self. Hume Studies 18 (2):275-280.
  19.  41
    George S. Pappas (2002). Abstract Ideas and the New Theory of Vision. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
    In the _New Theory of Vision, Berkeley defends the heterogeneity thesis, i.e., the view that the ideas of sight and touch are numerically and specifically distinct. In sections 121-122 of that work, he suggests that the thesis of abstract ideas is somehow closely connected to the heterogeneity thesis, though he does not there fully explain just what the connection is supposed to be. In this paper an interpretation of this connection is proposed and defended. Berkeley needs to reject abstract ideas (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  35
    George S. Pappas (2007). Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Philosophica.
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  30
    George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain (1973). Some Conclusive Reasons Against 'Conclusive Reasons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):72 – 76.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  22. George Pappas (1979). ``Basing Relations&Quot. In Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel 51-65.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  33
    George S. Pappas (2003). On Some Philosophical Accounts of Perception. In Journal of Philosophical Research. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center 71-82.
    Philosophical accounts of perception in the tradition of Kant and Reid have generally supposed that an event of making a judgment is a key element in every perceptual experience. An alternative very austere view regards perception as an event containing nothing judgmental, nor anything conceptual. This account of perception as nonconceptual is discussed first historically as found in the philosophies of Locke and (briefly) Berkeley, and then examined in the contemporary work of Chisholm and Alston.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. James W. Cornman, Keith Lehrer & George Sotiros Pappas (1982). Philosophical Problems and Arguments an Introduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  25
    George S. Pappas (2011). Berkeley's Positive Epistemology. Philosophical Inquiry 35 (3-4):23-35.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  36
    Steven E. Boër & George S. Pappas (1975). The Epistemology of Speaker-Meaning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):204 – 219.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  30
    George S. Pappas (1975). Incorrigibilism and Future Science. Philosophical Studies 28 (September):207-210.
  28.  15
    George S. Pappas (1980). Lost Justification. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):127-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  18
    George S. Pappas (1989). Abstract General Ideas in Hume. Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  13
    George S. Pappas (1982). Postulation and Materialism. Philosophical Studies 41 (January):71-82.
  31. George Pappas (1978). Some Forms of Epistemological Scepticism. In George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.), Essays on Knowledge and Justification. Cornell University Press 309--316.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  29
    George S. Pappas (1983). Ongoing Knowledge. Synthese 55 (2):253 - 267.
    Ongoing knowledge is that knowledge that a person possesses continuously across a period of time. Given the plausible assumption that knowledge implies justification, it then follows that ongoing knowledge implies ongoing justification. However, the actual character of a person's justification for a belief often changes as time passes. Two types of changes in one's ongoing justification are explored: content change and structure change. It is argued that justification held over time often undergoes both content and structure change, and that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  19
    George Pappas (2002). Abstraction and Existence. History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (1):43 - 63.
  34.  12
    George S. Pappas (1997). The Likelihood of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):131-132.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  29
    George S. Pappas (1974). Incorrigibility, Knowledge, and Justification. Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.
  36.  11
    George Pappas (1994). Contemporary Readings in Epistemology. Teaching Philosophy 17 (4):362-364.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  21
    George S. Pappas (1987). Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):105 – 114.
  38.  23
    George S. Pappas (1980). Ideas, Minds, and Berkeley. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):181 - 194.
    A number of commentators on the work of berkeley have maintained that berkeleyan minds are related to ideas by the relation of inherence. Thus, Ideas are taken to inhere in minds in something like the way that accidents were supposed to inhere in substances for the aristotelian. This inherence account, As I call it, Is spelled out in detail and critically evaluated. Ultimately it is rejected despite its considerable initial plausibility.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  14
    George S. Pappas (1977). Hume and Abstract General Ideas. Hume Studies 3 (1):17-31.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. George S. Pappas (1987). Berkeley and Immediate Perception. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel
  41.  32
    George S. Pappas (1976). Incorrigibility and Central-State Materialism. Philosophical Studies 29 (June):445-56.
  42.  10
    George S. Pappas (1983). Adversary Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  10
    George S. Pappas (2009). Weak and Strong Senses Of. Journal of Critical Analysis 6 (3):83-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  16
    George S. Pappas (1994). Perception and Mystical Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):877-883.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  14
    George S. Pappas (1974). Knowledge and Reasons. Philosophical Studies 25 (6):423 - 428.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  15
    George S. Pappas (1991). Berkeley and Common Sense Realism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):27 - 42.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  13
    George S. Pappas (1986). Knowledge and Scepticism. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):72-73.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  15
    George S. Pappas & Thomas O. Buford (1991). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (1):61-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  6
    George S. Pappas (1994). Review: Perception and Mystical Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):877 - 883.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. George Pappas (1995). Berkeleian Idealism and Impossible Performances. In Robert G. Muehlmann (ed.), Berkeley's Metaphysics: Structural, Interpretive, and Critical Essays. The Pennsylvania State University Press
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 73