15 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
George Pavlakos [12]George I. Pavlakos [3]
See also:
Profile: George Pavlakos (Glasgow University)
Profile: George Pavlakos (University of Antwerp)
  1. George Pavlakos (2012). Correctness and Cognitivism. Remarks on Robert Alexy's Argument From the Claim to Correctness. Ratio Juris 25 (1):15-30.
    The argument from the claim to correctness has been put forward by Robert Alexy to defend the view that normative utterances admit of objective answers. My purpose in this paper is to preserve this initial aspiration even at the cost of diverting from some of the original ideas in support of the argument. I begin by spelling out a full-blooded version of normative cognitivism, against which I propose to reconstruct the argument from the claim to correctness. I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. George Pavlakos, Douglas Lavin, Niko Kolodny & Ulrike Heuer (2012). Discussion: Three Comments on Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity. Jurisprudence 2 (2):329-378.
    This section is a discussion of Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity introduced by Georgios Pavlakos.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stefano Bertea & George Pavlakos (eds.) (2011). New Essays on the Normativity of Law. Hart Pub..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Triantafyllos Gkouvas & George Pavlakos (2011). Preliminary Remarks on a Theory of Legal Normativity. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. George Pavlakos (2011). Coercion and the Grounds of Legal Obligation: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom. Jurisprudence 1 (2):305-316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. George Pavlakos (2009). Practice, Reasons, and the Agent's Point of View. Ratio Juris 22 (1):74-94.
    Positivism, in its standard outlook, is normative contextualism: If legal reasons are content-independent, then their content may vary with the context or point of view. Despite several advantages vis-à-vis strong metaphysical conceptions of reasons, contextualism implies relativism, which may lead further to the fragmentation of the point of view of agency. In his Oxford Hart Lecture, Coleman put forward a fresh account of the moral semantics of legal content, one that lays claim to preserving the unity of agency while retaining (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. George Pavlakos (2008). Non-Individualism, Rights, and Practical Reason. Ratio Juris 21 (1):66-93.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George Pavlakos (2007). Our Knowledge of the Law: Objectivity and Practice in Legal Theory. Hart Pub..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George Pavlakos & Robert Alexy (eds.) (2007). Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy. Hart Pub..
  10. Sean Coyle & George Pavlakos (eds.) (2005). Jurisprudence or Legal Science?: A Debate About the Nature of Legal Theory. Hart Publishing.
    Are the scientific and juristic approaches in the end as rigidly distinct from one another as some have claimed?In a series of important new essays the authors ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. George Pavlakos (2005). On the Necessity of the Interconnection Between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 18 (1):64-83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. George Pavlakos (2003). Normativity versus Ontologiy: Law, Facts and Practical Reason. Rechtstheorie 34 (4):393-419.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. George I. Pavlakos (2003). Autonomy and Normativity. Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):908-910.
  14. George I. Pavlakos (2002). David Daiches Raphael, Concepts of Justice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (4):301-303.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. George I. Pavlakos (2001). Jürgen Habermas, The Liberating Power of Symbols Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (5):334-336.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation