21 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
George Pavlakos [18]George I. Pavlakos [3]
See also:
Profile: George Pavlakos (Glasgow University)
Profile: George Pavlakos (University of Antwerp)
  1. George Pavlakos & Robert Alexy (eds.) (2007). Law, Rights and Discourse: The Legal Philosophy of Robert Alexy. Hart Pub..
  2. George Pavlakos (2007). Our Knowledge of the Law: Objectivity and Practice in Legal Theory. Hart Pub..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Stefano Bertea & George Pavlakos (eds.) (2011). New Essays on the Normativity of Law. Hart Pub..
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  64
    George Pavlakos, Niko Kolodny, Ulrike Heuer & Douglas Lavin (2011). Three Comments on Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity. Jurisprudence 2 (2):329-378.
    This section is a discussion of Joseph Raz's Conception of Normativity introduced by Georgios Pavlakos.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  28
    George Pavlakos (2009). Practice, Reasons, and the Agent's Point of View. Ratio Juris 22 (1):74-94.
    Positivism, in its standard outlook, is normative contextualism: If legal reasons are content-independent, then their content may vary with the context or point of view. Despite several advantages vis-à-vis strong metaphysical conceptions of reasons, contextualism implies relativism, which may lead further to the fragmentation of the point of view of agency. In his Oxford Hart Lecture, Coleman put forward a fresh account of the moral semantics of legal content, one that lays claim to preserving the unity of agency while retaining (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  7
    George Pavlakos (2003). Normativity versus Ontologiy: Law, Facts and Practical Reason. Rechtstheorie 34 (4):393-419.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  3
    George Pavlakos (2015). On Second-Order Morality. Jurisprudence 6 (2):276-297.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    George Pavlakos (2011). Constitutional Rights, Balancing and the Structure of Autonomy. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 24 (1):129-153.
    The question of the character of constitutional rights norms is complex and admits of no easy answer. Without reducing the complexity of the issue, I attempt in this paper to formulate some clear views on the matter. I shall argue that constitutional rights reasoning is a species of rational practical reasoning that combines both balancing and the grounds as to why balancing is appropriate . Absent the latter type of reason, the application of constitutional principles remains a pure instance of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  36
    George Pavlakos (2010). Coercion and the Grounds of Legal Obligation: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom. Jurisprudence 1 (2):305-316.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    George Pavlakos (2012). Correctness and Cognitivism. Remarks on Robert Alexy's Argument From the Claim to Correctness. Ratio Juris 25 (1):15-30.
    The argument from the claim to correctness has been put forward by Robert Alexy to defend the view that normative utterances admit of objective answers. My purpose in this paper is to preserve this initial aspiration even at the cost of diverting from some of the original ideas in support of the argument. I begin by spelling out a full-blooded version of normative cognitivism, against which I propose to reconstruct the argument from the claim to correctness. I argue that the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  13
    George I. Pavlakos (2003). Autonomy and Normativity. Review of Metaphysics 56 (4):908-910.
  12. George I. Pavlakos (2001). Jürgen Habermas, The Liberating Power of Symbols Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 21 (5):334-336.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  11
    George Pavlakos (2005). On the Necessity of the Interconnection Between Law and Morality. Ratio Juris 18 (1):64-83.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  10
    George Pavlakos (2008). Non-Individualism, Rights, and Practical Reason. Ratio Juris 21 (1):66-93.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. George I. Pavlakos (2002). David Daiches Raphael, Concepts of Justice Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (4):301-303.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  13
    Sean Coyle & George Pavlakos (eds.) (2005). Jurisprudence or Legal Science?: A Debate About the Nature of Legal Theory. Hart Publishing.
    Are the scientific and juristic approaches in the end as rigidly distinct from one another as some have claimed?In a series of important new essays the authors ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Triantafyllos Gkouvas & George Pavlakos (2011). Preliminary Remarks on a Theory of Legal Normativity. In Jerzy Stelmach & Bartosz Brożek (eds.), The Normativity of Law. Copernicus Center Press
  18. George Pavlakos (2002). David Daiches Raphael, Concepts of Justice. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 22:301-303.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. George Pavlakos (2001). Jürgen Habermas, The Liberating Power of Symbols. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 21:334-336.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez Blanco (eds.) (2015). Practical Normativity. Essays on Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Reason. Cambridge University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. George Pavlakos & Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (eds.) (2015). Reasons and Intentions in Law and Practical Agency. Cambridge University Press.
    This collection of new essays explores in depth how and why we act when we follow practical standards, particularly in connection with the authority of legal texts and lawmakers. The essays focus on the interplay of intentions and practical reasons, engaging incisive arguments to demonstrate both the close connection between them, and the inadequacy of accounts that downplay this important link. Their wide-ranging discussion includes topics such as legal interpretation, the paradox of intention, the relation between moral and legal obligation, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography