55 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
George S. Pappas [52]George Sotiros Pappas [4]
  1. George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.) (1978). Essays on Knowledge and Justification. Cornell University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  2.  22
    George Sotiros Pappas (2000). Berkeley's Thought. Cornell University Press.
    He assesses the validity of this self-description and considers why Berkeley might have chosen to align himself with a commonsense position.Pappas shows how ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3. William G. Lycan & George S. Pappas (1972). What is Eliminative Materialism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (August):149-59.
    In 19651 Richard Rorty defended a theory of mind which has since come to be called' eliminative materialism'. The theory has attained some status as a distinct, autonomous brand of materialism; and it has been criticized at length in the literature, ... \n.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  4. George S. Pappas (1976). Seeinge and Seeingn. Mind 85 (338):171-188.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  37
    George S. Pappas (1989). Symposiums Papers: Sensation and Perception in Reid. Noûs 23 (2):155-167.
  6.  90
    George S. Pappas (2007). Review: Berkeley's World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (463):779-781.
  7.  72
    George S. Pappas (1990). Causation and Perception in Reid. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):763-766.
  8. George S. Pappas (2000). Epistemic Deference. Acta Analytica 24:113-126.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  57
    George S. Pappas (1982). Non-Inferential Knowledge. Philosophia 12 (December):81-98.
  10.  21
    George S. Pappas (1991). A Second Copy Thesis in Hume? Hume Studies 17 (1):51-59.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  21
    George S. Pappas (1992). Perception of the Self. Hume Studies 18 (2):275-280.
  12.  39
    George S. Pappas (2002). Abstract Ideas and the New Theory of Vision. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.
    In the _New Theory of Vision, Berkeley defends the heterogeneity thesis, i.e., the view that the ideas of sight and touch are numerically and specifically distinct. In sections 121-122 of that work, he suggests that the thesis of abstract ideas is somehow closely connected to the heterogeneity thesis, though he does not there fully explain just what the connection is supposed to be. In this paper an interpretation of this connection is proposed and defended. Berkeley needs to reject abstract ideas (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  13. James W. Cornman, Keith Lehrer & George Sotiros Pappas (1982). Philosophical Problems and Arguments an Introduction. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14.  30
    George S. Pappas (2003). On Some Philosophical Accounts of Perception. In Journal of Philosophical Research. Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center 71-82.
    Philosophical accounts of perception in the tradition of Kant and Reid have generally supposed that an event of making a judgment is a key element in every perceptual experience. An alternative very austere view regards perception as an event containing nothing judgmental, nor anything conceptual. This account of perception as nonconceptual is discussed first historically as found in the philosophies of Locke and (briefly) Berkeley, and then examined in the contemporary work of Chisholm and Alston.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  30
    George S. Pappas (2007). Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Philosophica.
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  28
    George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain (1973). Some Conclusive Reasons Against 'Conclusive Reasons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):72 – 76.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  15
    George S. Pappas (1980). Lost Justification. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):127-134.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  23
    George S. Pappas (2011). Berkeley's Positive Epistemology. Philosophical Inquiry 35 (3-4):23-35.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  28
    George S. Pappas (1975). Incorrigibilism and Future Science. Philosophical Studies 28 (September):207-210.
  20.  30
    Steven E. Boër & George S. Pappas (1975). The Epistemology of Speaker-Meaning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):204 – 219.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  13
    George S. Pappas (1982). Postulation and Materialism. Philosophical Studies 41 (January):71-82.
  22.  12
    George S. Pappas (1997). The Likelihood of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):131-132.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  28
    George S. Pappas (1983). Ongoing Knowledge. Synthese 55 (2):253 - 267.
    Ongoing knowledge is that knowledge that a person possesses continuously across a period of time. Given the plausible assumption that knowledge implies justification, it then follows that ongoing knowledge implies ongoing justification. However, the actual character of a person's justification for a belief often changes as time passes. Two types of changes in one's ongoing justification are explored: content change and structure change. It is argued that justification held over time often undergoes both content and structure change, and that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. George S. Pappas (1987). Berkeley and Immediate Perception. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel
  25.  10
    George S. Pappas (1983). Adversary Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  27
    George S. Pappas (1974). Incorrigibility, Knowledge, and Justification. Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.
  27.  20
    George S. Pappas (1987). Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):105 – 114.
  28.  32
    George S. Pappas (1976). Incorrigibility and Central-State Materialism. Philosophical Studies 29 (June):445-56.
  29.  9
    George S. Pappas (2009). Weak and Strong Senses Of. Journal of Critical Analysis 6 (3):83-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  16
    George S. Pappas (1995). God and the Burden of Proof. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):298-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  14
    George S. Pappas (1974). Knowledge and Reasons. Philosophical Studies 25 (6):423 - 428.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32.  15
    George S. Pappas (1994). Perception and Mystical Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):877-883.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  15
    George S. Pappas (1989). Abstract General Ideas in Hume. Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  16
    George S. Pappas (1980). Ideas, Minds, and Berkeley. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):181 - 194.
    A number of commentators on the work of berkeley have maintained that berkeleyan minds are related to ideas by the relation of inherence. Thus, Ideas are taken to inhere in minds in something like the way that accidents were supposed to inhere in substances for the aristotelian. This inherence account, As I call it, Is spelled out in detail and critically evaluated. Ultimately it is rejected despite its considerable initial plausibility.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    George S. Pappas (1994). Review: Perception and Mystical Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):877 - 883.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  14
    George S. Pappas (1991). Berkeley and Common Sense Realism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):27 - 42.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  12
    George S. Pappas (1986). Knowledge and Scepticism. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):72-73.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  14
    George S. Pappas & Thomas O. Buford (1991). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (1):61-64.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    George S. Pappas (1977). Hume and Abstract General Ideas. Hume Studies 3 (1):17-31.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  18
    George S. Pappas (1981). Knowing and Coming to Know. Philosophical Studies 39 (3):275 - 279.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. George S. Pappas (1989). Sensation and Perception of Reid. Noûs 23 (April):155-167.
  42.  11
    George S. Pappas (1997). The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753. International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):126-127.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  16
    George S. Pappas (1980). Reply to Bailey. Philosophical Studies 37 (February):201-202.
  44.  6
    George S. Pappas (2012). Ancient Models of Mind. Philosophical Inquiry 36 (1-2):71-76.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  8
    George S. Pappas (1977). Armstrong's Materialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (September):569-592.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  8
    George S. Pappas (1976). Weak and Strong Senses of "Perceives". Journal of Critical Analysis 6 (3):83-88.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. George S. Pappas (1977). Perception Without Belief. Ratio 19 (December):142-161.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  9
    Shaun Baker, Eileen Carroll Sweeney, Sarah Patterson, Roger Ariew, George S. Pappas, Dudley Knowles & Gideon Makin (2005). History of Philosophy. Philosophical Books 46 (2):138-151.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  6
    George S. Pappas (1998). Epistemology in the Empiricists. History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (3):285 - 302.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    George S. Pappas (1981). On McRae's Hume. Hume Studies 7 (2):167-171.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 55