Search results for 'George Sotiros Pappas' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. George Sotiros Pappas (2000). Berkeley's Thought. Cornell University Press.score: 960.0
    He assesses the validity of this self-description and considers why Berkeley might have chosen to align himself with a commonsense position.Pappas shows how ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. George Sotiros Pappas & Marshall Swain (eds.) (1978). Essays on Knowledge and Justification. Cornell University Press.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. George S. Pappas (1997). The Metaphysics of George Berkeley, 1685-1753. International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):126-127.score: 420.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. George S. Pappas (1987). Berkeley and Immediate Perception. In Ernest Sosa (ed.), Essays on the Philosophy of George Berkeley. D. Reidel.score: 300.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. William G. Lycan & George S. Pappas (1972). What is Eliminative Materialism? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50 (August):149-59.score: 240.0
    In 19651 Richard Rorty defended a theory of mind which has since come to be called' eliminative materialism'. The theory has attained some status as a distinct, autonomous brand of materialism; and it has been criticized at length in the literature, ... \n.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. George Pappas, Internalist Vs. Externalist Conceptions of Epistemic Justification. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. George S. Pappas (1982). Non-Inferential Knowledge. Philosophia 12 (December):81-98.score: 240.0
  8. George Pappas (1999). Berkeley and Scepticism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (1):133 - 149.score: 240.0
    In both the Principles and the Three Dialogues, Berkeley claims that he wants to uncover those principles which lead to scepticism; to refute those principles; and to refute scepticism itself. This paper examines the principles Berkeley says have scepticial consequences, and contends that only one of them implies scepticism. It is also argued that Berkeley's attempted refutation of scepticism rests not on his acceptance of the esse est percipi principle, but rather on the thesis that physical objects and their sensible (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George S. Pappas (1990). Causation and Perception in Reid. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):763-766.score: 240.0
  10. George S. Pappas (2002). Abstract Ideas and the New Theory of Vision. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (1):55 – 69.score: 240.0
    In the _New Theory of Vision, Berkeley defends the heterogeneity thesis, i.e., the view that the ideas of sight and touch are numerically and specifically distinct. In sections 121-122 of that work, he suggests that the thesis of abstract ideas is somehow closely connected to the heterogeneity thesis, though he does not there fully explain just what the connection is supposed to be. In this paper an interpretation of this connection is proposed and defended. Berkeley needs to reject abstract ideas (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. George S. Pappas (1989). Symposiums Papers: Sensation and Perception in Reid. Noûs 23 (2):155-167.score: 240.0
  12. George S. Pappas (1976). Incorrigibility and Central-State Materialism. Philosophical Studies 29 (June):445-56.score: 240.0
  13. Steven E. Boër & George S. Pappas (1975). The Epistemology of Speaker-Meaning. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 53 (3):204 – 219.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. George S. Pappas (2003). On Some Philosophical Accounts of Perception. In Philosophy in America at the Turn of the Century (Apa Centennial Supplement Journal of Philosophical Research). Charlottesville: Philosophy Documentation Center. 71-82.score: 240.0
    Philosophical accounts of perception in the tradition of Kant and Reid have generally supposed that an event of making a judgment is a key element in every perceptual experience. An alternative very austere view regards perception as an event containing nothing judgmental, nor anything conceptual. This account of perception as nonconceptual is discussed first historically as found in the philosophies of Locke and (briefly) Berkeley, and then examined in the contemporary work of Chisholm and Alston.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. George S. Pappas & Marshall Swain (1973). Some Conclusive Reasons Against 'Conclusive Reasons'. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 51 (1):72 – 76.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. George S. Pappas (1975). Incorrigibilism and Future Science. Philosophical Studies 28 (September):207-210.score: 240.0
  17. George Pappas (2006). Access Internalism. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):159-169.score: 240.0
    Access internalism about epistemic justification is the thesis that a person’s justification for a belief is directly accessible to that person, in the sense that the person can have direct awareness of whatever is functioning as the actual justification for the belief. This thesis is distinguished into a weak and a strong version, and a number of arguments in favor of the access internalist position are assessed. It is concluded that none of the arguments in support of access internalism is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. George Pappas (ed.) (1979). Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel.score: 240.0
    Many epistemologists have been interested in justification because of its presumed close relationship to knowledge. This relationship is intended to be ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. George S. Pappas (1981). Knowing and Coming to Know. Philosophical Studies 39 (3):275 - 279.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. George S. Pappas (1987). Science and Metaphysics in Berkeley. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2 (1):105 – 114.score: 240.0
  21. George S. Pappas (1974). Incorrigibility, Knowledge, and Justification. Philosophical Studies 25 (April):219-25.score: 240.0
  22. George S. Pappas (2007). Review: Berkeley's World: An Examination of the Three Dialogues. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (463):779-781.score: 240.0
  23. George Pappas (2002). Abstraction and Existence. History of Philosophy Quarterly 19 (1):43 - 63.score: 240.0
  24. George S. Pappas (1983). Ongoing Knowledge. Synthese 55 (2):253 - 267.score: 240.0
    Ongoing knowledge is that knowledge that a person possesses continuously across a period of time. Given the plausible assumption that knowledge implies justification, it then follows that ongoing knowledge implies ongoing justification. However, the actual character of a person's justification for a belief often changes as time passes. Two types of changes in one's ongoing justification are explored: content change and structure change. It is argued that justification held over time often undergoes both content and structure change, and that the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. George S. Pappas (1980). Lost Justification. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 5 (1):127-134.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. George S. Pappas (1991). Berkeley and Common Sense Realism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (1):27 - 42.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. George S. Pappas (1980). Ideas, Minds, and Berkeley. American Philosophical Quarterly 17 (3):181 - 194.score: 240.0
    A number of commentators on the work of berkeley have maintained that berkeleyan minds are related to ideas by the relation of inherence. Thus, Ideas are taken to inhere in minds in something like the way that accidents were supposed to inhere in substances for the aristotelian. This inherence account, As I call it, Is spelled out in detail and critically evaluated. Ultimately it is rejected despite its considerable initial plausibility.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. George S. Pappas (1989). Abstract General Ideas in Hume. Hume Studies 15 (2):339-352.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. George Pappas (2006). Comments on Goldman and on Intelligent Design. Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (S1):23-27.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Shaun Baker, Eileen Carroll Sweeney, Sarah Patterson, Roger Ariew, George S. Pappas, Dudley Knowles & Gideon Makin (2005). History of Philosophy. Philosophical Books 46 (2):138-151.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. George S. Pappas (1991). A Second Copy Thesis in Hume? Hume Studies 17 (1):51-59.score: 240.0
  32. George S. Pappas (2011). Berkeley's Positive Epistemology. Philosophical Inquiry 35 (3-4):23-35.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. George S. Pappas (1977). Hume and Abstract General Ideas. Hume Studies 3 (1):17-31.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. George S. Pappas (1974). Knowledge and Reasons. Philosophical Studies 25 (6):423 - 428.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. George S. Pappas (1995). God and the Burden of Proof. Faith and Philosophy 12 (2):298-300.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. George S. Pappas (1976). Seeinge and Seeingn. Mind 85 (338):171-188.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. George S. Pappas (1997). The Likelihood of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 29 (4):131-132.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. George S. Pappas (1977). Armstrong's Materialism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 7 (September):569-592.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. George S. Pappas (2012). Ancient Models of Mind. Philosophical Inquiry 36 (1-2):71-76.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. George S. Pappas (1998). Epistemology in the Empiricists. History of Philosophy Quarterly 15 (3):285 - 302.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. George S. Pappas (1986). Knowledge and Scepticism. International Studies in Philosophy 18 (3):72-73.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. George S. Pappas (1992). Perception of the Self. Hume Studies 18 (2):275-280.score: 240.0
  43. George S. Pappas (2007). Berkeley's Assessment of Locke's Epistemology. In Stephen H. Daniel (ed.), Reexamining Berkeley's Philosophy.score: 240.0
    In this essay, the author analyses Berkeley’s conformity and inference argument against Locke’s theory of percep tion. Both arguments are not as decisive as traditionally has been perceived and fail to engage in Locke’s actual position. The main reason for this is that Berkeley does not see that Locke’s position is compatible with the non-inferential nature of perceptual knowledge.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. George S. Pappas & Thomas O. Buford (1991). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 30 (1):61-64.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. George S. Pappas (1982). Postulation and Materialism. Philosophical Studies 41 (January):71-82.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. George S. Pappas (1994). Review: Perception and Mystical Experience. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (4):877 - 883.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. George S. Pappas (1980). Reply to Bailey. Philosophical Studies 37 (February):201-202.score: 240.0
  48. George S. Pappas (1983). Adversary Metaphysics. Philosophy Research Archives 9:571-585.score: 240.0
    Berkeley construes his own immaterialist philosophy as facing a serious competitor, namely, what he often termed ‘materialism.’ He tries on several grounds to eliminate materialism from the competition, thus leaving immaterialism as the most plausible metaphysical theory of perception and the external world. In this paper these grounds are explored, and it is found that Berkeley’s method for rational choice between materialism and immaterialism involves consideration of a host of criteria for choice between competitive theories.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. George Pappas (2005). Robert G. Turnbull, 1918-2004. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 78 (5):183 - 184.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. George Pappas (1994). Contemporary Readings in Epistemology. Teaching Philosophy 17 (4):362-364.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000