10 found
Sort by:
  1. George W. Rainbolt (2006). Rights Theory. Philosophy Compass 1 (1):11–21.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. George W. Rainbolt (2005). Two Interpretations of Feinberg's Theory of Rights. Legal Theory 11 (3):227-236.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. George W. Rainbolt (2004). David Schmidtz, Ed., Robert Nozick:Robert Nozick. Ethics 114 (3):631-633.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. George W. Rainbolt (1993). Rights as Normative Constraints on Others. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (1):93-111.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Alan Milchman, Alan Rosenberg, Edward W. Maine & George W. Rainbolt (1992). Book Review. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 26 (4):573-585.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. George W. Rainbolt (1990). Mercy: An Independent, Imperfect Virtue. American Philosophical Quarterly 27 (2):169 - 173.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. George W. Rainbolt (1989). Gauthier on Cooperating in Prisoners' Dilemmas. Analysis 49 (4):216 - 220.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. George W. Rainbolt (1989). Justified Hard Paternalism:A Response to Ten. Bioethics 3 (2):140–141.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. George W. Rainbolt (1989). Prescription Drug Laws:Justified Hard Paternalism. Bioethics 3 (1):45–58.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. George W. Rainbolt (1987). Competition and the Patient-Centered Ethic. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 12 (1):85-99.
    This essay critically evaluates the claim that competition in medicine destroys the moral integrity of the traditional patient-physician relationship. The author argues that the traditional patient-centered ethic is indefensible on moral grounds, and that it should be jettisoned in favor of a fiduciary ethic. A fiduciary ethic is found to provide the best defensible account of the patient-physician relationship because it takes seriously the roles economic efficiency, competition, and respect for individual self-determination play in fashioning moral health care delivery. Keywords: (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation