Search results for 'Gert Jan Wilt' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Gert Jan van Der Wilt (1994). Health Care and the Principle of Fair Equality of Opportunity. Bioethics 8 (4):329-349.score: 870.0
  2. Michael Ruse, Gert Jan Wilt & Mark G. Kuczewski (1994). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 15 (4):455-463.score: 870.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rob Reuzel, Wija Oortwijn, Michael Decker, Christian Clausen, Pedro Gallo, John Grin, Armin Grunwald, Leo Hennen, Gert Wilt & Yutaka Yoshinaka (2004). Ethics and HTA: Some Lessons and Challenges for the Future. Poiesis and Praxis 2 (s 2-3):247-256.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bernard Gert (2007). Reply to Julia Driver, Timm Triplett, and Kathleen Wallace. Metaphilosophy 38 (4):404-419.score: 90.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gert Jan van der Wilt (1994). Health Care and the Principle of Fair Equality of Opportunity. Bioethics 8 (4):329–349.score: 87.0
  6. Gert Jan van der Wilt (1995). Towards a Two Tier Health System in the Netherlands: How to Put Theory Into Practice. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (6):617-630.score: 87.0
    The Dutch health care system is developing a two, or multiple, tier system. How can moral principles be of help in assessing whether this is the right track? Instead of dismissing as unhelpful the principles that have been suggested so far and exchanging them for other, usually more complex, principles, it is suggested that the methods of moral inquiry be reconsidered. Keywords: diversification in health care, health care financing, public and private responsibility in health care CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gert Jan van der Wilt, Rob Reuzel & H. David Banta (2000). The Ethics of Assessing Health Technologies. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 21 (1):101-113.score: 87.0
    Health technology assessment (HTA) consists of thesystematic study of the consequences of theintroduction or continued use of the technology in aparticular context, with the explicit objective toarrive at a judgment of the value or merit of thetechnology. Ideally, it is aimed at assessing allaspects of a given technology or group oftechnologies, including non-technical, e.g.socio-ethical, aspects. However, methods for assessingsocio-ethical implications of health technology arerelatively undeveloped and few mechanisms exist totake action based on the results of such evaluations.Still, the examples (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Rob P. B. Reuzel, Gert-Jan van Der Wilt, Henk A. M. J. ten Have & Pieter F. de Vries Robbé (1999). Reducing Normative Bias in Health Technology Assessment: Interactive Evaluation and Casuistry. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 2 (3):255-263.score: 87.0
    Health technology assessment (HTA) is often biased in the sense that it neglects relevant perspectives on the technology in question. To incorporate different perspectives in HTA, we should pursue agreement about what are relevant, plausible, and feasible research questions; interactive technology assessment (iTA) might be suitable for this goal. In this way a kind of procedural ethics is established. Currently, ethics too often is focussed on the application of general principles, which leaves a lot of confusion as to what really (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Margriet Moret-Hartman, Rob Reuzel, John Grin & Gert Jan van der Wilt (2008). Participatory Workshops Are Not Enough to Prevent Policy Implementation Failures: An Example of a Policy Development Process Concerning the Drug Interferon-Beta for Multiple Sclerosis. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 16 (2):161-175.score: 87.0
    A possible explanation for policy implementation failure is that the views of the policy’s target groups are insufficiently taken into account during policy development. It has been argued that involving these groups in an interactive process of policy development could improve this. We analysed a project in which several target populations participated in workshops aimed to optimise the utilisation of an expensive novel drug (interferon beta) for patients with Multiple Sclerosis. All participants seemed to agree on the appropriateness of establishing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Rob Reuzel, Gert Jan van Der Wilt, Pieter Vries Robbdeé & Henk ten Have (2001). A View From the Netherlands: Ethics as Interactive Evaluation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):110-114.score: 87.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Rob Reuzel, Gert Jan Van der Wilt, Pieter de Vries Robbé & Henk ten Have (2001). A View From the Netherlands: Ethics as Interactive Evaluation. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):110-114.score: 87.0
    From 1991 to 1994 the Dutch Health Insurance Council financed research on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO). This is a technique for providing cardiopulmonary bypass to patients with pulmonary and/or cardiac failure. Most often, these patients are premature neonates. During ECMO, blood is drained from the right atrium, pumped along a membrane where gas exchange takes place, and then redirected to the aorta. To prevent blood clotting, heparin is added. However, with the heparin added, the risk of hemorrhage is considerably increased. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gert Jan van der Wilt (1994). Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Health Care Services, and Concepts of Distributive Justice. Health Care Analysis 2 (4):296-305.score: 87.0
    Two answers to the question ‘how can we allocate health care resources fairly?’ are introduced and discussed. Both utilitarian and egalitarian approaches are found relevant, but both exhibit considerable theoretical and practical difficulties. Neither seems capable of solving the problem on its own. It is suggested that, for practical purposes, a version of Rawls' famous thought experiment might provide at least some enlightenment about which theoretical approach should be used to address the question.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Garrett Zantow Bredeson (2011). The Truth (and Untruth) of Language: Heidegger, Ricoeur, and Derrida on Disclosure and Displacement Gert-Jan van der Heiden Pittsburgh, PA: Duquesne University Press, 2010; 296 Pp.; $25.00 (Paperback). [REVIEW] Dialogue 50 (02):407-409.score: 84.0
  14. Karl Simms (2010). Review of Gert-Jan Van der Heiden, The Truth (and Untruth) of Language: Heidegger, Ricoeur and Derrida on Disclosure and Displacement. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (11).score: 84.0
  15. Luca M. Possati, Aurore Dumont, Paul-Gabriel Sandu, Paul Marinescu, Witold Płotka, Delia Popa, Maria Gyemant, Christian Ferencz-Flatz, Bogdan Mincă, Denisa Butnaru, Ovidiu Stanciu & Mădălina Diaconu (2013). Book Reviews: Jean Grondin, Paul Ricoeur_, Paris: PUF, 2013 (Luca M. Possati); François Dosse Et Catherine Goldenstein (Éds.), _Paul Ricoeur : Penser la Mémoire_, Paris, Seuil, 2013 (Aurore Dumont); Gert-Jan van der Heiden, _The Truth (and Untruth) of Language. Heidegger, Ricoeur and Derrida on Disclosure and Displacement_, Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press (Paul-Gabriel Sandu); Marc-Antoine Vallée, _Gadamer Et Ricoeur. La Conception Herméneutique du Langage_, Rennes, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, 2012, Coll. «Philosophica»,(Paul Marinescu); Saulius Geniusas, _The Origins of the Horizon in Husserl's Phenomenology_, Dordrecht: Springer, Series: Contributions to Phenomenology, Vol. 67, 2012 (Witold Płotka); Annabelle Dufourcq, _La Dimension Imaginaire du Réel Dans la Philosophie de Husserl_, Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, Coll.: _Phaenomenologica_ 198 (Delia Popa); Denis Seron, _Ce Que Voir Veut Dire. Essai Sur la Perception, Paris: Éditions du Cerf, 2012 (Maria Gyemant); Hans Frie. [REVIEW] Studia Phaenomenologica 13:469-508.score: 84.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Lauren Swayne Barthold (2014). The Truth (and Untruth) of Language: Heidegger, Ricoeur, and Derrida on Disclosure and Displacement. By Gert‐Jan van der Heiden. Pp. 244, Pittsburgh, PA, Duquesne University Press, 2010, $20.54. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 55 (4):739-742.score: 84.0
  17. Mally'S. Deont1c Log1c (2004). Gert-Jan C. LOKHORST Erasmus University, Rotterdam Lou GOBLE Willamette University, Salem. Grazer Philosophische Studien: Internationale Zeitschrift für Analytische Philosophie. Vol. 67 67:37-57.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Bernard Gert, Charles M. Culver & K. Danner Clouser (2000). Common Morality Versus Specified Principlism: Reply to Richardson. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 25 (3):308 – 322.score: 60.0
    In his article 'Specifying, balancing and interpreting bioethical principles' (Richardson, 2000), Henry Richardson claims that the two dominant theories in bioethics - principlism, put forward by Beauchamp and Childress in Principles of Bioethics , and common morality, put forward by Gert, Culver and Clouser in Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals - are deficient because they employ balancing rather than specification to resolve disputes between principles or rules. We show that, contrary to Richardson's claim, the major problem with principlism, either (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Bernard Gert (2004/2007). Common Morality: Deciding What to Do. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    Moral problems do not always come in the form of great social controversies. More often, the moral decisions we make are made quietly, constantly, and within the context of everyday activities and quotidian dilemmas. Indeed, these smaller decisions are based on a moral foundation that few of us ever stop to think about but which guides our every action. Here distinguished philosopher Bernard Gert presents a clear and concise introduction to what he calls "common morality" -- the moral system (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Bernard Gert (1998). Morality: Its Nature and Justification. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    This book offers the fullest and most sophisticated account of Gert's influential moral theory, a model first articulated in the classic work The Moral Rules: A New Rational Foundation for Morality, published in 1970. In this final revision, Gert makes clear that the moral rules are only one part of an informal system that does not provide unique answers to every moral question but does always provide a range of morally acceptable options. A new chapter on reasons includes (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Joshua Gert (2004). Brute Rationality: Normativity and Human Action. Cambridge University Press.score: 60.0
    Joshua Gert presents a new account of normative practical reasons and the way in which they contribute to the rationality of action. He argues that, rather than simply "counting in favor of" action, normative reasons play two logically distinct roles--that of requiring action and that of justifying action. Gert's book will appeal to a range of readers interested in practical reasoning in particular, and moral theory more generally.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Bernard Gert (1997). Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    An updated and expanded successor to Culver and Gert's Philosophy in Medicine, this book integrates moral philosophy with clinical medicine to present a comprehensive summary of the theory, concepts, and lines of reasoning underlying the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Joshua Gert (2012). Normative Bedrock: Response-Dependence, Rationality, and Reasons. Oup Oxford.score: 60.0
    Joshua Gert offers an original account of normative facts and properties, those which have implications for how we ought to behave. He argues that our ability to think and talk about normative notions such as reasons and benefits is dependent on how we respond to the world around us, including how we respond to the actions of other people.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Bernard Gert (1988). Morality: A New Justification of the Moral Rules. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    This volume is a revised, enlarged, and broadened version of Gert's classic 1970 book, The Moral Rules. Advocating an approach he terms "morality as impartial rationality," Gert here presents a full discussion of his moral theory, adding a wealth of new illuminating detail to his analysis of the concepts--rationality/irrationality, good/evil, and impartiality--by which he defines morality. He constructs a "moral system" that includes rules prohibiting the kinds of actions that cause evil, procedures for determining when violation of the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Joshua Gert (2006). A Realistic Colour Realism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (4):565 – 589.score: 30.0
    Whether or not one endorses realism about colour, it is very tempting to regard realism about determinable colours such as green and yellow as standing or falling together with realism about determinate colours such as unique green or green31. Indeed some of the most prominent representatives of both sides of the colour realism debate explicitly endorse the idea that these two kinds of realism are so linked. Against such theorists, the present paper argues that one can be a realist about (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Joshua Gert (2005). Breaking the Law of Desire. Erkenntnis 62 (3):295-319.score: 30.0
    This paper offers one formal reason why it may often be inappropriate to hold, of two conflicting desires, that the first must be weaker than, stronger than, or of the same strength as the second. The explanation of this fact does not rely on vagueness or epistemological problems in determining the strengths of desires. Nor does it make use of the problematic notion of incommensurability. Rather, the suggestion is that the motivational capacities of many desires might best be characterized by (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Maarten Simons & Jan Masschelein (eds.) (2011). Rancière, Public Education and the Taming of Democracy. Wiley-Blackwell.score: 30.0
    Machine generated contents note: Notes on Contributors.1. Introduction: Hatred of Democracy... and of the Public Role of Education? (Maarten Simons and Jan Masschelein).2. The Public Role of Teaching: To Keep the Door Closed (Goele Cornelissen).3. Learner, Student, Speaker: Why It Matters How We Call Those We Teach (Gert Biesta).4. Ignorance and Translation, 'Artifacts' for Practices of Equality (Marc Derycke).5. Democratic Education: An (im)possibility That Yet Remains to Come (Daniel Friedrich, Bryn Jaastad and Thomas S. Popkewitz)6. Governmental, Political and Pedagogic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bernard Gert (1965). Imagination and Verifiability. Philosophical Studies 16 (3):44-47.score: 30.0
  29. Bernard Gert (1967). Can a Brain Have a Pain? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (March):432-436.score: 30.0
  30. Joshua Gert (2006). Mistaken Expressions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (4):459-479.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Deborah Giaschi, James E. Jan, Bruce Bjornson, Simon Au Young, Matthew Tata, Christopher J. Lyons, William V. Good & Peter K. H. Wong (2003). Conscious Visual Abilities in a Patient with Early Bilateral Occipital Damage. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 45 (11):772-781.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Bernard Gert (2006). Making the Morally Relevant Features Explicit: A Response to Carson Strong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (1):59-71.score: 30.0
    : Carson Strong criticizes the application of my moral theory to bioethics cases. Some of his criticisms are due to my failure to make explicit that both the irrationality or rationality of a decision and the irrationality or rationality of the ranking of evils are part of morally relevant feature 3. Other criticisms are the result of his not using the two-step procedure in a sufficiently rigorous way. His claim that I come up with a wrong answer depends upon his (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Bernard Gert (2006). A Reply to Carson Strong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):195-197.score: 30.0
    : Carson Strong's reply to my response to his article demonstrates what happens when there is unacknowledged disagreement about the facts of a case or about the meaning of the terms used to describe those facts. I hope that our dialogue will help reduce this disagreement.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Joshua Gert (2007). Reply to Tenenbaum. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):463-476.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Bernard Gert (1971). Personal Identity and the Body. Dialogue 10 (3):458-478.score: 30.0
  36. Timothy J. Duggan & Bernard Gert (1979). Free Will as the Ability to Will. Noûs 13 (2):197-217.score: 30.0
  37. Bernard Gert & Charles M. Culver (2004). Defining Mental Disorder. In Jennifer Radden (ed.), The Philosophy of Psychiatry: A Companion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
  38. Robert E. Lerner (1997). Andreas Wilts, Beginen im Bodenseeraum. (Bodensee-Bibliothek, 37.) Sigmaringen: Jan Thorbecke, 1994. Pp. 508 plus 1 color plate; maps, tables, graphs. DM 78. [REVIEW] Speculum 72 (4):1223-1225.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Nicole A. Vincent, Pim Haselager & Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2011). “The Neuroscience of Responsibility”—Workshop Report. Neuroethics 4 (2):175-178.score: 28.0
    This is a report on the 3-day workshop “The Neuroscience of Responsibility” that was held in the Philosophy Department at Delft University of Technology in The Netherlands during February 11th–13th, 2010. The workshop had 25 participants from The Netherlands, Germany, Italy, UK, USA, Canada and Australia, with expertise in philosophy, neuroscience, psychology, psychiatry and law. Its aim was to identify current trends in neurolaw research related specifically to the topic of responsibility, and to foster international collaborative research on this topic. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2011). Computational Meta-Ethics. Minds and Machines 21 (2):261-274.score: 28.0
    It has been argued that ethically correct robots should be able to reason about right and wrong. In order to do so, they must have a set of do’s and don’ts at their disposal. However, such a list may be inconsistent, incomplete or otherwise unsatisfactory, depending on the reasoning principles that one employs. For this reason, it might be desirable if robots were to some extent able to reason about their own reasoning—in other words, if they had some meta-ethical capacities. (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gert Jan Lokhorst (1988). Ontology, Semantics and Philosophy of Mind in Wittgenstein's Tractatus: A Formal Reconstruction. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 29 (1):35 - 75.score: 28.0
    The paper presents a formal explication of the early Wittgenstein's views on ontology, the syntax and semantics of an ideal logical language, and the propositional attitudes. It will be shown that Wittgenstein gave a language of thought analysis of propositional attitude ascriptions, and that his ontological views imply that such ascriptions are truth-functions of (and supervenient upon) elementary sentences. Finally, an axiomatization of a quantified doxastic modal logic corresponding to Tractarian semantics will be given.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (1999). The Digital Phoenix: How Computers Are Changing Philosophy. Terrell Ward Bynum and James H. Moor, Editor. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):67-71.score: 28.0
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Jeroen van den Hoven, Gert-Jan Lokhorst & Ibo van de Poel (2012). Engineering and the Problem of Moral Overload. Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (1):143-155.score: 28.0
    When thinking about ethics, technology is often only mentioned as the source of our problems, not as a potential solution to our moral dilemmas. When thinking about technology, ethics is often only mentioned as a constraint on developments, not as a source and spring of innovation. In this paper, we argue that ethics can be the source of technological development rather than just a constraint and technological progress can create moral progress rather than just moral problems. We show this by (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Jeroen van Den Hoven & Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2002). Deontic Logic and Computer-Supported Computer Ethics. In James Moor & Terrell Ward Bynum (eds.), Cyberphilosophy: The Intersection of Philosophy and Computing. Blackwell Pub.. 376-386.score: 28.0
  45. Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (2006). Andersonian Deontic Logic, Propositional Quantification, and Mally. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 47 (3):385-395.score: 28.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (2013). An Intuitionistic Reformulation of Mally's Deontic Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (4):635-641.score: 28.0
    In 1926, Ernst Mally proposed a number of deontic postulates. He added them as axioms to classical propositional logic. The resulting system was unsatisfactory because it had the consequence that A is the case if and only if it is obligatory that A. We present an intuitionistic reformulation of Mally’s deontic logic. We show that this system does not provide the just-mentioned objectionable theorem while most of the theorems that Mally considered acceptable are still derivable. The resulting system is unacceptable (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gert-Jan van der Heiden (2012). Speaking on Behalf of the Other: Death and Dialogue in Plato, Gadamer, and Derrida. Heythrop Journal 53 (2):264-277.score: 28.0
  48. Gert-Jan Lokhorst (2011). Erratum To: Computational Meta-Ethics. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 21 (3):475-475.score: 28.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (1999). Ernst Mally's Deontik (1926). Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):273-282.score: 28.0
    In 1926, Mally proposed the first formal deontic system. As Mally and others soon realized, this system had some rather strange consequences. We show that the strangeness of Mally's system is not so much due to Mally's informal deontic principles as to the fact that he formalized those principles in terms of the propositional calculus. If they are formalized in terms of relevant logic rather than classical logic, one obtains a system which is related to Anderson's relevant deontic logic and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Gert-Jan C. Lokhorst (1991). Wittgenstein on the Structure of the Soul: A New Interpretation of Tractatus 5.5421. Philosophical Investigations 14 (4):324-341.score: 28.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000