Search results for 'Gideon Segal' (try it on Scholar)

349 found
Sort by:
  1. Gideon Segal (2000). Beyond Subjectivity: Spinoza's Cognitivism of the Emotions. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):1 – 19.score: 120.0
    In what follows I try to show that Spinoza modelled his project of rational psychology, in some of its major respects, upon Descartes's metaphysics of matter. I argue further that, like Descartes, who paid for the rationalization of the science of matter the price of having to leave out of his description non-quantifiable qualities, so Spinoza left out of his psychology the non-rationalizable aspects of emotions, i.e. whatever in them could not be subsumed under common notions. He therefore was left (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Yirmiyahu Yovel & Gideon Segal (eds.) (1994). Spinoza on Knowledge and the Human Mind: Papers Presented at the Second Jerusalem Conference (Ethica Ii). E.J. Brill.score: 120.0
    This volume revolves around Part II of Spinoza's "opus magnum, the "Ethics where he offers his theory of knowledge and the human mind.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. William Segal (1998). Opening: Collected Writings of William Segal, 1985-1997. Continuum.score: 120.0
    Opening -- The structure of man -- The middle ground -- Conversations -- The ten oxherding pictures.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jerome M. Segal (2002). Graceful Simplicity: The Philosophy and Politics of the Alternative American Dream. University of California Press.score: 60.0
    Despite the United States' economic abundance, "the good life" has proved elusive. Millions long for more time for friends and family, for reading or walking or relaxing. Instead our lives are frantic, hectic, and harried. In Graceful Simplicity, Jerome M. Segal, philosopher, political activist, and former staff member of the House Budget Committee, expands and deepens the contemporary discourse on simple living. He articulates his conception of a politics of simplicity--one rooted in beauty, peace of mind, appreciativeness, and generosity (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gabriel Segal (2007). Cognitive Content and Propositional Attitude Attributions. In Brian P. McLaughlin & Jonathan D. Cohen (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Mind. Blackwell.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Daniel Rothschild & Gabriel Segal (2009). Indexical Predicates. Mind and Language 24 (4):467--493.score: 30.0
    We discuss the challenge to truth-conditional semantics presented by apparent shifts in extension of predicates such as 'red'. We propose an explicit indexical semantics for 'red' and argue that our account is preferable to the alternatives on conceptual and empirical grounds.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gabriel M. A. Segal (2009). The Causal Inefficacy of Content. Mind and Language 24 (1):80-102.score: 30.0
    Abstract: The paper begins with the assumption that psychological event tokens are identical to or constituted from physical events. It then articulates a familiar apparent problem concerning the causal role of psychological properties. If they do not reduce to physical properties, then either they must be epiphenomenal or any effects they cause must also be caused by physical properties, and hence be overdetermined. It then argues that both epiphenomenalism and over-determinationism are prima facie perfectly reasonable and relatively unproblematic views. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gabriel Segal (2005). Intentionality. In Frank Jackson & Michael A. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gabriel Segal (2004). Reference, Causal Powers, Externalist Intuitions, and Unicorns. In Richard Schantz (ed.), The Externalist Challenge. De Gruyter.score: 30.0
    In this chapter, I will compare and contrast singular concepts with what I call.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gabriel Segal & Elliott Sober (1991). The Causal Efficacy of Content. Philosophical Studies 63 (July):1-30.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gabriel Segal (2000). A Slim Book About Narrow Content. MIT Press.score: 30.0
    The book, written in a clear, engaging style, contains four chapters.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gabriel Segal (2001). Two Theories of Names. Mind and Language 16 (5):547–563.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gabriel Segal (1989). Seeing What is Not There. Philosophical Review 97 (April):189-214.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gabriel Segal (1989). The Return of the Individual. Mind 98 (January):39-57.score: 30.0
  15. Gabriel Segal (2009). Keep Making Sense. Synthese 170 (2):275 - 287.score: 30.0
    In a number works Jerry Fodor has defended a reductive, causal and referential theory of cognitive content. I argue against this, defending a quasi-Fregean notion of cognitive content, and arguing also that the cognitive content of non-singular concepts is narrow, rather than wide.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gabriel Segal, Cognitive Content and Propositional Attitude Attributions.score: 30.0
    Tyler Burge (Burge (1979)) has developed a very influential line of anti-individualistic thought. He argued that the cognitive content of a person.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gabriel Segal (1991). Defence of a Reasonable Individualism. Mind 100 (399):485-94.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gabriel Segal, In Deference to Reference.score: 30.0
    of (from Philosophy Dissertations Online).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gabriel Segal (1989). A Preference for Sense and Reference. Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):73-89.score: 30.0
  20. Gabriel Segal, Truth and Meaning.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. William J. Rapaport, Erwin M. Segal, Stuart C. Shapiro, David A. Zubin, Gail A. Bruder, Judith Felson Duchan & David M. Mark, Cognitive and Computer Systems for Understanding Narrative Text.score: 30.0
    This project continues our interdisciplinary research into computational and cognitive aspects of narrative comprehension. Our ultimate goal is the development of a computational theory of how humans understand narrative texts. The theory will be informed by joint research from the viewpoints of linguistics, cognitive psychology, the study of language acquisition, literary theory, geography, philosophy, and artificial intelligence. The linguists, literary theorists, and geographers in our group are developing theories of narrative language and spatial understanding that are being tested by the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gabriel M. A. Segal (2001). On a Difference Between Language and Thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (1):125-129.score: 30.0
  23. Gabriel Segal, Poverty of Stimulus Arguments Concerning Language and Folk Psychology.score: 30.0
    This paper is principally devoted to comparing and contrasting poverty of stimulus arguments for innate cognitive apparatus in relation to language and in relation to folk psychology. These days one is no longer allowed to use the term ‘innate’ without saying what one means by it. So I will begin by saying what I mean by ‘innate’. Sections 2 and 3 will discuss language and theory of mind, respectively. Along the way, I will also briefly discuss other arguments for innate (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Gabriel Segal, Cognitive Content and Propositional Attitude Ascriptions.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Alan Stainer, Lorice Stainer & Alexandra Segal (1997). The Ethics of Tax Planning. Business Ethics 6 (4):213–219.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Gabriel Segal, Indexical Predicates.score: 30.0
    Truth-conditional semantics is the project of determining a way of assigning truth-conditions to sentences based on A) the extension of their constituents and B) their syntactic mode of composition. Truth-conditional semantics is the major research project of linguistic semantics and the project and its prospects are a central concern in contemporary philosophy of language.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Gabriel M. A. Segal (1997). Content and Computation: Chasing the Arrowsa Critical Notice of Jerry Fodor's the Elm and the Expert. Mind and Language 12 (3&4):490–501.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Gabriel Segal, Five Flies in the Ointment.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robert A. Segal (2011). What is “Mythic Reality”? Zygon 46 (3):588-592.score: 30.0
    Abstract. The topic of the March 2011 symposium in Zygon is “The Mythic Reality of the Autonomous Individual.” Yet few of the contributors even discuss “mythic reality.” Of the ones who do, most cavalierly use “myth” dismissively, as simply a false belief. Rather than reconciling myth with reality, they oppose myth to reality. Their view of myth is by no means unfamiliar or unwarranted, but they need to recognize other views of myth and to defend their own. Above all, they (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Gabriel Segal (2003). Ignorance of Meaning. In Alex Barber (ed.), Epistemology of Language. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ralph W. Giacobbe & Madhav N. Segal (2000). A Comparative Analysis of Ethical Perceptions in Marketing Research: U.S.A. Vs. Canada. Journal of Business Ethics 27 (3).score: 30.0
    The study compares Canadian and U.S. marketing researchers' attitudes, perceptions and intentions related to several areas of ethical concern. A particular focus involves salience of norms common to marketing research codes of ethics (COEs) and familiarity of such codes to marketing research professionals. Researchers' attitudes towards today's ethical climate are identified and compared between the two countries. Relationships are examined between familiarity, ethical intention and salience. Results indicate that U.S. and Canadian marketing researchers have similar perceptions of the relative importance (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Gabriel Segal & Margaret Speas (1986). On Saying �?? Mind and Language 1 (2):124-132.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Aaron Segal (2011). Sceptical Theism and Divine Truths. Religious Studies 47 (1):85-95.score: 30.0
    Sceptical theism has been employed by its adherents in an argument aimed at undermining the so called ‘noseeum inference’. Erik Wielenberg (2010) has recently argued that there is an equally plausible argument for the conclusion that sceptical theism implies that we do not know any proposition that has word-of-God justification only. Thus, sceptical theists need to give up their argument against the noseeum inference or accept the conclusion that we do not know any proposition that has word-of-God justification only. I (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Robert A. Segal (1983). Victor Turners Theory of Ritual. Zygon 18 (3):327-335.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. James Higginbotham & Gabriel Segal (1994). Priorities in the Philosophy of Thought. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 68:85 - 130.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Aaron Segal & Alvin Plantinga (2010). Response to Churchland. Philo 13 (2):201-207.score: 30.0
    Paul Churchland argues that Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism is unsuccessful and so we need not accept its conclusion. In this paper, we respond to Churchland’s argument. After we briefly recapitulate Plantinga’s argument and state Churchland’s argument, we offer three objections to Churchland’s argument: (1) its first premise has little to recommend it, (2) its second premise is false, and (3) its conclusion is consistent with, and indeed entails, the conclusion of Plantinga’s argument.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Erwin M. Segal, Meredith Williams, David J. Cole, James Geller, Yorick Wilks, Shoshana Loeb, Kim Sterelny, Jerry Fodor, Sara Heinämaa & Ausonio Marras (1993). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 3 (3).score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Judy Z. Segal (1997). Public Discourse and Public Policy: Some Ways That Metaphor Constrains Health (Care). Journal of Medical Humanities 18 (4):217-231.score: 30.0
    Since the terms of the health policy debate in the United States and Canada are largely supplied by biomedicine, the current crisis in health care is, in part, a product of biomedical rhetoric. In this essay, three metaphors widely identified as being associated with biomedicine—the body is a machine, medicine is war,and medicine is a business—are examined with a view to the ways in which they influence the health policy debate, not only with respect to outcomes, but also with respect (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J.é Segal, R.ô & Me (2003). The Use of Information Theory in Biology: A Historical Perspective. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 25 (2):275-281.score: 30.0
  40. Steven Segal (1998). The Anxiety of Strangers and the Fear of Enemies. Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (4):271-282.score: 30.0
    In this paper I use a distinction between the "anxiety of strangers" and the "fear of enemies" to show how uncertainty and tension experienced in the face of what is other and different need not lead to a nationalist insularity, but can be the occasion for an existential philosophical education - an education in which the resolute acceptance of strangeness allows us to reflect on our taken-for-granted about the everyday.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. E. Segal (1998). Tragic Seneca: An Essay in the Theatrical Tradition. A J Boyle. The Classical Review 48 (2):316-318.score: 30.0
  42. Evalyn F. Segal (1976). Mind-Body: What is the Question? Philosophy Forum 14 (4):325-350.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Robert Segal (1982). Pike on Divine Omniscience and Voluntary Action. The New Scholasticism 56 (3):329-339.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gabriel Segal (1997). Review. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Ariel Rubinstein & Uzi Segal, On the Likelihood of Cyclic Comparisons.score: 30.0
    We investigate the procedure of "random sampling" where the alternatives are random variables. When comparing any two alternatives, the decision maker samples each of the alternatives once and ranks them according to the comparison between the two realizations. Our main result is that when applied to three alternatives, the procedure yields a cycle with a probability bounded above by 8 27 . Bounds are also obtained for other related procedures.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Steven Segal (2011). A Heideggerian Perspective on the Relationship Between Mintzberg's Distinction Between Engaged and Disconnected Management: The Role of Uncertainty in Management. Journal of Business Ethics 103 (3):469-483.score: 30.0
    In the context of uncertainty and anxiety regarding the role of leadership and management, this article explores the relationship between Mintzberg’s concept of the distinction between the engaged and disconnected manager, Heidegger’s notion authentic and inauthentic being and Benner and Wrubel’s distinction between two forms of professional practice attunement: an attunement to technique and an attunement to lived experience. It argues that while Mintzberg outlines the distinction between engaged and disengaged management, he does not develop an understanding of the conditions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Alex Segal (1988). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 28 (4).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Gabriel Segal (1990). In the Mood for a Semantic Theory. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:103 - 118.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Steven Segal (1998). Philosophy as a Therapeutic Activity. Inquiry 17 (3):36-47.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Steven P. Segal & Alfred I. Tauber (2007). Revisiting Hume's Law. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):43 – 45.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Teresa M. Segal (2010). The Role of the Reproductive Technology Clinic in the Imposition of Societal Values. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (2).score: 30.0
    The evaluative process of preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) that accompanies in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures is a "standard of care" implemented in order to increase the likelihood that a genetically "healthy" or nondisabled baby will result from pregnancy. PGS is also employed when maternal age is determined to be a risk factor, especially when "abnormal" embryos are perceived to be the cause of spontaneous abortion. The scope of genetic information currently available for examination and evaluation within the PGS process is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Robert A. Segal (1985). Anthropological Definitions of Religion. Zygon 20 (1):78-79.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Lydia Segal & Mark Lehrer (forthcoming). The Conflict of Ethos and Ethics: A Sociological Theory of Business People's Ethical Values. Journal of Business Ethics.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. E. Meletinsky, D. Segal & N. Slater (1971). Structuralism and Semiotics in the USSR. Diogenes 19 (73):88-115.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Judy Z. Segal (2000). Contesting Death, Speaking of Dying. Journal of Medical Humanities 21 (1):29-44.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Erich Segal (1992). A Political Euripides. The Classical Review 42 (02):268-.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Daniel A. Segal (1999). A Response to Jones's Critique of Interpretive Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (2):306-309.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Gabriel Segal (1991). Consciousness, by W. G. Lycan. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1):240-243.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Alex Segal (2004). Goodness Beyond Speech. Philosophical Investigations 27 (3):201–221.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Robert A. Segal (1985). A Jungian View of Evil. Zygon 20 (1):83-89.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Erich Segal (1992). A Political Euripides Justina Gregory: Euripides and the Instruction of the Athenians. Pp. Ix + 208. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 1991. £25. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 42 (02):268-269.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Jacob Segal (1994). A Storm From Paradise: Liberalism and the Problem of Time. Critical Review 8 (1):23-48.score: 30.0
    The tendency of classical politics to embed the individual in universal and transcendental patterns of action followed in part from the recognition of the futility of unpredictable action oriented to the individual's transient personal future. By contrast, F. A. Hayek argues for liberalism and the rule of law because it is instrumental to the achievement of human ends. Michael Oakeshott, however, claims that freedom is a value in itself, and that liberalism should emphasize moral autonomy because the moral life is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. Lynne Segal (1999). Cautionary Tales: Between Freud and Feminism. Constellations 6 (1):61-79.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Uzi Segal (2006). Fair Bias. Economics and Philosophy 22 (2):213-229.score: 30.0
    This paper takes a simple, informal suggestion by Broome and another more explicit suggestion by Kamm for how to deal with asymmetric claims and shows how they can be interpreted to be consistent with two different social welfare functions: Sum-of-square-roots of individual utilities, and product of utilities. These functions are then used to analyze more complicated situations but I show that the first yields more intuitive results, and a better compromise of efficiency and justice, than the other. (Published Online July (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. G. Segal (1997). Review. Cartesian Psychology and Physical Minds: Individualism and the Sciences of Mind. Robert A Wilson. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):151-156.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Erich Segal (1991). The Originality of Menaechmi Ekkehard Stärk: Die Menaechmi des Plautus Und Kein Griechisches Original. (ScriptOralia, 11. Reihe A: Altertumswissenschaftliche Reihe, I.) Pp Vii + 237. Tübingen: Gunter Narr, 1989. DM 68. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (01):48-49.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Sydney Segal (1980). The Award of Distinction-Dr. David Takayoshi Suzuki. Bioethics Quarterly 2 (1):64-67.score: 30.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Ned Block & Gabriel Segal (1998). Philosophy 2: Further Through the Subject. New York: Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Ned Block & Gabriel Segal (1998). The Philosophy of Psychology. In Philosophy 2: Further Through the Subject. New York: Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. Martin Davies, Ron Segal & Elaine Weyuker (1994). Computability, Complexity and Languages. Academic Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. Vasilikie P. Demos & Marcia Texler Segal (eds.) (2001). An International Feminist Challenge to Theory. Jai.score: 30.0
  72. Fritz Grunewald & Daniel Segal (1985). Decision Problems Concerning s-Arithmetic Groups. Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (3):743-772.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. L. Robin Keller, Uzi Segal & Tan Wang (1993). The Becker-DeGroot-Marschak Mechanism and Generalized Utility Theories: Theoretical Predictions and Empirical Observations. Theory and Decision 34 (2):83-97.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Richard Larson & Gabriel Segal (1995). Knowledge of Meaning. The Mit Press.score: 30.0
  75. Uriel Procaccia & Uzi Segal (2003). Super Majoritarianism and the Endowment Effect. Theory and Decision 55 (3):181-207.score: 30.0
    The American and some other constitutions entrench property rights by requiring super majoritarian voting as a condition for amending or revoking their own provisions. Following Buchanan and Tullock [The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), 1962], this paper analyzes individuals' interests behind a veil of ignorance, and shows that under some standard assumptions, a (simple) majoritarian rule should be adopted. This result changes if one assumes that preferences are consistent with the behavioral (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. Jerome M. Segal (2008). Agency, Illusion, and Well-Being: Essays in Moral Psychology and Philosophical Economics. Lexington Books.score: 30.0
    Human agency -- Alienness : experiencing one's own incoherence -- Alienness, understanding, and self-deception -- God's project of self-deception -- Alienation and political agency -- How we fooled ourselves into believing in progress -- The monetary illusion -- The good life and economic activity -- Human activity : a molecular approach to action theory.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Alan F. Segal (2008). Afterlife in Modern America : The Public Sentiment. In Michael K. Bartalos (ed.), Speaking of Death: America's New Sense of Mortality. Praeger Publishers.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Gabriel Segal (1999). A Slim Book on Narrow Content. The Mit Press.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Hannah Segal (1961). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 1 (4).score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Gabriel Segal, Content and Causation.score: 30.0
    Allow me to recapitulate some territory that will be familiar to most readers. Here is how the problem of mental causation has typically been set up since shortly after the onset of non-reductive physicalism. It is now widely assumed that the realm of the physical is causally closed: every physical event has a complete physical cause, a cause that is sufficient for the event’s occurrence. This apparently leaves us with a limited number of options concerning psychological causation, none of which (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. Leah Segal & Ruth Richter (2001). Criticism and Democracy. Inquiry 20 (4):34-41.score: 30.0
    This paper describes a holistic approach and an interdisciplinary curriculum in enhancing critical thinking and education for democracy at the junior-high schools and highschools levels. The curriculum includes academic subjects such as the humanities, sciences, social sciences and art. The aim of this curriculum is not to teach an additional lesson in history, political sciences, art, etc., but to fostercritical thinking and democratic behavior. The theoretical framework has two bases. The first derives from eighteenth century rationalism and scientific thinking, while (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Steven Segal, Ecstasy on the Boundary : The Role of Theorising and Educating in Disruptive Market Places.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  83. Gabriel Segal, Flies 07.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. Ora Segal (1968). Further Studies in Philosophy. Jerusalem, Magness Press, Hebrew University.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Jerome M. Segal (2008). God's Project. In Charles Harry Manekin & Robert Eisen (eds.), Philosophers and the Jewish Bible. University Press of Maryland.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Jerome M. Segal (1999). Graceful Simplicity: Toward a Philosophy and Politics of Simple Living. H. Holt & Co..score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. Robert A. Segal (1990). Misconceptions of the Social Sciences. Zygon 25 (3):263-278.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. Robert Alan Segal (ed.) (1996). Philosophy, Religious Studies, and Myth. Garland Pub..score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. Gabriel Segal (1997). Review of Robert A. Wilson: Cartesian Psychology and Physical Minds: Iindividualism and the Sciences of Mind. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48:151--156.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Robert A. Segal (1992). Religionists'misconceptions: Replies to Sharma and Pals. Zygon 27 (1):107-111.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Alan F. Segal (2009). The Afterlife in Modern America. In Michael K. Bartalos (ed.), Speaking of Death: America's New Sense of Mortality. Praeger.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. Gabriel Segal, The Causal Inefficacy of Psychological Properties.score: 30.0
    Please allow me to recapitulate some territory that will be familiar to most readers. Here is how the problem of mental causation has typically been set up since shortly after the onset of non-reductive physicalism. It is now widely assumed that the realm of the physical is causally closed. This means that the probability of any event’s occurring is fully determined by physical causes, and physical causes alone. There is no space in the physical causal nexus for any non-physical event (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Robert Segal (1997). The Myth and Ritual Theory: An Overview. Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 6 (1):1-18.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. Eliaz Segal (2004). The Mind's Direction of Time. Journal of Mind and Behavior 25 (3):227-235.score: 30.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. S. L. Pinto, E. Lipowski, R. Segal, C. Kimberlin & J. Algina (2007). Physicians' Intent to Comply with the American Medical Association's Guidelines on Gifts From the Pharmaceutical Industry. Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (6):313-319.score: 30.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Teresa Marques (2006). On an Argument of Segal's Against Singular Object-Dependent Thoughts. Disputatio 2 (26).score: 12.0
    This paper discusses and criticizes Segal’s 1989 argument against singular object-dependent thoughts. His argument aims at showing that object-dependent thoughts are explanatorily redundant. My criticism of Segal’s argument has two parts. First, I appeal to common anti-individualist arguments to the effect that Segal’s type of argument only succeeds in establishing that object-dependent thoughts are explanatorily redundant for those aspects of subjects’ behaviour that do not require reference to external objects. Secondly, Segal’s view on singular thoughts is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Alec Walen (2012). Potholes on the Path to Purity: Gideon Yaffe's Overly Ambitious Attempt to Account for Criminal Attempts. Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (3):383-386.score: 12.0
    Gideon Yaffe’s “subjectivism about attempts” rest on the Transfer Principle: “If a particular form of conduct is legitimately criminalized, then the attempt to engage in that form of conduct is also legitimately criminalized.” From the perspective of a moral concern with culpability, this principle seems to get to the heart of the matter: the true essence of what is wrong with attempting to commit a crime. Unfortunately, Yaffe’s argument for the Transfer Principle is based on an equivocation and therefore (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Maya Bar-Hillel & Avishai Margalit (1985). Gideon's Paradox — a Paradox of Rationality. Synthese 63 (2):139 - 155.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. G. William Barnard (2005). Pt. 3. James and Mysticism. For an Engaged Reading : William James and the Varieties of Postmodern Religious Experience / Grace M. Jantzen ; Asian Religions and Mysticism : The Legacy of William James in the Study of Religions / Richard King ; James and Freud on Mysticism / Robert A. Segal ; Mystical Assessments : Jamesian Reflections on Spiritual Judgments. [REVIEW] In Jeremy R. Carrette (ed.), William James and the Varieties of Religious Experience: A Centenary Celebration. Routledge.score: 9.0
1 — 100 / 349