Glassen distinguishes various categories of moral terms that are nowadays often confused, conflated, or neglected.

It is one of the objects of what is sometimes called “general theory of value” to study all sorts of value judgments or evaluational judgments. But what the sorts of evaluational judgment are is a question that has so far by no means been settled. There are only two kinds of evaluational judgment that are universally recognized and that have well–established names, the ethical or moral, and the aesthetic. Another pair that have sometimes been mentioned are the prudential and the (...) economic. The object of this paper is to direct attention to still another, quite distinct, sort of evaluational judgment which we commonly make, to give judgments of this sort a name, and to characterize them in a provisional way. (shrink)