Search results for 'God' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Richard Swinburne (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press.
    Richard Swinburne presents a substantially rewritten and updated edition of his most celebrated book. No other work has made a more powerful case for the probability of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   85 citations  
  2. Erik Wielenberg (2009). Dawkins's Gambit, Hume's Aroma, and God's Simplicity. Philosophia Christi 11 (1):113-127.
    I examine the central atheistic argument of Richard Dawkinss book The God Delusion (“Dawkinss Gambit”) and illustrate its failure. I further show that Dawkinss Gambit (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Courtney Fugate (2014). The Highest Good and Kant's Proof(s) of God's Existence. History of Philosophy Quarterly 31 (2).
    This paper explains a way of understanding Kant's proof of God's existence in the Critique of Practical Reason that has hitherto gone unnoticed and argues that (...) this interpretation possesses several advantages over its rivals. By first looking at examples where Kant indicates the role that faith plays in moral life and then reconstructing the proof of the second Critique with this in view, I argue that, for Kant, we must adopt a certain conception of the highest good, and so also must choose to believe in the kind of God that can make it possible, because this is essentially a way of actively striving for virtue. One advantage of this interpretation, I argue, is that it is able to make sense of the strong link Kant draws between morality and religion. (shrink)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Gabriel Vacariu, (2015) "God Cannot Even Exist!".
    We have to change our oldest paradigm of thinking about the existence of theworldand God. In my books and articles, I have showed that the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Vuko Andric & Attila Tanyi (forthcoming). God and Eternal Boredom. Religious Studies:1-20.
    God is thought to be eternal. Does this mean that he is timeless? Or is he, rather, omnitemporal? In this paper we want to show that God (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  60
    David Torrijos-Castrillejo (2015). Feuerbach, Xenophanes and the Too Human God. In Gabriela Blebea Nicolae (ed.), Credința în época secularizării. Editura Arhiepiscopiei Romano-Catolice 179-192.
    Feuerbach is known for his unmasking of the concept of God insofar he solved it in a celestial idealization of the human essence. Xenophanes already rejected the (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Arman Hovhannisyan, God and Reality.
    Metaphysics has done everything to involve God in the world of being. However, in case of considering Reality as being and nothingness, naturally, the metaphysical approach toward (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. William P. Alston (1991). Perceiving God: The Epistemology of Religious Experience. Cornell University Press.
    Introduction i. Character of the Book The central thesis of this book is that experiential awareness of God, or as I shall be saying, the perception of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   87 citations  
  9. Robert K. Garcia (forthcoming). Tropes as Divine Acts: the Nature of Creaturely Properties in a World Sustained by God. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion.
    I aim to synthesize two issues within theistic metaphysics. The first concerns the metaphysics of creaturely properties and, more specifically, the nature of unshareable properties, or tropes. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  11
    Marek Pepliński (2016). Dobroć (Boga - Goodness of God). In Janusz Salamon (ed.), Przewodnik po filozofii religii. Nurt analityczny, Kraków 2016. Wydawnictwo WAM 121-40.
    The paper presents some historical (Plato, Aristotle, Plotin, Augustine, Boethius, Aquinas) and main contemporary topics about different accounts of goodness of God understood as ontological goodness, perfection (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Paul Gould (2012). The Problem of Universals, Realism, and God. Metaphysica 13 (2):183-194.
    There has been much discussion of late on what exactly the Problem of Universals is and is not. Of course answers to these questions and many more (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  35
    Dani Adams (forthcoming). God and Dispositional Essentialism: An Account of the Laws of Nature. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly.
    It is common to appeal to governing laws of nature in order to explain the existence of natural regularities. Classical theism, however, maintains the sovereignty thesis: everything (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Andrew Chignell & Dean Zimmerman (2012). Review: Saving God From Saving God. [REVIEW] Books and Culture 15 (3).
    Mark Johnstons book, Saving God (Princeton University Press, 2010) has two main goals, one negative and the other positive: (1) to eliminate the gods of the (...)major Western monotheisms (Judaism, Christianity, and Islam) as candidates for the role ofthe Highest One”; (2) to introduce the real Highest One, a panentheistic deity worthy of devotion and capable of extending to us the grace needed to transform us from inwardly-turned sinners to practitioners of agape. In this review, we argue that Johnstons attack on traditional forms of monotheism has less force than his criticism of theundergraduate atheists” (e.g., Hitchens, Harris, Dawkins); and that his candidate for Highest One is not the greatest possible being, and so could not play the role Johnston casts for it. -/- . (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Brooke Alan Trisel (2012). God's Silence as an Epistemological Concern. Philosophical Forum 43 (4):383-393.
    Throughout history, many people, including Mother Teresa, have been troubled by Gods silence. In spite of the conflicting interpretations of the Bible, God has remained silent. (...)What are the implications of divine hiddenness/silence for a meaning of life? Is there a good reason that explains Gods silence? If God created humanity to fulfill a purpose, then God would have clarified his purpose and our role by now, as I will argue. To help God carry out his purpose, we would need to have a clear understanding of our role. Thus, by failing to clarify our role, God would be undermining himself in achieving the purpose he conceived, which would not make sense. Because God, if he exists, would not engage in this self-defeating behavior, this suggests that humanity was not created by God to fulfill a purpose. (shrink)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Robert K. Garcia (2013). Is God's Benevolence Impartial? Southwest Philosophy Review 29 (1):23-30.
    In this paper I consider the intuitive idea that God is fair and does not play favorites. This belief appears to be held by many theists. I (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  68
    Jordan Howard Sobel (2004). Logic and Theism: Arguments for and Against Beliefs in God. Cambridge University Press.
    This is a wide-ranging book about arguments for and against belief in God.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  17. C. Stephen Evans (2012). Natural Signs and Knowledge of God: A New Look at Theistic Arguments. Oxford University Press.
    Is there such a thing as natural knowledge of God? C. Stephen Evans presents the case for understanding theistic arguments as expressions of natural signs in order (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  18.  39
    Brian Leftow (2012). God and Necessity. Oxford University Press.
    Modal basics -- Some solutions -- Theist solutions -- The ontology of possibility -- Modal truthmakers -- Modality and the divine nature -- Deity as essential -- Against deity theories -- The (...)role of deity -- The biggest bang -- Divine concepts -- Concepts, syntax, and actualism -- Modality: basic notions -- The genesis of secular modality -- Modal reality -- Essences -- Non-secular modalities -- Theism and modal semantics -- Freedom, preference, and cost -- Explaining modal status -- Explaining the necessary -- Against theistic platonism -- Worlds and the existence of God. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  19. Guy Kahane (2011). Should We Want God to Exist? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 82 (3):674-696.
    Whether God exists is a metaphysical question. But there is also a neglected evaluative question about Gods existence: Should we want God to exist? Very many, (...)including many atheists and agnostics, appear to think we should. Theists claim that if God didnt exist things would be far worse, and many atheists agree; they regret Gods inexistence. Some remarks by Thomas Nagel suggest an opposing view: that we should want God not to exist. I call this view anti-theism. I explain how such view can be coherent, and why it might be correct. Anti-theism must be distinguished from the argument from evil or the denial of Gods goodness; it is a claim about the goodness of Gods existence. Anti-theists must claim that its a logical consequence of Gods existence that things are worse in certain respects. The problem is that Gods existence would also make things better in many ways. Given that Gods existence is likely to be impersonally better overall, anti-theists face a challenge similar to that facing nonconsequentialists. I explore two ways of meeting this challenge. (shrink)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  20.  83
    Richard Oxenberg (2015). My Understanding of the Biblical God: A Brief 'Transreligious' Reflection. Interreligious Insight.
    In this brief paper I reflect upon the Bible's portrayal of God as pointing beyond itself toward a notion of divinity many religions can embrace, but (...)one only imperfectly expressed in the biblical portrait itself. I argue that a fuller recognition of the *fallibility* of the biblical portrait can lead us to a deeper and more satisfying appreciation of the Bible itself. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  7
    Stephen T. Davis (forthcoming). Divine Incomprehensibility: Can We Know The Unknowable God? Topoi:1-6.
    Christians traditionally hold that we know God as God is revealed to us, but that we do not know God in essence, as God is in himself. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Emmanuel Lévinas (1998). Of God Who Comes to Mind. Stanford University Press.
    Emmanuel Levinas is one of the most original philosophers in the twentieth century. In this book, continuing his thought on obligation, he investigates the possibility that the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  23. Rob Lovering (2012). On the Morality of Having Faith That God Exists. Sophia 51 (1):17-30.
    Many theists who identify themselves with the Abrahamic religions maintain that it is perfectly acceptable to have faith that God exists. In this paper, I argue that, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  6
    Richard Swinburne (forthcoming). Causation, Time, and Gods Omniscience. Topoi:1-10.
    The cause of an event must continue over a period at which the effect is not occurring and the whole period at which it is occurring. It (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  46
    Philippe Gagnon (2015). Review Article on Amir D. Aczel, Why Science Does Not Disprove God (New York: W. Morrow, 2014). [REVIEW] ESSSAT News and Reviews 25 (2):22-27.
    Review of the book by mathematician and science writer Amir Aczel, Why Science does not Disprove God, recently reissued in paperback, with a focus on the chapters (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Yitzhak Melamed (2014). Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on Actual Infinity and the Infinity of Gods Attributes. In Steven Nadler (ed.), Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 204-215.
    The seventeenth century was an important period in the conceptual development of the notion of the infinite. In 1643, Evangelista Torricelli (1608-1647)—Galileos successor in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Raphaël Millière (2014). Is God a Zombie? Divine Consciousness and Omnipresence. International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 75 (1):38-54.
    While nobody will ever know what it may be like to be God, there is a more basic question one may try to answer: does God have (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Paolo Diego Bubbio (2014). God, Incarnation, and Metaphysics in Hegel's Philosophy of Religion. Sophia (4):1-19.
    In this article, I draw upon thepost-Kantianreading of Hegel to examine the consequences Hegels idea of God has on his metaphysics. In particular, I (...) apply Hegelsrecognition-theoreticapproach to his theology. Within the context of this analysis, I focus especially on the incarnation and sacrifice of Christ. First, I argue that Hegels philosophy of religion employs a distinctive notion of sacrifice (kenotic sacrifice). Here, sacrifice is conceived as a giving up something of oneself tomake roomfor the other. Second, I argue that the idea of kenotic sacrifice plays a fundamental role in Hegels account of Christ. Third, I conclude by sketching some of the consequences of Hegels idea of a God who renounces his own divinity for an idealistically conceived metaphysics. My main thesis is that the notion of incarnation is conceived by Hegel as the expression of a spirit that advances only insofar as it is willing to withdraw and make room for the other. A kenotic reading of the Hegelian notion of the incarnation is also useful in terms of a clarification of the dispute betweenleft Hegeliansandright Hegeliansconcerning the status of the idea of God in Hegels philosophy. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    Herman Philipse (2012). God in the Age of Science?: A Critique of Religious Reason. OUP Oxford.
    Herman Philipse puts forward a powerful new critique of belief in God. He examines the strategies that have been used for the philosophical defence of religious belief, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  30. Stewart Duncan (2005). Knowledge of God in Leviathan. History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (1):31-48.
    Hobbes denies in Leviathan that we have an idea of God. He does think, though, that God exists, and does not even deny that we can think (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31. Danny Frederick (2013). A Puzzle About Natural Laws and the Existence of God. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 73 (3):269-283.
    The existence of natural laws, whether deterministic or indeterministic, and whether exceptionless or ceteris paribus, seems puzzling because it implies that mindless bits of matter behave in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  9
    Paul K. Moser (2010). The Evidence for God: Religious Knowledge Reexamined. Cambridge University Press.
    If God exists, where can we find adequate evidence for God's existence? In this book, Paul Moser offers a new perspective on the evidence for God (...)that centers on a morally robust version of theism that is cognitively resilient. The resulting evidence for God is not speculative, abstract, or casual. Rather, it is morally and existentially challenging to humans, as they themselves responsively and willingly become evidence of God's reality in receiving and reflecting God's moral character for others. Moser calls this 'personifying evidence of God,' because it requires the evidence to be personified in an intentional agent - such as a human - and thereby to be inherent evidence of an intentional agent. Contrasting this approach with skepticism, scientific naturalism, fideism, and natural theology, Moser also grapples with the potential problems of divine hiddenness, religious diversity, and vast evil. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  33.  86
    Stewart Duncan (2015). Leibniz on the Expression of God. Ergo, an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):83-103.
    Leibniz frequently uses the notion of expression, but it is not easy to see just how he understood that relation. This paper focuses on the particular case (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  5
    Daniel Howard-Snyder (forthcoming). Who or What is God, According to John Hick? Topoi:1-16.
    I summarize John Hicks pluralistic theory of the worlds great religions, largely in his own voice. I then focus on the core posit of his theory (...), what he callsthe Real,” but which I less tendentiously callGodhick”. Godhick is supposed to be the ultimate religious reality. As such, it must be both possible and capable of explanatory and religious significance. Unfortunately, Godhick is, by definition, transcategorial, i.e. necessarily, for any creaturely conceivable substantial property F, it is neither an F nor a non-F. As a result, Godhick is impossible, as shown by the Self-Identity Problem, the Number Problem, and the Pairing Problem. Moreover, even if Godhick is possible, it faces the Insignificance Problem. The upshot is that, so far as I can see, John Hicks God is unworthy of any further interest. (shrink)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    John Bishop & Ken Perszyk (forthcoming). The Divine Attributes and Non-Personal Conceptions of God. Topoi:1-13.
    Analytical philosophers of religion widely assume that God is a person, albeit immaterial and of unique status, and the divine attributes are thus understood as attributes of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Steven M. Duncan, Kant's Pre-Critical Proof for God's Existence.
    In his Beweisgrund (1762), Kant presents a sketch of "the only possible basis" for a proof of God's existence. In this essay, I attempt to (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Jim Stone (1998). Free Will as a Gift From God: A New Compatibilism. Philosophical Studies 92 (3):257-81.
    I argue that God could give us the robust power to do other than we do in a deterministic universe.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  38.  40
    Graham Oppy (2014). Leftow on God and Necessity. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):5-16.
    This paper is a critical examination of some of the major themes of Brian Leftow's book *God and Necessity*.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Henk van den Belt (2009). Playing God in Frankenstein's Footsteps: Synthetic Biology and the Meaning of Life. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 3 (3):257-268.
    The emergent new science of synthetic biology is challenging entrenched distinctions between, amongst others, life and non-life, the natural and the artificial, the evolved and the (...)designed, and even the material and the informational. Whenever such culturally sanctioned boundaries are breached, researchers are inevitably accused of playing God or treading in Frankensteins footsteps. Bioethicists, theologians and editors of scientific journals feel obliged to provide an authoritative answer to the ambiguous question of themeaningof life, both as a scientific definition and as an explication with wider existential connotations. This article analyses the arguments mooted in the emerging societal debates on synthetic biology and the way its practitioners respond to criticism, mostly by assuming a defiant posture or professing humility. It explores the relationship between theplaying Godtheme and the Frankenstein motif and examines the doctrinal status of theplaying Godargument. One particularly interesting finding is that liberal theologians generally deny the religious character of theplaying Godargumenta response which fits in with the curious fact that this argument is used mainly by secular organizations. Synthetic biology, it is therefore maintained, does not offend so much the God of the Bible as a deified Nature. While syntheses of artificial life forms cause some vague uneasiness that life may lose its special meaning, most concerns turn out to be narrowly anthropocentric. As long as synthetic biology creates only new microbial life and does not directly affect human life, it will in all likelihood be considered acceptable. (shrink)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  40. Benedikt Paul Göcke (2013). An Analytic Theologian's Stance on the Existence of God. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (2).
    The existence of God is once again the focus of vivid philosophical discussion. From the point of view of analytic theology, however, people often talk past each (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41. Rob Lovering (2009). On What God Would Do. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (2):87 - 104.
    Many debates in the philosophy of religion, particularly arguments for and against the existence of God, depend on a claim or set of claims about what God (...)qua sovereign, omnipotent, omniscient, and perfectly good beingwould do , either directly or indirectly, in particular cases or in general. Accordingly, before these debates can be resolved we must first settle the more fundamental issue of whether we can know, or at least have justified belief about, what God would do. In this paper, I lay out the possible positions on the issue of whether we can know what God would do, positions I refer to as Broad Skeptical Theism, Broad Epistemic Theism, and Narrow Skeptical Theism. I then examine the implications of each of these views and argue that each presents serious problems for theism. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  42. Stephen R. Palmquist (2009). Kant's Religious Argument for the Existence of God. Faith and Philosophy 26 (1):3-22.
    After reviewing Kants well-known criticisms of the traditional proofs of Gods existence and his preferred moral argument, this paper presents a detailed analysis of a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  66
    Richard Swinburne (1994). The Christian God. Oxford University Press.
    What is it for there to be a God, and what reason is there for supposing him to conform to the claims of Christian doctrine? In this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  44. Hugh Chandler, Paley's 'Proof' of the Existence of God.
    Paleysproofof the existence of God, or some supposed version of it, is well known. In this paper I offer the real thing and two (...)objections to it. One objection is Hume's, and the other is provided by Darwin. (shrink)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  48
    Brian Davies (2011). Thomas Aquinas on God and Evil. Oxford University Press.
    The problem of evil -- Aquinas, philosophy, and theology -- What there is -- Goodness and badness -- God the creator -- God's perfection and goodness -- The creator and (...)evil -- Providence and grace -- The trinity and Christ -- Aquinas on god and evil. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46.  79
    Hugh Chandler, Does God Necessarly Exist?
    If God necessarily exists this has some interesting consequences. In this little note I mention some of these.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  15
    Nancy Ellen Abrams (2015). A God That Could Be Real in the New Scientific Universe. Zygon 50 (2):376-388.
    We are living at the dawn of the first truly scientific picture of the universe-as-a-whole, yet people are still dragging along prescientific ideas about God (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Andrew A. Fingelkurts (2009). Is Our Brain Hardwired to Produce God, or is Our Brain Hardwired to Perceive God? A Systematic Review on the Role of the Brain in Mediating Religious Experience. Cognitive Processing 10 (4):293-326.
    To figure out whether the main empirical questionIs our brain hardwired to believe in and produce God, or is our brain hardwired to perceive and experience (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  26
    Aku Visala (2014). Imago Dei, Dualism, and Evolution: A Philosophical Defense of the Structural Image of God. Zygon 49 (1):101-120.
    Most contemporary theologians have distanced themselves from views that identify the image of God with a capacity or a set of capacities that humans have. This article (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50.  55
    John Foster (2004). The Divine Lawmaker: Lectures on Induction, Laws of Nature, and the Existence of God. Oxford University Press.
    John Foster presents a clear and powerful discussion of a range of topics relating to our understanding of the universe: induction, laws of nature, and the existence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000