111 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Sanford C. Goldberg [36]Sanford Goldberg [35]Stanley Goldberg [11]Steven Goldberg [7]
Sander M. Goldberg [6]Sandy Goldberg [5]Stephen J. Goldberg [3]S. Goldberg [3]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Sanford Goldberg (Northwestern University)
Profile: Stephen Goldberg (American River College)
Profile: Susan Goldberg (Hamilton College)
  1. Kimberley N. Chapman, Eric Pevzner, Joan M. Mangan, Peter Breese, Dorcas Lamunu, Robin Shrestha-Kuwahara, Joseph G. Nakibali & Stefan V. Goldberg (forthcoming). Evaluation of the Informed Consent Process of a Multicenter Tuberculosis Treatment Trial. Ajob Empirical Bioethics:00-00.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Sanford Goldberg (ed.) (forthcoming). Putnam on Brains in Vats. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Sanford C. Goldberg (forthcoming). Should Have Known. Synthese:1-32.
    In this paper I will be arguing that there are cases in which a subject, S, should have known that p, even though, given her state of evidence at the time, she was in no position to know it. My argument for this result will involve making two claims. The uncontroversial claim is this: S should have known that p when another person has, or would have, legitimate expectations regarding S’s epistemic condition, the satisfaction of these expectations would require that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Sanford C. Goldberg (2015). Assertion: On the Philosophical Significance of Assertoric Speech. Oxford University Press.
    Sanford C. Goldberg presents a novel account of the speech act of assertion. He argues that this type of speech act is answerable to an epistemic, context-sensitive norm. On this basis he shows the philosophical importance of assertion for key debates in philosophy of language and mind, epistemology, and ethics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.) (2015). Externalism, Self-Knowledge, and Skepticism: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.
    Written by an international team of leading scholars, this collection of thirteen new essays explores the implications of semantic externalism for self-knowledge and skepticism, bringing recent developments in the philosophy of mind, the philosophy of language, and epistemology to bear on the issue. Structured in three parts, the collection looks at self-knowledge, content transparency, and then meta-semantics and the nature of mental content. The chapters examine a wide range of topics in the philosophy of mind and the philosophy of language, (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.) (2015). The Brain in a Vat. Cambridge University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sander M. Goldberg (2014). (V.) FabriziMores veteresque novosque. Rappresentazioni del passato e del presente di Roma negliAnnales di Ennio. (Pubblicazioni della Facoltà di Lettere e Filosofia dell'Università di Pavia 125.) Pp. 252.Pisa:Edizioni ETS,2012. Paper, €22. ISBN:978-88-467-3454-9. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 64 (2):626-627.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Sandy Goldberg (2014). Epistemic Entitlement and Luck. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (1):n/a-n/a.
    The aim of this paper is to defend a novel characterization of epistemic luck. Helping myself to the notions of epistemic entitlement and adequate explanation, I propose that a true belief suffers from epistemic luck iff an adequate explanation of the fact that the belief acquired is true must appeal to propositions to which the subject herself is not epistemically entitled. The burden of the argument is to show that there is a plausible construal of the notions of epistemic entitlement (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sanford C. Goldberg (2014). Interpersonal Epistemic Entitlements. Philosophical Issues 24 (1):159-183.
    In this paper I argue that the nature of our epistemic entitlement to rely on certain belief-forming processes—perception, memory, reasoning, and perhaps others—is not restricted to one's own belief-forming processes. I argue as well that we can have access to the outputs of others’ processes, in the form of their assertions. These two points support the conclusion that epistemic entitlements are “interpersonal.” I then proceed to argue that this opens the way for a non-standard version of anti-reductionism in the epistemology (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Sandy Goldberg (2013). Self-Trust and Extended Trust. Res Philosophica 90 (2):277-292.
    Where most discussions of trust focus on the rationality of trust, in this paper I explore the doxastic justification of beliefs formed through trust. I examinetwo forms of trust: the self-trust that is involved when one trusts one’s own basic cognitive faculties, and the interpersonal trust that is involved when one trusts another speaker. Both cases involve regarding a source of information as dependable for the truth. In thinking about the epistemic significance regarding a source in this way, I call (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Sanford Goldberg (2013). Disagreement, Defeat, and Assertion1. In David Phiroze Christensen & Jennifer Lackey (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press 167.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Sanford Goldberg (2013). Epistemic Dependence in Testimonial Belief, in the Classroom and Beyond. Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (2):168-186.
    The process of education, and in particular that involving very young children, often involves students' taking their teachers' word on a good many things. At the same time, good education at every level ought to inculcate, develop, and support students' ability to think for themselves. While these two features of education need not be regarded as contradictory, it is not clear how they relate to one another, nor is it clear how (when taken together) these features ought to bear on (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Sanford C. Goldberg (2013). Anonymous Assertions. Episteme 10 (2):135-151.
    This paper addresses how the anonymity of an assertion affects the epistemological dimension of its production by speakers, and its reception by hearers. After arguing that anonymity does have implications in both respects, I go on to argue that at least some of these implications derive from a warranted diminishment in speakers' and hearers' expectations of one another when there are few mechanisms for enforcing the responsibilities attendant to speech. As a result, I argue, anonymous assertions do not carry the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sanford C. Goldberg (2013). Inclusiveness in the Face of Anticipated Disagreement. Synthese 190 (7):1189-1207.
    This paper discusses the epistemic outcomes of following a belief-forming policy of inclusiveness under conditions in which one anticipates systematic disagreement with one’s interlocutors. These cases highlight the possibility of distinctly epistemic costs of inclusiveness, in the form of lost knowledge of or a diminishment in one’s rational confidence in a proposition. It is somewhat controversial whether following a policy of inclusiveness under such circumstances will have such costs; this will depend in part on the correct account of the epistemic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. S. Goldberg (2012). A Novel (and Surprising) Argument Against Justification Internalism. Analysis 72 (2):239-243.
    A variant 'evil demon' case is used to argue against internalism about doxastic justification. The argument is not merely novel but surprising, since evil demon cases have long been used by internalists against externalist accounts of doxastic justification.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Sanford Goldberg (2012). A Reliabilist Foundationalist Coherentism. Erkenntnis 77 (2):187-196.
    While Process Reliabilism has long been regarded by many as a version of Foundationalism, this paper argues that there is a version of Process Reliabilism that can also been seen as at least a partial vindication of Coherentism as well. The significance of this result lies in what it tells us both about the prospects for a plausible Process Reliabilism, but also about the old-school debate between Foundationalists and Coherentists.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Sanford C. Goldberg (2012). Epistemic Extendedness, Testimony, and the Epistemology of Instrument-Based Belief. Philosophical Explorations 15 (2):181 - 197.
    In Relying on others [Goldberg, S. 2010a. Relying on others: An essay in epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press], I argued that, from the perspective of an interest in epistemic assessment, the testimonial belief-forming process should be regarded as interpersonally extended. At the same time, I explicitly rejected the extendedness model for beliefs formed through reliance on a mere mechanism, such as a clock. In this paper, I try to bolster my defense of this asymmetric treatment. I argue that a crucial (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. S. Bartsch O'Gorman, S. M. Goldberg, E. Paratore, N. P. Miller, P. V. Jones, D. S. Levene, R. Martin, R. Syme, J. Ginsburg & C. Pelling (2012). Jakob Andersson. Kingship in the Early Mesopotamian Onomasticon 2800–2200 B. C. E. Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Studia Semitica Upsaliensia, 28. Up-Psala: Uppsala University Library, 2012. Pp. Xxxix, 440. SEK 392 (Pb.). ISBN 978-91-554-8270-1. [REVIEW] Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 106 (1):149-154.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Sandy Goldberg (2011). The Division of Epistemic Labor. Episteme 8 (1):112-125.
    In this paper I formulate the thesis of the Division of Epistemic Labor as a thesis of epistemic dependence, illustrate several ways in which individual subjects are epistemically dependent on one or more of the members of their community in the process of knowledge acquisition, and draw conclusions about the cognitively distributed nature of some knowledge acquisition.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Sanford Goldberg (2011). Putting the Norm of Assertion to Work: The Case of Testimony. In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. OUP Oxford
  21. Sanford Goldberg (2011). Work: The Case of Testimony. In Jessica Brown & Herman Cappelen (eds.), Assertion: New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press 175.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sander M. Goldberg (2010). (A.) Russo (ed.) Quinto Ennio: Le opere minori. Introduzione, edizione critica dei frammenti e commento. Volume 1. Praecepta, Protrepticus, Saturae, Scipio, Sota. (Testi e Studi di Cultura Classica 40.) Pp. 299. Pisa: Edizioni ETS, 2007. Paper, €23. ISBN: 978-88-467-1819-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 60 (1):309.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Sanford Goldberg (2010). Comments on Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice. Episteme 7 (2):138-150.
    Miranda Fricker's Epistemic Injustice is a wide-ranging and important book on a much-neglected topic: the injustice involved in cases in which distrust arises out of prejudice. Fricker has some important things to say about this sort of injustice: its nature, how it arises, what sustains it, and the unhappy outcomes associated with it for the victim and the society in which it takes place. In the course of developing this account, Fricker also develops an account of the epistemology of testimony. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Sanford Goldberg (2010). Relying on Others: An Essay in Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Sanford Goldberg investigates the role that others play in our attempts to acquire knowledge of the world.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Sanford Goldberg (2010). The Metasemantics of Memory. Philosophical Studies 153 (1):95-107.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Sanford C. Goldberg (2010). The Epistemology of Silence. In Adrian Haddock, Alan Millar & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), Social Epistemology. OUP Oxford 243--261.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Stephen J. Goldberg (2010). The Gestural Imagination: Toward a Phenomenology of Duration in the Art of Chinese Writing. Comparative and Continental Philosophy 1 (2):211-221.
    This essay represents a reflection on the nature of shufa, the Chinese “art of writing,” and its ontological grounding as a continuous, “durational transcription,” of an inscriptional event, producing a phenomenology of “viewing.” This distinguishes it from ordinary writing (xiezi) in which attention is focused on the lexical meaning of the written characters (i.e., an experience of “reading”). Viewing a calligraphic inscription actually unfolding in time (i.e., as a dynamical structure or “temporal object event”), however, raises an interesting theoretical question (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Steven Goldberg, Neuroscience and the Free Exercise of Religion.
    Recent developments in neuroscience that purport to reduce religious experience to specific parts of the brain will not diminish the fundamental cultural or legal standing of religion. William James debunked this possibility in The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902) when he noted that “the organic causation of a religious state of mind” no more refutes religion than the argument that scientific theories are so caused refutes science. But there will be incremental legal change in areas like civil commitment where judges (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. S. Goldberg (2009). The Possibility of Knowledge, by Quassim Cassam. Mind 118 (471):815-820.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. S. Goldberg (2009). The Social Virtues: Two Accounts. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 24 (4):237-248.
    Social (epistemic) virtues are the virtues bound up with those forms of inquiry involved in social routes to knowledge. A thoroughly individualistic account of the social virtues endorses two claims: (1) we can fully characterize the nature of the social virtues independent of the social factors that are typically in play when these virtues are exemplified, and (2) even when a subject’s route to knowledge is social, the only epistemic virtues that are relevant to her acquisition of knowledge are those (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Sandy Goldberg (2009). Review of Katalin Farkas, The Subject's Point of View. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (5).
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Sanford Goldberg (2009). Experts, Semantic and Epistemic. Noûs 43 (4):581-598.
    In this paper I argue that the tendency to defer in matters semantic is rationalized by our reliance on the say-so of others for much of what we know about the world. The result, I contend, is a new and distinctly epistemic source of support for the doctrine of attitude anti-individualism.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Sanford Goldberg (2009). Introduction. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):1-3.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Sanford Goldberg (2009). The Knowledge Account of Assertion and the Conditions on Testimonial Knowledge. In Duncan Pritchard & Patrick Greenough (eds.), Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Sanford C. Goldberg (2009). Reliabilism in Philosophy. Philosophical Studies 142 (1):105 - 117.
    The following three propositions appear to be individually defensible but jointly inconsistent: (1) reliability is a necessary condition on epistemic justification; (2) on contested matters in philosophy, my beliefs are not reliably formed; (3) some of these beliefs are epistemically justified. I explore the nature and scope of the problem, examine and reject some candidate solutions, compare the issue with ones arising in discussions about disagreement, and offer a brief assessment of our predicament.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stephen J. Goldberg (2009). Philosophical Reflection and Visual Art in Traditional China. In David Edward Jones & Ellen R. Klein (eds.), Asian Texts, Asian Contexts: Encounters with Asian Philosophies and Religions. State University of New York Press
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Sanford Goldberg (2008). Internalism, Externalism and the Epistemology of Linguistic Understanding. Communication and Cognition. Monographies 41 (3-4):191-216.
  38. Sanford Goldberg (2008). Must Differences in Cognitive Value Be Transparent? Erkenntnis 69 (2):165 - 187.
    Frege’s ‘differential dubitability’ test is a test for differences in cognitive value: if one can rationally believe that p while simultaneously doubting that q, then the contents p and q amount to different ‘cognitive values’. If subject S is rational, does her simultaneous adoption of different attitudes towards p and q require that the difference between p and q (as cognitive values) be transparent to her? It is natural to think so. But I argue that, if attitude anti-individualism is true, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Sanford Goldberg (2008). Metaphysical Realism and Thought. American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):149 - 163.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Sanford C. Goldberg (2008). Testimonial Knowledge in Early Childhood, Revisited. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (1):1–36.
    Many epistemologists agree that even very young children sometimes acquire knowledge through testimony. In this paper I address two challenges facing this view. The first (building on a point made in Lackey (2005)) is the defeater challenge, which is to square the hypothesis that very young children acquire testimonial knowledge with the fact that children (whose cognitive immaturity prevents them from having or appreciating reasons) cannot be said to satisfy the No-Defeaters condition on knowledge. The second is the extension challenge, (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Sanford Goldberg (2007). Anti-Individualism and Knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74 (2):515–518.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Sanford Goldberg (2007). Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. Cambridge University Press.
    Sanford Goldberg argues that a proper account of the communication of knowledge through speech has anti-individualistic implications for both epistemology and the philosophy of mind and language. In Part 1 he offers a novel argument for anti-individualism about mind and language, the view that the contents of one's thoughts and the meanings of one's words depend for their individuation on one's social and natural environment. In Part 2 he discusses the epistemic dimension of knowledge communication, arguing that the epistemic characteristics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Sanford Goldberg (2007). How Lucky Can You Get? Synthese 158 (3):315 - 327.
    In this paper, I apply Duncan Pritchard’s anti-luck epistemology to the case of knowledge through testimony. I claim (1) that Pritchard’s distinction between veritic and reflective luck provides a nice taxonomy of testimony cases, (2) that the taxonomic categories that emerge can be used to suggest precisely what epistemic statuses are transmissible through testimony, and (3) that the resulting picture can make clear how testimony can actually be knowledge-generating.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Sanford Goldberg (2007). Introduction. In Sanford C. Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Clarendon Press
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Sanford Goldberg (ed.) (2007). Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology presents eleven specially written essays exploring these debates in metaphysics and epistemology and ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Sanford C. Goldberg (2007). Anti-Individualism, Content Preservation, and Discursive Justification. Nos 41 (2):178�203.
    Most explorations of the epistemic implications of Semantic Anti- Individualism (SAI) focus on issues of self-knowledge (first-person au- thority) and/or external-world skepticism. Less explored has been SAIs implications forthe epistemology of reasoning. In this paperI argue that SAI has some nontrivial implications on this score. I bring these out by reflecting on a problem first raised by Boghossian (1992). Whereas Boghos- sians main interest was in establishing the incompatibility of SAI and the a priority of logical abilities (Boghossian 1992: 22), (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Sanford C. Goldberg (2007). Semantic Externalism and Epistemic Illusions. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press 235--252.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Ariel Linden & Steven Goldberg (2007). The Case‐Mix of Chronic Illness Hospitalization Rates in a Managed Care Population: Implications for Health Management Programmes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (6):947-951.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Sanford Goldberg (2006). An Anti-Individualistic Semantics for 'Empty' Natural Kind Terms. Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):147-168.
    Several authors (Boghossian 1998; Segal 2000) allege that 'empty' would-be natural kind terms are a problem for anti-individualistic semantics. In this paper I rebut the charge by providing an anti-individualistic semantics for such terms.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Sanford Goldberg (2006). Reductionism and the Distinctiveness of Testimonial Knowledge. In Jennifer Lackey & Ernest Sosa (eds.), The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford University Press 127--44.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 111