55 found
Sort by:
See also:
Profile: Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (Oxford University)
  1. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (forthcoming). Grounding is Not a Strict Order. Journal of the American Philosophical Association.
    The paper argues that grounding is neither irreflexive, nor asymmetric, nor transitive. In arguing for that conclusion the paper also arguesthat truthmaking is neither irreflexive, nor asymmetric, nor transitive.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (forthcoming). Leibniz on Substance in the Discourse on Metaphysics. In T. Stoneham & P. Lodge (eds.), Locke and Leibniz on Substance. Routledge.
    In the Discourse on Metaphysics Leibniz put forward his famous complete-concept definition of substance. Sometimes this definition is glossed as stating that a substance is an entity with a concept so complete that it contains all its predicates, and it is thought that it follows directly from Leibniz’s theory of truth. Now, an adequate definition of substance should not apply to accidents. But, as I shall point out, if Leibniz’s theory of truth is correct then an accident is an entity (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (forthcoming). The Principles of Contradiction, Sufficient Reason, and Identity of Indiscernibles. In Maria Rosa Antognazza (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Leibniz. Oxford University Press.
    Leibniz was a philosopher of principles: the principles of Contradiction, of Sufficient Reason, of Identity of Indiscernibles, of Plenitude, of the Best, and of Continuity are among the most famous Leibnizian principles. In this article I shall focus on the first three principles; I shall discuss various formulations of the principles (sect. 1), what it means for these theses to have the status of principles or axioms in Leibniz’s philosophy (sect. 2), the fundamental character of the Principles of Contradiction and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Eduardo Barrio (forthcoming). Truthmaker Maximalism Defended Again. Analysis:anu121.
    n this note we argue that Milne’s new effort does not refute Truthmaker Maximalism. In section 2 we shall argue that Milne is still begging the question against Truthmaker Maximalism. In section 3 we shall argue that, even assimilating M to the Liar does not force the truthmaker maximalist to maintain the ‘dull option’ that M does not express a proposition. There are other options open and they invalidate the logic that Mlne uses in his proof. In section 4 we (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2014). Leibniz's Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles. Oxford University Press.
    Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra presents an original study of the place and role of the Identity of Indiscernibles in Leibniz's philosophy. The Principle of the Identity of Indiscernibles rules out numerically distinct but perfectly similar things; Leibniz derived it from more basic principles and used it to establish important philosophical theses. Rodriguez-Pereyra aims to establish what Leibniz meant by the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles, what his arguments for and from it were, and to assess those arguments and Leibniz's claims about the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2013). Resemblance Nominalism, Conjunctions and Truthmakers. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 113 (1):21-38.
    The resemblance nominalist says that the truthmaker of 〈Socrates is white〉 ultimately involves only concrete particulars that resemble each other. Furthermore he also says that Socrates and Plato are the truthmakers of 〈Socrates resembles Plato〉, and Socrates and Aristotle those of 〈Socrates resembles Aristotle〉. But this, combined with a principle about the truthmakers of conjunctions, leads to the apparently implausible conclusion that 〈Socrates resembles Plato and Socrates resembles Aristotle〉 and 〈Socrates resembles Plato and Plato resembles Aristotle〉 have the same truthmakers, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2013). The Language of Publication of "Analytic" Philosophy. Critica 45 (133):83-90.
    This note argues that research in analytical philosophy broadly conceived should be published exclusively in English. Reasons are given for this and the thesis is defended against thirteen objections.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2013). The Subtraction Arguments for Metaphysical Nihilism: Compared and Defended. In Tyron Goldschmidt (ed.), The Puzzle of Existence. Why is There Something rather than Nothing? Routledge. 197-214.
    The subtraction argument, originally put forward by Thomas Baldwin (1996), is intended to establish Metaphysical Nihilism, the thesis that there could have been no concrete objects. Some modified versions of the argument have been proposed in order to avoid some difficulties faced by the original argument. In this paper I shall concentrate on two of those versions, the so-called subtraction argument* (presented and defended in Rodriguez-Pereyra 1997, 2000, 2002), and Efird and Stoneham’s recent version of the argument (Efird and Stoneham (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2012). Leibniz's Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in His Letter to Casati (with Transcription and Translation). The Leibniz Review 22:137-150.
    Leibniz’s short letter to the mathematician and physicist Ludovico Casati of 1689 is a short but interesting text on the Principle of Identity of Indiscernibles, to which it is entirely dedicated. Since there is no watermark in the paper of the letter, the letter is difficult to date, but it is likely that it was written during Leibniz’s stay in Rome, sometime between April and November of 1689 (A 2 2 287–8). When addressing the letter, Leibniz wrote ‘Casani’, but this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2011). Truth and Ontology, by Trenton Merricks. [REVIEW] Mind 120 (478):542-552.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Paul Lodge (2011). Infinite Analysis, Lucky Proof, and Guaranteed Proof in Leibniz. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 93 (2):222-236.
    According to one of Leibniz's theories of contingency a proposition is contingent if and only if it cannot be proved in a finite number of steps. It has been argued that this faces the Problem of Lucky Proof , namely that we could begin by analysing the concept ‘Peter’ by saying that ‘Peter is a denier of Christ and …’, thereby having proved the proposition ‘Peter denies Christ’ in a finite number of steps. It also faces a more general but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2009). Leibniz : Mind-Body Causation and Pre-Established Harmony. In Robin Le Poidevin, Peter Simons, Andrew McGonigal & Ross Cameron (eds.), The Routledge Companion to Metaphysics. Routledge. 109-118.
    Causation was an important topic of philosophical reflection during the Seventeenth Century. This reflection centred around certain particular problems about causation, one of which was the problem of causation between mind and body. The doctrine of the pre-established harmony is Leibniz's response to the problem of causation between mind and body. In this chapter I shall (a) explain the problem of mind-body causation; (b) explain Leibniz's pre-established harmony; and (c) assess his case for it.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2009). The Disjunction and Conjunction Theses. Mind 118 (470):427-443.
    This paper is a response to replies by Dan López de Sa and Mark Jago to my ‘Truthmaking, Entailment, and the Conjuction Thesis’. In that paper, my main aim was to argue against the Entailment Principle by arguing against the Conjunction Thesis, which is entailed by the Entailment Principle. In the course of so doing, although not essential for my project in that paper, I defended the Disjunction Thesis. López de Sa has objected both to my defence of the Disjunction (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Descartes's Substance Dualism and His Independence Conception of Substance. Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (1):69-89.
    Descartes maintained substance dualism, the thesis that no substance has both mental and material properties. His main argument for this thesis, the so-called separability argument from the Sixth Meditation (AT VII: 78) has long puzzled readers. In this paper I argue that Descartes’ independence conception of substance (which Descartes presents in article 51 of the Principles) is crucial for the success of the separability argument and that Descartes used this conception of substance to defend his argument for substance dualism from (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra, Nominalism in Metaphysics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2008). Postscript to Why Truthmakers. In E. J. Lowe & A. Rami (eds.), Truth and Truth-making. Acumen.
    In this chapter I shall reply to a pair of articles in which the main contention of my “Why truthmakers” – namely, that an important class of synthetic true propositions have entities as truth-makers – is rejected. In §§1–5 I reply to Jennifer Hornsby’s “Truth without Truthmaking Entities” (2005) and in §§6–7 I reply to Julian Dodd’s “Negative Truths and Truthmaker Principles” (2007).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2007). El hacer verdad, la implicación y la tesis de la conjunción. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 33 (1):55-85.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2006). How Not to Trivialise the Identity of Indiscernibles. In P. F. Strawson & A. Chakrabarti (eds.), Concepts, Properties and Qualities. Ashgate.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2006). Truthmakers. Philosophy Compass 1 (2):186–200.
    This bulletin contains a summary of the main topics of discussion in truthmaker theory, namely: the definition of truthmakers, problems with Truthmaker Necessitarianism and Truthmaker Maximalism, the ontological burden of truthmakers and the recalcitrant topic of truthmakers for negative truths.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2006). Truthmaking, Entailment, and the Conjunction Thesis. Mind 115 (460):957-982.
    In this paper I undermine the Entailment Principle according to which if an entity is a truthmaker for a certain proposition and this proposition entails another, then the entity in question is a truthmaker for the latter proposition. I argue that the two most promising versions of the principle entail the popular but false Conjunction Thesis, namely that a truthmaker for a conjunction is a truthmaker for its conjuncts. One promising version of the principle understands entailment as strict implication but (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2006). Truthmaker Maximalism Defended. Analysis 66 (3):260–264.
    Peter Milne has tried to refure Truthmaker Maximalism. the thesis that every truth has a truthmaker, by producing a simple and direct counterexample to it, the sentence M: This sentence has no truthmaker. I argue that, contrary to what Milne argues, on Truthmaker Maximalism M is equivalent to the Liar, which gives the truthmaker maximalist a way to defend his position from Milne's counterexample: to argue that M expresses no proposition.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2005). Why Truthmakers. In H. Beebee & J. Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: the contemporary debate. Oxford University Press. 17-31.
    Consider a certain red rose. The proposition that the rose is red is true because the rose is red. One might say as well that the proposition that the rose is red is made true by the rose’s being red. This, it has been thought, does not commit one to a truthmaker of the proposition that the rose is red. For there is no entity that makes the proposition true. What makes it true is how the rose is, and how (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). The Bundle Theory is Compatible with Distinct but Indiscernible Particulars. Analysis 64 (1).
    1. The Bundle Theory I shall discuss is a theory about the nature of substances or concrete particulars, like apples, chairs, atoms, stars and people. The point of the Bundle Theory is to avoid undesirable entities like substrata that allegedly constitute particulars. The version of the Bundle Theory I shall discuss takes particulars to be entirely constituted by the universals they instantiate.' Thus particulars are said to be just bundles of universals. Together with the claim that it is necessary that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Leibniz's Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in Primary Truths. In M. Carrara, A. M. Nunziante & G. Tomasi (eds.), Individuals, minds and bodies: themes from Leibniz. Franz Steiner Verlag.
    In this paper I reconstruct Leibniz's argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in his *Primary Truths*. I criticise the alternative interpretation put forward by Cover and O'Leary-Hawthorne and defend my own interpretation, both on philosophical and hermeneutical grounds.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Modal Realism and Metaphysical Nihilism. Mind 113 (452):683-704.
    In this paper I argue that Modal Realism, the thesis that there exist non-actual possible individuals and worlds, can be made compatible with Metaphysical Nihilism, the thesis that it is possible that nothing concrete exists. Modal Realism as developed by Lewis rules out the possibility of a world where nothing concrete exists and so conflicts with Metaphysical Nihilism. In the paper I argue that Modal Realism can be modified so as to be compatible with Metaphysical Nihilism. Such a modification makes (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2004). Paradigms and Russell's Resemblance Regress. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (4):644 – 651.
    Resemblance Nominalism is the view that denies universals and tropes and claims that what makes F-things F is their resemblances. A famous argument against Resemblance Nominalism is Russell's regress of resemblances, according to which the resemblance nominalist falls into a vicious infinite regress. Aristocratic Resemblance Nominalism, as opposed to Egalitarian Resemblance Nominalism, is the version of Resemblance Nominalism that claims that what makes F-things F is that they resemble the F-paradigms. In this paper I attempt to show that a recently (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Hallvard Lillehammer & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.) (2003). Real Metaphysics: Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor. New York: Routledge.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Hallvard Lillehammer & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.) (2003). Real Metaphysics. Routledge.
    This text brings together a collection of new essays by a number of philosophers to honor Hugh Mellor's contribution to philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Hallvard Lillehammer & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.) (2003). Real Metaphysics. Essays in Honour of D. H. Mellor. Routledge.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2003). Review: Facing Facts. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (448):780-786.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2003). Resemblance Nominalism and Counterparts: Reply to Bird. Analysis 63 (3):229–237.
    In my book *Resemblance Nominalism* I argued that the truthmakers of ´a and b resemble each other´ are just a and b. In his "Resemblance Nominalism and counterparts" Alexander Bird objects to my claim that the truthmakers of ´a and b resemble each other´ are just a and b. In this paper I respond to Bird´s objections.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2003). Review of "Facing Facts", by S. Neale. [REVIEW] Mind 112 (448):780-786.
  33. Gonzalo Rodríguez-Pereyra (2003). What is Wrong with the Relational Theory of Change? In Hallvard Lillehammer & Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (eds.), Real Metaphysics. Routledge. 184--195.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra & Hallvard Lillehammer (eds.) (2003). Real Metaphysics. Routledge.
    Real Metaphysics brings together new articles by leading metaphysicians to honour Hugh Mellor's outstanding contribution to metaphysics. Some of the most outstanding minds of current times shed new light on all the main topics in metaphysics: truth, causation, dispositions and properties, explanation, and time. At the end of the book, Hugh Mellor responds to the issues raised by each of the thirteen contributors and gives us new insight into his own highly influential work on metaphysics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002). Metaphysical Nihilism Defended: Reply to Lowe and Paseau. Analysis 62 (2):172–180.
    I believe in metaphysical nihilism, the thesis that there could have been no concrete objects, because I believe in a version of the subtraction argument, the subtraction argument*, that proves it. But both Jonathan Lowe (2002) and Alexander Paseau (2002) express doubts about the subtraction argument*. Paseau thinks the argument is invalid, and Lowe argues that invoking concrete* objects is unnecessary. Furthermore Lowe attempts to rebut my objections (Rodriguez-Pereyra 2000) to his anti-nihilist argument (Lowe 1998). In this paper I defend (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002). Resemblance Nominalism. Oxford University Press.
    Gardeners, poets, lovers, and philosophers are all interested in the redness of roses; but only philosophers wonder how it is that two different roses can share the same property. Are red things red because they resemble each other? Or do they resemble each other because they are red? Since the 1970s philosophers have tended to favour the latter view, and held that a satisfactory account of properties must involve the postulation of either universals or tropes. But Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra revives the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002). Resemblance Nominalism: A Solution to the Problem of Universals. Oxford University Press.
    Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra offers a fresh philosophical account of properties. How is it that two different things (such as two red roses) can share the same property (redness)? According to resemblance nominalism, things have their properties in virtue of resembling other things. This unfashionable view is championed with clarity and rigor.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2002). The Problem of Universals and the Limits of Conceptual Analysis. Philosophical Papers 31 (1):39-47.
    In this paper I argue, contra Fraser MacBride, that conceptual analysis, and in particular the distinction between numerical and qualitative identity, can solve the Problem of Universals, whether understood as the One over Many or the as the Many over One. In this paper I show why the solutions needed to solve either version of the problem must be in terms of truthmakers, and that the distinction between numerical and qualitative identity is not sufficient to solve them.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2001). Resemblance Nominalism and Russell's Regress. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (3):395 – 408.
    Bertrand Russell argued that any attempt to get rid of universals in favor of resemblances fails. He argued that no resemblance theory could avoid postulating a universal of resemblance without falling prey to a vicious infinite regress. He added that admitting such a universal of resemblance made it pointless to avoid other universals. In this paper I defend resemblance nominalism from both of Russell's points by arguing that (a) resemblance nominalism can avoid the postulation of a universal of resemblance without (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000). El problema metafísico de la verdad. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 26 (2):351-59.
    In this paper I present what I call the 'Metaphysical Problem of Truth', which consists in explaining in virtue of what all true sentences are true, and argue that a version of the Correspondence Theory of Truth is the most plausible solution to this problem.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000). Lowe's Argument Against Nihilism. Analysis 60 (4):335–340.
    By nihilism I shall understand the thesis that it is metaphysically possible that there are no concrete objects. I think there is a version of an argu- ment, the subtraction argument, which proves nihilism nicely (see Baldwin 1996 and Rodriguez-Pereyra 1997). But E. J. Lowe, who is no nihilist, has a very interesting argument purporting to show that concrete objects exist necessarily (Lowe 1996, 1998). In this paper I shall defend nihilism from Lowe’s argument.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (2000). What is the Problem of Universals? Mind 109 (434):255-273.
    In this article I address the Problem of Universals by answering questions about what facts a solution to the Problem of Universals should explain and how the explanation should go. I argue that a solution to the Problem of Universals explains the facts the Problem of Universals is about by giving the truthmakers (as opposed to the conceptual content and the ontological commitments) of the sentences stating those facts. I argue that the sentences stating the relevant facts are those like (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1999). Leibniz's Argument for the Identity of Indiscernibles in His Correspondence with Clarke. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (4):429 – 438.
    In Section 21 of his fifth letter to Clarke Leibniz attempts to derive the Identity of Indiscernibles from an application of the Principle of Sufficient Reason to God´s act of creation, namely that God has a reason to create the world he creates. In this paper I argue that this argument fails, not just because the Identity of Indiscernibles is false, but because there is a counterexample to one of the premises that Leibniz cannot satisfactorily rule out.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1999). Resemblance Nominalism and the Imperfect Community. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):965-982.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1999). Truthmaking and the Slingshot. In Uwe Meixner & Peter Simons (eds.), Metaphysics in the Post-Metaphysical Age: Papers of the 22nd International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society.
    In this paper I shall show how the Correspondence Theory of Truth can block Davidson’s Slingshot (Davidson 1984), which threatens to make the Correspondence Theory collapse. In particular I shall show that the Slingshot is unsound − and in so doing I shall show that the Correspondence Theory has some metaphysical commitments about the nature of facts.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1998). Mellor's Facts and Chances of Causation. Analysis 58 (3):175–181.
    Mellor´s theory of causation has two components, one according to which causes raise their effects´ chances, and one according to which causation links facts. I argue that these two components are not independent from each other and, in particular, that Mellor´s thesis that causation links facts requires his thesis that causes raise their effects´ chances, since without the latter thesis Mellor cannot stop the slingshot argument, an argument that is a threat to any theory postulating facts as the relata of (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1998). Searle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Slingshot. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):513-522.
1 — 50 / 55