68 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Alison Gopnik [63]A. Gopnik [5]
  1.  6
    Alison Gopnik (1997). Words, Thoughts, and Theories. MIT Press.
    Recently, the theory theory has led to much interesting research. However, this is the first book to look at the theory in extensive detail and to systematically contrast it with other theories.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   119 citations  
  2. Alison Gopnik (1993). How We Know Our Minds: The Illusion of First-Person Knowledge of Intentionality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):1.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   147 citations  
  3. Alison Gopnik & H. M. Wellman (1992). Why the Child's Theory of Mind Really is a Theory. Mind and Language 7 (1-2):145-71.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   114 citations  
  4.  52
    Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.) (2007). Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press.
    Understanding causal structure is a central task of human cognition. Causal learning underpins the development of our concepts and categories, our intuitive theories, and our capacities for planning, imagination and inference. During the last few years, there has been an interdisciplinary revolution in our understanding of learning and reasoning: Researchers in philosophy, psychology, and computation have discovered new mechanisms for learning the causal structure of the world. This new work provides a rigorous, formal basis for theory theories of concepts and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  5.  13
    Stephanie Denison, Elizabeth Bonawitz, Alison Gopnik & Thomas L. Griffiths (2013). Rational Variability in Children's Causal Inferences: The Sampling Hypothesis. Cognition 126 (2):285-300.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  6.  27
    Alison Gopnik (1990). Developing the Idea of Intentionality: Children's Theories of Mind. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 20 (1):89-114.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   65 citations  
  7.  25
    Alison Gopnik (1988). Conceptual and Semantic Development as Theory Change: The Case of Object Permanence. Mind and Language 3 (3):197-216.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   70 citations  
  8.  13
    Daphna Buchsbaum, Alison Gopnik, Thomas L. Griffiths & Patrick Shafto (2011). Children’s Imitation of Causal Action Sequences is Influenced by Statistical and Pedagogical Evidence. Cognition 120 (3):331-340.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  9.  38
    Alison Gopnik (2004). Mechanisms of Theory Formation in Young Children. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8 (8):371-377.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  10.  41
    Alison Gopnik, Clark Glymour, David M. Sobel, Laura E. Schulz, Tamar Kushnir & David Danks (2004). A Theory of Causal Learning in Children: Causal Maps and Bayes Nets. Psychological Review 111 (1):3-32.
    We propose that children employ specialized cognitive systems that allow them to recover an accurate “causal map” of the world: an abstract, coherent, learned representation of the causal relations among events. This kind of knowledge can be perspicuously understood in terms of the formalism of directed graphical causal models, or “Bayes nets”. Children’s causal learning and inference may involve computations similar to those for learning causal Bayes nets and for predicting with them. Experimental results suggest that 2- to 4-year-old children (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  11.  2
    Clark Glymour, Alison Gopnik, David M. Sobel & Laura E. Schulz, Causal Learning Mechanisms in Very Young Children: Two-, Three-, and Four-Year-Olds Infer Causal Relations From Patterns of Variation and Covariation.
  12.  5
    Caren M. Walker, Tania Lombrozo, Cristine H. Legare & Alison Gopnik (2014). Explaining Prompts Children to Privilege Inductively Rich Properties. Cognition 133 (2):343-357.
    Two studies examined the specificity of effects of explanation on learning by prompting 3- to 6-year-old children to explain a mechanical toy and comparing what they learned about the toy’s causal and non-causal properties to children who only observed the toy, both with and without accompanying verbalization. In Study 1, children were experimentally assigned to either explain or observe the mechanical toy. In Study 2, children were classified according to whether the content of their response to an undirected prompt involved (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  13.  56
    Alison Gopnik (1998). Explanation as Orgasm. Minds and Machines 8 (1):101-118.
    I argue that explanation should be thought of as the phenomenological mark of the operation of a particular kind of cognitive system, the theory-formation system. The theory-formation system operates most clearly in children and scientists but is also part of our everyday cognition. The system is devoted to uncovering the underlying causal structure of the world. Since this process often involves active intervention in the world, in the case of systematic experiment in scientists, and play in children, the cognitive system (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  14.  9
    Elizabeth Baraff Bonawitz, Darlene Ferranti, Rebecca Saxe, Alison Gopnik, Andrew N. Meltzoff, James Woodward & Laura E. Schulz (2010). Just Do It? Investigating the Gap Between Prediction and Action in Toddlers’ Causal Inferences. Cognition 115 (1):104-117.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  15. Alison Gopnik (2003). The Theory Theory as an Alternative to the Innateness Hypothesis. In Louise M. Antony (ed.), Chomsky and His Critics. Blackwell 238--254.
  16.  14
    Elizabeth Bonawitz, Stephanie Denison, Thomas L. Griffiths & Alison Gopnik (2014). Probabilistic Models, Learning Algorithms, and Response Variability: Sampling in Cognitive Development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (10):497-500.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  6
    Christopher G. Lucas, Sophie Bridgers, Thomas L. Griffiths & Alison Gopnik (2014). When Children Are Better Learners Than Adults: Developmental Differences in Learning the Forms of Causal Relationships. Cognition 131 (2):284-299.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18.  73
    Alison Gopnik (1997). The Scientist as Child. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):485-514.
    This paper argues that there are powerful similarities between cognitive development in children and scientific theory change. These similarities are best explained by postulating an underlying abstract set of rules and representations that underwrite both types of cognitive abilities. In fact, science may be successful largely because it exploits powerful and flexible cognitive devices that were designed by evolution to facilitate learning in young children. Both science and cognitive development involve abstract, coherent systems of entities and rules, theories. In both (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  19.  18
    Thierry Nazzi & Alison Gopnik (2001). Linguistic and Cognitive Abilities in Infancy: When Does Language Become a Tool for Categorization? Cognition 80 (3):B11-B20.
  20. E. Bonawitz, D. Ferranti, R. Saxe, A. Gopnik, A. Meltzoff, J. Woodward & L. Schulz (2010). Just Do It? Toddlers' Ability to Integrate Prediction and Action. Cognition 115:104-117.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21.  23
    Thomas L. Griffiths, David M. Sobel, Joshua B. Tenenbaum & Alison Gopnik (2011). Bayes and Blickets: Effects of Knowledge on Causal Induction in Children and Adults. Cognitive Science 35 (8):1407-1455.
    People are adept at inferring novel causal relations, even from only a few observations. Prior knowledge about the probability of encountering causal relations of various types and the nature of the mechanisms relating causes and effects plays a crucial role in these inferences. We test a formal account of how this knowledge can be used and acquired, based on analyzing causal induction as Bayesian inference. Five studies explored the predictions of this account with adults and 4-year-olds, using tasks in which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  22.  12
    Alison Gopnik & Clark Glymour (2002). Causal Maps and Bayes Nets: A Cognitive and Computational Account of Theory-Formation. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen P. Stich & Michael Siegal (eds.), The Cognitive Basis of Science. Cambridge University Press 117--132.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  23.  5
    Tamar Kushnir, Alison Gopnik, Nadia Chernyak, Elizabeth Seiver & Henry M. Wellman (2015). Developing Intuitions About Free Will Between Ages Four and Six. Cognition 138:79-101.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  79
    Alison Gopnik (2010). Could David Hume Have Known About Buddhism? Hume Studies 35 (1/2):5-28.
    Philosophers and Buddhist scholars have noted the affinities between David Hume's empiricism and the Buddhist philosophical tradition. I show that it was possible for Hume to have had contact with Buddhist philosophical views. The link to Buddhism comes through the Jesuit scholars at the Royal College of La Fleche. Charles Francois Dolu was a Jesuit missionary who lived at the Royal College from 1723-1740, overlapping with Hume's stay. He had extensive knowledge both of other religions and cultures and of scientific (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Alison Gopnik & Eric Schwitzgebel (1998). Whose Concepts Are They, Anyway? The Role of Philosophical Intuition in Empirical Psychology. In M. R. DePaul & William Ramsey (eds.), Rethinking Intuition. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield 75--91.
    This chapter examines several ways in which philosophical attention to intuition can contribute to empirical scientific psychology. The authors then discuss one prevalent misuse of intuition. An unspoken assumption of much argumentation in the philosophy of mind has been that to articulate our folk psychological intuitions, our ordinary concepts of belief, truth, meaning, and so forth, is itself sufficient to give a theoretical account of what belief, truth, meaning, and so forth, actually are. It is believed that this assumption rests (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  26. Laura Schulz, Tamar Kushnir & Alison Gopnik (2007). Learning From Doing: Intervention and Causal Inference. In Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press 67--85.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  32
    Deena S. Weisberg & Alison Gopnik (2013). Pretense, Counterfactuals, and Bayesian Causal Models: Why What Is Not Real Really Matters. Cognitive Science 37 (7):1368-1381.
    Young children spend a large portion of their time pretending about non-real situations. Why? We answer this question by using the framework of Bayesian causal models to argue that pretending and counterfactual reasoning engage the same component cognitive abilities: disengaging with current reality, making inferences about an alternative representation of reality, and keeping this representation separate from reality. In turn, according to causal models accounts, counterfactual reasoning is a crucial tool that children need to plan for the future and learn (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  6
    Alison Gopnik (1996). 11 Theories and Modules; Creation Myths, Developmental Realities, and Neurath's Boat. In Peter Carruthers & Peter K. Smith (eds.), Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press 169.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  29.  4
    Alison Gopnik (1993). Psychopsychology. Consciousness and Cognition 2 (4):264-280.
  30.  9
    Alison Gopnik (1993). Theories and Illusions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):90.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  31.  12
    Tamar Kushnir, Alison Gopnik, Chris Lucas & Laura Schulz (2010). Inferring Hidden Causal Structure. Cognitive Science 34 (1):148-160.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. Thomas Richardson, Laura Schulz & Alison Gopnik (2007). Data-Mining Probabilists or Experimental Determinists. In Alison Gopnik & Laura Schulz (eds.), Causal Learning: Psychology, Philosophy, and Computation. Oxford University Press 208--230.
  33.  24
    Alison Gopnik (2011). A Unified Account of Abstract Structure and Conceptual Change: Probabilistic Models and Early Learning Mechanisms. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (3):129-130.
    We need not propose, as Carey does, a radical discontinuity between core cognition, which is responsible for abstract structure, and language and which are responsible for learning and conceptual change. From a probabilistic models view, conceptual structure and learning reflect the same principles, and they are both in place from the beginning.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  15
    Chris Lucas, Alison Gopnik & Thomas L. Griffiths (2010). Developmental Differences in Learning the Forms of Causal Relationships. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society 28--52.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  13
    Alison Gopnik (2007). Why Babies Are More Conscious Than We Are. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 30 (5-6):503-504.
    Block argues for a method and a substantive thesis – that consciousness overflows accessibility. The method can help answer the question of what it is like to be a baby. Substantively, infant consciousness may be accessible in some ways but not others. But development itself can also add important methodological tools and substantive insights to the study of consciousness.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36.  31
    Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1998). Theories Vs. Modules: To the Max and Beyond: A Reply to Poulin-Dubois and to Stich and Nichols. Mind and Language 13 (3):450-456.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  37.  11
    Rachel Wu, Alison Gopnik, Daniel C. Richardson & Natasha Z. Kirkham (2010). Social Cues Support Learning About Objects From Statistics in Infancy. In S. Ohlsson & R. Catrambone (eds.), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  13
    Daphna Buchsbaum, Thomas L. Griffiths, Alison Gopnik & Dare Baldwin (2009). Learning From Actions and Their Consequences: Inferring Causal Variables From Continuous Sequences of Human Action. In N. A. Taatgen & H. van Rijn (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. 134.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39.  11
    Herbert A. Simon, Discovering Explanations, Clark Glymour, Andy Clark, Twisted Tales, Alison Gopnik & Explanation as Orgasm (1998). Cognition and Explanation. Cognition 8 (1).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  11
    Alison Gopnik (1996). Reply to Commentators. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):552-561.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  41.  3
    Caren M. Walker, Sophie Bridgers & Alison Gopnik (2016). The Early Emergence and Puzzling Decline of Relational Reasoning: Effects of Knowledge and Search on Inferring Abstract Concepts. Cognition 156:30-40.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  2
    Alison Gopnik (1993). Theories and Qualities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (1):44.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  43.  13
    A. D. Rosati, E. D. Knowles, C. W. Kalish, A. Gopnik, D. R. Ames & M. W. Morris (2001). What Theory of Mind Can Teach Social Psychology: Traits as Intentional Terms. In Bertram Malle, L. J. Moses & Dare Baldwin (eds.), Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. MIT Press
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  30
    Alison Gopnik, Henry M. Wellman, Susan A. Gelman & Andrew N. Meltzoff (2010). A Computational Foundation for Cognitive Development: Comment on Griffths Et Al. And McLelland Et Al. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (8):342-343.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Alison Gopnik & Andrew N. Meltzoff (1994). Minds, Bodies, and Persons: Young Children's Understanding of the Self and Others as Reflected in Imitation and Theory of Mind Research. In S. T. Parker, R. Mitchell & M. L. Boccia (eds.), Self-Awareness in Animals and Humans: Developmental Perspectives. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  46.  15
    Deena Skolnick Weisberg & Alison Gopnik (2016). Which Counterfactuals Matter? A Response to Beck. Cognitive Science 40 (1):257-259.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    Alison Gopnik & Andrew Meltzoff (1993). Imitation, Cultural Learning and the Origins of “Theory of Mind”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 16 (3):521.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48. A. Gopnik (1996). The Child as Scientist. Philosophy of Science 63 (4):485-514.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49.  3
    Andrea D. Rosati, Eric D. Knowles, Charles W. Kalish, Alison Gopnik, Daniel R. Ames & Michael W. Morris (2001). The Rocky Road From Acts to Dispositions: Insights for Attribution Theory From Developmental Research on Theories of Mind. In Bertram Malle, L. J. Moses & Dare Baldwin (eds.), Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. MIT Press
  50.  9
    Daniel R. Ames, Eric D. Knowles, Michael W. Morris, Charles W. Kalish, Andrea D. Rosati & Alison Gopnik (2001). The Social Folk Theorist: Insights From Social and Cultural Psychology on The. In Bertram Malle, L. J. Moses & Dare Baldwin (eds.), Intentions and Intentionality: Foundations of Social Cognition. MIT Press
1 — 50 / 68