Search results for 'Group decision-making' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  12
    Benjamin S. Wilfond, Paul Steven Miller, Carolyn Korfiatis, Douglas S. Diekema, Denise M. Dudzinski, Sara Goering & The Seattle Growth Attenuation and Ethics Working Group (forthcoming). Navigating Growth Attenuation in Children with Profound Disabilities: Children's Interests, Family Decision-Making, and Community Concerns. Hastings Center Report 40 (6):27-40.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  16
    Decision Making (2012). S Hared Decision Making is Widely Accepted as an Ethical Imperative1–5 and as an Important Part of Reasoned Clinical Practice. 6 Major Texts in Decision Analysis, 7 Medical Ethics, 8 and Evidence-Based Medicine9 All Encourage Physicians to Include Patients in the Decision-Making Process. [REVIEW] In Stephen Holland (ed.), Arguing About Bioethics. Routledge 346.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Measuring Decision Making (2002). Emotion, Decision Making, and the Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. In Donald T. Stuss & Robert T. Knight (eds.), Principles of Frontal Lobe Function. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  10
    Juliane E. Kämmer, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Torsten Reimer & Carsten C. Schermuly (2014). The Adaptive Use of Recognition in Group Decision Making. Cognitive Science 38 (5):911-942.
    Applying the framework of ecological rationality, the authors studied the adaptivity of group decision making. In detail, they investigated whether groups apply decision strategies conditional on their composition in terms of task-relevant features. The authors focused on the recognition heuristic, so the task-relevant features were the validity of the group members' recognition and knowledge, which influenced the potential performance of group strategies. Forty-three three-member groups performed an inference task in which they had to infer which of two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  7
    Bojana Radovanovic (2012). Individual Decision Making, Group Decision Making and Deliberation. Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):147-167.
    Each of us makes a number of decisions, from the less important to those with far-reaching consequences. As members of different groups, we are also actors of group decision making. In order to make a rational decision, a choice-making procedure must satisfy a number of assumptions of rationality. In addition, when it comes to group decisions, those procedures should also be “fair.” However, it is not possible to define a procedure of choice-making that would transform individual orders of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  18
    James J. Cappel & John C. Windsor (2000). Ethical Decision Making: A Comparison of Computer- Supported and Face-to-Face Group. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 28 (2):95 - 107.
    This study compares computer-supported groups, i.e., groups using group support systems (GSS), and face-to-face groups using ethical decision-making tasks. A laboratory experiment was conducted using five-person groups of information systems professionals. Face-to-face (FTF) and GSS groups were compared in terms of their decision outcomes and group members' reactions. The results revealed that computer-supported and face-to-face groups showed no significant difference in terms of the decision outcomes of choice shift and decision polarity. However, FTF groups reached their decisions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7.  8
    P. Korhonen & J. Wallenius (1990). Supporting Individuals in Group Decision-Making. Theory and Decision 28 (3):313-329.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  3
    Hiroki Sayama, Dene L. Farrell & Shelley D. Dionne (2011). The Effects of Mental Model Formation on Group Decision Making: An Agent-Based Simulation. Complexity 16 (3):49-57.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9.  17
    Paul Thagard & Fred W. Kroon (2006). Emotional Consensus in Group Decision Making. Mind and Society 5 (1):85-104.
    This paper presents a theory and computational model of the role of emotions in group decision making. After reviewing the role of emotions in individual decision making, it describes social and psychological mechanisms by which emotional and other information is transmitted between individuals. The processes by which these mechanisms can contribute to group consensus are modeled computationally using a program, HOTCO 3, which has been used to simulate simple cases of emotion-based group decision making.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  39
    Erica K. Rangel (2009). Clinical Ethics and the Dynamics of Group Decision-Making: Applying the Psychological Data to Decisions Made by Ethics Committees. [REVIEW] HEC Forum 21 (2):207-228.
    Clinical Ethics and the Dynamics of Group Decision-Making: Applying the Psychological Data to Decisions Made by Ethics Committees Content Type Journal Article Pages 207-228 DOI 10.1007/s10730-009-9096-7 Authors Erica K. Rangel, Saint Louis University Department of Health Care Ethics 6333 North Rosebury Ave #3W St. Louis MO 63105 USA Journal HEC Forum Online ISSN 1572-8498 Print ISSN 0956-2737 Journal Volume Volume 21 Journal Issue Volume 21, Number 2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  1
    Peide Liu & Fei Teng (2016). An Extended TODIM Method for Multiple Attribute Group Decision-Making Based on 2-Dimension Uncertain Linguistic Variable. Complexity 21 (5):20-30.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  7
    Crystal L. Hoyt & Terry L. Price (2015). Ethical Decision Making and Leadership: Merging Social Role and Self-Construal Perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (4):531-539.
    This research extends our understanding of ethical decision making on the part of leaders by merging social role and self-construal perspectives. Interdependent self-construal is generally seen as enhancing concern for justice and moral values. Across two studies, we tested the prediction that non-leading group members’ interdependent self-construal would be associated with lower levels of unethical decision making on behalf of their group but that, in contrast, this relationship would be weaker for leaders, given their social role. These predictions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  21
    Jean Laine, Michel Le Breton & Alain Trannoy (1986). Group Decision Making Under Uncertainty a Note on the Aggregation of “Ordinal Probabilities”. Theory and Decision 21 (2):155-161.
    This paper is a first attempt to study the problem of aggregation of individual ordinal probabilistic beliefs in an Arrowian framework. We exhibit some properties an aggregation rule must fulfil; in particular we prove the existence of a “quasi-dictator”.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  6
    Jean Laine, Michel Le Breton & Alain Trannoy (1986). Group Decision Making Under Uncertainty a Note on the Aggregation of “Ordinal Probabilities”. Theory and Decision 21 (2):155-161.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  4
    Adrian Coyle, Maria Knapp & Edmond O'Dea (1996). Decision Making in HIV Testing Among a Group with Low HIV Risk. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 2 (3):223-230.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16.  17
    Carl Wagner (1978). Consensus Through Respect: A Model of Rational Group Decision-Making. Philosophical Studies 34 (4):335 - 349.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  17.  23
    Luc Bovens & Wlodek Rabinowicz, A Dutch Book for Group Decision-Making?
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  7
    Torsten Reimer & Konstantinos V. Katsikopoulos (2004). The Use of Recognition in Group Decision‐Making. Cognitive Science 28 (6):1009-1029.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. Robert D. Sorkin, Christopher J. Hays & Ryan West (2001). Signal-Detection Analysis of Group Decision Making. Psychological Review 108 (1):183-203.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Garold Stasser & James H. Davis (1981). Group Decision Making and Social Influence: A Social Interaction Sequence Model. Psychological Review 88 (6):523-551.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. M. Hogg (2001). Social Psychology of Group Decision Making. In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 9--6403.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Tobias Greitemeyer, Stefan Schulz-Hardt, Felix C. Brodbeck & Dieter Frey (2006). Information Sampling and Group Decision Making: The Effects of an Advocacy Decision Procedure and Task Experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 12 (1):31-42.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Tatsuya Kameda, Takafumi Tsukasaki, Reid Hastie & Nathan Berg (2011). Democracy Under Uncertainty: The Wisdom of Crowds and the Free-Rider Problem in Group Decision Making. Psychological Review 118 (1):76-96.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. J. Sniezek (2001). Cognitive Psychology of Group Decision Making. In N. J. Smelser & B. Baltes (eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 9--6399.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Rd Sorkin, Dj Hilton & B. Wallace (1993). Group Decision-Making-Analysis of the Ideal Group (Vol 30, Pg 484, 1992). Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 31 (1):85-85.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Petru L. Curşeu, Nicoleta Meslec, Helen Pluut & Gerardus J. M. Lucas (2015). Cognitive Synergy in Groups and Group-to-Individual Transfer of Decision-Making Competencies. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  15
    Amira Galin (2013). Endowment Effect in Negotiations: Group Versus Individual Decision-Making. [REVIEW] Theory and Decision 75 (3):389-401.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  3
    Michael J. Miller, Jeroan J. Allison, Daniel J. Cobaugh, Midge N. Ray & Kenneth G. Saag (2014). A Group-Randomized Trial of Shared Decision Making for Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Risk Awareness: Primary Results and Lessons Learned. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 20 (5):638-648.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Bart W. Terwel, Fieke Harinck, Naomi Ellemers & Dancker D. L. Daamen (2010). Voice in Political Decision-Making: The Effect of Group Voice on Perceived Trustworthiness of Decision Makers and Subsequent Acceptance of Decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 16 (2):173-186.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  12
    Chris Provis (2010). Virtuous Decision Making for Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 91 (1):3 - 16.
    In recent years, increasing attention has been given to virtue ethics in business. Aristotle's thought is often seen as the basis of the virtue ethics tradition. For Aristotle, the idea of phronësis, or 'practical wisdom', lies at the foundation of ethics. Confucian ethics has notable similarities to Aristotelian virtue ethics, and may embody some similar ideas of practical wisdom. This article considers how ideas of moral judgment in these traditions are consistent with modern ideas about intuition in management decision making. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  31.  52
    Maria Rosario G. Catacutan & Allan de Guzman (2015). Ethical Decision-Making in Academic Administration: A Qualitative Inquiry of Filipino College Deans' Ethical Frameworks. Australian Educational Researcher 42 (4):483-514.
    Ethical decision-making in school administration has received considerable attention in educational leadership literature. However, most research has focused on principals working in secondary school settings while studies that explore ethical reasoning processes of academic deans have been significantly few. This qualitative study aims to describe the ethical decision-making processes employed by a select group of Filipino college deans in solving ethical dilemmas using the ethical paradigms proposed in the works of Starratt (Educ Adm Q 27:185–202, 1991) and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  26
    Alan G. Sanfey (2009). Expectations and Social Decision-Making: Biasing Effects of Prior Knowledge on Ultimatum Responses. [REVIEW] Mind and Society 8 (1):93-107.
    Psychological studies have long demonstrated effects of expectations on judgment, whereby the provision of information, either implicitly or explicitly, prior to an experience or decision can exert a substantial influence on the observed behavior. This study extended these expectation effects to the domain of interactive economic decision-making. Prior to playing a commonly-used bargaining task, the Ultimatum Game, participants were primed to expect offers that would be either relatively fair or unfair. A third group played the Game without receiving (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  33.  34
    Diego Gracia (2003). Ethical Case Deliberation and Decision Making. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 6 (3):227-233.
    During the last thirty years different methods have been proposed in order to manage and resolve ethical quandaries, specially in the clinical setting. Some of these methodologies are based on the principles of Decision-making theory. Others looked to other philosophical traditions, like Principlism, Hermeneutics, Narrativism, Casuistry, Pragmatism, etc. This paper defends the view that deliberation is the cornerstone of any adequate methodology. This is due to the fact that moral decisions must take into account not only principles and ideas, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34.  4
    Heidi Albisser Schleger, Nicole R. Oehninger & Stella Reiter-Theil (2011). Avoiding Bias in Medical Ethical Decision-Making. Lessons to Be Learnt From Psychology Research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):155-162.
    When ethical decisions have to be taken in critical, complex medical situations, they often involve decisions that set the course for or against life-sustaining treatments. Therefore the decisions have far-reaching consequences for the patients, their relatives, and often for the clinical staff. Although the rich psychology literature provides evidence that reasoning may be affected by undesired influences that may undermine the quality of the decision outcome, not much attention has been given to this phenomenon in health care or ethics consultation. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  37
    Peter C. Gøtzsche (2007). Rational Diagnosis and Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision-Making. J. Wiley.
    Now in its fourth edition, Rational Diagnosis and Treatment: Evidence-Based Clinical Decision - Making is a unique book to look at evidence-based medicine and the difficulty of applying evidence from group studies to individual patients._ The book analyses the successive stages of the decision process and deals with topics such as the examination of the patient,_the reliability of clinical data, the logic of diagnosis, the fallacies of uncontrolled therapeutic experience and the need for randomised clinical trials and meta-analyses. It (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  4
    F. Torralba & C. Palazzi (2010). Decision-Making in Organisations, According to the Aristotelian Model. Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):109.
    One field in ethics that has been developed during recent decades is virtue ethics, represented most importantly by Alasdair MacIntyre's work After Virtue. Virtue ethics is not opposed to principle-based ethics, but rather complements its task and develops it more fully. In the field of US bioethics, this option has proved to be even more fruitful, especially in the work of Edmund Pellegrino and David Thomasma. Virtue ethics is also being reappraised in relation to the ethics of organisations and business. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  20
    Torsten Reimer & Ulrich Hoffrage (2006). The Ecological Rationality of Simple Group Heuristics: Effects of Group Member Strategies on Decision Accuracy. Theory and Decision 60 (4):403-438.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  34
    Barbara A. Ritter (2006). Can Business Ethics Be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-Making Process in Business Students. Journal of Business Ethics 68 (2):153 - 164.
    The purpose of this paper is to examine the various guidelines presented in the literature for instituting an ethics curriculum and to empirically study their effectiveness. Three questions are addressed concerning the trainability of ethics material and the proper integration and implementation of an ethics curriculum. An empirical study then tested the effect of ethics training on moral awareness and reasoning. The sample consisted of two business classes, one exposed to additional ethics curriculum (experimental), and one not exposed (control). For (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   45 citations  
  39.  5
    Myriam Lewkowicz & Manuel Zacklad (2001). Rationalisation of Decision-Making Processes in Design Teams with a New Formalism of Design Rationale. AI and Society 15 (4):396-408.
    More and more frequently, the organisation of design fits into a project organisation where different designers have to cooperate with flexibility and reactivity. In order to help these cooperative design processes, we have to respond to new types of needs: a relatively unformalised coordination that requires permanent mutual adjustment, the fact that members of the team are geographically distant, the difficulty of building a shared reference via design documents and technical and organisational decisions that structure the project. In order to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Jeffrey Cohen, Gil B. Manzon Jr & Valentina L. Zamora (2013). Contextual and Individual Dimensions of Taxpayer Decision Making. Journal of Business Ethics 126 (4):1-17.
    We examine whether a taxpayer’s decision to choose a taxpayer-favorable (vs. a taxpayer-unfavorable) characterization of income is associated with contextual and individual dimensions of that decision. Using a 2 × 2 factorial experimental design, we manipulate the prevailing social norm on whether there is a general belief that a specific form of income should be characterized as a capital gain (taxed at a lower tax rate and hence taxpayer favorable) or as ordinary income (taxed at a higher tax rate and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  17
    James M. DuBois, John T. Chibnall, Raymond C. Tait, Jillon S. Vander Wal, Kari A. Baldwin, Alison L. Antes & Michael D. Mumford (2016). Professional Decision-Making in Research : The Validity of a New Measure. Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (2):391-416.
    In this paper, we report on the development and validity of the Professional Decision-Making in Research measure, a vignette-based test that examines decision-making strategies used by investigators when confronted with challenging situations in the context of empirical research. The PDR was administered online with a battery of validity measures to a group of NIH-funded researchers and research trainees who were diverse in terms of age, years of experience, types of research, and race. The PDR demonstrated adequate reliability (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  42.  13
    Jordi Honey-Rosés, Marc Le Menestrel, Daniel Arenas, Felix Rauschmayer & Julian Rode (2013). Enriching Intergenerational Decision-Making with Guided Visualization Exercises. Journal of Business Ethics:1-6.
    Seriously engaging with the needs, hardships, and aspirations of future generations is an emotional experience as much as an intellectual endeavor. In this essay we describe a guided visualization exercise used to overcome the emotional barriers that often prevent us from dealing effectively with intergenerational decisions. The meditation and dreaming technique was applied to a diverse group of researchers who engaged in a visualized encounter with future generations. Following the exercise, we concluded that a serious analysis of intergenerational conflict (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  69
    Jan Sprenger, Carlo Martini & Stephan Hartmann (2009). Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers. Episteme 6 (2):110-129.
    This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the “equal weight view” to resolve disagreement among epistemic peers. We apply our findings to an analysis of the impact of social network structures on group deliberation processes, and we (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  44.  45
    Gabriella Pigozzi, Collective Decision-Making Without Paradoxes: A Fusion Approach.
    The combination of individual judgments on logically interconnected propositions into a collective decision on the same propositions is called judgment aggregation. Literature in social choice and political theory has claimed that judgment aggregation raises serious concerns. For example, consider a set of premises and a conclusion in which the latter is logically equivalent to the former. When majority voting is applied to some propositions (the premises) it may give a different outcome than majority voting applied to another set of propositions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  18
    Conor O'Leary & Gladies Pangemanan (2007). The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (3):215 - 228.
    Recent accounting scandals involving the collapse of large corporate firms have brought into question the adequacy of ethics education within accounting programs. This paper investigates the ethical decisions of accountancy students and in particular analyses the effect of group (as opposed to individual) decision-making on ethical decisions. Final year accountancy students (sample size of 165) were randomly allocated into two experimental conditions. The participants were then presented with five (5) ethical vignettes. One experimental condition involved completing the ethical (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46.  21
    Robin Mackenzie & H. Biggs (2006). End of Life Decision Making, Policy and the Criminal Justice System: Untrained Carers Assuming Responsibility (UCARes) and Their Uncertain Legal Liabilities. Genomics, Society and Policy 2 (1):118-128.
    This article will explore some previously unrecognised legal and ethical issues associated with informal care-giving and criminal justice in the context of end of life decision-making. It was prompted by a recent case in Leeds Crown Court, which raises important issues for the people who care for their loved ones at home and for the criminal justice system more generally. Government figures estimate that over 5.2 million Britons are responsible for the care of relatives or loved ones. In order (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  7
    L. A. Jansen & J. S. Fogel (2010). Ascribing Intentions in Clinical Decision-Making. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (1):2-6.
    Background: The intentions of clinicians are widely considered to be relevant to the ethical assessment of their actions. A better understanding of the psychological factors that influence the ascription of intentions in clinical practice is important for improving the self-understanding of clinical decision-making and, ultimately, the ethics of clinical care. Drawing on empirical research on intentionality that has been done in other contexts, this is the first study to test whether the “asymmetric effect” of intention ascription is exhibited by (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  7
    Steven M. Dunphy (2004). Demonstrating the Value of Diversity for Improved Decision Making: The “Wuzzle-Puzzle” Exercise. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):325-331.
    The wuzzle-puzzle exercisé requires small groups of individuals to initially explore their diversity, explicate this diversity to the class, solve a wuzzle-puzzle series of anagrams on their own, and then solve a similar series in a diversified group. The improvement concomitant with a diverse group of individuals in the second, wuzzle-puzzle condition demonstrates that diversity may indeed improve decision-making. This demonstration may be of special interest to business educators and ethicists as they encourage group work. Further, (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  49.  4
    Chitu Womehoma Princewill, Ayodele S. Jegede, Karin Nordström, Bolatito Lanre‐Abass & Bernice Simone Elger (2016). Factors Affecting Women's Autonomous Decision Making In Research Participation Amongst Yoruba Women Of Western Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics 16 (2).
    Research is a global enterprise requiring participation of both genders for generalizable knowledge; advancement of science and evidence based medical treatment. Participation of women in research is necessary to reduce the current bias that most empirical evidence is obtained from studies with men to inform health care and related policy interventions. Various factors are assumed to limit autonomy amongst the Yoruba women of western Nigeria. This paper seeks to explore the experience and understanding of autonomy by the Yoruba women in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  20
    Conor O’Leary & Gladies Pangemanan (2007). The Effect of Groupwork on Ethical Decision-Making of Accountancy Students. Journal of Business Ethics 75 (3):215 - 228.
    Recent accounting scandals involving the collapse of large corporate firms have brought into question the adequacy of ethics education within accounting programs. This paper investigates the ethical decisions of accountancy students and in particular analyses the effect of group (as opposed to individual) decision-making on ethical decisions. Final year accountancy students (sample size of 165) were randomly allocated into two experimental conditions. The participants were then presented with five (5) ethical vignettes. One experimental condition involved completing the ethical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 1000