Search results for 'Guillermo Rosado Haddock' (try it on Scholar)

656 found
Sort by:
  1. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Some Uses of Logic in Rigorous Philosophy. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):385-398.score: 810.0
    This paper is concerned with the use of logic to solve philosophical problems. Such use of logic goes counter to the prevailing empiricist tradition in analytic circles. Specifically, model-theoretic tools are applied to three fundamental issues in the philosophy of logic and mathematics, namely, to the issue of the existence of mathematical entities, to the dispute between first- and second-order logic and to the definition of analyticity.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2006). Husserl's Philosophy of Mathematics: Its Origin and Relevance. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 22 (3):193-222.score: 810.0
    This paper offers an exposition of Husserl's mature philosophy of mathematics, expounded for the first time in Logische Untersuchungen and maintained without any essential change throughout the rest of his life. It is shown that Husserl's views on mathematics were strongly influenced by Riemann, and had clear affinities with the much later Bourbaki school.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2008). Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond. Husserl Studies 24 (2):131-140.score: 810.0
    Quine’s criticism of the notion of analyticity applies, at best, to Carnap’s notion, not to those of Frege or Husserl. The failure of logicism is also the failure of Frege’s definition of analyticity, but it does not even touch Husserl’s views, which are based on logical form. However, some relatively concrete number-theoretic statements do not admit such a formalization salva veritate. A new definition of analyticity based not on syntactical but on semantical logical form is proposed and argued for.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2004). Idealization in Mathematics: Husserl and Beyond. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 82 (1):245-252.score: 810.0
    Husserl's contributions to the nature of mathematical knowledge are opposed to the naturalist, empiricist and pragmatist tendences that are nowadays dominant. It is claimed that mainstream tendences fail to distinguish the historical problem of the origin and evolution of mathematical knowledge from the epistemological problem of how is it that we have access to mathematical knowledge.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1982). Remarks on Sense and Reference in Frege and Husserl. Kant-Studien 73 (1-4):425-439.score: 810.0
    Frege's semantics of sense and reference and two husserlian alternatives are discussed. it is shown that husserl neither took his semantics of sense and reference from frege nor abandoned psychologism under his influence. frege's arguments on behalf of his choice of truth values as the reference of statements and of concepts as the reference of conceptual words are submitted to criticism. some algebraic considerations are sketched in the last part of the article.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2008). Elisabeth Schuhmann (Ed.), Review of Edmund Husserl, Alte Und Neue Logik: Vorlesungen 1908/09. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (2):141-148.score: 810.0
  7. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1998). The Other Philosophers of Mathematics: Review of J. Hintikka (Ed.), From Dedekind to Gödel. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 9 (3):361-381.score: 810.0
  8. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2001). Recent Truth Theories: A Case Study. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 12 (1-2):87-115.score: 810.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2012). Husserl's Conception of Physical Theories and Physical Geometry in the Time of the Prolegomena: A Comparison with Duhem's and Poincaré's Views. Axiomathes 22 (1):171-193.score: 810.0
    This paper discusses Husserl’s views on physical theories in the first volume of his Logical Investigations, and compares them with those of his contemporaries Pierre Duhem and Henri Poincaré. Poincaré’s views serve as a bridge to a discussion of Husserl’s almost unknown views on physical geometry from about 1890 on, which in comparison even with Poincaré’s—not to say Frege’s—or almost any other philosopher of his time, represented a rupture with the philosophical tradition and were much more in tune with the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1999). Review: Olav K. Wiegand, Interpretationen der Modallogik. Ein Beitrag zur phanomenologischen Wissenschaftstheorie. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (4):1849-1853.score: 810.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Issues in the Philosophy of Logic: An Unorthodox Approach. Principia 11 (1):25-44.score: 810.0
    In this paper six of the most important issues in the philosophy of logic are examined from a standpoint that rejects the First Commandment of empiricist analytic philosophy, namely, Ockham’s razor. Such a standpoint opens the door to the clarification of such fundamental issues and to possible new solutions to each of them.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1997). Husserl's Relevance for the Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics. Axiomathes 8 (1-3):125-142.score: 810.0
  13. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). La relevancia de Carnap: Estudio critico Del libro el programa de Carnap. Ramón Cirera, Andoni Ibarra Y Thomas Mormann, (eds.). C.e.L.c.: Barcelona, 1996, 324pp. [REVIEW] Principia 10 (2):209-235.score: 810.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Platonism, Phenomenology, and Interderivability. In Mirja Hartimo (ed.), Phenomenology and Mathematics. Springer. 23--46.score: 810.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Introduction. Axiomathes 20 (2-3):147-151.score: 810.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1992). Interderivability of Seemingly Unrelated Mathematical Statements and the Philosophy of Mathematics. Dialogos 27 (59):121-134.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1991). Review: Richard L. Tieszen, Mathematical Intuition. Phenomenology and Mathematical Knowledge. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):356-360.score: 810.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. O. Chateaubriand (2004). Syntax, Semantics and Metaphysics in Logic: Reply to Guillermo Rosado Haddock. Manuscrito 27 (1):129-140.score: 450.0
    In §§1-2 I consider some issues that Guillermo raises in connection with Husserl, especially the distinction between the notion of state of affairs and the more general notion of situation of affairs conceived as a common substratum for different states of affairs. After a few remarks about Church’s slingshot argument in §3, I discuss several objections that Guillermo raises to my interpretation of Frege , to Kripke’s notion of rigid designator and to my objections to Tarski’s semantic conception (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. O. Chateaubriand (2008). Logical Truth and Second-Order Logic: Response to Guillermo Rosado-Haddock. Manuscrito 31 (1):179-184.score: 450.0
    In my response to Guillermo Rosado-Haddock I discuss the two main issues raised in his paper. The first is that by allowing Henkin’s general models as a legitimate model-theoretic interpretation of second-order logic, I undermine my defense of second-order logic against Quine’s views concerning the primacy of first-order logic. The second is that my treatment of logical truth and logical properties does not take into account various systems of logic and properties of systems of logic such as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Patrick Madigan (2011). The Young Carnap's Unknown Master: Husserl's Influence on Der Raum and Der Logische Aufbau der Welt. By Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock. Heythrop Journal 52 (1):157-157.score: 435.0
  21. P. A. Ebert (2011). Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock. A Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Aldershot, Hampshire, and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing, 2006. Isbn 978-0-7546-5471-1. Pp. X+157. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):363-367.score: 435.0
    Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock's critical introduction to the philosophy of Gottlob Frege is based on twenty-five years of teaching Frege's philosophy at the University of Puerto Rico. It developed from an earlier publication by Rosado Haddock on Frege's philosophy which was, however, available only in Spanish. This introduction to Frege is meant to steer a path between the two main approaches to Frege studies: on the one hand, we have interpretations of Frege which portray him (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ivonne V. Pallares Vega (2003). Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock: Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 19 (2):179-191.score: 435.0
  23. Ivonne V. Pallares Vega (2003). Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock: Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 19 (2):179-191.score: 435.0
  24. Markus Van Atten (2003). Bespr. Van: Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics (Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock). Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):241-244.score: 435.0
  25. Jairo da Silva (2000). Resenha 'Husserl or Frege: Meaning, Objectivity and Mathematics' (Claire Ortiz Hill & Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock). Manuscrito 23 (2):351-372.score: 435.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rosado E. Haddock (2003). Critical Studies/Book Reviews. Philosophia Mathematica 11 (1):108-120.score: 240.0
  27. Guillermo Haddock (2000). The Structure of Husserl's 'Prolegomena'. Manuscrito 23 (2):61-100.score: 240.0
    Husserl’s refutation of psychologism one hundred years ago in his opus mag-num Logische Untersuchungen is a painfully detailed enterprise. After justi-fying the existence of logic as a separate practical discipline, Husserl first shows that normative and a fortiori practical disciplines are founded on theoretical ones. He then formulates the psychologistic theses, extracts empirical consequences from them and shows how psychologism distorts the content of logical laws. The nucleus of the refutation consists in six arguments showing that specific relativism and, in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Guillermo Haddock (2008). Chateaubriand on Logical Truth Andsecond-Order Logic: Reflections on Someissues of Logical Forms Ii. Manuscrito 31 (1):163-178.score: 240.0
    In this short paper I am concerned with basically two especially important issues in Oswaldo Chateaubriand’s Logical Forms II; namely, the dispute between first- and higher-order logic and his conception of logical truth and related notions, like logical property, logical state of affairs and logical falsehood. The first issue was also present in the first volume of the book, but the last is privative of the second volume. The extraordinary significance of both issues for philosophy is emphasized and, though there (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Guillermo Haddock (2006). Releyendo al joven Carnap: estudio crítico de 'der raum'. Manuscrito 29 (1):259-296.score: 240.0
    Este estudio crítico se ocupa de la tesis doctoral de Rudolf Carnap, Der Raum. El mismo ofrece una breve exposición de esta obra juvenil, frecuentemente ignorada, de Carnap, e intenta corregir algunas interpretaciones incorrectas de dicha obra. Se muestra convincentemente que la principal influencia filosófica en Der Raum no es ni Kant ni los ne-okantianos, sino Edmund Husserl, y que la defensa que hace Carnap en esa obra de lo sintético a priori es claramente no kantiana, sino mucho más cercana (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Guillermo Haddock (2007). On the Semantics of Mathematical Statements/Sobre a Semântica Dos Enunciados Matemáticos. Manuscrito 30 (2):317-340.score: 240.0
    Husserl developed – independently of Frege – a semantics of sense and reference. There are, however, some important differences, specially with respect to the references of statements. According to Husserl, an assertive sentence refers to a state of affairs, which was its basis what he called a situation of affairs. Situations of affairs could also be considered as an alternative referent for statements on their own right, although for Husserl they were simply a sort of referential basis. Both Husserlian states (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Guillermo Haddock (2004). Chateaubriand on Logical Form and Semantics. Manuscrito 27 (1):115-128.score: 240.0
    In this paper on Oswaldo Chateaubriand’s book Logical Forms I, I am mostly concerned with the critical task of indicating some shortcomings and stressing my disagreements with the distinguished scholar. The most important shortcoming of the book is Chateaubriand’s unfamiliarity with Husserl’s views on logic and semantics, some of which anticipate views propounded by the former – e.g., the distinction between logical law and logical necessity-, whereas others are more subtle than Chateaubriand’s views – e.g., Husserl’s views on the referent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Guillermo Haddock (2007). Critical Study of Oswaldo Chateaubriand's Logical Forms I CLE and Logical Forms II. Manuscrito 30 (1):185-218.score: 240.0
    In this critical study I try to highlight some of the most important issues discussed in Chateaubriand’s excellent book. In particular, I discuss in some detail Chateaubriand’s criticism of one of the icons of analytic philosophy, namely, Quine, as well as some of his own valuable contributions to philosophy in this book – for example, his refutation of the various forms of the slingshot argument and his characterization of logical truth.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mark van Atten (2003). Review of C. O. Hill and G. E. Rosado Haddock, Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 11 (2):241-244.score: 140.0
  34. Mary Leng (2002). Claire Ortiz Hill and Guillenno E. Rosado Haddock, Husserl or Frege? Meaning, Objectivity, and Mathematics Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (5):325-327.score: 140.0
  35. Philip Ebert (2011). Review of G. E. R. Haddock, A Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 19 (3):363-367.score: 132.0
    Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock. A Critical Introduction to the Philosophy of Gottlob Frege. Aldershot, Hampshire, and Burlington, Vermont: Ashgate Publishing, 2006. ISBN 978-0-7546-5471-1. Pp. x+157.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Guillermo Rosado Haddock (2012). Introduction: The Other Husserl. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):1-4.score: 87.0
  37. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1986). On Frege's Two Notions of Sense. History and Philosophy of Logic 7 (1):31-41.score: 87.0
    Frege had not one but two different notions of sense, namely, that of ?Über Sinn und Bedeutung? and one implicit in a letter to Husserl of 1906 and elsewhere. This last one originates in Frege's notion of conceptual content. The distinction is used to clarify some obscurities in Frege's thought. In the last section a sort of ?explicans? of Frege's notion of conceptual content is introduced and applied to the semantic analysis of mathematics.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Guillermo Rosado Haddock (2012). Husserl's Conception of Physical Theories and Physical Geometry in the Time of the Prolegomena : A Comparison with Duhem's and Poincaré's Views. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 22 (1):171-193.score: 87.0
    This paper discusses Husserl’s views on physical theories in the first volume of his Logical Investigations , and compares them with those of his contemporaries Pierre Duhem and Henri Poincaré. Poincaré’s views serve as a bridge to a discussion of Husserl’s almost unknown views on physical geometry from about 1890 on, which in comparison even with Poincaré’s—not to say Frege’s—or almost any other philosopher of his time, represented a rupture with the philosophical tradition and were much more in tune with (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Guillermo Rosado Haddock (2008). Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond. Husserl Studies 24 (2):131-140.score: 87.0
    Quine’s criticism of the notion of analyticity applies, at best, to Carnap’s notion, not to those of Frege or Husserl. The failure of logicism is also the failure of Frege’s definition of analyticity, but it does not even touch Husserl’s views, which are based on logical form. However, some relatively concrete number-theoretic statements do not admit such a formalization salva veritate. A new definition of analyticity based not on syntactical but on semantical logical form is proposed and argued for.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Guillermo Rosado Haddock (2008). Elisabeth Schuhmann (Ed.), Review of Edmund Husserl, Alte Und Neue Logik: Vorlesungen 1908/09. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 24 (2):141-148.score: 87.0
  41. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1998). Essay Review. History and Philosophy of Logic 19 (4):249-266.score: 87.0
    Matthias Schirn (ed.), Frege:Importance and Legacy, Berlin, Walter De Gruyter, 1996, viii + 466pp.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2010). Husserl pour les philosophes analytiques. Philosophiques 37 (2):325-348.score: 87.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1997). Husserl's Relevance for the Philosophy and Foundations of Mathematics. Axiomathes 8 (1):125-142.score: 87.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2001). Recent Truth Theories: A Case Study. [REVIEW] Axiomathes 12 (1/2):87-115.score: 87.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (2006). La relevancia de Carnap. Principia 10 (2):209-235.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Guillermo E. Rosado Haddock (1998). The Other Philosophers of Mathematics. Axiomathes 9 (3):361-381.score: 87.0
  47. Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (2008). Introduction: Varieties of Disjunctivism. In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    Inspired by the writings of J. M. Hinton (1967a, 1967b, 1973), but ushered into the mainstream by Paul Snowdon (1980–1, 1990–1), John McDowell (1982, 1986), and M. G. F. Martin (2002, 2004, 2006), disjunctivism is currently discussed, advocated, and opposed in the philosophy of perception, the theory of knowledge, the theory of practical reason, and the philosophy of action. But what is disjunctivism?
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.) (2008). Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
1 — 50 / 656