7 found
Sort by:
  1. Christopher T. Kello, Gordon D. A. Brown, Ramon Ferrer-I.-Cancho, John G. Holden, Klaus Linkenkaer-Hansen, Theo Rhodes & Guy C. Van Orden (2010). Scaling Laws in Cognitive Sciences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14 (5):223-232.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Christopher T. Kello, Gregory G. Anderson, John G. Holden & Guy C. Van Orden (2008). The Pervasiveness of 1/F Scaling in Speech Reflects the Metastable Basis of Cognition. Cognitive Science 32 (7):1217-1231.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Eric L. Amazeen & Guy C. Van Orden (2004). Specificity in a Global Array is Only One Possibility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):887-888.
    The suggestion of seeking specificity in a higher-order array is attractive, but Stoffregen & Bardy (S&B) fail to provide a compelling empirical basis to their claim that specificity exists solely in the global array. Using the example of relative motion, the alternate hypotheses that must be considered are presented.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Guy C. Van Orden, John G. Holden & Michael T. Turvey (2003). Self-Organization of Cognitive Performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 132 (3):331.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Guy C. Van Orden & Marian A. Jansen op de Haar (2000). Schneider's Apraxia and the Strained Relation Between Experience and Description. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):247 – 259.
    Borrett, Kelly and Kwan [(2000) Phenomenology, dynamical neural networks and brain function, Philosophical Psychology, 13, 000-000] claim that unbiased, self-evident, direct description is possible, and may supply the data that brain theories account for. Merleau-Ponty's [(1962) Phenomenology of perception, London: Routledge] description of Schneider's apraxia is offered as a case in point. According to the authors, Schneider's apraxia justifies brain components of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Guy C. Van Orden & Marian A. Jansen op de Haar (2000). Schneider's Apraxia and the Strained Relation Between Experience and Description. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):247-259.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Johannes C. Ziegler & Guy C. Van Orden (2000). Feedback Consistency Effects. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (3):351-352.
    Models are not adequately evaluated simply by whether they capture the data, after the fact. Other criteria are needed. One criterion is parsimony; but utility and generality are at least as important. Even with respect to parsimony, however, the case against feedback is not as straightforward as Norris et al. present it. We use feedback consistency effects to illustrate these points.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation