Search results for 'H. E. Longino' (try it on Scholar)

10 found
Sort by:
  1. H. E. Longino (1983). Scientific Objectivity and the Logics of Science. Inquiry 26 (1):85 – 106.score: 870.0
    This paper develops an account of scientific objectivity for a relativist theory of evidence. It briefly reviews the character and shortcomings of empiricist and wholist treatments of theory acceptance and objectivity and argues that the relativist account of evidence developed by the author in an earlier essay offers a more satisfactory framework within which to approach questions of justification and intertheoretic comparison. The difficulty with relativism is that it seems to eliminate objectivity from scientific method. Reconceiving objectivity as a function (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. H. E. Longino (1994). Review of Jill S. Becker, S. Marc Breedlove & David Crews' Behavioral Endocrinology. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 7:401-401.score: 870.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (2006). ¸ Itekellersetal:Sp.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (forthcoming). Scientific Pluralism. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.score: 810.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (eds.) (2006). Scientific Pluralism Vol. 19. University of Minnesota Press.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino & C. Kenneth Waters (2006). The Pluralist Stance. In ¸ Itekellersetal:Sp.score: 810.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jordi Cat (2012). Essay Review:Scientific Pluralism* Stephen H. Kellert , Helen E. Longino , and C. Kenneth Waters , Eds., Scientific Pluralism . Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 19. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (2006), Xxix+248 Pp., $50.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 79 (2):317-325.score: 261.0
  8. David L. Hull (2008). Review of Stephen H. Kellert, Helen E. Longino, C. Kenneth Waters (Eds.), Scientific Pluralism. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (5).score: 261.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Philip Lewin (1984). IV. Longino and Heidegger on Objectivity. Inquiry 27 (1-4):145-148.score: 117.0
    H. E. Longino maintains ('Scientific Objectivity and the Logics of Science?, Inquiry, Vol. 26 [1983], pp. 85?106) that scientific objectivity is constituted jointly by the intersubjective criticism and corroboration of the community of scientists, and by ?the formal requirement of demonstrable evidential relevance . . . independent of and external to any particular research program or scientific theory?. Not only do these two constituents of objectivity seem incompatible, but several additional problems arise from her account, the main one of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. E. M. Sent (forthcoming). Pluralisms in Economics, B Dzie Opublikowane W: S. Kellert, H. Longino, K. Waters, Red., Scientific Pluralism. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science.score: 117.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation