24 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Henry Pietersma [17]H. Pietersma [7]
  1. Henry Pietersma (2006). What Happened to Epistemology In Our Tradititon? Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):553 - 576.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Henry Pietersma (2002). Donn Welton, The Other Husserl: The Horizons of Transcendental Phenomenology Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (5):381-383.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Henry Pietersma (2000). Phenomenological Epistemology. Oxford University Press.
    This work offers a provocative new historical and systematic interpretation of the epistemological doctrines of three twentieth-century giants: Husserl, Heidegger, and Merleau-Ponty. Pietersma argues that these three philosophers, while connected by their phenomenological doctrines, have underappreciated and interestingly-linked views on the theory of knowledge.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Henry Pietersma (1990). Knowledge and Being in Merleau-Ponty. Man and World 23 (2):205-223.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Henry Pietersma (ed.) (1989). Merleau Ponty: Critical Essays. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology.
  6. Henry Pietersma (ed.) (1989). Merleau-Ponty: Critical Essays. University Press of America.
  7. Henry Pietersma (1989). Truth and the Evident. In William R. McKenna & J. N. Mohanty (eds.), Husserl's Phenomenology: A Textbook. University Press of America. 213--248.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Henry Pietersma (1989). The Problem of Knowledge and Phenomenology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (1):27-47.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Henry Pietersma (1988). Merleau-Ponty and Spinoza. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):89-93.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Henry Pietersma (1988). Seppo Sajama and Matti Kamppinen, A Historical Introduction to Phenomenology Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (5):188-190.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Henry Pietersma (1987). A Critique of Two Recent Husserl Interpretations. Dialogue 26 (04):695-.
  12. Henry Pietersma (1987). Intentionality and Epistemic Appraisal. Southern Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):381-394.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. H. Pietersma, Reto Parpan & Timothy Casey (1986). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] Husserl Studies 3 (3).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Henry Pietersma (1986). Husserl's Concept of Existence. Synthese 66 (2):311 - 328.
  15. H. Pietersma (1985). Assertion and Predication in Husserl. Husserl Studies 2 (1):75-95.
    Husserl's views add up to a very complex set of conceptual relationships, Which I try to articulate in twelve theses. What I here call assertion--The author himself uses various terms--Is the sort of propositional attitude hume discussed as belief and brentano as judgment, I show how he distinguishes it from such things as namings and predications, Even from predications which assign existence, Truth, Or reality. I also deal with the neutral counterpart of assertion and its relation to the characteristically phenomenological (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. H. Pietersma (1981). Marcel's Notion of the Metaproblematical. Man and World 14 (4):411-421.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. H. Pietersma (1979). Husserl and Heidegger. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (2):194-211.
    Husserl speaks of horizons, Heidegger of worlds. The concept behind these terms is the same; the two philosophers mentioned held generally widely divergent views. In this article I articulate the shared concept and then proceed to argue that the differences of view can be reduced to a difference in the range accorded to the concept. This strategy brings about a great simplification in the generally muddled controversy about the two philosophers. It also has the additional advantage of showing the interest (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. H. Pietersma (1979). Value of Man as a Knower. Humanitas 15 (2):177-190.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Henry Pietersma (1979). The Phenomenological Reduction: Some Remarks on Its Role in Philosophy. American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (1):37 - 44.
    The paper begins with a characterization of its methodological point designed to bring out those features that would recommend it to philosophers. The concept of this method is emphatically distinguished from the scope given to it by philosophers who actually use it. Husserl, For instance, Held that all philosophical questions are accessible by this method of reduction. In the last part of the paper I am suggesting that there is a legitimate form of skepticism which husserl's position fails to recognize.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Henry Pietersma (1978). Brentano's Concept of the Evident. Analecta Husserliana 7:235-244.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Henry Pietersma (1973). Intuition and Horizon in the Philosophy of Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 34 (1):95-101.
    The notion of "seeing the object itself," basic in husserl's theory of knowledge, Can only make sense, If we interpret it with the help of his notion of horizon or implicit context. Seeing the object itself is an achievement experienced as such. This must mean that the subject has an implicit awareness of a context of other possible epistemic situations in which what is now "seen" or viewed "close up" can be referred to from a "distance." "distance" is here of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. H. Pietersma (1967). Husserl und Kant. Eine Untersuchung ueber Husserls Verhaeltnis zu Kant und zum Neukantianismus (Phaenomenologica, vol. 16). By Iso Kern. The Hague, Martinus Nijhoff, 1964. Pp. xxiii, 448. Fl. 36. [REVIEW] Dialogue 5 (04):630-633.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Henry Pietersma (1967). Husserl and Frege. Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 49 (3):298-323.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. H. Pietersma (1966). Husserl's Concept of Philosophy. Dialogue 5 (03):425-442.
    As philosophers speak, they think that there are things whicht they can see and speak about as philosophers. But what are these things? And what is the general character of the philosopher's statements? How can we find out whether they are true? If, as is widely agreed, the philosopher does not rely on empirical research, in which direction ought we to look for the evidence to support philosophical statements? Husserl's transcendental-phenomenological reduction, we propose to show, can best be understood as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation