Search results for 'H. S. Silverstein' (try it on Scholar)

6 found
Sort by:
  1. J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & H. S. Silverstein (eds.) (2007). Causation and Explanation. MIT Press.score: 870.0
    Leading scholars discuss the development and application of theories of causation and explanation, offering a state-of-the-art view of current work on these two ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & H. Silverstein (eds.) (forthcoming). Action, Ethics and Responsibility: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 7. MIT Press.score: 450.0
    Overview -/- Most philosophical explorations of responsibility discuss the topic solely in terms of metaphysics and the "free will" problem. By contrast, these essays by leading philosophers view responsibility from a variety of perspectives—metaphysics, ethics, action theory, and the philosophy of law. After a broad, framing introduction by the volume's editors, the contributors consider such subjects as responsibility as it relates to the "free will" problem; the relation between responsibility and knowledge or ignorance; the relation between causal and moral responsibility; (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. M. Alvarez (2012). Action, Ethics, and Responsibility * Edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke and Harry S. Silverstein * Causing Human Actions: New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action * Edited by Jesus H. Aguilar and Andrei A. Buckareff. [REVIEW] Analysis 72 (1):190-193.score: 261.0
  4. O. Gjelsvik (2012). Causing Human Actions, New Perspectives on the Causal Theory of Action, Edited by Jesus H. Aguilar and Andrei A. Buckareff. * Action, Ethics and Responsibility, Edited by Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke, and Harry S. Silverstein. [REVIEW] Mind 121 (482):471-474.score: 261.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Michael H. Robins (1974). Hare's Golden-Rule Argument: A Reply to Silverstein. Mind 83 (332):578-581.score: 117.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Leopold Stubenberg (1990). Epicurus on Death. Grazer Philosophische Studien 37:185-203.score: 90.0
    In this paper I try to state and defend Epicurus' argument that death is nothing to us. I discuss some of the most prominent objections that have been raised against Epicurus' position in the recent literature; the authors whose work I discuss include T. Nagel, B.Williams, H. S. Silverstein, and D. Furley. I argue that all of these author's criticisms are flawed in one way or another While this result does not suffice to prove Epicurus right, it does show (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation