44 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Hanne Andersen (University of Aarhus)
Profile: Hanne Andersen (University of Copenhagen)
  1.  32
    Brian Hepburn & Hanne Andersen (2015). Scientific Method. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    1. Overview and organizing themes 2. Historical Review: Aristotle to Mill 3. Logic of method and critical responses 3.1 Logical constructionism and Operationalism 3.2. H-D as a logic of confirmation 3.3. Popper and falsificationism 3.4 Meta-methodology and the end of method 4. Statistical methods for hypothesis testing 5. Method in Practice 5.1 Creative and exploratory practices 5.2 Computer methods and the ‘third way’ of doing science 6. Discourse on scientific method 6.1 “The scientific method” in science education and as seen (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Anna Paldam Folker, Hanne Andersen & Peter Sandøe (2008). Implicit Normativity in Scientific Advice: Values in Nutrition Scientists' Decisions to Give Public Advice. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 51 (2):199-206.
  3.  92
    Hanne Andersen (2006). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
    Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions became the most widely read book about science in the twentieth century. His terms 'paradigm' and 'scientific revolution' entered everyday speech, but they remain controversial. In the second half of the twentieth century, the new field of cognitive science combined empirical psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. In this book, the recent theories of concepts developed by cognitive scientists are used to evaluate and extend Kuhn's most influential ideas. Based on case studies of the Copernican (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  4. Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen (1996). Kuhn's Mature Philosophy of Science and Cognitive Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 9 (3):347 – 363.
    Drawing on the results of modem psychology and cognitive science we suggest that the traditional theory of concepts is no longer tenable, and that the alternative account proposed by Kuhn may now be seen to have independent empirical support quite apart from its success as part of an account of scientific change. We suggest that these mechanisms can also be understood as special cases of general cognitive structures revealed by cognitive science. Against this background, incommensurability is not an insurmountable obstacle (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  5.  16
    Mads Goddiksen & Hanne Andersen, Expertise in Interdisciplinary Science and EDucation.
    Many degree programs in science and engineering aim at enabling their students to perform interdisciplinary problem solving. In this paper we present three types of expertise that are involved in different ways in interdisciplinary problem solving. In doing so we shall first characterise two important epistemological challenges commonly faced in interdisciplinary problem solving, namely the communication challenge that arises from the use of different concepts within different scientific domains, and the integration challenge that arises from the differences between domain-specific epistemological (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Hanne Andersen (2001). Critical Notice: Kuhn, Conant and Everything-a Full or Fuller Account. Philosophy of Science 68 (2):258-262.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  7.  23
    Peter Barker, Xiang Chen & Hanne Andersen (2003). Kuhn on Concepts and Categorization. In Thomas Nickles (ed.), Thomas Kuhn. Cambridge University Press 212--245.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  8.  58
    Hanne Andersen (2004). Incommensurability and Dynamic Conceptual Structures. Philosophia Scientiae 8 (1):153-168.
    One important problem concerning incommensurability is to explain how theories that are incommensurable can nevertheless compete. In this paper I shall briefly review Kuhn’s account of the difference between revolutionary and non-revolutionary conceptual developments. I shall argue that his taxonomic approach and the no-overlap principle it entails does not suffice to distinguish between revolutionary and non-revolutionary developments. I shall show that his approach builds mainly on analyses of feature correlations, and that it is necessary to include explanations of these feature (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  44
    Hanne Andersen (2010). Joint Acceptance and Scientific Change: A Case Study. Episteme 7 (3):248-265.
    Recently, several scholars have argued that scientists can accept scientific claims in a collective process, and that the capacity of scientific groups to form joint acceptances is linked to a functional division of labor between the group members. However, these accounts reveal little about how the cognitive content of the jointly accepted claim is formed, and how group members depend on each other in this process. In this paper, I shall therefore argue that we need to link analyses of joint (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10.  24
    Hanne Andersen (2012). 9 Scientific Concepts and Conceptual Change. In Vasō Kintē & Theodore Arabatzis (eds.), Kuhn's the Structure of Scientific Revolutions Revisited. Routledge 179.
  11.  28
    Hanne Andersen & Susann Wagenknecht (2013). Epistemic Dependence in Interdisciplinary Groups. Synthese 190 (11):1881-1898.
    In interdisciplinary research scientists have to share and integrate knowledge between people and across disciplinary boundaries. An important issue for philosophy of science is to understand how scientists who work in these kinds of environments exchange knowledge and develop new concepts and theories across diverging fields. There is a substantial literature within social epistemology that discusses the social aspects of scientific knowledge, but so far few attempts have been made to apply these resources to the analysis of interdisciplinary science. Further, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12.  64
    Hanne Andersen (2000). Kuhn's Account of Family Resemblance: A Solution to the Problem of Wide-Open Texture. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 52 (3):313-337.
    It is a commonly raised argument against thefamily resemblance account of concepts that, on thisaccount, there is no limit to a concept's extension.An account of family resemblance which attempts toprovide a solution to this problem by including bothsimilarity among instances and dissimilarity tonon-instances has been developed by the philosopher ofscience Thomas Kuhn. Similar solutions have beenhinted at in the literature on family resemblanceconcepts, but the solution has never received adetailed investigation. I shall provide areconstruction of Kuhn's theory and argue that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  13.  9
    Hanne Andersen (2016). Collaboration, Interdisciplinarity, and the Epistemology of Contemporary Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 56:1-10.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Hanne Andersen (2001). On Kuhn. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15.  50
    N. Nersessian & Hanne Andersen (1997). Conceptual Change and Incommensurability: A Cognitive-Historical View. Danish Yearbook of Philosophy 32:111-152.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Xiang Chen, Hanne Andersen & Peter Barker (1998). Kuhn's Theory of Scientific Revolutions and Cognitive Psychology. Philosophical Psychology 11 (1):5 – 28.
    In a previous article we have shown that Kuhn's theory of concepts is independently supported by recent research in cognitive psychology. In this paper we propose a cognitive re-reading of Kuhn's cyclical model of scientific revolutions: all of the important features of the model may now be seen as consequences of a more fundamental account of the nature of concepts and their dynamics. We begin by examining incommensurability, the central theme of Kuhn's theory of scientific revolutions, according to two different (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  17.  56
    Stig Brorson & Hanne Andersen (2001). Stabilizing and Changing Phenomenal Worlds: Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn on Scientific Literature. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 32 (1):109-129.
    In the work of both Ludwik Fleck and Thomas Kuhn the scientific literature plays important roles for stability and change of scientific phenomenal worlds. In this article we shall introduce the analyses of scientific literature provided by Fleck and Kuhn, respectively. From this background we shall discuss the problem of how divergent thinking can emerge in a dogmatic atmosphere. We shall argue that in their accounts of the factors inducing changes of scientific phenomenal worlds Fleck and Kuhn offer substantially different (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  18. Hanne Andersen & Nancy J. Nersessian (2000). Nomic Concepts, Frames, and Conceptual Change. Philosophy of Science 67 (3):241.
  19.  16
    Hanne Andersen (2013). Conceptual Development and Dynamic Realism. Studia Philosophica Estonica 5 (2):133-151.
    This paper focuses on Thomas S. Kuhn's work on taxonomic concepts and how it relates to empirical work from the cognitive sciences on categorization and conceptual development. I shall first review the basic features of Kuhn's family resemblance account and compare to work from the cognitive sciences. I shall then show how Kuhn's account can be extended to cover the development of new taxonomies in science, and I shall illustrate by a detailed case study that Kuhn himself mentioned only briefly (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  95
    Hanne Andersen (1997). Craig Dilworth: Scientific Progress. A Study Concerning the Nature of the Relation Between Successive Scientific Theories. Craig Dilworth: The Metaphysics of Science. An Account of Modern Science in Terms of Principles, Laws and Theories. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (2):265-271.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  45
    Eric Oberheim, Hanne Andersen & Paul Hoyningen-Huene (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  22.  30
    Hanne Andersen & Brian Hepburn, Scientific Change. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Scientific Change How do scientific theories, concepts and methods change over time? Answers to this question have historical parts and philosophical parts. There can be descriptive accounts of the recorded differences over time of particular theories, concepts, and methods—what might be called the shape of scientific change. Many stories of scientific change attempt to give […].
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  34
    Hanne Andersen (2013). The Second Essential Tension: On Tradition and Innovation in Interdisciplinary Research. Topoi 32 (1):3-8.
    In his analysis of “the essential tension between tradition and innovation” Thomas S. Kuhn focused on the apparent paradox that, on the one hand, normal research is a highly convergent activity based upon a settled consensus, but, on the other hand, the ultimate effect of this tradition-bound work has invariably been to change the tradition. Kuhn argued that, on the one hand, without the possibility of divergent thought, fundamental innovation would be precluded. On the other hand, without a strong emphasis (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  21
    Paul Hoyningen-Huene, Eric Oberheim & Hanne Andersen (1996). On Incommensurability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 27 (1):131-141.
  25.  6
    Hanne Andersen (2012). Conceptual Development in Interdisciplinary Research. In Uljana Feest & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Scientific Concepts and Investigative Practice. De Gruyter 3--271.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  46
    Hanne Andersen (2010). Edwin H.-C. Hung Beyond Kuhn. Scientific Explanation, Theory Structure, Incommensurability and Physical Necessity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 61 (1):237-239.
    (No abstract is available for this citation).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  45
    Hanne Andersen, History and Philosophy of Modern Epidemiology.
    Epidemiological studies of chronic diseases began around the mid-20th century. Contrary to the infectious disease epidemiology which had prevailed at the beginning of the 20th century and which had focused on single agents causing individual diseases, the chronic disease epidemiology which emerged at the end of Word War II was a much more complex enterprise that investigated a multiplicity of risk factors for each disease. Involved in the development of chronic disease epidemi-ology were therefore fundamental discussions on the notion of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  50
    Hanne Andersen (2001). Reference and Resemblance. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S50-.
    Many discussions between realists and non-realists have centered on the issue of reference, especially whether there is referential stability during theory change. In this paper, I shall summarize the debate, sketching the problems that remain within the two opposing positions, and show that both have ended on their own slippery slope, sliding away from their original position toward that of their opponents. In the search for a viable intermediate position, I shall then suggest an account of reference which, to a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    Hanne Andersen (2000). Learning by Ostension: Thomas Kuhn on Science Education. Science and Education 9 (1-2):91-106.
    Significant claims about science education form an integral part of Thomas Kuhn's philosophy. Since the late 1950s, when Kuhn started wrestling with the ideas of ‘normal research’ and ‘convergent thought’, the nature of science education has played an important role in his argument. Hence, the nature of science education is an essential aspect of the phase-model of scientific development developed in his famous The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, just as his later work on categories and conceptual structures takes its starting (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  9
    Hanne Andersen (1996). Categorization, Anomalies and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 27 (4):463-492.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  31.  36
    Hanne Andersen, Demarcating Misconduct From Misinterpretations and Mistakes.
    Within recent years, scientific misconduct has become an increasingly important topic, not only in the scientific community, but in the general public as well. Spectacular cases have been extensively covered in the news media, such as the cases of the Korean stem cell researcher Hwang, the German nanoscientist Schön, or the Norwegian cancer researcher Sudbø. In Science's latest annual "breakthrough of the year" report from December 2006, the descriptions of the year's hottest breakthroughs were accompanied by a similar description of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Hanne Andersen (2013). Women in the History of Philosophy of Science: What We Do and Do Not Know. Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 3 (1):136-139.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  14
    Mauricio Suárez & Hanne Andersen (1994). Book Review. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 40 (3):403-415.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  8
    Décio Krause, Eric Schliesser & Hanne Andersen (2007). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 21 (3):345 – 357.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Hanne Andersen (1996). Categorization, Anomalies and the Discovery of Nuclear Fission. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 27 (4):463-492.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    Hanne Andersen, Nancy Nersessian & Susann Wagenknecht, Empirical Philosophy of Science: Introducing Qualitative Methods Into Philosophy of Science.
    The book examines the emerging approach of using qualitative methods, such as interviews and field observations, in the philosophy of science. Qualitative methods are gaining popularity among philosophers of science as more and more scholars are resorting to empirical work in their study of scientific practices. At the same time, the results produced through empirical work are quite different from those gained through the kind of introspective conceptual analysis more typical of philosophy. This volume explores the benefits and challenges of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Hanne Andersen (2004). Incommensurability and Dynamic Conceptual Structures. Philosophia Scientae 8:153-168.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  25
    Hanne Andersen, Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao González, Thomas Uebel & Gregory Wheeler (eds.) (2013). New Challenges to Philosophy of Science. Springer Verlag.
    This fourth volume of the Programme “The Philosophy of Science in a European Perspective” deals with new challenges in this field. In this regard, it seeks to broaden the scope of the philosophy of science in two directions. On the one hand, ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Hanne Andersen (2001). Reference and Resemblance. Philosophy of Science 68 (S3):S50-S61.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen (2006). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
    Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions became the most widely read book about science in the twentieth century. His terms 'paradigm' and 'scientific revolution' entered everyday speech, but they remain controversial. In the second half of the twentieth century, the new field of cognitive science combined empirical psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. In this book, the theories of concepts developed by cognitive scientists are used to evaluate and extend Kuhn's most influential ideas. Based on case studies of the Copernican revolution, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen (2009). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
    Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions became the most widely read book about science in the twentieth century. His terms 'paradigm' and 'scientific revolution' entered everyday speech, but they remain controversial. In the second half of the twentieth century, the new field of cognitive science combined empirical psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. In this book, the theories of concepts developed by cognitive scientists are used to evaluate and extend Kuhn's most influential ideas. Based on case studies of the Copernican revolution, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Hanne Andersen, Peter Barker & Xiang Chen (2013). The Cognitive Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Cambridge University Press.
    Thomas Kuhn's Structure of Scientific Revolutions became the most widely read book about science in the twentieth century. His terms 'paradigm' and 'scientific revolution' entered everyday speech, but they remain controversial. In the second half of the twentieth century, the new field of cognitive science combined empirical psychology, computer science, and neuroscience. In this book, the theories of concepts developed by cognitive scientists are used to evaluate and extend Kuhn's most influential ideas. Based on case studies of the Copernican revolution, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Hanne Andersen (2004). Viii. Science: Process and History. In Michel Weber (ed.), After Whitehead: Rescher on Process Metaphysics. Ontos Verlag 1--197.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Hanne Andersen, Louis Klostergaard, Henrik Knudsen, Helge Kragh, Keld Nielsen, Kurt Mã¸Ller Pedersen & Henrik Kragh Sã¸Rensen (2009). Vedkommende Videnskabsteori. Aktuel Naturvidenskab (1):32--35.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography