1. Hans Henrik Bruun (2011). Book Review: David Chalcraft, Fanon Howell, Marisol Lopez Menendez & Hector Vera (Eds.): Max Weber Matters: Interweaving Past and Present. Burlington, Ashgate 2008. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (1):142-147.
  2. Hans Henrik Bruun (2010). The Incompatibility of Values and the Importance of Consequences: Max Weber and the Kantian Legacy. Philosophical Forum 41 (1):51-67.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Hans Henrik Bruun (2008). Objectivity, Value Spheres, and "Inherent Laws": On Some Suggestive Isomorphisms Between Weber, Bourdieu, and Luhmann. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 38 (1):97-120.
    I give an account of Max Weber's views concerning the basis of the objectivity of the cultural sciences. In this connection, I offer a critical discussion of his distinction between different "value spheres," each with its own "intrinsic logic." I then consider parallels between Weber's "value spheres" and central elements of Bourdieu's field theory and Luhmann's systems theory, and try to show to what extent Bourdieu's and Luhmann's problems, and the solutions they suggest, can be seen as similar to Weber's. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation