Search results for 'Hartry H. Field' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  80
    Hartry H. Field (2008). Saving Truth From Paradox. Oxford University Press.
    A selective background -- Broadly classical approaches -- Paracompleteness -- More on paracomplete solutions -- Paraconsistent dialetheism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   77 citations  
  2. Hartry Field (2008). Saving Truth From Paradox. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Saving Truth from Paradox is an ambitious investigation into paradoxes of truth and related issues, with occasional forays into notions such as vagueness, the nature of validity, and the Gödel incompleteness theorems. Hartry Field presents a new approach to the paradoxes and provides a systematic and detailed account of the main competing approaches. Part One examines Tarski's, Kripke>'s, and Lukasiewicz>'s theories of truth, and discusses validity and soundness, and vagueness. Part Two considers a wide range of attempts to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  3.  20
    David Malament (1982). Science Without Numbers by Hartry H. Field. Journal of Philosophy 79 (9):523-534.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  4.  49
    Michael Friedman (1981). Book Review:Science Without Numbers: A Defense of Nominalism Hartry H. Field. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 48 (3):505-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  10
    Kenneth L. Manders (1984). Review: Hartry H. Field, Science Without Numbers. A Defence of Nominalism. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 49 (1):303-306.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Bernard Linsky (1982). Hartry H. Field, Science Without Numbers Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 2 (4):161-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Bernard Linsky (1982). Hartry H. Field, Science Without Numbers. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 2:161-164.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Michael Lockwood (1982). Hartry H. Field, "Science Without Number". [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 32 (28):281.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  6
    G. C. Field (1932). Neue Untersuchungen zu platonischen Dialogen. Von H. Rick. Pp. viii + 391. Bonn: Röhrscheid, 1931. Paper, M. 20. The Classical Review 46 (05):232-.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  15
    G. C. Field (1949). The Pre-Socratic Philosophers: A Companion to Diels. By Kathleen Freeman. (Oxford: Basil Blackwell. 1946. Pp. Xvi + 468. Price 25s.)An Introduction to Ancient Philosophy. By A. H. Armstrong. (London: Methuen & Co. 1947. Pp. Xvi + 241. Price 15s.)Knowledge and the Good in Plato's Republic. By H. W. B. Joseph. (Oxford University Press. 1948. Pp. Viii + 75. Price 5s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 24 (88):83-.
  11.  4
    G. C. Field (1937). Plato To-Day. By R. H. S. Crossman. (London: George Allen & Unwin, Ltd.1937. Pp. 302. Price 7s. 6d.). Philosophy 12 (48):480-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  2
    Rosalind Field (1988). Norris J. Lacy, Ed.; Geoffrey Ashe, Sandra Ness Ihle, Marianne E. Kalinke, and Raymond H. Thompson, Assoc. Eds., The Arthurian Encyclopedia.(Garland Reference Library of the Humanities, 585.) New York and London: Garland, 1986. Pp. Xl, 649; 49 Black-and-White Illustrations. $60. [REVIEW] Speculum 63 (2):426-428.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  7
    G. C. Field (1936). Two Books on Plato The Argument of Plato. By F. H. Anderson. Pp. Viii + 216. London: Dent, 1935. Cloth, 10s. 6d. Plato's Thought. By G. M. A. Grube. Pp. Xvii + 320. London: Methuen, 1935. Cloth, 12s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 50 (02):63-64.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  1
    J. Field (1978). The Historical Roots of Elementary Mathematics by Lucas N. H. Bunt; Phillip S. Jones; Jack D. Bedient. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 69:274-274.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  4
    G. C. Field (1932). Human Values. By Dewitt H. Parker(Professor of Philosophy, University of Michigan. New York and London: Harper & Bros. 1931. Pp. Viii + 415. Price 10s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 7 (25):105-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. G. C. Field (1936). LASKI, H. J. - The State in Theory and Practice. [REVIEW] Mind 45:77.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. G. C. Field (1936). LASKI, H. J. - The Rise of European Liberalism. [REVIEW] Mind 45:525.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. G. C. Field (1926). MUIRHEAD, J. H. - Contemporary British Philosophy, II. [REVIEW] Mind 35:473.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  87
    Hartry Field (1984). Can We Dispense with Space-Time? PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:33-90.
    This paper is concerned with the debate between substantival and relational theories of space-time, and discusses two difficulties that beset the relationalist: a difficulty posed by field theories, and another difficulty called the problem of quantities. A main purpose of the paper is to argue that possibility can not always be used as a surrogate of ontology, and that in particular that there is no hope of using possibility to solve the problem of quantities.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  20. Hartry Field (1989). Realism, Mathematics & Modality. Basil Blackwell.
  21.  7
    Hartry Field (2001). Truth and the Absence of Fact. Oxford University Press.
    Presenting a selection of thirteen essays on various topics at the foundations of philosophy--one previously unpublished and eight accompanied by substantial new postscripts--this book offers outstanding insight on truth, meaning, and propositional attitudes; semantic indeterminacy and other kinds of "factual defectiveness;" and issues concerning objectivity, especially in mathematics and in epistemology. It will reward the attention of any philosopher interested in language, epistemology, or mathematics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   65 citations  
  22. Hartry Field (1980). Science Without Numbers. Princeton University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   137 citations  
  23.  39
    Hartry Field (2016). Egocentric Content. Noûs 50 (1):n/a-n/a.
    The paper distinguishes two approaches to understanding the representational content of sentences and intentional states, and its role in describing people, predicting and explaining their behavior, and so forth. It sets forth the case for one of these approaches, the “egocentric” one, initially on the basis of its ability to explain the near-indefeasibility of ascriptions of content to our own terms, but more generally on the basis of its providing an attractive overall picture of the descriptive and explanatory role of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Hartry Field (forthcoming). Indicative Conditionals, Restricted Quantifiers and Naive Truth. Review of Symbolic Logic:1-28.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Hartry Field (1978). Mental Representation. Erkenntnis 13 (July):9-61.
  26. Hartry Field (1994). Deflationist Views of Meaning and Content. Mind 103 (411):249-285.
  27. Hartry Field (1972). Tarski's Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 64 (13):347-375.
  28. Hartry Field (2009). What is the Normative Role of Logic? Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):251-268.
    The paper tries to spell out a connection between deductive logic and rationality, against Harman's arguments that there is no such connection, and also against the thought that any such connection would preclude rational change in logic. One might not need to connect logic to rationality if one could view logic as the science of what preserves truth by a certain kind of necessity (or by necessity plus logical form); but the paper points out a serious obstacle to any such (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  29. Hartry Field (1977). Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role. Journal of Philosophy 74 (July):379-409.
  30. Hartry Field (2009). Epistemology Without Metaphysics. Philosophical Studies 143 (2):249 - 290.
    The paper outlines a view of normativity that combines elements of relativism and expressivism, and applies it to normative concepts in epistemology. The result is a kind of epistemological anti-realism, which denies that epistemic norms can be (in any straightforward sense) correct or incorrect; it does allow some to be better than others, but takes this to be goal-relative and is skeptical of the existence of best norms. It discusses the circularity that arises from the fact that we need to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  31. Hartry Field (1973). Theory Change and the Indeterminacy of Reference. Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):462-481.
  32. Hartry Field (2015). What Is Logical Validity? In Colin R. Caret & Ole T. Hjortland (eds.), Foundations of Logical Consequence. Oxford University Press
    What are people who disagree about logic disagreeing about? The paper argues that (in a wide range of cases) they are primarily disagreeing about how to regulate their degrees of belief. An analogy is drawn between beliefs about validity and beliefs about chance: both sorts of belief serve primarily to regulate degrees of belief about other matters, but in both cases the concepts have a kind of objectivity nonetheless.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. Hartry Field (2009). Pluralism in Logic. Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (2):342-359.
    There are quite a few theses about logic that are in one way or another pluralist: they hold (i) that there is no uniquely correct logic, and (ii) that because of this, some or all debates about logic are illusory, or need to be somehow reconceived as not straightforwardly factual. Pluralist theses differ markedly over the reasons offered for there being no uniquely correct logic. Some such theses are more interesting than others, because they more radically affect how we are (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  34.  69
    Hartry Field (2003). A Revenge-Immune Solution to the Semantic Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (2):139-177.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  35. Hartry Field (forthcoming). Disarming a Paradox of Validity. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic.
    Abstract. Any theory of truth must find a way around Curry’s paradox, and there are well-known ways to do so. This paper concerns an apparently analogous paradox, about validity rather than truth, which JC Beall and Julien Murzi (“Two Flavor's of Curry's Paradox”) call the v-Curry. They argue that there are reasons to want a common solution to it and the standard Curry paradox, and that this rules out the solutions to the latter offered by most “naive truth theorists”. To (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Hartry Field (2003). Causation in a Physical World. In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press 435-460.
    1. Of what use is the concept of causation? Bertrand Russell [1912-13] argued that it is not useful: it is “a relic of a bygone age, surviving, like the monarchy, only because it is erroneously supposed to do no harm.” His argument for this was that the kind of physical theories that we have come to regard as fundamental leave no place for the notion of causation: not only does the word ‘cause’ not appear in the advanced sciences, but the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  37.  8
    Hartry Field (2000). 1. The Concept of Apriority. In Paul Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press 117.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  38.  27
    Hartry Field (2013). Naive Truth and Restricted Quantification: Saving Truth a Whole Lot Better. Review of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):1-45.
    Restricted quantification poses a serious and under-appreciated challenge for nonclassical approaches to both vagueness and the semantic paradoxes. It is tempting to explain as ; but in the nonclassical logics typically used in dealing with vagueness and the semantic paradoxes (even those where thend expect. If we’re going to use a nonclassical logic, we need one that handles restricted quantification better.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  39.  63
    Hartry Field (1994). Disquotational Truth and Factually Defective Discourse. Philosophical Review 103 (3):405-452.
  40. Hartry Field (2003). No Fact of the Matter. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (4):457 – 480.
    Are there questions for which 'there is no determinate fact of the matter' as to which answer is correct? Most of us think so, but there are serious difficulties in maintaining the view, and in explaining the idea of determinateness in a satisfactory manner. The paper argues that to overcome the difficulties, we need to reject the law of excluded middle; and it investigates the sense of 'rejection' that is involved. The paper also explores the logic that is required if (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  41. Hartry Field (2005). Recent Debates About the A Priori. In Tamar Szabo Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology. OUP Oxford
  42.  68
    Hartry Field (2000). Indeterminacy, Degree of Belief, and Excluded Middle. Noûs 34 (1):1–30.
  43. Hartry Field (1988). Realism, Mathematics and Modality. Philosophical Topics 16 (1):57-107.
  44.  61
    Hartry Field (2006). Truth and the Unprovability of Consistency. Mind 115 (459):567 - 605.
    It might be thought that we could argue for the consistency of a mathematical theory T within T, by giving an inductive argument that all theorems of T are true and inferring consistency. By Gödel's second incompleteness theorem any such argument must break down, but just how it breaks down depends on the kind of theory of truth that is built into T. The paper surveys the possibilities, and suggests that some theories of truth give far more intuitive diagnoses of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  45.  84
    Hartry Field (1999). Deflating the Conservativeness Argument. Journal of Philosophy 96 (10):533-540.
  46.  44
    Hartry Field (1998). ``Epistemological Nonfactualism and the A Prioricity of Logic&Quot. Philosophical Studies 92 (1/2):1--24.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  47.  74
    Hartry Field (1978). A Note on Jeffrey Conditionalization. Philosophy of Science 45 (3):361-367.
    Bayesian decision theory can be viewed as the core of psychological theory for idealized agents. To get a complete psychological theory for such agents, you have to supplement it with input and output laws. On a Bayesian theory that employs strict conditionalization, the input laws are easy to give. On a Bayesian theory that employs Jeffrey conditionalization, there appears to be a considerable problem with giving the input laws. However, Jeffrey conditionalization can be reformulated so that the problem disappears, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   29 citations  
  48.  6
    S. Chopra, B. J. Copeland, E. Corazza, S. Donaho, F. Ferreira, H. Field, D. M. Gabbay, L. Goldstein, J. Heidema & M. J. Hill (2002). Benton, RA, 527 Blackburn, P., 281 Braüner, T., 359 Brink, C., 543. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31 (615).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  49. H. Field (1986). The Deflationary Conception of Truth. In G. MacDonald & C. Wright (eds.), Fact, Science and Morality. Blackwell 55-117.
  50. Hartry Field (2000). A Priority as an Evaluative Notion. In Paul A. Boghossian & Christopher Peacocke (eds.), New Essays on the a Priori. Oxford University Press
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000