Search results for 'Heinrich von Helmholtz' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. H. Von Helmholtz (1971). On the Conservation of Force; a Physical Memoir. In Russell Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press. 3--55.score: 520.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. H. Von Helmholtz (1971). The Origin and Correct Interpretation of Our Sense Impressions. In Russell Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press. 501--512.score: 520.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Hermann von Helmholtz (1971). The Scientific Researches of Goethe.”. In Russell Kahl (ed.), Selected Writings of Hermann von Helmholtz. Wesleyan University Press.score: 520.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gregor Schiemann (1998). The Loss of World in the Image. Origin and Development of the Concept of Image in the Thought of Hermann von Helmholtz and Heinrich Hertz. In D. Baird (ed.), Heinrich Hertz. Classical Physicist, Modern Philosopher. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer.score: 357.0
    In searching for the origins of current conceptions of science in the history of physics, one encounters a remarkable phenomenon. A typical view today is that theoretical knowledge-claims have only relativized validity. Historically, however, this thesis was supported by proponents of a conception of nature that today is far from typical, a mechanistic conception within which natural phenomena were to be explained by the action of mechanically moved matter. Two of these proponents, Hermann von Helmholtz and his pupil (...) Hertz, contributed significantly to the modernization of the conception of science. Paradigmatic for their common contribution to this development is the way in which they employed the concept of image. By considering the origin and the different meanings of this concept we may trace a line of development which begins with Helmholtz's original claim that a universally and forever valid theory provides a unique representation of nature. It continues with the realization that the status of scientific knowledge is capable of revision; and it arrives at Hertz's admission that a variety of theories over a domain of objects is possible, at least at times. (shrink)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. H. Helmholtz (1977). On the Origin and Significance of the Axioms of Geometry. In Robert Cohen & Elkana Yehuda (eds.), Hermann von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Reidel.score: 340.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hermann von Helmholtz (2013). Ein unveröffentlichter Bericht über verschiedene Arbeiten Angelo Mossos. Philosophia Scientiæ 17:205.score: 300.0
    [a] Die Arbeit des Herrn Mosso hat ein Resultat, welches für die Physiologie des Gehirns und für die Psychologie von hervorragender und fundamentaler Wichtigkeit ist; sie zeigt nämlich, dass bei jeder hinreichend kräftigen Empfindung, bei jeder willkürlichen Anspannung des Denkens, wie sie zum Beispiel beim Rechnen eintritt, augenblicklich eine Steigerung des Blutdrucks und eine grössere Amplitude der Pulswellen im Gehirn eintritt, welche nur so lange [b] dauert, wie die erhöhte Thätigkeit de..
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Hermann von Helmholtz (2013). Un rapport inédit sur divers travaux d'Angelo Mosso. Philosophia Scientiæ 17:206-207.score: 300.0
    Note du traducteur: La transcription rend fidèlement l’orthographe de l’inédit autographe de Helmholtz, et cela jusqu’à l’oubli du « t » dans le mot « nicht », erreur que l’auteur ne semble pas avoir remarquée ou à laquelle il ne devait pas accorder d’importance, vu qu’il s’agissait, probablement, d’une ébauche très avancée du rapport qui aurait dû, ou pu, être copiée, après correction, pour l’envoi en Italie.Dans la transcription ainsi que dans la traduction, l’espace laissé en blanc d’une..
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gregor Schiemann (2008). Verlust der Welt im Bild. Ursprung und Entwicklung des Bildbegriffes bei Hermann von Helmholtz und Heinrich Hertz. In G. Wolfschmidt (ed.), Heinrich Hertz (1857-1894) and the Development of Communication (Nuncius Hamburgensis. Beitrage zur Geschichte der Naturwissenschaften, Band 10). Norderstedt.score: 270.0
    Helmhotz initially ascribes more to theoretical knowledge than merely that it is a picture of the world: it penetrates even to the unobservable causes of the phenomena which he conceived throughout his career as matter set mechanically in motion. The introduction of the picture-concept in the 1860s to characterize scientific theories marks the beginning of the loss of a direct connection with the world. Theories now constitute only a representation of a law-like structure of the world but no longer shed (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Hermann von Helmholtz (2001). On the Nature of Putrefaction and Fermentation. Science in Context 14 (3).score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Hermann von Helmholtz (1998). Book Notices-Science and Culture. Popular and Philosophical Essays. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 20 (3):376-376.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Hermann von Helmholtz (2005). Induction et déduction. Philosophia Scientiae 9:73-81.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Hermann von Helmholtz (2005). Sur l'Ambition de Vulgariser la Science (1874). Philosophia Scientiae 9:59-71.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Hermann von Helmholtz (2010). Sur le Voir Humain (1855). Philosophia Scientiae 14:13-35.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gregor Schiemann (2009). Hermann von Helmholtz's Mechanism: The Loss of Certainty. A Study on the Transition From Classical to Modern Philosophy of Nature. Springer.score: 168.0
    Two seemingly contradictory tendencies have accompanied the development of the natural sciences in the past 150 years. On the one hand, the natural sciences have been instrumental in effecting a thoroughgoing transformation of social structures and have made a permanent impact on the conceptual world of human beings. This histori¬cal period has, on the other hand, also brought to light the merely hypothetical validity of scientific knowledge. As late as the middle of the 19th century the truth-pathos in the natural (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gregor Schiemann (ed.) (1997). Wahrheitsgewissheitsverlust. Hermann von Helmholtz' Mechanismus im Anbruch der Moderne. Eine Studie zum Übergang von klassischer zu moderner Naturphilosophie. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.score: 164.0
    Der Verzicht auf absolut gültige Erkenntnis, heute in den Naturwissenschaften beinahe schon selbstverständlich, ist erst jüngeren Datums. Noch im vergangenen Jahrhundert zweifelte die experimentelle Forschung kaum an der vollkommenen Begreifbarkeit der Welt. Diesen Wandel zu erkunden und aufzuzeigen ist Thema der vorliegenden Studie. Der erste Teil präsentiert verschiedene Typen neuzeitlicher und moderner Wissenschaftsauffassungen von Galilei über Newton bis hin zu Kant. Im zweiten Teil werden Entwicklung und Wandel der Wissenschafts- und Naturauffassung bei Helmholtz (1821-1895) erstmals mittels detaillierter Textanalysen einer (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Daniel Feige & M. Von (2011). Zum Verhaumlltnis von Kunsttheorie und Asthetik Sinnlichkeit als konstitutive Dimension der Kunst? Zeitschrift für Ästhetik Und Allgemeine Kunstwissenschaft 56 (1):123-142.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Gregor Schiemann (1994). Die Hypothetisierung des Mechanismus Bei Hermann von Helmholtz. Ein Beitrag Zum Wandel der Wissenschafts- Und Naturauffassung Im 19. Jahrhundert. In Lorenz Krüger (ed.), Universalgenie Helmholtz. Rückblick nach 100 Jahren. Akademie-Verlag.score: 118.0
    In der ersten Zeit seiner wissenschaftlichen Karriere, d.h. vom Ende der 40er bis etwa zum Ende der 60er Jahre, trägt Hermann von Helmholtz seine mechanistische Naturauffassung noch mit absolutem Geltungsanspruch vor. Im Verlauf der 70er Jahre wird dann ein Wandlungsprozeß auffällig, der sich am deutlichsten in seinen öffentlichen Reden nachweisen läßt. Die mit dem Mechanismus verbundenen Geltungsansprüche werden einer Hypothetisierung unterworfen, wobei Helmholtz allerdings an den Grundaussagen seiner Naturauffassung im wesentlichen unbeirrt festhält. Er korrigiert zwar seine Aussagen über (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Lydia Patton, Hermann Von Helmholtz. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 112.0
    Hermann von Helmholtz (1821-1894) participated in two of the most significant developments in physics and in the philosophy of science in the 19th century: the proof that Euclidean geometry does not describe the only possible visualizable and physical space, and the shift from physics based on actions between particles at a distance to the field theory. Helmholtz achieved a staggering number of scientific results, including the formulation of energy conservation, the vortex equations for fluid dynamics, the notion of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Gregor Schiemann (1998). Physik und Natur. Zu Hermann von Helmholtz' Begründung des Energieprinzips in der Einleitung zu seiner Schrift "Über die Erhaltung der Kraft". In H. Klages (ed.), Hermann von Helmholtz. Klassiker an der Epochenwende. Wissenschaftsverlag.score: 112.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Gregor Schiemann (1995). Zwischen klassischer und moderner Wissenschaftstheorie: Hermann von Helmholtz und Karl R. Popper, erkenntnistheoretisch verglichen. Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 43:845—859.score: 112.0
    Mit seinem Einfluß auf die Entwicklung der Physiologie, Physik und Geometrie ist Hermann von Helmholtz wie kaum ein anderer Wissenschaftler der zweiten Hälfte des 19. Jahrhunderts repräsentativ für die Naturforschung in Deutschland. Nicht weniger repräsentativ nimmt sich die Entwicklung seiner Wissenschaftsauffassung aus. Während er bis in die späten 60er Jahre einen emphatischen Wahrheitsanspruch der Wissenschaft vertrat, begann er in der nachfolgenden Zeit, die Geltungsbedingungen der wissenschaftlichen Erkenntnis einer Relativierung zu unterwerfen, die zusammenfassend als Hypothetisierung bezeichnet werden kann. Helmholtz' (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. A. E. Hui (2011). Instruments of Music, Instruments of Science: Hermann von Helmholtz's Musical Practices, His Classicism, and His Beethoven Sonata. Annals of Science 68 (2):149-177.score: 108.0
    Summary The young Hermann Helmholtz, in an 1838 letter home, declared that he always appreciated music much more when he played it for himself. Though a frequent concert-goer, and celebrated for his highly influential 1863 work on the physiological basis of music theory, Die Lehre von den Tonempfindungen, it is likely that Helmholtz's enduring engagement with music began with his initial, personal experience of playing music for himself. I develop this idea, shifting the discussion of Helmholtz's work (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. D. C. McCarty (2000). Optics of Thought: Logic and Vision in Müller, Helmholtz, and Frege. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41 (4):365-378.score: 102.0
    The historical antecedents of Frege's treatment of binocular vision in "The thought" were the physiological writings of Johannes Mueller, Hermann von Helmholtz, and Emil du Bois-Reymond. In their research on human vision, logic was assigned an unexpected role: it was to be the means by which knowledge of a world extended in three dimensions arises from stimuli that are at best two-dimensional. An examination of this literature yields a richer understanding of Frege's insistence that a proper epistemology requires us (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Scott Edgar (forthcoming). The Physiology of the Sense Organs and Early Neo-Kantian Conceptions of Objectivity: Helmholtz, Lange, Liebmann. In Flavia Padovani, Alan Richardson & Jonathan Y. Tsou (eds.), Objectivity in Science: Approaches to Historical Epistemology. Boston Studies in Philosophy and History of Science. Springer.score: 102.0
    The physiologist Johannes Müller’s doctrine of specific nerve energies had a decisive influence on neo-Kantian conceptions of the objectivity of knowledge in the 1850s - 1870s. In the first half of the nineteenth century, Müller amassed a body of experimental evidence to support his doctrine, according to which the character of our sensations is determined by the structures of our own sensory nerves, and not by the external objects that cause the sensations. Neo-Kantians such as Hermann von Helmholtz, F.A. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. O. Darrigol (2003). Number and Measure: Hermann Von Helmholtz at the Crossroads of Mathematics, Physics, and Psychology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 34 (3):515-573.score: 90.0
    In 1887 Helmholtz discussed the foundations of measurement in science as a last contribution to his philosophy of knowledge. This essay borrowed from earlier debates on the foundations of mathematics (Grassmann / Du Bois), on the possibility of quantitative psychology (Fechner / Kries, Wundt / Zeller), and on the meaning of temperature measurement (Maxwell, Mach). Late nineteenth-century scrutinisers of the foundations of mathematics (Dedekind, Cantor, Frege, Russell) made little of Helmholtz's essay. Yet it inspired two mathematicians with an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. F. W. von Kries (1986). Frieder Schanze, Meisterliche Liedkunst zwischen Heinrich von Mügeln und Hans Sachs, 1: Untersuchungen; 2: Verzeichnisse. (Münchener Texte und Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literatur, 82, 83.) Munich: Artemis, 1983, 1984. 1: pp. ix, 430. 2: pp. viii, 357. 1: DM 78. 2: DM 68. [REVIEW] Speculum 61 (2):460-465.score: 90.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Lydia Patton (2009). Signs, Toy Models, and the A Priori. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 40 (3):281-289.score: 87.0
    The Marburg neo-Kantians argue that Hermann von Helmholtz's empiricist account of the a priori does not account for certain knowledge, since it is based on a psychological phenomenon, trust in the regularities of nature. They argue that Helmholtz's account raises the 'problem of validity' (Gueltigkeitsproblem): how to establish a warranted claim that observed regularities are based on actual relations. I reconstruct Heinrich Hertz's and Ludwig Wittgenstein's Bild theoretic answer to the problem of validity: that scientists and philosophers (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Joan L. Richards (1977). The Evolution of Empiricism: Hermann Von Helmholtz and the Foundations of Geometry. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (3):235-253.score: 84.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Femke Kok (2008). Heinrich von Gent über Metaphysik als erste Wissenschaft. Studien zu einem Metaphysikentwurf aus dem letzten Viertel des 13. Jahrhunderts. Early Science and Medicine 13 (2):206-207.score: 84.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Dani Hallet (2010). On the Subject of Goethe: Hermann von Helmholtz on Goethe and Scientific Objectivity. Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):178-194.score: 84.0
    In their recent book, Objectivity, Lorraine Daston and Peter Galison oppose the image of the scientist as a rational, objective, an dispassionate investigator of nature with that of the intuitively guided and emotionally volatile artistic genius. The authors argue that the emergence of objectivity as an epistemic virtue in nineteenth-century scienti?c practices was intimately tied to a newly perceived threat to knowledge: that of the subjective self. In their discussion, Daston and Galison cite the artist’s creative imposition of ideas on (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Francesca Biagioli (2014). What Does It Mean That “Space Can Be Transcendental Without the Axioms Being So”? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 45 (1):1-21.score: 84.0
    In 1870, Hermann von Helmholtz criticized the Kantian conception of geometrical axioms as a priori synthetic judgments grounded in spatial intuition. However, during his dispute with Albrecht Krause (Kant und Helmholtz über den Ursprung und die Bedeutung der Raumanschauung und der geometrischen Axiome. Lahr, Schauenburg, 1878), Helmholtz maintained that space can be transcendental without the axioms being so. In this paper, I will analyze Helmholtz’s claim in connection with his theory of measurement. Helmholtz uses a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. P. M. Heimann (1979). Book Review:Epistemological Writings Hermann Von Helmholtz, Malcolm F. Lowe, Robert S. Cohen, Yehuda Elkana. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 46 (2):333-.score: 84.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. James Longrigg (1990). At Last, At Last Heinrich von Staden (Ed., Tr.): Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria (Edition, Translation and Essays). Pp. Xliii + 666. Cambridge University Press, 1989. £75. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):238-240.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. A. G. Peskett (1907). C. Iulii Caesaris Commentarii de Bello Civili erklärt von Fr. Kraner u. Fr. Hofmann, elfte vollätandig umgearbeitete Auflage Dr Heinrich von Meusel, Direktor des Kölnischen Gymnasiums in Berlin Berlin: Weidmannsche Buchhandlung, 1906. 8vo. Pp. xvi + 374. Five Maps and Plates. M. 3.40. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 21 (06):186-187.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Veit Pittioni (1991). The Significance of Goethe for the Natural Sciences. Hermann von Helmholtz, Ernst Haeckel, Werner Heisenberg, Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker. Philosophy and History 24 (1/2):36-37.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Gregor Schiemann (1999). 100 Jahre Danach: Zum Stand der Dinge in Sachen Hermann Von Helmholtz. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (1):179-185.score: 84.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Andreas Rupschus (2012). Nachweis aus Heinrich von Treitschke, Samuel Pufendorf, in: Preußische Jahrbücher 35 (1875). Nietzsche-Studien 41 (1).score: 84.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Christophe Bouriau (2005). Déduction Et Induction, Hermann von Helmholtz. Philosophia Scientiae 9 (1):73-81.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Christophe Bouriau (2005). Sur l'Ambition de Vulgariser la Science, Hermann von Helmholtz. Philosophia Scientiae 9 (1):59-71.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. B. D. Haage (1972). P. Rainer Rudolf, SDS (Hrsg.): Heinrich von Langenstein, Erchantnuzz der sund. (Texte des späten Mittelalters und der frühen Neuzeit, H. 22). Berlin 1969, 206 pp. [REVIEW] Zeitschrift für Religions- Und Geistesgeschichte 24 (2):187-189.score: 84.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Catherine Perret (2001). La métaphore comme résistance, variation sur Heinrich von Kleist. Rue Descartes 3 (3):49-56.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. A. Shewan (1913). Homeric Literature 1. Homeri Carmina, cum prolegomenis, notis criticis, commentariis exegeticis. Edidit J. van Leeuwen, J.F. Ilias I.-XII. 9⅜″ × 6⅜″. Pp. lxviii–450. Leyden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1912. M. 9. 2. Der augenblickliche Stand der homerischen Frage. Von Carl Rothe. 9⅛″ × 6″. Pp. 94. Berlin: Weidemann, 1912. M. 2. 3. Menschenart und Heldentum in Homers Ilias. Dr Heinrich Von Spiess. 1 vol. 8½″ × 5⅜″. Pp. vi + 314. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1913. M. 4.50. 4. Homerische Götterstudien, akademische Abhandlung. Von Eric Hedén. 1 vol. 9″ × 5¾″. Pp. iv + 191. Uppsala: K. W. Appelberg, 1912. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 27 (03):93-96.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. E. M. Walker (1927). Griechische Staatskunde Erster Hauptteil: Allgemeine Darstellung des griechischen Staates. Dr Georg Von Busolt. München, 1920. Zweite Hälfte: Darstellung einzelner Staaten und der zwischenstaatlichen Beziehungen. Bearbeitet Dr Heinrich von Swoboda. München, 1926. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 41 (02):68-69.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Christophe Bouriau (2003). Hermann von Helmholtz, Les Faits Dans la Perception: Dossier Helmholtz. Philosophia Scientiae 7 (1):43-47.score: 84.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Christophe Bouriau (2003). Les Faits Dans la Perception, Hermann von Helmholtz. Philosophia Scientiae 7 (1):49-78.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Christophe Bouriau & Alexandre Métraux (2010). Présentation de la Traduction de « Sur le Voir Humain (1855) »1 Hermann von Helmholtz. Philosophia Scientiae 14:1-12.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Danielle Buschinger (1989). La Weltchronik de Heinrich von München (Manuscrit Gotha — Chart. A3). Revue Belge de Philologie Et D'Histoire 67 (3):551-555.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. David Cahan & M. J. Duck (1996). Science and Culture: Popular and Philosophical Essays by Hermann von Helmholtz. Annals of Science 53 (5):527-527.score: 84.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Robert Cohen & Elkana Yehuda (eds.) (1977). Hermann Von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings. Reidel.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Ruth H. Firestone (1991). Christoph Huber, Die Aufnahme und Verarbeitung des Alanus ab Insulis in mittelhochdeutschen Dichtungen: Untersuchungen zu Thomasin von Zerklœre, Gottfried von Straβburg, Frauenlob, Heinrich von Neustadt, Heinrich von St. Gallen, Heinrich von Mügeln und Johannes von Tepl.(Münchener Texte und Untersuchungen zur deutschen Literatur des Mittelalters, 89.) Munich: Artemis, 1988. Pp. xv, 478; 25 tables. DM 89. [REVIEW] Speculum 66 (1):167-169.score: 84.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. L. Hödl (1981). Von den korrekten, korrigierten Ausgaben der Quodlibeta des Heinrich von Gent († 1293) zur kritischen Neuausgabe (1979f.). [REVIEW] Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 63 (3):289-304.score: 84.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000