10 found
Sort by:
  1. Petra Hendriks, Helen de Hoop & Henriëtte de Swart (2012). The Interplay Between the Speaker's and the Hearer's Perspective. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):1-5.
    The neutralization of contrasts in form or meaning that is sometimes observed in language production and comprehension is at odds with the classical view that language is a systematic one-to-one pairing of forms and meanings. This special issue is concerned with patterns of forms and meanings in language. The papers in this special issue arose from a series of workshops that were organized to explore variants of bidirectional Optimality Theory and Game Theory as models of the interplay between the speaker’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Petra Hendriks, John Hoeks, Helen de Hoop, Irene Krämer, Erik-Jan Smits, Jennifer Spenader & Henriëtte de Swart (2009). A Large-Scale Investigation of Scalar Implicature. In Uli Sauerland & Kazuko Yatsushiro (eds.), Semantics and Pragmatics: From Experiment to Theory. Palgrave Macmillan.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Richard van Gerrevink & Helen de Hoop (2007). On the Optimal Use of Almost and Barely in Argumentation. In Dekker Aloni (ed.), Proceedings of the Sixteenth Amsterdam Colloquium.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Reinhard Blutner, Petra Hendriks, Helen de Hoop & Oren Schwartz (2004). When Compositionality Fails to Predict Systematicity. In Simon D. Levy & Ross Gayler (eds.), Compositional Connectionism in Cognitive Science. AAAI Press.
    has to do with the acquisition of encyclopedic knowledge.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Helen de Hoop & Peter de Swart (2004). Contrast in Discourse: Guest Editors' Introduction. Journal of Semantics 21 (2):87-93.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Helen De Hoop (2003). Scrambling in Dutch: Optionality and Optimality. In Simin Karimi (ed.), Word Order and Scrambling. Blackwell Pub..
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Helen de Hoop, Paul Dekker, Donka Farkas, Ted Fernald, Tim Fernando, Bart Geurts, Jonathan Ginzburg, Brendan Gillon, Barbara Grosz & Pat Healey (2001). 790 ACKNOWLEDGMENT Ariel Cohen Ann Copestake Robert Cummins. Linguistics and Philosophy 24:789-790.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Petra Hendriks & Helen de Hoop (2001). Optimality Theoretic Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 24 (1):1-32.
    The aim of this article is to elucidate the processes that characterize natural language interpretation. The basic hypothesis is that natural language interpretation can be characterized as an optimization problem. This innovative view on interpretation is shown to account for the crucial role of contextual information while avoiding certain well-known problems associated withcompositionality. This will become particularly clear in the context of incomplete expressions. Our approach takes as a point of departure total freedom ofinterpretation in combination with the parallel application (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Petra Hendriks, Helen de Hoop & Henriëtte de Swart (2000). Special Issue on Optimality-Theoretic Semantics. Journal of Semantics 17:185-314.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Helen De Hoop (1995). 13. On the Characterization of the Weak-Strong Distinction1. In Emmon Bach, Eloise Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Kluwer. 421.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation