15 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Helena de Bres (Wellesley College)
  1.  15
    Helena de Bres (2014). How Association Matters for Distributive Justice. Brill.
    _ Source: _Page Count 26 Under which conditions does the relation between the levels of benefit and burden held by distinct individuals become a concern of justice? Associativists argue that principles of comparative distributive justice apply only among those persons who share some form of association; humanists argue that some such principles apply among all human persons qua human persons. According to the “weak associativist” account that I defend, humanism is wrong, but so are current versions of associativism. Association is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Helena de Bres (2016). How Association Matters for Distributive Justice. Journal of Moral Philosophy 13 (2):161-186.
    _ Source: _Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 161 - 186 Under which conditions does the relation between the levels of benefit and burden held by distinct individuals become a concern of justice? _Associativists_ argue that principles of comparative distributive justice apply only among those persons who share some form of association; _humanists_ argue that some such principles apply among all human persons _qua_ human persons. According to the “weak associativist” account that I defend, humanism is wrong, but so are current (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  14
    Helena de Bres (2014). How Association Matters for Distributive Justice. New Content is Available for Journal of Moral Philosophy.
    _ Source: _Page Count 26 Under which conditions does the relation between the levels of benefit and burden held by distinct individuals become a concern of justice? Associativists argue that principles of comparative distributive justice apply only among those persons who share some form of association; humanists argue that some such principles apply among all human persons qua human persons. According to the “weak associativist” account that I defend, humanism is wrong, but so are current versions of associativism. Association is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Helena de Bres (2013). Disaggregating Global Justice. Social Theory and Practice 39 (3):422-448.
    If global distributive justice or injustice is to exist, there must be something that is just or unjust: something to which the moral assessments at issue attach. I argue in this paper against one popular candidate for that role: the “global basic structure.” I argue that principles of distributive justice that target the global basic structure fail to satisfy a crucial “action guidance” desideratum and that this problem points to an alternative target that philosophers of global justice have yet to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  54
    Helena de Bres (2011). The Many, Not the Few: Pluralism About Global Distributive Justice. Journal of Political Philosophy 20 (3):314-340.
  6.  56
    Helena de Bres (2011). What's Special About the State? Utilitas 23 (2):140-160.
    any of us think that we have duties of distributive justice towards our fellow citizens that we do not have towards foreigners. Is that thought justified? This paper considers the nature of the state's relationship to distributive justice from the perspective of utilitarianism, a theory that is barely represented in contemporary philosophical debates on this question. My strategy is to mount a utilitarian case for state-specific duties of distributive justice that is similar in its basic structure to the one that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  20
    Helena de Bres (2013). Fairness in Practice: A Social Contract for a Global Economy. Philosophical Review 122 (4):664-667.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  31
    Helena de Bres (2011). Climate Change Justice – By Eric A. Posner & David Weisbach. [REVIEW] Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (3):323-326.
  9.  19
    Helena de Bres (2012). Book Reviews Hassoun , Nicole . Globalization and Global Justice: Shrinking Distance, Expanding Obligations Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. Pp. 248. $85.00 (Cloth). [REVIEW] Ethics 123 (1):158-162.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Helena de Bres (2011). The Cooperation Argument for Fairness in International Trade. Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2):192-218.
  11. Helena de Bres (2011). Globalizing Justice - By Richard Miller. [REVIEW] Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):389-391.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  9
    Helena de Bres (2010). Review of Allen Buchanan, Human Rights, Legitimacy, and the Use of Force. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Helena de Bres (2011). Globalizing Justice: The Ethics of Poverty and Power, Richard W. Miller , 288 Pp., $99 Cloth, $29.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Ethics and International Affairs 25 (3):389-391.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Helena de Bres (2014). Philosophical Interventions: Reviews 1986–2011. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (2):253-256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Helena de Bres (2014). Risse on Justice in Trade. Ethics and International Affairs 28 (4):489-499.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography