301 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Carl G. Hempel [251]C. G. Hempel [13]Carl Gustav Hempel [10]Carl Hempel [8]
Hans-Peter Hempel [8]Peer Hempel [7]Wolfgang Hempel [3]Heinrich Hempel [3]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Gary Hempel Gary Hempel
Profile: Lm Hempel (Colorado State University)
Profile: Thomas Hempel
Profile: Thomas Hempel
  1. Carl Hempel (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press.
  2.  59
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation. In Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. Free Press 504.
  3. Carl G. Hempel (1966). Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,Prentice-Hall.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   211 citations  
  4. Carl G. Hempel (1942). The Function of General Laws in History. Journal of Philosophy 39 (2):35-48.
    The classic logical positivist account of historical explanation, putting forward what is variously called the "regularity interpretation" (#Gardiner, The Nature of Historical Explanation), the "covering law model" (#Dray, Laws and Explanation in History), or the "deductive model" (Michael #Scriven, "Truisms as Grounds for Historical Explanations"). See also #Danto, Narration and Knowledge, for further criticisms of the model. Hempel formalizes historical explanation as involving (a) statements of determining (initial and boundary) conditions for the event to be explained, and (b) statements of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   50 citations  
  5. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science 15 (2):135-175.
  6. Carl G. Hempel (1945). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (I.). Mind 54 (213):1-26.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   88 citations  
  7.  78
    Carl A. Hempel (1983). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation. In Peter Achinstein (ed.), The Concept of Evidence. Oxford University Press 1-26.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   48 citations  
  8. Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher (eds.) (1970). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,D. Reidel.
    Reminiscences of Peter, by P. Oppenheim.--Natural kinds, by W. V. Quine.--Inductive independence and the paradoxes of confirmation, by J. Hintikka.--Partial entailment as a basis for inductive logic, by W. C. Salmon.--Are there non-deductive logics?, by W. Sellars.--Statistical explanation vs. statistical inference, by R. C. Jeffre--Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice, by R. Nozick.--The meaning of time, by A. Grünbaum.--Lawfulness as mind-dependent, by N. Rescher.--Events and their descriptions: some considerations, by J. Kim.--The individuation of events, by D. Davidson.--On properties, by (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  9.  26
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1964). Fundamentals of Concept Formation in Empirical Science. University of Chicago Press.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
  10. Carl G. Hempel (1945). Studies in the Logic of Confirmation (II.). Mind 54 (214):97-121.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   46 citations  
  11.  45
    Carl G. Hempel (1980). The Logical Analysis of Psychology. In Ned Block (ed.), Readings in Philosophy of Psychology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press 1--14.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  12.  49
    Carl G. Hempel (1960). Inductive Inconsistencies. Synthese 12 (4):439-69.
  13.  30
    Carl Hempel, Geometry and Empirical Science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  14.  71
    Carl G. Hempel (1988). Provisoes: A Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Theories. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 28 (2):147 - 164.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  15.  64
    Carl G. Hempel (1980). Comments on Goodman's Ways of Worldmaking. Synthese 45 (2):193 - 199.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  16. Carl G. Hempel (1935). On the Logical Positivists' Theory of Truth. Analysis 2 (4):49 - 59.
  17.  99
    Carl G. Hempel (1968). Maximal Specificity and Lawlikeness in Probabilistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 35 (2):116-133.
    The article is a reappraisal of the requirement of maximal specificity (RMS) proposed by the author as a means of avoiding "ambiguity" in probabilistic explanation. The author argues that RMS is not, as he had held in one earlier publication, a rough substitute for the requirement of total evidence, but is independent of it and has quite a different rationale. A group of recent objections to RMS is answered by stressing that the statistical generalizations invoked in probabilistic explanations must be (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  18. Carl G. Hempel (1958). The Theoretician's Dilemma: A Study in the Logic of Theory Construction. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 2:173-226.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  19. Carl G. Hempel (1965). Science and Human Values. In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. The Free Press 81-96.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  20.  35
    Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1945). A Definition of "Degree of Confirmation". Philosophy of Science 12 (2):98-115.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   27 citations  
  21.  35
    Carl G. Hempel (1943). A Purely Syntactical Definition of Confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (4):122-143.
  22.  3
    Kathrin Bolte, Nicole Gruenheit, Gregor Felsner, Maik S. Sommer, Uwe‐G. Maier & Franziska Hempel (2011). Making New Out of Old: Recycling and Modification of an Ancient Protein Translocation System During Eukaryotic Evolution. Bioessays 33 (5):368-376.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  93
    Carl G. Hempel (2001). The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    Editor James Fetzer presents an analytical and historical introduction and a comprehensive bibliography together with selections of many of Carl G. Hempel's most important studies to give students and scholars an ideal opportunity to appreciate the enduring contributions of one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  24. Carl G. Hempel, Jaakko Hintikka, Gerald Holton, Peter Galison, Antonia Soulez & Nancy Cartwright (1993). Scientific Philosophy: Origins and Developments. Springer Netherlands.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  25.  92
    Carl G. Hempel (1935). Some Remarks on `Facts' and Propositions. Analysis 2 (6):93-96.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  26.  63
    Carl G. Hempel (1981). Turns in the Evolution of the Problem of Induction. Synthese 46 (3):389 - 404.
  27. Carl G. Hempel & Paul Oppenheim (1948). Reply to David L. Miller's Comments. Philosophy of Science 15 (4):350-352.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  2
    Leopold Lowenheim, S. C. Kleene, Paul Bernays, Saunders MacLane, Ernest Nagel, Albert Wohlstetter, J. C. C. McKinsey, Charles A. Baylis, Carl G. Hempel & C. H. Langford (2013). The Journal of Symbolic Logic Publishes Original Scholarly Work in Symbolic Logic. Founded in 1936, It has Become the Leading Research Journal in the Field. The Journal Aims to Represent Logic Broadly, Including its Connections with Mathematics and Philosophy as Well as Newer Aspects Related to Computer Science and Linguistics. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 43 (44).
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29.  45
    Carl G. Hempel (2000). Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge University Press.
    Carl Gustav Hempel (1905-1997) was one of the preeminent figures in the philosophical movement of logical empiricism. He was a member of both the Berlin and Vienna circles, fled Germany in 1934 and finally settled in the US where he taught for many years in New York, Princeton, and Pittsburgh. The essays in this collection come from the early and late periods of Hempel's career and chart his intellectual odyssey from a rigorous commitment to logical positivism in the 1930s (when (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  67
    Carl G. Hempel (1967). The White Shoe: No Red Herring. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 18 (3):239-240.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  31.  81
    Carl G. Hempel (1964). On the Nature of Mathematical Truth. In P. Benacerraf H. Putnam (ed.), Philosophy of Mathematics. Prentice-Hall 366--81.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  32.  39
    Carl G. Hempel (1961). Rational Action. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 35:5 - 23.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  33.  81
    Carl G. Hempel (1983). Kuhn and Salmon on Rationality and Theory Choice. Journal of Philosophy 80 (10):570-572.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  26
    Carl G. Hempel (1991). Hans Reichenbach Remembered. Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):5 - 10.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  35.  61
    Carl G. Hempel (1936). Some Remarks on Empiricism. Analysis 3 (3):33 - 40.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  36. Carl Hempel (1969). Reduction: Ontological and Linguistic Facets. In White Morgenbesser (ed.), Philosophy, Science, and Method: Essays in Honor of Ernest Nagel. St Martin's Press
  37. Carl G. Hempel (1950). Problems and Changes in the Empiricist Criterion of Meaning. 11 Rev. Intern. De Philos 41 (11):41-63.
    The fundamental tenet of modern empiricism is the view that all non-analytic knowledge is based on experience. Let us call this thesis the principle of empiricism. [1] Contemporary logical empiricism has added [2] to it the maxim that a sentence makes a cognitively meaningful assertion, and thus can be said to be either true or false, only if it is either (1) analytic or self-contradictory or (2) capable, at least in principle, of experiential test. According to this so-called empiricist criterion (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  38.  43
    Ernest Nagel & C. G. Hempel (1931). Measurement. Erkenntnis 2 (1):313-335.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  39.  26
    Carl G. Hempel (1968). On a Claim by Skyrms Concerning Lawlikeness and Confirmation. Philosophy of Science 35 (3):274-278.
  40.  15
    Carl G. Hempel (1983). Valuation and Objectivity in Science. In R. Cohen & L. Laudan (eds.), Physics, Philosophy, and Psychoanalysis. D. Reidel 73--100.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  4
    Hans Reichenbach, Carl G. Hempel & Gustav Bergmann (1952). The Verifiability Theory of Meaning. Journal of Symbolic Logic 17 (2):134-136.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  42.  37
    Carl G. Hempel (1939). Vagueness and Logic. Philosophy of Science 6 (2):163-180.
    As is rather generally admitted today, the terms of our language in scientific as well as in everyday use, are not completely precise, but exhibit a more or less high degree of vagueness. It is the purpose of this paper to examine the consequences of this circumstance for a series of questions which belong to the field of logic. First of all, the meaning and the logical status of the concept of vagueness will be analyzed; then we will try to (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  43.  33
    Carl G. Hempel (1973). Rudolf Carnap, Logical Empiricist. Synthese 25 (3-4):256 - 268.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  8
    Carl G. Hempel (1949). Theory of Experimental Inference. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 46 (17):557-561.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  27
    Carl G. Hempel (1992). In Memoriam Wolfgang Stegmüller. Erkenntnis 36 (1):5 - 1.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46.  26
    Carl G. Hempel (1975). The Old and the New 'Erkenntnis'. Erkenntnis 9 (1):1 - 4.
    In this first issue of the new Erkenntnis, it seems fitting to recall at least briefly the character and the main achievements of its distinguished namesake and predecessor. The old Erkenntnis came into existence when Hans Reichenbach and Rudolf Carnap assumed the editorship of the Annalen der Philosophie and gave the journal its new title and its characteristic orientation; the first issue appeared in 1930. The journal was backed by the Gesellschaft f r Empirische Philosophie in Berlin, in which Reichenbach, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  47.  7
    Carl G. Hempel & Nelson Goodman (1956). Philosophy and Analysis. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (1):78-82.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Carl Gustav Hempel (1988). Provisos: A Philosophical Problem Concerning the Inferential Function of Scientific Laws. In A. Grünbaum & W. Salmon (eds.), The Limits of Deductivism. University of California Press, Berkeley, Ca 19Ð36.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  49.  29
    Carl G. Hempel (1946). A Note on the Parodoxes of Confirmation. Mind 55 (217):79-82.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  50.  2
    Carl Hempel (1993). Empiricism in the Vienna Circle and in the Berlin Society for Scientific Philosophy: Recollections and Reflections. Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 1:1-9.
    The central ideas of logical, or scientific, empiricism as it developed during the twenties and early thirties in Vienna and in Berlin, grew out of collaborative efforts of scientifically interested philosophers and philosophically interested scientists. Those thinkers noted that while the claims made by the physical sciences were amenable to objective test by experiment and observation, the pronouncements put forward by metaphysics were incapable of any such objective critical appraisal. And while hypotheses advanced in the physical sciences would eventually be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 301