13 found
Sort by:
  1. William Sweet & Hendrik Hart (2012). Responses to the Enlightenment: An Exchange on Foundations, Faith, and Community. Editions Rodopi.
    Since the time of the Enlightenment in Western Europe, discussions of faith and reason have often pitted the believer against the skeptic, the theist against the atheist, and the person of one faith against the person of no professed faith. But the relation of reason to faith has been a matter of debate among believers as well. There are those who hold that religious faith can be proven or supported by rational argument. Others say that to try to give reasons (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. William Sweet, Hendrik Hart, Claire Taylor & Hugh Robert Williams (2012). American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 396. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (2):395-396.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Hendrik Hart (2000). Truth in Context. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 4 (1):143-145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Hendrik Hart (1999). Faith After Foundationalism. International Studies in Philosophy 31 (4):123-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Hendrik Hart (1997). Conceptual Understanding and Knowing Other-Wise: Reflections on Rationality and Spirituality in Philosophy. In James H. Olthuis (ed.), Knowing Other-Wise: Philosophy at the Threshold of Spirituality. Fordham University Press. 19--53.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hendrik Hart (1994). Faith as Trust and Belief as Intellectual Credulity. Philosophy and Theology 8 (3):251-256.
    In response to the critique of his work by William Sweet, Hendrik Hart first offers some terminological clarifications. The important difference between ‘faith’ (trust in God) and ‘belief’ (our network of accepted understandings of things, expressed in concepts and propositions) is emphasized and his use of terms such as ‘religion,’ ‘knowledge,’ and ‘truth’ are explained. Hart then clarifies his approach to the Western philosophical tradition . He argues that Christian accommodation to philosophy and its idea of ‘reason’ as ultimate arbiter (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Hendrik Hart (1993). Liberalism, Pluralism, and Lived Faith. Philosophy and Theology 8 (2):149-165.
    Liberalism is no longer defensible as a strategy for coping with conflicts in a pluralistic society, but is itself one of the pluralities in conflict. Hence its strategy for coping with plurality---tolerant suspension or privatization of the deep commitments that are the roots of conflict, coupled with rational discussion to form a public consensus not connected to the plurality of commitments---can no longer serve as a common sense approach for all citizens. In this paper I explore as a solution the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Kai Nielsen & Hendrik Hart (1990). Search for Community in a Withering Tradition. University Press of America.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Hendrik Hart (1988). A Theme From the Philosophy of Herman Dooyeweerd. Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):268-282.
    On the occasion of the 50th anniversary of Herman Dooyeweerd’s New Critique of Theoretical Thought in 1985 and the 10th anniversary of his death in 1987, I explore his theory of theory. Dooyeweerd distinguished theory as conceptual knowledge of abstracted functions from everyday knowing as integrated knowledge of wholes. He tried to show that critical theorizing requires philosophical integration, self-awareness, and religious knowledge of the origin of ourselves and creation. In the course of developing his view Dooyeweerd touched on many (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Hendrik Hart (1987). In Defence of Open-Mindedness William Hare Kingston and Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press, 1985. Pp. Xiii, 121. $17.95, $8.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Dialogue 26 (02):378-.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Hendrik Hart (1987). Kai Nielsen's Philosophy & Atheism. Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):334-346.
    Kai Nielsen’s recent book Philosophy and Atheism is discussed here. The main point is that Nielsen’s arguments against Christianity can be turned against his own rationalist atheism with similar results, namely that the position seems incoherent from its own point of view. Christianity is unempirical and irrational by certain arguments, but the position assumed underneath those arguments does not survive treatment by those same arguments. Nielsen’s dependence on arguments that undermine the position assumed in these arguments should make him open (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Hendrik Hart (1973). Problems of Time; an Essay. Philosophia Reformata 38:30-42.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Hendrik Hart (1966). Communal Certainty and Authorized Truth. Amsterdam, Swets & Zeitlinger.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation