32 found
Order:
Disambiguations
Henry T. Greely [28]Henry Greely [4]Henry T. “Hank” Greely [1]
  1. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy.Henry Greely, Barbara Sahakian, John Harris, Ronald Kessler, Gazzaniga C., Campbell Michael, Farah Philip & J. Martha - 2008 - Nature 456:702-705.
  2.  39
    Human Brain Surrogates Research: The Onrushing Ethical Dilemma.Henry T. Greely - 2021 - American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1):34-45.
    Human brain research is moving into a dilemma. The best way to understand how the human brain works is to study living human brains in living human beings, but ethical and legal standards make it d...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   23 citations  
  3.  77
    Thinking about the human neuron mouse.Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):27 – 40.
  4.  59
    Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4 – 13.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   37 citations  
  5.  56
    Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Strangers at the Beachside: Research Ethics Consultation”.Mildred K. Cho, Sara L. Tobin, Henry T. Greely, Jennifer McCormick, Angie Boyce & David Magnus - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (3):4-6.
    Institutional ethics consultation services for biomedical scientists have begun to proliferate, especially for clinical researchers. We discuss several models of ethics consultation and describe a team-based approach used at Stanford University in the context of these models. As research ethics consultation services expand, there are many unresolved questions that need to be addressed, including what the scope, composition, and purpose of such services should be, whether core competencies for consultants can and should be defined, and how conflicts of interest should (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   28 citations  
  6.  66
    Introduction: Sharing Data in a Medical Information Commons.Amy L. McGuire, Mary A. Majumder, Angela G. Villanueva, Jessica Bardill, Juli M. Bollinger, Eric Boerwinkle, Tania Bubela, Patricia A. Deverka, Barbara J. Evans, Nanibaa' A. Garrison, David Glazer, Melissa M. Goldstein, Henry T. Greely, Scott D. Kahn, Bartha M. Knoppers, Barbara A. Koenig, J. Mark Lambright, John E. Mattison, Christopher O'Donnell, Arti K. Rai, Laura L. Rodriguez, Tania Simoncelli, Sharon F. Terry, Adrian M. Thorogood, Michael S. Watson, John T. Wilbanks & Robert Cook-Deegan - 2019 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 47 (1):12-20.
    Drawing on a landscape analysis of existing data-sharing initiatives, in-depth interviews with expert stakeholders, and public deliberations with community advisory panels across the U.S., we describe features of the evolving medical information commons. We identify participant-centricity and trustworthiness as the most important features of an MIC and discuss the implications for those seeking to create a sustainable, useful, and widely available collection of linked resources for research and other purposes.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  7.  68
    Moral Issues of Human-Non-Human Primate Neural Grafting.Mark Greene, Kathryn Schill, Shoji Takahashi, Alison Bateman-House, Tom Beauchamp, Hilary Bok, Dorothy Cheney, Joseph Coyle, Terrence Deacon, Daniel Dennett, Peter Donovan, Owen Flanagan, Steven Goldman, Henry Greely, Lee Martin & Earl Miller - 2005 - Science 309 (5733):385-386.
    The scientific, ethical, and policy issues raised by research involving the engraftment of human neural stem cells into the brains of nonhuman primates are explored by an interdisciplinary working group in this Policy Forum. The authors consider the possibility that this research might alter the cognitive capacities of recipient great apes and monkeys, with potential significance for their moral status.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   27 citations  
  8.  19
    Should Cerebral Organoids be Used for Research if they Have the Capacity for Consciousness?Henry T. “Hank” Greely & Karola V. Kreitmair - 2021 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 30 (4):575-584.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  9. CRISPR Critters and CRISPR Cracks.R. Alta Charo & Henry T. Greely - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):11-17.
    This essay focuses on possible nonhuman applications of CRISPR/Cas9 that are likely to be widely overlooked because they are unexpected and, in some cases, perhaps even “frivolous.” We look at five uses for “CRISPR Critters”: wild de-extinction, domestic de-extinction, personal whim, art, and novel forms of disease prevention. We then discuss the current regulatory framework and its possible limitations in those contexts. We end with questions about some deeper issues raised by the increased human control over life on earth offered (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  10.  94
    Neuroethics and national security.Turhan Canli, Susan Brandon, William Casebeer, Philip J. Crowley, Don DuRousseau, Henry T. Greely & Alvaro Pascual-Leone - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):3 – 13.
    Science is driven by technical innovations, and perhaps nowhere as visibly as in neuroscience. In the past decade, advances in methods have led to an explosion of studies in cognitive (Gazzaniga et...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   20 citations  
  11. Clarifying the Ethics and Oversight of Chimeric Research.Josephine Johnston, Insoo Hyun, Carolyn P. Neuhaus, Karen J. Maschke, Patricia Marshall, Kaitlynn P. Craig, Margaret M. Matthews, Kara Drolet, Henry T. Greely, Lori R. Hill, Amy Hinterberger, Elisa A. Hurley, Robert Kesterson, Jonathan Kimmelman, Nancy M. P. King, Melissa J. Lopes, P. Pearl O'Rourke, Brendan Parent, Steven Peckman, Monika Piotrowska, May Schwarz, Jeff Sebo, Chris Stodgell, Robert Streiffer & Amy Wilkerson - 2022 - Hastings Center Report 52 (S2):2-23.
    This article is the lead piece in a special report that presents the results of a bioethical investigation into chimeric research, which involves the insertion of human cells into nonhuman animals and nonhuman animal embryos, including into their brains. Rapid scientific developments in this field may advance knowledge and could lead to new therapies for humans. They also reveal the conceptual, ethical, and procedural limitations of existing ethics guidance for human‐nonhuman chimeric research. Led by bioethics researchers working closely with an (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12.  32
    Assessing ESCROs: Yesterday and Tomorrow.Henry T. Greely - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (1):44-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  13. Integrating Rules for Genomic Research, Clinical Care, Public Health Screening and DTC Testing: Creating Translational Law for Translational Genomics.Susan M. Wolf, Pilar N. Ossorio, Susan A. Berry, Henry T. Greely, Amy L. McGuire, Michelle A. Penny & Sharon F. Terry - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):69-86.
    Human genomics is a translational field spanning research, clinical care, public health, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, law differs across these domains on issues including liability, consent, promoting quality of analysis and interpretation, and safeguarding privacy. Genomic activities crossing domains can thus encounter confusion and conflicts among these approaches. This paper suggests how to resolve these conflicts while protecting the rights and interests of individuals sequenced. Translational genomics requires this more translational approach to law.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14.  14
    The Future of DTC Genomics and the Law.Henry T. Greely - 2020 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 48 (1):151-160.
    Direct-to-Consumer genomics has been a controversial topic for over a decade. Much work has been done on the legal issues it raises. This article asks a different question: What will DTC genomics and its legal issues look like in ten to twenty years? After discussing the five current uses of DTC genomics, it describes three current legal issues: medical uses, privacy of genomic information, and privacy in collection and analysis of human DNA. It then suggests that changes in human genomics (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  15.  3
    Of Nails and Hammers.Henry T. Greely - 2011 - In Julian Savulescu, Ruud ter Meulen & Guy Kahane (eds.), Enhancing Human Capacities. Blackwell. pp. 501–520.
    This chapter explores the questions “What policy tools do we have to deal with human biological enhancements?” as well as “What policy tools do we need?.” After discussing the policy tools available in the United States, it examines their adequacy in coping with human biological enhancements in two respects – how easy they would be to adopt and how easy they would be to enforce. In each category, three major issues raised by human biological enhancement are considered: safety, coercion, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  16.  30
    Defining chimeras...And chimeric concerns.Henry T. Greely - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (3):17 – 20.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   9 citations  
  17.  23
    Academic Chimeras?Henry T. Greely - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (2):13-14.
  18.  13
    Is De-extinction Special?Henry T. Greely - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (S2):S30-S36.
    I have been involved with the current interest in de‐extinction since early 2012, nearly its beginning. I have given a lot of thought to the potential risks and benefits of de‐extinction. But only recently, after deep immersion in discussions around CRISPR‐Cas9, the hottest new tool in bioscience since polymerase chain reaction, have I thought about a more fundamental question: how, if at all, is de‐extinction special? Are “revived species” just another kind of genetically modified organism, raising essentially the same general (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  19.  29
    To the Barricades!Henry T. Greely - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):1-2.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  20.  12
    Premarket Approval Regulation for Lie Detections: An Idea Whose Time May Be Coming.Henry T. Greely - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (2):50-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  21.  43
    Response to open Peer commentaries on "thinking about the human neuron mouse".Henry T. Greely, Mildred K. Cho, Linda F. Hogle & Debra M. Satz - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W4 – W6.
  22.  42
    What If? The Farther Shores of Neuroethics: Commentary on “Neuroscience May Supersede Ethics and Law”.Henry T. Greely - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (3):439-446.
    Neuroscience is clearly making enormous progress toward understanding how human brains work. The implications of this progress for ethics, law, society, and culture are much less clear. Some have argued that neuroscience will lead to vast changes, superseding much of law and ethics. The likely limits to the explanatory power of neuroscience argue against that position, as do the limits to the social relevance of what neuroscience will be able to explain. At the same time neuroscience is likely to change (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  23.  38
    Response to open Peer commentaries on "neuroethics and national security".Turhan Canli, Susan Brandon, William Casebeer, Philip J. Crowley, Don DuRousseau, Henry T. Greely & Alvaro Pascual-Leones - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (5):W1 – W3.
  24.  21
    Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders' Kin.Henry T. Greely, Daniel P. Riordan, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Joanna L. Mountain - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):248-262.
    “The sins of the fathers are to be laid upon the children.”Just after midnight on March 21, 2003, a drunk stood on a footbridge over a motorway in a village in Surrey in southern England. After eight pints of beer, he was drunk enough to decide to drop a brick from the overpass into traffic to see if he could hit something; unfortunately, he was not so drunk that he missed. The brick crashed through the windshield on the driver's side (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25.  25
    Family Ties: The Use of DNA Offender Databases to Catch Offenders' Kin.Henry T. Greely, Daniel P. Riordan, Nanibaa' A. Garrison & Joanna L. Mountain - 2006 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 34 (2):248-262.
    The authors examine the scientific possibility and the legal and ethical implications of using DNA forensic technology, through partial matches to DNA from crime scenes, to turn into suspects the relatives of people whose DNA profiles are in forensic databases.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  26. The social effects of advances in neuroscience: legal problems, legal perspectives.Henry Greely - 2005 - In Judy Illes (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27. The social effects of advances in neuroscience: legal problems, legal perspectives.Henry Greely - 2005 - In Judy Illes (ed.), Neuroethics: Defining the Issues in Theory, Practice, and Policy, J Illes (Ed). Oxford University Press: Oxford. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28.  20
    Some First Steps Toward Responsible Use of Cognitive-Enhancing Drugs by the Healthy.Henry T. Greely - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (7):39-41.
  29.  13
    Consumer genetic technologies: ethical and legal considerations.I. Glenn Cohen, Nita A. Farahany, Henry T. Greely & Carmel Shachar (eds.) - 2021 - New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
    For the average person, genetic testing has two very different faces. The rise of genetic testing is often promoted as the democratization of genetics by enabling individuals to gain insights into their unique makeup. At the same time, many have raised concerns that genetic testing and sequencing reveal intensely personal and private information. As these technologies become increasingly available as consumer products, the ethical, legal, and regulatory challenges presented by genomics are ever looming. Assembling multidisciplinary experts, this volume evaluates the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30.  12
    Conflicts in the Biotechnology Industry.Henry T. Greely - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):354-359.
    True revolutions turn the entire world upside down, in ways expected and surprising, profound and mundane. The revolution spawned by advances in molecular biology is no exception. Most of the attention has gone, deservedly, to the possible effects of these advances on medicine, on society, and on our understanding of what it means to be human. But the revolution has already had effects—large and small, good and bad—in other areas. This paper analyzes one aspect of the industry created by that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  25
    Conflicts in the Biotechnology Industry.Henry T. Greely - 1995 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 23 (4):354-359.
    True revolutions turn the entire world upside down, in ways expected and surprising, profound and mundane. The revolution spawned by advances in molecular biology is no exception. Most of the attention has gone, deservedly, to the possible effects of these advances on medicine, on society, and on our understanding of what it means to be human. But the revolution has already had effects—large and small, good and bad—in other areas. This paper analyzes one aspect of the industry created by that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  6
    OrganEx: What Will It Mean?Henry T. Greely - 2022 - American Journal of Bioethics 22 (11):4-7.
    In April 2019 Yale Professor Nenad Sestan’s “BrainEx” experiments startled the world (Vrselja 2019). Four hours after pigs were decapitated, researchers perfused the pigs’ brains using what they ca...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark