98 found
Order:
  1.  82
    David L. Hull, Andrew Lugg, Robert E. Butts & I. C. Jarvie (1979). Review Symposium : Laurens Laudan. Progress and its Problems: Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth. Berkeley and Los Angeles: The University of California Press, 1977. Pp. X + 257.Laudan's Progress and its Problems. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9 (4):457-465.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  2.  70
    I. C. Jarvie (1964). Key Problems of Sociology. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14 (56):352-355.
  3.  86
    I. C. Jarvie (1993). Review Essays : Relativism yet Again. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (4):537-547.
  4.  78
    I. C. Jarvie (1967). On Theories of Fieldwork and the Scientific Character of Social Anthropology. Philosophy of Science 34 (3):223-242.
    The following intellectual as opposed to practical reasons for all anthropologists doing fieldwork are examined: fieldwork: (1) records dying societies, (2) corrects ethnocentric bias, (3) helps put customs in their true context, (4) helps get the "feel" of a place, (5) helps to get to understand a society from the inside, (6) enables appreciation of what translating one culture into terms of another involves, (7) makes one a changed man, (8) provides the observational, factual basis for generalizations. None of these (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  60
    I. C. Jarvie (1961). Nadel on the Aims and Methods of Social Anthropology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):1-24.
  6.  17
    I. C. Jarvie (1972). Concepts and Society. London,Routledge and K. Paul.
    1 The logic of the situation1 What do the social sciences explain? It is a mistake, to which careless expressions by social scientists often give ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  7.  20
    I. C. Jarvie (1999). Criticism and the History of Science. International Studies in Philosophy 31 (2):111-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  11
    I. C. Jarvie (1993). Review of Appraising Economic Theories: Studies in the Methodology of Scientific Research Programs, Edited by Neil de Marchi and Mark Blaug. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 9 (02):313-313.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    I. C. Jarvie (2001). Science in a Democratic Republic. Philosophy of Science 68 (4):545-564.
    Polanyi's and Popper's defenses of the status quo in science are explored and criticized. According to Polanyi, science resembles a hierarchical and tradition-oriented republic and is necessarily conservative; according to Popper's political philosophy the best republic is social democratic and reformist. By either philosopher's lights science is not a model republic; yet each claims it to be so. Both authors are inconsistent in failing to apply their own ideals. Both underplay the extent to which science depends upon the wider society; (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10. Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.) (1987). Rationality: The Critical View. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  11.  31
    I. C. Jarvie (1980). Rationality and the Social Sciences. International Studies in Philosophy 12 (1):99-101.
  12.  14
    I. C. Jarvie (1988). Local Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):113-115.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  48
    I. C. Jarvie (1978). Seeing Through Movies. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8 (4):374-397.
  14.  5
    I. C. Jarvie (1961). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12 (45):193-199.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  12
    I. C. Jarvie (2003). Theories of Culture in Postmodern Time. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (2):144-145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  19
    I. C. Jarvie (1988). Evolutionary Epistemology. Critical Review 2 (1):92-102.
    EVOLUTIONARY EPISTEMOLOGY, THEORY OF RATIONALITY, AND THE SOCIOLOGY OF KNOWLEDGE by Gerard Radnitzky and W. W. Bartley, III La Salle, Ill.: Open Court, 1987. 475 pp., $39.95, $14.95 (paper).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17. I. C. Jarvie (1964). The Revolution in Anthropology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (58):143-150.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  18.  96
    I. C. Jarvie (1987). Philosophy of the Film: Epistemology, Ontology, Aesthetics. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    Examines the overlap between film and philosophy in three distinct ways: epistemological issues in film-making and viewing; aesthetic theory and film; and film as a medium of philosophical expression. This title available in eBook format. Click here for more information . Visit our eBookstore at: www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  4
    I. C. Jarvie (1964). Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (58):193-199.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  36
    Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (1980). The Rationality of Irrationalism. Metaphilosophy 11 (2):127–133.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  9
    I. C. Jarvie (2003). Fuller on Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 33 (2):261-285.
  22.  9
    I. C. Jarvie (1965). Reply to Professor Horowitz. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 16 (63):241-242.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  33
    I. C. Jarvie & Sandra Pralong (eds.) (1999). Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years: The Continuing Relevance of Karl Popper. Routledge.
    Popper's Open Society After Fifty Years presents a coherent survey of the reception and influence of Karl Popper's masterpiece The Open Society and its Enemies over the fifty years since its publication in 1945, as well as applying some of its principles to the context of modern Eastern Europe. This unique volume contains papers by many of Popper's contemporaries and friends, including such luminaries as Ernst Gombrich, in his paper "The Open Society and its Enemies: Remembering its Publication Fifty Years (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  7
    P. Baert, D. Weinberg, V. Mottier, I. C. Jarvie & J. Zamora-Bonilla, Social Constructionism, Postmodernism and Deconstructionism.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  15
    I. C. Jarvie (1987). Concept Formation in the Humanities and the Social Sciences. International Studies in Philosophy 19 (1):99-99.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  23
    I. C. Jarvie (1987). The Sociology of the Pornography Debate. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 17 (2):257-275.
  27.  17
    I. C. Jarvie (1964). Explanation in Social Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (57):62-72.
  28.  16
    I. C. Jarvie (1991). Book Reviews : Karl R. Popper, A World of Propensities. Thoemmes, Bristol, 1990. Pp. 51. 5.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (3):407-409.
  29.  12
    I. C. Jarvie (2003). The Ethical Nature of Karl Popper's Theory of Knowledge. International Studies in Philosophy 35 (4):144-145.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Fred D'Agostino & I. C. Jarvie (eds.) (1989). Freedom and Rationality. Reidel.
    INTRODUCTION The editors of this volume - Jarvie and D'Agostino - encountered John Watkins at such different times in his career that they have never ...
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  8
    I. C. Jarvie (1989). Culture Theory. International Studies in Philosophy 21 (3):147-148.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  17
    I. C. Jarvie (1998). Situational Logic and its Reception. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):365-380.
    Popper holds to the unity of scientific method: any differences between natural and social science are a product of theory, not a pretheoretical premise. Distin guishing instead pure and applied generalizing sciences, Popper focuses on the different role of laws in each. In generalizing social science, our tools are the logic of the situation, including the rationality principle, and unintended conse quences. Situations contain individuals, but also social entities not reducible to individuals: conspiracy theory is the extreme form of individualism. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  8
    I. C. Jarvie (1975). Book Reviews : Human Understanding. Volume I: The Collective Use and Evolution of Concepts. Stephen Toulmin. Toronto: Saunders (Princeton University Press), I972. Pp. 502. $I4.85. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5 (1):91-94.
  34. I. C. Jarvie (1986). Thinking About Society Theory and Practice. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  10
    I. C. Jarvie (1995). Against Relativism. International Studies in Philosophy 27 (4):116-118.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. I. C. Jarvie (1984). Rationality and Relativism: In Search of a Philosophy and History of Anthropology. Routledge & K. Paul.
  37.  6
    Tom Settle, I. C. Jarvie & Joseph Agassi (1974). Towards a Theory of Openness to Criticism. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 4 (1):83-90.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  9
    I. C. Jarvie (1984). Anthropology as Science and the Anthropology of Science and of Anthropology or Understanding and Explanation in the Social Sciences, Part II. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:745 - 763.
    Anthropology, the science of human culture, includes in its scope the anthropology of scientific cultures. Anthropological accounts of these scientific cultures -- which also happen to be the cultures to which most anthropologists belong -- are scarcely adequate. All too often science is assimilated to the practices and thought systems of non-scientific cultures; some anthropologists espousing the anti-scientific methods of symbol analysis and relativism. Arguments of M. Douglas, C. Geertz and F. Hanson are used as critical illustrations.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  11
    I. C. Jarvie (1982). Hilary Putnam Meaning and the Moral Sciences. Metaphilosophy 13 (2):161–164.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  10
    I. C. Jarvie (2000). Book Review:Culture. The Anthropologist's Account Adam Kuper. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 67 (3):540-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  8
    I. C. Jarvie (1964). Review: Explanation in Social Science. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15 (57):62 - 72.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Joseph Agassi, I. C. Jarvie & Tom Settle (1971). The Grounds of Reason. Philosophy 46 (175):43 - 50.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  9
    I. C. Jarvie (1998). Book Reviews : Marshall Sahlins, How Natives Think. About Captain Cook, for Example. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1995. Pp. X + 318. $24.95. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (4):567-570.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  12
    I. C. Jarvie (1981). Social Perception and Social Change. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (3):223–240.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  9
    I. C. Jarvie (2001). Freeman on Mead Again. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (4):557-562.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  10
    I. C. Jarvie (2000). The Philosophical Deficit in Randall Collins's the Sociology of Philosophies. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (2):274-283.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  3
    J. N. Hattiangadi, I. C. Jarvie & J. O'Neill (1982). Editors/Redacteurs En Chef. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (2):120-120.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  3
    I. C. Jarvie & Joseph Agassi (1987). A Study in Westernization. In Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Rationality: The Critical View. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers 395--421.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    I. C. Jarvie (1986). Book Reviews : Cinema and Sentiment. By Charles Affron. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982. Pp. XI + 202. $20.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 16 (2):265-267.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    I. C. Jarvie (1960). Professor Passmore on the Objectivity of History. Philosophy 35 (135):355 - 356.
    In his lucid paper “The Objectivity of History” Professor Pass more poses the problem of history's objectivity and seeks to find out in what the objectivity of history might consist. In this note I wish only to criticize his presentation of Popper's views . I think Pass more's failure to report Popper's views correctly causes him to overlook the striking similarity between Popper's conclusion and his own.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 98