Search results for 'Ian Bapty' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  71
    Ian Bapty & Tim Yates (eds.) (1990). Archaeology After Structuralism: Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology. Routledge.
    Introduction: Archaeology and Post-Structuralism Ian Bapty and Tim Yates i If it recedes one day, leaving behind its works and signs on the shores of our ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ian Bapty (1990). Nietzsche, Derrida, and Foucault. In Ian Bapty & Tim Yates (eds.), Archaeology After Structuralism: Post-Structuralism and the Practice of Archaeology. Routledge
  3.  19
    Luca Sciortino (2016). On Ian Hacking’s Notion of Style of Reasoning. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    The analytical notion of ‘scientific style of reasoning’, introduced by Ian Hacking in the middle of the 1980s, has become widespread in the literature of the history and philosophy of science. However, scholars have rarely made explicit the philosophical assumptions and the research objectives underlying the notion of style: what are its philosophical roots? How does the notion of style fit into the area of research of historical epistemology? What does a comparison between Hacking’s project on styles of thinking and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  12
    María Laura Martínez (2010). Ontología histórica Y nominalismo dinámico: La propuesta de Ian Hacking para las ciencias humanas. Cinta de Moebio 39:130-141.
    En los últimos años Ian Hacking se ha dedicado a trabajar principalmente acerca de las ciencias humanas. El objetivo de este artículo es presentar algunas de las nociones acuñadas por el filósofo canadiense -fundamentalmente las de ontología histórica y nominalismo dinámico- para dicho ámbito. A par..
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Jonathan H. Pye & Ian T. Ramsey (1979). A Bibliography of the Published Works [of] Ian Thomas Ramsey.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Nils Kürbis (forthcoming). Some Comments on Ian Rumfitt’s Bilateralism. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-22.
    Ian Rumfitt has proposed systems of bilateral logic for primitive speech acts of assertion and denial, with the purpose of ‘exploring the possibility of specifying the classically intended senses for the connectives in terms of their deductive use’ : 810f). Rumfitt formalises two systems of bilateral logic and gives two arguments for their classical nature. I assess both arguments and conclude that only one system satisfies the meaning-theoretical requirements Rumfitt imposes in his arguments. I then formalise an intuitionist system of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ann Milliken Pederson (2004). "Writing the Agenda," Summary and Response to the Panel Participants: V. V. Raman, Grace Wolf-Chase, Ian Barbour, Vitor Westhelle. Zygon 39 (2):379-382.
    . This essay highlights the basic issues, goals, and questions for the future of ZCRS.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  62
    Ian Rumfitt (1999). Logic and Existence: Ian Rumfitt. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 73 (1):151–180.
    [Ian Rumfitt] Frege's logicism in the philosophy of arithmetic consisted, au fond, in the claim that in justifying basic arithmetical axioms a thinker need appeal only to methods and principles which he already needs to appeal in order to justify paradigmatically logical truths and paradigmatically logical forms of inference. Using ideas of Gentzen to spell out what these methods and principles might include, I sketch a strategy for vindicating this logicist claim for the special case of the arithmetic of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Jon Robson (2012). Do Possible Worlds Compromise God's Beauty? A Reply to Mark Ian Thomas Robson. Religious Studies 48 (4):515 - 532.
    In a recent article Mark Ian Thomas Robson argues that there is a clear contradiction between the view that possible worlds are a part of God's nature and the theologically pivotal, but philosophically neglected, claim that God is perfectly beautiful. In this article I show that Robson's argument depends on several key assumptions that he fails to justify and as such that there is reason to doubt the soundness of his argument. I also demonstrate that if Robson's argument were sound (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  4
    Jarrod W. Brown (2016). Buddhism in a Dark Age: Cambodian Monks Under Pol Pot by Ian Harris. Philosophy East and West 66 (3):1052-1053.
    Buddhism in a Dark Age: Cambodian Monks under Pol Pot, by Ian Harris, is a natural follow-up to Harris’s 2005 work, Cambodian Buddhism: History and Practice, also published by the University of Hawai‘i Press. The present work, like the earlier one, is primarily focused on the social and political history of Cambodian Buddhism and expands on the final two chapters of that earlier work in that it deals with Buddhism in Democratic Kampuchea from 1975 to 1979 and the aftermath of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    Luca Sciortino (forthcoming). On Ian Hacking’s Notion of Style of Reasoning. Erkenntnis:1-22.
    The analytical notion of ‘scientific style of reasoning’, introduced by Ian Hacking in the middle of the 1980s, has become widespread in the literature of the history and philosophy of science. However, scholars have rarely made explicit the philosophical assumptions and the research objectives underlying the notion of style: what are its philosophical roots? How does the notion of style fit into the area of research of historical epistemology? What does a comparison between the Hacking’s project on styles of thinking (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  3
    William Uzgalis (2016). John Toland's Letters to Serena Ed. By Ian Leask. Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (3):506-506.
    Ian Leask’s new edition of John Toland’s Letters to Serena, last published in 1704, has all the marks of a fine new edition of an early eighteenth-century book—it has an index, timeline, all of Toland’s notes, along with editor’s notes explaining many of the obscure names to be found in the letters; and it has a first-rate introduction in which Leask nicely explains the letters and what he takes Toland to be doing. John Toland’s intentions and influences are a matter (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Taede A. Smedes (2008). Taking Theology and Science Seriously Without Category Mistakes: A Response to Ian Barbour. Zygon 43 (1):271-276.
    . In my response to Ian Barbour's criticisms, I first argue for the anthropological dimensions and contextuality of any theology. Next I examine and criticize Barbour's thesis that I am an in‐compatibilist about divine action. Finally I illustrate the fact that I see genuine opportunities for a dialogue between theologians and scientists without apologetics, category mistakes, or relegating theology to the fringes of science, by pointing to evolutionary explanations of religion.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Ian Hacking (1983). Representing and Intervening Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science /Ian Hacking. --. --. Cambridge University Press,1983.
    This 1983 book is a lively and clearly written introduction to the philosophy of natural science, organized around the central theme of scientific realism. It has two parts. 'Representing' deals with the different philosophical accounts of scientific objectivity and the reality of scientific entities. The views of Kuhn, Feyerabend, Lakatos, Putnam, van Fraassen, and others, are all considered. 'Intervening' presents the first sustained treatment of experimental science for many years and uses it to give a new direction to debates about (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  15. Reinhard Schulz (1999). Darstellen Und Rekonstruieren: Eine Hermeneutische Erwiderung Auf Ian Hacking. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 30 (2):365-378.
    Representing and Reconstructing: A Hermeneutical Reply to Ian Hacking. Hacking published in 1983 Representing and Intervening which has provoked, particularly in the US, the so called realism/anti-realism debate which is still alive today. He lays claim to anti-realism for theory and to realism for the experiment. Following him, only that which can be used for manipulating something is realistic. H. Putnam is a severe critic of this dualism. In my paper I am going to take the Hacking -Putnam controversy as (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. María Laura Martínez (2009). Ian Hacking's Proposal for the Distinction Between Natural and Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):212-234.
    This article explores the proposal offered by Ian Hacking for the distinction between natural and social sciences—a proposal that he has defined from the outset as complex and different from the traditional ones. Our objective is not only to present the path followed by Hacking 's distinction, but also to determine if it constitutes a novelty or not. For this purpose, we deemed it necessary to briefly introduce the core notions Hacking uses to establish his strategic approach to social sciences, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  2
    Ian Rumfitt (2014). I—Ian Rumfitt: Truth and Meaning. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 88 (1):21-55.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  75
    Alan G. Gross (1990). Reinventing Certainty: The Significance of Ian Hacking's Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:421 - 431.
    This paper examines Ian Hacking's arguments in favor of entity realism. It shows that his examples from science do not support his realism. Furthermore, his proposed criterion of experimental use is neither sufficient nor necessary for conferring a privileged status on his preferred unobservables. Nonetheless his insight is genuine; it may be most profitably seen as part of a more general effort to create a space for a new form of scientific and philosophical certainty, one that does not require foundations.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  55
    Andrew Davis (2008). Ian Hacking, Learner Categories and Human Taxonomies. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (3-4):441-455.
    I use Ian Hacking 's views to explore ways of classifying people, exploiting his distinction between indifferent kinds and interactive kinds, and his accounts of how we 'make up' people. The natural kind/essentialist approach to indifferent kinds is explored in some depth. I relate this to debates in psychiatry about the existence of mental illness, and to educational controversies about the credentials of learner classifications such as 'dyslexic'. Claims about the 'existence' of learning disabilities cannot be given a clear, simple (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  15
    J. Macnaughton (2007). Literature and the "Good Doctor" in Ian McEwan's Saturday. Medical Humanities 33 (2):70-74.
    There is widespread acceptance in medical humanities circles that reading is good for doctors and that, in medical educational terms, it is particularly good at making better doctors by widening perspective and developing the sensibilities. Recent recommendations on medical education in the UK have allowed medical students to take courses in literature as a component of their degrees, and some have suggested that this option should be compulsory for all doctors. It is possible, however, that in our eagerness to assert (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  32
    David Stump (1988). The Role of Skill in Experimentation: Reading Ludwik Fleck's Study of the Wasserman Reaction as an Example of Ian Hacking's Experimental Realism. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:302 - 308.
    While Ludwik Fleck's Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact is mainly concerned with social elements in science, a central argument depends on his case study of the development of a serum test for syphilis, the Wasserman Reaction, which Fleck argues was the product of skill and of laboratory practice, not a simple discovery. Ian Hacking interprets the creation of new phenomena in science very differently, arguing that it can seen as an argument for scientific realism. Hacking's argument shows that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  14
    Ruth Abbey (2006). Turning or Spinning? Charles Taylor's Catholicism: A Reply to Ian Fraser. Contemporary Political Theory 5 (2):163.
    Charles Taylor's work has recently taken a religious turn, with Taylor becoming more explicit about his own religious faith and its influence on his thinking. Ian Fraser offers a systematic, critical exploration of the nature of Taylor's Catholicism as it appears in his writings. This reply to Fraser endorses his belief in the importance of looking carefully at Taylor's religious views. However, it raises doubts about some of Fraser's particular arguments and conclusions, and aims to foster a clearer understanding of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  34
    Thom Brooks (2006). Ian Shapiro, The State of Democratic Theory:The State of Democratic Theory. Ethics 116 (2):442-444.
  24.  45
    M. Kusch (2002). Metaphysical Deja Vu: Hacking and Latour on Science Studies and Metaphysics - the Social Construction of What? Ian Hacking; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. And London, England, 1999, Pp. X+261, Price £18.50 Hardback, ISBN 0-674-81200-X.Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies Bruno Latour; Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. And London, England, 1999, Pp. X+324, Price £12.50, $19.95 Paperback, ISBN 0-67-465336-X, £27.95, $45.00 Hardback, ISBN 0-67-465335-. [REVIEW] Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 33 (3):639-647.
    Ian Hacking, Hacking and Latour on science studies and metaphysics: The Social Construction of What?Harvard University Press, ISBN 0-674-81200-X Bruno Latour, Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science StudiesHarvard University Press, ISBN0-67-465336-X.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  9
    William A. Rottschaefer (1985). Religious Cognition as Interpreted Experience: An Examination of Ian Barbour's Comparison of the Epistemic Structures of Science and Religion. Zygon 20 (3):265-282.
    . Using as a model contemporary analyses of scientific cognition, Ian Harbour has claimed that religious cognition is neither immediate nor inferential but has the structure of interpreted experience. Although I contend that Barbour has failed to establish his claim, I believe his views about the similarities between scientific and religious cognition are well founded. Thus on that basis I offer an alternative proposal that theistic religious cognition is essentially inferential and that religious experience is in fact the use of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  19
    Dan Robins (2012). Reply to Ian Johnston. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 11 (2):271-272.
    Reply to Ian Johnston Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-2 DOI 10.1007/s11712-012-9274-1 Authors Dan Robins, School of Arts and Humanities, The Richard Stockton College of New Jersey, 101 Vera King Farris Drive, Galloway, NJ 08205, USA Journal Dao Online ISSN 1569-7274 Print ISSN 1540-3009.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  31
    Ruth Beilin (2013). Frederick R. Steiner (Ed): The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature, 2006. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (3):711-720.
    Frederick R. Steiner (ed): The Essential Ian McHarg: Writings on Design and Nature, 2006 Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-10 DOI 10.1007/s10806-009-9217-y Authors Ruth Beilin, University of Melbourne Landscape Sociologist, Department of Resource Management and Geography, Melbourne School of Land and Environment Melbourne VIC 3010 Australia Journal Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Online ISSN 1573-322X Print ISSN 1187-7863.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    Ian McKellen (2002). Sir Ian McKellen's Film Diary. The Chesterton Review 28 (1/2):207-210.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  17
    M. L. Martinez (2009). Ian Hacking's Proposal for the Distinction Between Natural and Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 39 (2):212-234.
    This article explores the proposal offered by Ian Hacking for the distinction between natural and social sciences—a proposal that he has defined from the outset as complex and different from the traditional ones. Our objective is not only to present the path followed by Hacking’s distinction, but also to determine if it constitutes a novelty or not. For this purpose, we deemed it necessary to briefly introduce the core notions Hacking uses to establish his strategic approach to social sciences, under (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    David Hitchcock (2014). Andrew Aberdein and Ian J. Dove (Eds): The Argument of Mathematics (Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science, Vol. 30). Argumentation 28 (2):245-258.
    Post-war argumentation theorists have tended to regard argumentation as one thing and mathematical proof as another. Perelman (1958, 1969), for example, defined the word ‘argumentation’ stipulatively as a contrast term to ‘demonstration’: whereas mathematical reasoning as theorized by modern formal logic, he writes, is a matter of deducing theorems from axioms in accordance with stipulated rules of transformation, argumentation aims at gaining the adherence of minds (Perelman 1969, pp. 1–2). Toulmin (1958) contrasted his “jurisprudential model” of argument, according to which (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  17
    Ronald C. Arnett (1988). A Choice-Making Ethic for Organizational Communication: The Work of Ian I. Mitroff. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 7 (3):151 - 161.
    This article examines the ethical implications of Ian Mitroff's scholarly contribution to the study of Organizational Communication. Although Mitroff does not specifically ground his work in ethics, this article considers an ethic of choicemaking to be a significant interpretive key for understanding the contribution of his research. In addition, this article provides another conceptual key for understanding the considerable quantity of Mitroff's work by organizing it around three major themes: science, decision-making, and myth. The goal of this article is to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  16
    Sebastian Assenza (2010). Ian Hesketh. Of Apes and Ancestors: Evolution, Christianity, and the Oxford Debate. Spontaneous Generations 4 (1):262-265.
    In Of Apes and Ancestors, Ian Hesketh attempts to de-mythologize the famous Oxford debate between Samuel Wilberforce, the bishop of Oxford, and Charles Darwin’s friends, Thomas Huxley and Joseph Hooker. Hooker and Huxley clashed publicly with Wilberforce at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science (BAAS) in June of 1860. At issue was the scientific content and general implication of Darwin’s Origin of Species. Hesketh argues that this event is best understood as a minor episode in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  13
    Aristotle Tympas (2011). Ian Inkster (Ed.): History of Technology. Vol. 29. London: Continuum, 2009, 232pp, £90.00 HB. [REVIEW] Metascience 20 (3):601-602.
    Ian Inkster (ed.): History of technology. Vol. 29. London: Continuum, 2009, 232pp, £90.00 HB Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-2 DOI 10.1007/s11016-011-9523-7 Authors Aristotle Tympas, Department of Philosophy and History of Science, University of Athens, University Campus, 157 71 Athens, Greece Journal Metascience Online ISSN 1467-9981 Print ISSN 0815-0796.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    Annette Patterson (2013). The Legacy of Ian Hunter's Work on Literature Education and the History of Reading Practices: Some Preliminary Remarks. History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-7.
    Summary Ian Hunter's early work on the history of literature education and the emergence of English as school subject issued a bold challenge to traditional accounts that have in the main focused on English either as knowledge of a particular field or as ideology. The alternative proposal put forward by Hunter and supported by detailed historical analysis is that English exists as a series of historically contingent techniques and practices for shaping the self-managing capacities of children. The challenge for the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    Ian Boyd (2013). Interview with Fr. Ian Boyd. The Chesterton Review 39 (3):240-244.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  5
    Ole Jacob Madsen, Johannes Servan & Simen Andersen Øyen (2013). 'I Am a Philosopher of the Particular Case' An Interview with the 2009 Holberg Prizewinner Ian Hacking. History of the Human Sciences 26 (3):32-51.
    When Ian Hacking won the Holberg International Memorial Prize 2009 his candidature was said to strengthen the legitimacy of the prize after years of controversy. Ole Jacob Madsen, Johannes Servan and Simen Andersen Øyen have talked to Ian Hacking about current questions in the philosophy and history of science.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  5
    [Name Unavailable] (2009). Ian Rory Owen. Psychotherapy and Phenomenology: On Freud, Husserl, and Heidegger. Lincoln, N.E.,: iUniverse, 2006. Analecta Hermeneutica 1 (1).
    Book Review. Ian Rory Owen. Psychotherapy and Phenomenology: On Freud, Husserl, and Heidegger. Lincoln, N.E.,: iUniverse, 2006.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Ian White (1978). Condorget: Politics and Reason: Ian White. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 12:110-139.
    From the time of its clearest origins with Pascal, the theory of probabilities seemed to offer means by which the study of human affairs might be reduced to the same kind of mathematical discipline that was already being achieved in the study of nature. Condorcet is to a great extent merely representative of the philosophers of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries who were led on by the prospect of developing moral and political sciences on the pattern of the natural sciences, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  3
    Tony Bennett (2013). A Thorn in the Side: Ian Hunter, Cultural Studies, and the Humanities. History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-7.
    Summary What are the connections between Ian Hunter's specific criticisms of cultural studies and his more general criticisms of those strands of the humanities that take issue with instrumental reasoning? How are these connections informed by his assessments of the limitations, and the consequences, of the ?moment of theory?? What are the implications of his critique of anti-instrumental defences of the humanities for contemporary debates concerning the future trajectories of cultural studies? In exploring these questions I consider the continuities between (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  3
    Peter Holbrook (2013). Context and Contextualisation: Remarks on the Work of Ian Hunter. History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-7.
    Summary This essay focuses on a characteristic analytical and rhetorical strategy of the style of intellectual history practiced by Ian Hunter. It assesses the moral and political resources supplied by that strategy, as well as its implications for one particular humanities discipline, that of literary criticism.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Terry Nardin (2012). Historian or Philosopher? Ian Hunter on Kant and Vattel. History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-13.
    Summary Ian Hunter's essay pursues several lines of argument, one explicit and the others not. The first is that of an historian correcting the mistaken view among Kantian commentators that Kant's conception of international justice had displaced Vattel's as the dominant one in nineteenth- and twentieth-century international thought. The second, which is not acknowledged, is that of a philosopher entering a debate over the relative cogency of the two conceptions. To accomplish this unacknowledged philosophical task, Hunter exaggerates the importance of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  2
    Christopher Insole (2000). Ian Markham's Critical Realism. Heythrop Journal 41 (3):318–326.
    Book reviewed in this article:Ian Markham's, Critical Realism.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Bernard Harbaš (2014). Book Review: Ian James, The New French Philosophy. [REVIEW] Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 22 (2):137-140.
    A review of Ian James, The New French Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  5
    Peter E. Langford (1996). A Comment on Ian Vine's Review Article. Journal of Moral Education 25 (4):467-467.
    A reply to Ian Vine's review of Peter Langford's Approaches to the development of moral reasoning, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hove, 1995.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    Ian Kesarcodi-Watson (1980). Can I Die?–An Essay in Religious Philosophy: Ian Kesarcodi-Watson. Religious Studies 16 (2):163-178.
    Often we feel there is something odd about death, and especially about our own. This latter at least we often feel beyond our ken. Well, I think in a sense it may be; but in another, clearly is not. Among those who have felt this strangeness is Ramchandra Gandhi who, in an excellent recent work, The Availability of Religious Ideas , maintained – There is no difficulty in seeing that I cannot intelligibly conceive of my own death – the ceasing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Anna Yeatman (2013). Ian Hunter's Civil Philosophy. History of European Ideas 40 (1):1-6.
    Ian Hunter's normative commitment is to civil philosophy. His sustained critique of metaphysical philosophy is to be understood in the context of his proposition that civil and moral philosophy are at war. Since civil philosophy is the only guarantor of social peace, the stakes are high.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  4
    Donald Evans (1971). Ian Ramsey on Talk About God (Continued). Religious Studies 7 (3):213 - 226.
    For Ian Ramsey, talk about God raises many philosophical problems: ‘If we are not to use anthropomorphic concepts like love, power, wisdom, we cannot talk about God; but if we do use them, how do we manage to talk of God and not man?’ ‘Believers wish on the one hand to claim that he is indescribable and ineffable, and yet on the other hand to talk a great deal about him. Nay more, when they speak of God they say that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Leonard Angel (2015). Is There Adequate Empirical Evidence for Reincarnation? An Analysis of Ian Stevenson’s Work. In Keith Augustine & Michael Martin (eds.), The Myth of an Afterlife: The Case against Life After Death. Rowman & Littlefield 575-583.
    This article reviews the research of “top rebirth scientist” Ian Stevenson on spontaneous past-life memory cases, focusing on three key problems with Stevenson’s work. First, his research of entirely anecdotal case reports contains a number of errors and omissions. Second, like other reincarnation researchers, Stevenson has done no controlled experimental work on such cases; yet only such research could ever resolve whether the correspondences found between a child’s statements and a deceased person’s life exceed what we might find by chance. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Ian G. Barbour (2002). Response: Ian Barbour on Typologies.”. Zygon 37:345-359.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Ian Buchanan (2000). Deleuzism: A Metacommentary / Ian Buchanan. Duke University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000