29 found
Sort by:
  1. Ian Carter (2013). Are Toleration and Respect Compatible? Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (3):195-208.
    Toleration and respect are often thought of as compatible, and indeed complementary, liberal democratic ideals. However, it has sometimes been said that toleration is disrespectful, because it necessarily involves a negative evaluation of the object of toleration. This article shows how toleration and respect are compatible as long as ‘respect’ is taken to mean (what some moral philosophers have called) recognition respect, as opposed to appraisal respect. But it also argues that recognition respect itself rules out certain kinds of evaluation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ian Carter (2013). Basic Equality and the Site of Egalitarian Justice. Economics and Philosophy 29 (1):21-41.
    The nature of basic equality (what it is that makes us all equals) can have implications not only for the question of the currency of egalitarian justice but also for that of its . The latter question is raised by G. A. Cohen in his critique of John Rawls's theory of justice. In this paper I argue that Rawlsian liberals might provide an answer to Cohen's critique by establishing two distinct kinds of basic equality, thus providing a of basic equality. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ian Carter & Maria Paola Ferretti (2013). Introduction. Journal of Applied Philosophy 30 (3):191-194.
    In attempting to clarify both the concept of toleration and its role in contemporary society several authors have interpreted it as based on the notion of respect for persons. Persons are due respect as moral agents and as such should be allowed to make their own choices, even if the content of those choices meets with our disapproval. According to a classical understanding of toleration, one can be said to tolerate something if one disapproves of it (this is commonly called (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ian Carter (2011). Debate: The Myth of 'Merely Formal Freedom'. Journal of Political Philosophy 19 (4):486-495.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ian Carter (2011). I due Rawls di Maffettone. Iride 24 (3):643-652.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ian Carter (2011). Respect and the Basis of Equality. Ethics 121 (3):538-571.
  7. Debbie Roberts, Tom Dougherty, Ian Carter, Anna Stilz & David Shoemaker (2011). 10. George Sher, Who Knew? Responsibility Without Awareness George Sher, Who Knew? Responsibility Without Awareness (Pp. 675-680). [REVIEW] Ethics 121 (3).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ian Carter (2010). Italy. The Philosophers' Magazine 49:44-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ian Carter (2010). The March of Freedom. The Philosophers' Magazine 50 (50):123-124.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ian Carter (2010). La Libertad negativa y positiva. Astrolabio: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 10:15-35.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ian Carter (2009). Respect for Persons and the Interest in Freedom. In Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.), Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge 16--167.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen De Wijze, Matthew H. Kramer & Ian Carter (eds.) (2009). Hillel Steiner and the Anatomy of Justice: Themes and Challenges. Routledge.
    Throughout the English-speaking world, and in the many other countries where analytic philosophy is studied, Hillel Steiner is esteemed as one of the foremost contemporary political philosophers. This volume is designed as a festschrift for Steiner and as an important collection of philosophical essays in its own right. The editors have assembled a roster of highly distinguished international contributors, all of whom are eager to pay tribute to Steiner by focusing on topics on which he himself has concentrated. Some of (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ian Carter (2008). How Are Power and Unfreedom Related. In Cécile Laborde & John W. Maynor (eds.), Republicanism and Political Theory. Blackwell 58--82.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ian Carter & Matthew H. Kramer (2008). How Changes in One's Preferences Can Affect One's Freedom (and How They Cannot): A Reply to Dowding and Van Hees. Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):81-96.
    How is a person's freedom related to his or her preferences? Liberal theorists of negative freedom have generally taken the view that the desire of a person to do or not do something is irrelevant to the question of whether he is free to do it. Supporters of the “pure negative” conception of freedom have advocated this view in its starkest form: they maintain that a person is unfree to Φ if and only if he is prevented from Φ-ing by (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ian Carter, Matthew H. Kramer & Hillel Steiner (eds.) (2007). Freedom: A Philosophical Anthology. Blackwell Pub..
    Edited by leading contributors to the literature, Freedom: An Anthology is the most complete anthology on social, political and economic freedom ever compiled. Offers a broad guide to the vast literature on social, political and economic freedom. Contains selections from the best scholarship of recent decades as well as classic writings from Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau and Kant among others. General and sectional introductions help to orient the reader. Compiled and edited by three important contributors to the field.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ian Carter (2005). Book Review: José Saramago: Latterday Tolstoy? [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 83 (1):122-131.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ian Carter (2005). Book Review: Raymond Williams' Sociology of Culture: A Critical Reconstruction. [REVIEW] Thesis Eleven 80 (1):126-130.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ian Carter (2004). A Measure of Freedom. OUP Oxford.
    How do we know when one person or society is 'freer' than another? Can freedom be measured? Is more freedom better than less? This book provides the first full-length treatment of these fundamental yet neglected issues, throwing new light both on the notion of freedom and on contemporary liberalism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ian Carter (2004). Review of Michael Otsuka, Libertarianism Without Inequality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2004 (9).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ian Carter (2001). Funzionamenti e capacità: una critica liberale alle teorie di Sen e Nussbaum. Rivista di Filosofia 92 (1):49-70.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ian Carter (2001). Freedom, Power and Political Morality: Essays for Felix Oppenheim. Palgrave.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ian Carter (2001). Ought Implies Practically Possible. In Freedom, Power and Political Morality: Essays for Felix Oppenheim. Palgrave 79-95.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ian Carter, Michael Otsuka & Francesco Saverio Trincia (2001). Discussione Su "If You're an Egalitarian, How Come You're So Rich?" di G.A. Cohen. Iride 14 (3):609-634.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Felix E. Oppenheim, Ian Carter & Mario Ricciardi (eds.) (2001). Freedom, Power, and Political Morality: Essays for Felix Oppenheim. Palgrave.
    This collection of original essays on political and legal theory concentrates on themes dealt with in the work of Felix Oppenheim, including fundamental political and legal concepts and their implications for the scope of morality in politics and international relations. Among the issues addressed are the relationship between empirical and normative definitions of "freedom", "power", and "interests", whether governments are free to act against the national interest, and whether they can ever be morally obliged to do so.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ian Carter (1997). Can Enlightenment Morality Be Justified Teleologically? Manchester Centre for Political Thought.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ian Carter (1995). The Independent Value of Freedom. Ethics 105 (4):819-845.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ian Carter (1995). Interpersonal Comparisons of Freedom. Economics and Philosophy 11 (01):1-.
    This paper is about the relevance, to the definition of freedom, of values or goods other than freedom. In this respect,its subject matter is not at all new. However, I do believe that new light can be thrown on the nature of this relationship by paying more attention to another relationship – one which exists within the concept of freedom itself. There are two senses in which we can be said to possess freedom. Firstly, there is the sense in which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ian Carter (1991). Is Analytical Action Theory Reductionist? Analyse & Kritik 13 (1):61-66.
    Steven Lukes and Alasdair MacIntyre have accused analytical action theory of being motivated by reductionist aims and of ignoring the fact that what is distinctively human about actions is their essentially social character. These reductionist aims are said to 'subvert, the search for the distinctively human. Enterprises that have particularly come under fire are the search for 'basic' actions and attempts to solve problems regarding the 'individuation' of actions. Lukes and MacIntyre are mistaken however, both in their interpretation of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Diana Forsythe, Ian Carter, G. A. Mackay, John Nisbet, Peter Sadler & John Sewel (1984). The Rural Community and the Small School. British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (3):286-287.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation