57 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Ian Kerridge [49]Ian H. Kerridge [8]
  1. Scott J. Fitzpatrick, Claire Hooker & Ian Kerridge (forthcoming). Suicidology as a Social Practice. Social Epistemology:1-20.
    Suicidology as a Social Practice. . ???aop.label???. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2014.895448.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. David Levy, Ben Gadd, Ian Kerridge & Paul A. Komesaroff (forthcoming). A Gentle Ethical Defence of Homeopathy. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry:1-7.
    Recent discourses about the legitimacy of homeopathy have focused on its scientific plausibility, mechanism of action, and evidence base. These, frequently, conclude not only that homeopathy is scientifically baseless, but that it is “unethical.” They have also diminished patients’ perspectives, values, and preferences. We contend that these critics confuse epistemic questions with questions of ethics, misconstrue the moral status of homeopaths, and have an impoverished idea of ethics—one that fails to account either for the moral worth of care and of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Justin T. Denholm & Ian H. Kerridge (2014). Privacy in the Context of “Re-Emergent” Infectious Diseases. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (2):263-264.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny (2014). Double Meanings Will Not Save the Principle of Double Effect. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (3):304-316.
    In an article somewhat ironically entitled “Disambiguating Clinical Intentions,” Lynn Jansen promotes an idea that should be bewildering to anyone familiar with the literature on the intention/foresight distinction. According to Jansen, “intention” has two commonsense meanings, one of which is equivalent to “foresight.” Consequently, questions about intention are “infected” with ambiguity—people cannot tell what they mean and do not know how to answer them. This hypothesis is unsupported by evidence, but Jansen states it as if it were accepted fact. In (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mitchell Lawlor & Ian Kerridge (2014). Understanding Selective Refusal of Eye Donation. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (1):57-64.
    Corneal transplantation is the most common form of organ transplantation performed globally. However, of all organs, eyes have the highest rate of refusal of donation. This study explored the reasons why individuals decide whether or not to donate corneas. Twenty-one individuals were interviewed who had made a donation decision (13 refused corneal donation and eight consented). Analysis was performed using Grounded Theory. Refusal of corneal donation was related to concerns about disfigurement and the role of eyes in memory and communication. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Bronwen Morrell, Wendy L. Lipworth, Rowena Forsyth, Christopher F. C. Jordens & Ian Kerridge (2014). Power and Control in Interactions Between Journalists and Health-Related Industries: The View From Industry. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (2):233-244.
    The mass media is a major source of health information for the public, and as such the quality and independence of health news reporting is an important concern. Concerns have been expressed that journalists reporting on health are increasingly dependent on their sources—including representatives of industries responsible for manufacturing health-related products—for story ideas and content. Many critics perceive an imbalance of power between journalists and industry sources, with industry being in a position of relative power, however the empirical evidence to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kimberly Strong, Ian Kerridge & Miles Little (2014). Savior Siblings, Parenting and the Moral Valorization of Children. Bioethics 28 (4):187-193.
    Philosophy has long been concerned with ‘moral status’. Discussions about the moral status of children, however, seem often to promote confusion rather than clarity. Using the creation of ‘savior siblings’ as an example, this paper provides a philosophical critique of the moral status of children and the moral relevance of parenting and the role that formative experience, regret and relational autonomy play in parental decisions. We suggest that parents make moral decisions that are guided by the moral significance they attach (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Karolyn L. A. White, Christopher F. C. Jordens & Ian Kerridge (2014). Contextualising Professional Ethics: The Impact of the Prison Context on the Practices and Norms of Health Care Practitioners. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 11 (3):333-345.
    Health care is provided in many contexts—not just hospitals, clinics, and community health settings. Different institutional settings may significantly influence the design and delivery of health care and the ethical obligations and practices of health care practitioners working within them. This is particularly true in institutions that are established to constrain freedom, ensure security and authority, and restrict movement and choice. We describe the results of a qualitative study of the experiences of doctors and nurses working within two women’s prisons (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Helen Jane Crowther & Ian Kerridge (2013). Intractable Difficulties in Caring for People With Sickle Cell Disease. American Journal of Bioethics 13 (4):22 - 24.
    (2013). Intractable Difficulties in Caring for People With Sickle Cell Disease. The American Journal of Bioethics: Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 22-24. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2013.767959.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Chris Degeling, Ian Kerridge & Melanie Rock (2013). What to Think of Canine Obesity? Emerging Challenges to Our Understanding of Human–Animal Health Relationships. Social Epistemology 27 (1):90 - 104.
    (2013). What to Think of Canine Obesity? Emerging Challenges to Our Understanding of Human–Animal Health Relationships. Social Epistemology: Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 90-104. doi: 10.1080/02691728.2012.760662.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Charles D. Douglas, Ian H. Kerridge & Rachel A. Ankeny (2013). Narratives of 'Terminal Sedation', and the Importance of the Intention-Foresight Distinction in Palliative Care Practice. Bioethics 27 (1):1-11.
    The moral importance of the ‘intention–foresight’ distinction has long been a matter of philosophical controversy, particularly in the context of end-of-life care. Previous empirical research in Australia has suggested that general physicians and surgeons may use analgesic or sedative infusions with ambiguous intentions, their actions sometimes approximating ‘slow euthanasia’. In this paper, we report findings from a qualitative study of 18 Australian palliative care medical specialists, using in-depth interviews to address the use of sedation at the end of life. The (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ronald K. F. Fung & Ian H. Kerridge (2013). Uncertain Translation, Uncertain Benefit and Uncertain Risk: Ethical Challenges Facing First-in-Human Trials of Induced Pluripotent Stem (Ips) Cells. Bioethics 27 (2):89-96.
    The discovery of induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells in 2006 was heralded as a major breakthrough in stem cell research. Since then, progress in iPS cell technology has paved the way towards clinical application, particularly cell replacement therapy, which has refueled debate on the ethics of stem cell research. However, much of the discourse has focused on questions of moral status and potentiality, overlooking the ethical issues which are introduced by the clinical testing of iPS cell replacement therapy. First-in-human trials, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Narcyz Ghinea, Wendy Lipworth, Miles Little, Ian Kerridge & Richard Day (2013). Overcoming Entrenched Disagreements: The Case of Misoprostol for Post‐Partum Haemorrhage. Developing World Bioethics 14 (3).
    The debate about whether misoprostol should be distributed to low resource communities to prevent post-partum haemorrhage (PPH), recognised as a major cause of maternal mortality, is deeply polarised. This is in spite of stakeholders having access to the same evidence about the risks and benefits of misoprostol. To understand the disagreement, we conducted a qualitative analysis of the values underpinning debates surrounding community distribution of misoprostol. We found that different moral priorities, epistemic values, and attitudes towards uncertainty were the main (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Rob Irvine, Chris Degeling & Ian Kerridge (2013). Bioethics and Nonhuman Animals. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (4):435-440.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Wendy Lipworth, Miles Little, Pippa Markham, Jill Gordon & Ian Kerridge (2013). Doctors on Status and Respect: A Qualitative Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):205-217.
    While doctors generally enjoy considerable status, some believe that this is increasingly threatened by consumerism, managerialism, and competition from other health professions. Research into doctors’ perceptions of the changes occurring in medicine has provided some insights into how they perceive and respond to these changes but has generally failed to distinguish clearly between concerns about “status,” related to the entitlements associated with one’s position in a social hierarchy, and concerns about “respect,” related to being held in high regard for one’s (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Charles Douglas, Melanie Jansen & Ian Kerridge (2012). The Devil Is in the Detail: Best Practice, or Catholic Practice? American Journal of Bioethics 12 (7):38 - 39.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 7, Page 38-39, July 2012.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Rowena Forsyth, Bronwen Morrell, Wendy Lipworth, Ian Kerridge, Christopher F. C. Jordens & Simon Chapman (2012). Health Journalists' Perceptions of Their Professional Roles and Responsibilities for Ensuring the Veracity of Reports of Health Research. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 27 (2):130 - 141.
    Health industries attempt to influence the public through the news media and through their relationships with expert academics and opinion leaders. This study reports journalists' perceptions of their professional roles and responsibilities regarding the relationships between industry and academia and research results. Journalists believe that responsibility for the scientific validity of their reports rests with academics and systems of peer review. However, this approach fails to account for the extent of industry-academy interactions and the flaws of peer review. Health journalists' (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Rob Irvine, Chris Degeling & Ian Kerridge (2012). Uncanny Animals: Thinking Differently About Ethics and the Animal–Human Relationship. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (9):30-32.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 9, Page 30-32, September 2012.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Wendy Lipworth, Ian Kerridge, Miles Little, Jill Gordon & Pippa Markham (2012). Meaning and Value in Medical School Curricula. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1027-1035.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Miles Little, Wendy Lipworth, Jill Gordon, Pippa Markham & Ian Kerridge (2012). Values‐Based Medicine and Modest Foundationalism. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (5):1020-1026.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Maree Porter, Ian Kerridge & Christopher Jordens (2012). “Good Mothering” or “Good Citizenship”? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):41-47.
    Umbilical cord blood banking is one of many biomedical innovations that confront pregnant women with new choices about what they should do to secure their own and their child’s best interests. Many mothers can now choose to donate their baby’s umbilical cord blood (UCB) to a public cord blood bank or pay to store it in a private cord blood bank. Donation to a public bank is widely regarded as an altruistic act of civic responsibility. Paying to store UCB may (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Catherine Waldby, Ian Kerridge & Loane Skene (2012). Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (1):15-17.
    Multidisciplinary Perspectives on the Donation of Stem Cells and Reproductive Tissue Content Type Journal Article Category Symposium Pages 15-17 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9351-x Authors Catherine Waldby, School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Ian Kerridge, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, Medical Foundation Building (K25), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia Loane Skene, Faculty of Law and Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Studies, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VA, Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Helen Crowther, Wendy Lipworth & Ian Kerridge (2011). Evidence‐Based Medicine and Epistemological Imperialism: Narrowing the Divide Between Evidence and Illness. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):868-872.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Rob Irvine, Ian Kerridge & Paul Komesaroff (2011). Bioethics in Australia : On Politics, Power, and the Rise of the Christian Right. In Catherine Myser (ed.), Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Rob Irvine, Ian Kerridge & Paul Komesaroff (2011). On Politics, Power, and the Rise of the Christian Right. In Catherine Myser (ed.), Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford University Press. 245.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ian Kerridge & Wendy Lipworth (2011). Shifting Power Relations and the Ethics of Journal Peer Review. Social Epistemology 25 (1):97-121.
    Peer review of manuscripts has recently become a subject of academic research and ethical debate. Critics of the review process argue that it is a means by which powerful members of the scientific community maintain their power, and achieve their personal and communal aspirations, often at others' expense. This qualitative study aimed to generate a rich, empirically?grounded understanding of the process of manuscript review, with a view to informing strategies to improve the review process. Open?ended interviews were carried out with (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Paul Komesaroff & Ian Kerridge (2011). It is Time to Move Beyond a Culture of Unexamined Assumptions, Recrimination, and Blame to One of Systematic Analysis and Ethical Dialogue. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (1):31 - 33.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Wendy Lipworth, Ian Kerridge, Stacy Carter & Miles Little (2011). Should Biomedical Publishing Be “Opened Up”? Toward a Values-Based Peer-Review Process. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (3):267-280.
    Peer review of manuscripts for biomedical journals has become a subject of intense ethical debate. One of the most contentious issues is whether or not peer review should be anonymous. This study aimed to generate a rich, empirically-grounded understanding of the values held by journal editors and peer reviewers with a view to informing journal policy. Qualitative methods were used to carry out an inductive analysis of biomedical reviewers’ and editors’ values. Data was derived from in-depth, open-ended interviews with journal (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Miles Little, Jill Gordon, Pippa Markham, Lucie Rychetnik & Ian Kerridge (2011). Virtuous Acts as Practical Medical Ethics: An Empirical Study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (5):948-953.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Tamra Lysaght, John Little & Ian Kerridge (2011). Marginalizing Experience: A Critical Analysis of Public Discourse Surrounding Stem Cell Research in Australia (2005–6). [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):191-202.
    Over the past decade, stem cell science has generated considerable public and political debate. These debates tend to focus on issues concerning the protection of nascent human life and the need to generate medical and therapeutic treatments for the sick and vulnerable. The framing of the public debate around these issues not only dichotomises and oversimplifies the issues at stake, but tends to marginalise certain types of voices, such as the women who donate their eggs and/or embryos to stem cell (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Sarah Winch & Ian Kerridge (2011). No Chance, No Value, or No Way: Reassessing the Place of Futility in Health Care and Bioethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 8 (2):121-122.
    No Chance, No Value, or No Way: Reassessing the Place of Futility in Health Care and Bioethics Content Type Journal Article Pages 121-122 DOI 10.1007/s11673-011-9303-5 Authors Sarah Winch, School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia Ian Kerridge, Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia Journal Journal of Bioethical Inquiry Online ISSN 1872-4353 Print ISSN 1176-7529 Journal Volume Volume 8 Journal Issue Volume 8, Number 2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Ian Kerridge (2010). Ethics and EBM: Acknowledging Bias, Accepting Difference and Embracing Politics. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 16 (2):365-373.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Wendy Lipworth & Ian Kerridge (2010). Impediments to “T2” Research: Are Ethics Really to Blame? American Journal of Bioethics 10 (8):39-40.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Christopher Jordens, Ian Kerridge & Gabrielle Samuel (2009). Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genome Testing: The Problem Is Not Ignorance-It Is Market Failure. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (6):13-15.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michael Robertson, Ian Kerridge & Garry Walter (2009). Part 2: A Pilot Ethnomethodological Study. Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 3 (1):6.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Camilla Scanlan & Ian H. Kerridge (2009). Autonomy and Chronic Illness: Not Two Components but Many. American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):40 – 42.
  37. Charles Douglas, Ian Kerridge & Rachel Ankeny (2008). Managing Intentions: The End-of-Life Administration of Analgesics and Sedatives, and the Possibility of Slow Euthanasia. Bioethics 22 (7):388-396.
    There has been much debate regarding the 'double-effect' of sedatives and analgesics administered at the end-of-life, and the possibility that health professionals using these drugs are performing 'slow euthanasia.' On the one hand analgesics and sedatives can do much to relieve suffering in the terminally ill. On the other hand, they can hasten death. According to a standard view, the administration of analgesics and sedatives amounts to euthanasia when the drugs are given with an intention to hasten death. In this (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ian Kerridge (2008). Journal of Bioethical Inquiry: Reviewing Policy. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):93-99.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ian Kerridge, Stacy M. Carter & Wendy Lipworth (2008). The “EBM Movement”: Where Did It Come From, Where is It Going, and Why Does It Matter? Social Epistemology 22 (4):425-431.
    Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) has now been part of the dominant medical paradigm for 15 years, and has been frequently debated and progressively modified. One question about EBM that has not yet been considered systematically, and is now particularly timely, is the question of the novelty, or otherwise, of the principles and practices of EBM. We argue that answering this question, and the related question of whether EBM-type principles and practices are unique to medicine, sheds new light on EBM and has (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Ian Kerridge & Paul A. Komesaroff (2008). Editorial. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):1-1.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Paul A. Komesaroff, Ian Kerridge & Wendy Lipworth (2008). The Epistemology and Ethics of Journal Reviewing: A Second Look. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (1):3-6.
  42. Wendy Lipworth, Stacy M. Carter & Ian Kerridge (2008). The “Ebm Movement”: Where Did It Come From, Where is It Going, and Why Does It Matter? Social Epistemology 22 (4):425 – 431.
    Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM) has now been part of the dominant medical paradigm for 15 years, and has been frequently debated and progressively modified. One question about EBM that has not yet been considered systematically, and is now particularly timely, is the question of the novelty, or otherwise, of the principles and practices of EBM. We argue that answering this question, and the related question of whether EBM-type principles and practices are unique to medicine, sheds new light on EBM and has (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Wendy Lipworth, Bronwen Morrell & Ian Kerridge (2008). Ethics as an Act of Listening. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):80-81.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Karolyn Leslea White, Michael Carey & Ian Kerridge (2008). Seeking Proof Where the Subject is Ill-Defined and the Outcomes Limited. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):15 – 17.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Paul A. Komesaroff & Ian Kerridge (2007). The Asia Pacific Issue: Richness in Diversity. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):159-161.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Gabrielle N. Samuel & Ian H. Kerridge (2007). Equity, Utility, and the Marketplace: Emerging Ethical Issues of Umbilical Cord Blood Banking in Australia. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (1):57-63.
    Over the past decade, umbilical cord blood (UCB) has routinely been used as a source of haematopoietic stem cells for allogeneic stem cell transplants in the treatment of a range of malignant and non-malignant conditions affecting children and adults. UCB banks are a necessary part of the UCB transplant program, but their establishment has raised a number of important scientific, ethical and political issues. This paper examines the scientific and clinical evidence that has provided the basis for the establishment of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Ian Kerridge (2006). Taking the Oath in the Twenty-First Century. Metascience 15 (2):359-361.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Tamra Lysaght, Rachel A. Ankeny & Ian Kerridge (2006). The Scope of Public Discourse Surrounding Proposition 71: Looking Beyond the Moral Status of the Embryo. [REVIEW] Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (1-2):109-119.
    Human embryonic stem cell research has generated considerable discussion and debate in bioethics. Bioethical discourse tends to focus on the moral status of the embryo as the central issue, however, and it is unclear how much this reflects broader community values and beliefs related to stem cell research. This paper presents the results of a study which aims to identify and classify the issues and arguments that have arisen in public discourse associated with one prominent policy episode in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Paul M. McNeill, Ian H. Kerridge, Catherine Arciuli, David A. Henry, Graham J. Macdonald, Richard O. Day & Suzanne R. Hill (2006). Gifts, Drug Samples, and Other Items Given to Medical Specialists by Pharmaceutical Companies. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 3 (3):139-148.
    Aim To ascertain the quantity and nature of gifts and items provided by the pharmaceutical industry in Australia to medical specialists and to consider whether these are appropriate in terms of justifiable ethical standards, empirical research and views expressed in the literature.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 57