16 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Ian Verstegen [16]Ian F. Verstegen [1]
  1.  56
    Ian F. Verstegen (2006). A Critical Realist Perspective on Aesthetic Value. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):323-343.
    _ Source: _Volume 5, Issue 2, pp 323 - 343 The following article attempts to bring critical realism to bear on the changing nature of aesthetic value. Beginning with the transitive-intransitive distinction, it is advised that we withhold judgment on the possibility of aesthetic judgment, lest we commit the epistemic fallacy. Without hoping to attain a form of aesthetic value absolutism, a strategy of ‘eliminative realism’ is introduced, which seeks to remove false causes of apparent judgmental relativism. Then a (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    Ian Verstegen (2010). Arte e Espressione. Studi e Ricerche di Psicologia Dell'arte by argenton, alberto. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):196-197.
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  12
    Roger Rothman & Ian Verstegen (2007). Arnheim's Lesson: Cubism, Collage, and Gestalt Psychology. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (3):287–298.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  3
    Ian Verstegen (2014). Reforming Visual Semiotics: The Dynamic Approach. Semiotica 2014 (200):31-48.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  7
    Ian Verstegen (2012). When Are We Speculating on History? A Mandelbaumian Theory. Journal of the Philosophy of History 6 (1):60-83.
    Abstract This paper is a classic critique of speculative philosophies of history based on Maurice Mandelbaum's work. Unlike the more famous invective by Karl Popper, I argue that Mandelbaum's is a richer and more interesting approach, which reveals through exposition a deeper unity to Mandelbaum's work than is normally evident. Because Popper's nominalism is suspicious of all metaphysics, it loses credibility whereas Mandelbaum placed reflection on the nature of society and causality at the center of his interests. Mandelbaum's critique then (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  1
    Ian Verstegen (1999). A Formalist Reborn. Film-Philosophy 3 (1).
    Rudolf Arnheim _Film Essays and Criticism_ Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1997 ISBN: 0-299-15260-X ISBN: 0-299-15264-2 253 pp.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  2
    Ian Verstegen (2004). Arnheim and Gombrich in Social Scientific Perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (1):91–102.
    The two most common names to invoke for a perceptualist aesthetics are Rudolf Arnheim and E. H. Gombrich. But the similaritied and differences between them have never been explicitly drawn. This paper undertakes such an analysis based on the three categories of representation, expression and historical objectivity. Arnheim's less stringent solutions to the problems of representation and expression are applauded but Gombrich's unique attempt to ground both of these categories in a form amenable to non-historicist approach to history are also (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Ian Verstegen (2008). Cultivating Picturacy: Visual Art and Verbal Interventionsby Heffernan, James A. W. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (3):311-312.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Ian Verstegen (2006). A Critical Realist Perspective on Aesthetic Value. Journal of Critical Realism 5 (2):323-343.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Ian Verstegen (2006). A Plea for a Cognitive Iconology Within Visual Culture. Contemporary Aesthetics 4.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Ian Verstegen (2011). Come dire oggettivamente che la prospettiva e relativa. Rivista di Estetica 48 (1):217-235.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Ian Verstegen (2014). Cognitive Iconology: When and How Psychology Explains Images. Editions Rodopi.
    Cognitive Iconology is a new theory of the relation of psychology to art. Instead of being an application of psychological principles, it is a methodologically aware account of psychology, art and the nature of explanation. Rather than fight over biology or culture, it shows how they must fit together. The term “cognitive iconology” is meant to mirror other disciplines like cognitive poetics and musicology but the fear that images must be somehow transparent to understanding is calmed by the stratified approach (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Ian Verstegen (2011). How to Speak Objectively on Perspective and Related. Rivista di Estetica 51 (3):217-235.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Ian Verstegen (ed.) (2010). Maurice Mandelbaum and American Critical Realism. Routledge.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Ian Verstegen (2010). Mandelbaum's Noble Dream : Historical Objectivism Through a Century of Debate. In Maurice Mandelbaum and American Critical Realism. Routledge
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Ian Verstegen (2014). What Does Realism Entail for the Humanist? In Javier Cumpa, Greg Jesson & Guido Bonino (eds.), Defending Realism: Ontological and Epistemological Investigations. De Gruyter 417-444.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography