1. Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2012). Assessing the Incremental Algorithm: A Response to Krahmer Et Al. Cognitive Science 36 (5):842-845.
    This response discusses the experiment reported in Krahmer et al.’s Letter to the Editor of Cognitive Science. We observe that their results do not tell us whether the Incremental Algorithm is better or worse than its competitors, and we speculate about implications for reference in complex domains, and for learning from ‘‘normal” (i.e., non-semantically-balanced) corpora.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Kees van Deemter, Albert Gatt, Ielka van der Sluis & Richard Power (2011). Generation of Referring Expressions: Assessing the Incremental Algorithm. Cognitive Science 36 (5):799-836.
    A substantial amount of recent work in natural language generation has focused on the generation of ‘‘one-shot’’ referring expressions whose only aim is to identify a target referent. Dale and Reiter's Incremental Algorithm (IA) is often thought to be the best algorithm for maximizing the similarity to referring expressions produced by people. We test this hypothesis by eliciting referring expressions from human subjects and computing the similarity between the expressions elicited and the ones generated by algorithms. It turns out that (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Rodger Kibble, Paul Piwek & Ielka van der Sluis (2007). Introduction. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):361-363.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation