Search results for 'Ilene N. Moore' (try it on Scholar)

65 found
Sort by:
  1. Joshua E. Perry, Ilene N. Moore, Bruce Barry, Ellen Wright Clayton & Amanda R. Carrico (2009). The Ethical Health Lawyer: An Empirical Assessment of Moral Decision Making. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 37 (3):461-475.score: 870.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. W. Moore (1996). Review of N. Ya. Vilenkin, In Search of Infinity [Translated From V Poiskakh Beskonechnosti by Abe Shenitzer]. [REVIEW] Philosophia Mathematica 4 (3).score: 360.0
  3. Mary B. Moore (2013). N. Eschbach (ed.) Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum. Deutschland. Göttingen, Archäologisches Institut der Universität. Band 4. Attisch Rotfigurige Keramik. [Deutschland, Band 92.] Pp. 160, ills, colour pls. Munich: C.H. Beck, 2012. Cased, €88. ISBN: 978-3-406-63595-3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 63 (2):566-568.score: 360.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Katherine N. Moore (1995). Compliance or Collaboration? The Meaning for the Patient. Nursing Ethics 2 (1):71-77.score: 300.0
    Noncompliance exasperates health care professionals, leaves them worrying about the effective outcome of medical care, and results in noncompliant patients being labelled as 'difficult' or 'troublesome'. It is suggested that professionals who label a patient as noncompliant are following convenient paternalistic principles rather than considering the impact of a prescribed regimen on an individual patient. In this paper, the author considers autonomy and respect to be foremost in patient care. Further, compliance does not necessarily indicate that both professional and patient (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. N. Carroll & M. Moore (2011). Moving in Concert: Dance and Music. In Elisabeth Schellekens & Peter Goldie (eds.), The Aesthetic Mind: Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford University Press. 333--345.score: 280.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Alicia A. Bicknell, Can Cenik, Hon N. Chua, Frederick P. Roth & Melissa J. Moore (2012). Introns in UTRs: Why We Should Stop Ignoring Them. Bioessays 34 (12):1025-1034.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. James H. McHose & John N. Moore (1978). A Comparison of Positive and Negative Contrast Effects. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 11 (6):363-366.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Doohwan Ahn, Sanda Badescu, Giorgio Baruchello, Raj Nath Bhat, Laura Boileau, Rosalind Carey, Camelia-Mihaela Cmeciu, Alan Goldstone, James Grieve, John Grumley, Grant Havers, Stefan Höjelid, Peter Isackson, Marguerite Johnson, Adrienne Kertzer, J.-Guy Lalande, Clinton R. Long, Joseph Mali, Ben Marsden, Peter Monteath, Michael Edward Moore, Jeff Noonan, Lynda Payne, Joyce Senders Pedersen, Brayton Polka, Lily Polliack, John Preston, Anthony Pym, Marina Ritzarev, Joseph Rouse, Peter N. Saeta, Arthur B. Shostak, Stanley Shostak, Marcia Landy, Kenneth R. Stunkel, I. I. I. Wheeler & Phillip H. Wiebe (2009). Null. The European Legacy 14 (6):731-771.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jerry N. Conover, George Edw Seymour, Melvin H. Marx & Monica M. Moore (1978). Stereotyped Personality Trait Ratings of Concrete and “Typical” Stimulus Persons. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 12 (6):400-402.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. N. H. S. Executive, A. McColl, P. Roberick, H. Smith, E. Wilkinson, M. Moore, A. Farooqui, K. Khunti & R. Sorrie (2002). Primary Care and Clinical Governance. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 6 (2):111-20.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. James H. McHose & John N. Moore (1976). Reinforcer Magnitude and Instrumental Performance in the Rat. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 8 (6):416-418.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John N. Moore & Robert Adamson (1976). Contrast Effects Accompanying Shifts in Sucrose Concentration During the Acquisition of a Brightness Discrimination. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 7 (4):393-396.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Joan R. Moore, Karen N. Jones & Charles F. Gettys (1980). Prediction of Two Haptic Illusions From the Differential Adaptation Theory. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 15 (3):197-199.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John N. Moore & James H. McHose (1975). The Effects of Delay of Reward on Negative Contrast Effects Associated with Reductions in Reward Magnitude. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 6 (5):497-500.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Marshall D. Sundberg, Edward J. Kormondy, Jack L. Carter, John A. Moore, Samuel N. Postlethwait & John W. Thornton (1992). Reassessing the Commission on Undergraduate Education in the Biological Sciences. BioScience 42 (6):442-447.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. N. G. Wilson & J. M. Moore (1966). The Manuscript Tradition of Polybius. Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:188.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Stephen Hetherington (2007). Review of Mitchell Green, John N. Williams (Eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (8).score: 120.0
  18. J. S. Moore, R. S. Boyer & R. E. Shostak, Primitive Recursive Program Transformation.score: 120.0
    arbitrary flowchart programs by introducing a new recursive function for each tag point. In the above example, one obtains: int(x) = int1(x,0), p(n,¤| ,... .ur. ¢.vH(¤.¤,.~¤,) ..... 1 h(n.c¤| ..... ¤r)), w(n.y2l(n.¤l ,.... ul,) ...., y2r(n,a|,_,,¤l_))_..
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Alan Ross Anderson (1974). Review: Arthur N. Prior, Edward C. Moore, Richard S. Robin, The Algebra of the Copula. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 39 (2):354-354.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ted F. Andrews (1969). Review Feature High School Biology H. Kolb N. A. Anderson R. G. Beidleman D. S. Farner V. Larsen W. V. Mayer E. M. Palmer S. Perrott P. G. Pearson Biological Science: Molecules to Man C. A. Welch D. I. Arnon H. Cochran F. C. Erk J. Fishleder W. V. Mayer, Sr. M. Pius J. Shaver F. W. Smith, Jr. Biological Science: An Inquiry Into Life J. A. Moore E. F. Degenhardt B. Glass L. Hallenbeck M. Kennedy W. V. Mayer T. G. Meyer I. D. Olsen W. N. Stewart. [REVIEW] BioScience 19 (5):475-476.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Patrick C. Fischer (1970). Review: K. De Leeuw, E. F. Moore, C. E. Shannon, N. Shapiro, Computability by Probabilistic Machines. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 35 (3):481-482.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. T. J. R. Harris (1989). Recipes for the Molecular Biologist. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. Edited by F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. F. Seidman, J. A. Smith and K. Struhl John Wiley and Sons. Inc., N.Y. Pp. 650. $180.00 for Core Volume; $300 for the Core Book + Supplements. [REVIEW] Bioessays 10 (4):132-132.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Charles A. Campbell (1967). In Defence Of Free Will, With Other Philosophical Essays. London,: Allen &Amp; Unwin.score: 56.0
    First published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. John Knox (1969). The Problems of Perception. Personalist 50:254-267.score: 56.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John N. Williams (2006). Moore's Paradox and Conscious Belief. Philosophical Studies 127 (3):383-414.score: 54.0
    For Moore, it is a paradox that although I would be absurd in asserting that (it is raining but I don.
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (2011). Moore's Paradox, Truth and Accuracy. Acta Analytica 26 (3):243-255.score: 54.0
    G. E. Moore famously observed that to assert ‘I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I do not believe that I did’ would be ‘absurd’. Moore calls it a ‘paradox’ that this absurdity persists despite the fact that what I say about myself might be true. Krista Lawlor and John Perry have proposed an explanation of the absurdity that confines itself to semantic notions while eschewing pragmatic ones. We argue that this explanation faces four objections. We give (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. John N. Williams (2004). Moore's Paradoxes, Evans's Principle and Self-Knowledge. Analysis 64 (284):348-353.score: 54.0
    I supply an argument for Evans's principle that whatever justifies me in believing that p also justifies me in believing that I believe that p. I show how this principle helps explain how I come to know my own beliefs in a way that normally makes me the best authority on them. Then I show how the principle helps to solve Moore's paradoxes.
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. John N. Williams (2012). Moore-Paradoxical Belief, Conscious Belief and the Epistemic Ramsey Test. Synthese 188 (2):231-246.score: 54.0
    Chalmers and Hájek argue that on an epistemic reading of Ramsey’s test for the rational acceptability of conditionals, it is faulty. They claim that applying the test to each of a certain pair of conditionals requires one to think that one is omniscient or infallible, unless one forms irrational Moore-paradoxical beliefs. I show that this claim is false. The epistemic Ramsey test is indeed faulty. Applying it requires that one think of anyone as all-believing and if one is rational, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. John N. Williams (2010). Moore's Paradox, Defective Interpretation, Justified Belief and Conscious Belief. Theoria 76 (3):221-248.score: 54.0
    In this journal, Hamid Vahid argues against three families of explanation of Moore-paradoxicality. The first is the Wittgensteinian approach; I assert that p just in case I assert that I believe that p. So making a Moore-paradoxical assertion involves contradictory assertions. The second is the epistemic approach, one committed to: if I am justified in believing that p then I am justified in believing that I believe that p. So it is impossible to have a justified omissive (...)-paradoxical belief. The third is the conscious belief approach, being committed to: if I consciously believe that p then I believe that I believe that p. So if I have a conscious omissive Moore-paradoxical belief, then I have contradictory second-order beliefs. In their place, Vahid argues for the defective-interpretation approach, broadly that charity requires us to discount the utterer of a Moore-paradoxical sentence as a speaker. I agree that the Wittgensteinian approach is unsatisfactory. But so is the defective-interpretation approach. However, there is a satisfactory version of each of the epistemic and conscious-belief approaches. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Thomas Reydon (2011). Roger Sansom and Robert N. Brandon (Eds.): Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (1):81-86.score: 54.0
    Roger Sansom and Robert N. Brandon (eds.): Integrating Evolution and Development: From Theory to Practice Content Type Journal Article Pages 81-86 DOI 10.1007/s10441-010-9121-x Authors Thomas A. C. Reydon, Institute of Philosophy & Center for Philosophy and Ethics of Science (ZEWW), Leibniz Universität Hannover, Im Moore 21, 30167 Hannover, Germany Journal Acta Biotheoretica Online ISSN 1572-8358 Print ISSN 0001-5342 Journal Volume Volume 59 Journal Issue Volume 59, Number 1.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. John N. Williams (2013). Moore's Paradox and the Priority of Belief Thesis. Philosophical Studies 165 (3):1117-1138.score: 54.0
    Moore’s paradox is the fact that assertions or beliefs such asBangkok is the capital of Thailand but I do not believe that Bangkok is the capital of Thailand or Bangkok is the capital of Thailand but I believe that Bangkok is not the capital of Thailandare ‘absurd’ yet possibly true. The current orthodoxy is that an explanation of the absurdity should first start with belief, on the assumption that once the absurdity in belief has been explained then this will (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. John N. Williams (2014). Moore's Paradox in Belief and Desire. Acta Analytica 29 (1):1-23.score: 54.0
    Is there a Moore’s paradox in desire? I give a normative explanation of the epistemic irrationality, and hence absurdity, of Moorean belief that builds on Green and Williams’ normative account of absurdity. This explains why Moorean beliefs are normally irrational and thus absurd, while some Moorean beliefs are absurd without being irrational. Then I defend constructing a Moorean desire as the syntactic counterpart of a Moorean belief and distinguish it from a ‘Frankfurt’ conjunction of desires. Next I discuss putative (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John N. Williams (2013). The Completeness of the Pragmatic Solution to Moore's Paradox in Belief: A Reply to Chan. Synthese 190 (12):2457-2476.score: 54.0
    Moore’s paradox in belief is the fact that beliefs of the form ‘ p and I do not believe that p ’ are ‘absurd’ yet possibly true. Writers on the paradox have nearly all taken the absurdity to be a form of irrationality. These include those who give what Timothy Chan calls the ‘pragmatic solution’ to the paradox. This solution turns on the fact that having the Moorean belief falsifies its content. Chan, who also takes the absurdity to be (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Laurent Jaffro (2009). L'argument du sens commun et la « persécution des scientifiques ». Collingwood contre Moore. Philosophiques 36 (1):131-147.score: 54.0
    En s'appuyant surtout sur l'Essay on Philosophical Method (1933) et sur The New Leviathan (1942), cet article expose les principaux arguments qu'a employés R. G. Collingwood contre le recours au sens commun qu'opérait G. E. Moore. Selon The New Leviathan, le recours au sens commun comme à une protection contre le scepticisme ou l'idéalisme conduit à la « persécution des scientifiques » et à l'« obscurantisme ». On peut tenir ce point de vue pour exagéré. Toutefois, si l'on examine (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. John N. Williams (2013). Eliminativism, Dialetheism and Moore's Paradox. Theoria 80 (4).score: 54.0
    John Turri gives an example that he thinks refutes what he takes to be “G. E. Moore's view” that omissive assertions such as “It is raining but I do not believe that it is raining” are “inherently ‘absurd'”. This is that of Ellie, an eliminativist who makes such assertions. Turri thinks that these are perfectly reasonable and not even absurd. Nor does she seem irrational if the sincerity of her assertion requires her to believe its content. A commissive counterpart (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Mitchell S. Green (1999). Moore's Many Paradoxes. Philosophical Papers 28 (2):97-109.score: 48.0
    Over the last two decades J.N. Williams has developed an account of the absurdity of such utterances as Its raining but I dont believe it that is both intuitively plausible and applicable to a wide variety of forms that this so-called Moorean absurdity can take. His approach is also noteworthy for making only minimal appeal to principles of epistemic or doxastic logic in its account of such absurdity. We first show that Williams places undue emphasis upon assertion and belief: It (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Christopher A. Hoffman (1993). Desires and the Desirable. Philosophical Forum 25 (1):19-32.score: 48.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.) (2007). Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.score: 42.0
    G. E. Moore observed that to assert, 'I went to the pictures last Tuesday but I don't believe that I did' would be 'absurd'. Over half a century later, such sayings continue to perplex philosophers. In the definitive treatment of the famous paradox, Green and Williams explain its history and relevance and present new essays by leading thinkers in the area.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John N. Williams (2009). Justifying Circumstances and Moore-Paradoxical Beliefs: A Response to Brueckner. Analysis 69 (3):490-496.score: 42.0
    In 2004, I explained the absurdity of Moore-paradoxical belief via the syllogism (Williams 2004): (1) All circumstances that justify me in believing that p are circumstances that tend to make me believe that p. (2) All circumstances that tend to make me believe that p are circumstances that justify me in believing that I believe that p. (3) All circumstances that justify me in believing that p are circumstances that justify me in believing that I believe that p. I (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John N. Williams, Moore's Paradox, Defective Interpretation, Justified Belief and Conscious Belieftheo_1073 221..248.score: 42.0
    In this journal, Hamid Vahid argues against three families of explanation of Mooreparadoxicality. The first is the Wittgensteinian approach; I assert that p just in case I assert that I believe that p. So making a Moore-paradoxical assertion involves contradictory assertions. The second is the epistemic approach, one committed to: if I am justified in believing that p then I am justified in believing that I believe that p. So it is impossible to have a justified omissive Mooreparadoxical belief. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. John N. Williams (2007). Moore's Paradox, Evans's Principle, and Iterated Beliefs. In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.score: 42.0
  42. A. S. Wilkins (1894). Moor's Translation of the De Oratore Cicero de Oratore Book I. Translated Into English, with an Introduction, by E. N. P. Moor, M. A. Methuen and Co. London. 3s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (03):118-119.score: 40.0
  43. N. Fotion (1985). The Metaphysics of G. E. Moore. Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (1):125-126.score: 36.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. N. G. Wilson (2008). Byzantine and Modern Greek (P.) Moore Iter Psellianum. A Detailed Listing of Manuscript Sources for All Works Attributed to Michael Psellos, Including a Comprehensive Bibliography. (Subsidia Mediaevalia 26). Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, 2005. Pp. Xiii + 752. $145.95. 9780888443755. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 128:288-.score: 36.0
  45. J. N. Williams (1979). Moore's Paradox: One or Two? Analysis 39 (3):141 - 142.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John N. Williams (1982). The Absurdities of Moore's Paradoxes. Theoria 48 (1):38-46.score: 36.0
    The absurdity of (i) and (ii) arises because asserting 'p' normally expresses a belief that p. Normally, when (i) is asserted, what is conjointly expressed and asserted, i.e. a belief that p and a lack of belief that p, is logically impossible, whereas normally, when (ii) is asserted, it is differently absurd, since what is conjointly expressed and asserted, i.e. a belief that p and a belief that -p, is logically possible, but inconsistent. A possible source of confusion between 'impossible' (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. N. Stockman (1989). Intruding on Barrington Moore's Privacy: A Review Essay. Theory, Culture and Society 6 (1):125-144.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. A. N. Prior (1959). Review: Alan Ross Anderson, Omar Khayyam Moore, The Formal Analysis of Normative Concepts; Alan Ross Anderson, A Reduction of Deontic Logic to Alethic Modal Logic; Alan Ross Anderson, The Logic of Norms. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 24 (2):177-178.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Nicholas Griffin (2013). What Did Russell Learn From Leibniz? Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 2 (1).score: 24.0
    Russell’s rejection in 1898 of the doctrine of internal relations — the view that all relations are grounded in the intrinsic properties of the terms related — was a decisive part of his break with Hegelianism and opened the way for his turn to analytic philosophy. Before rejecting it, Russell had given the doctrine little thought, though it played an essential role in the most intractable of the problems facing his attempt to construct a Hegelian dialectic of the sciences. I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Harold Osborne (1972). Aesthetics. London,Oxford University Press.score: 24.0
    Valéry, P. The idea of art.--Sartre, J.-P. The work of art.--Ingarden, R. Artistic and aesthetic values.--Merleau-Ponty, M. Eye and mind.--Moore, G. E. Wittgenstein's lectures in 1930-33.--Findlay, J. N. The perspicuous and the poignant.--Hungerland, I. C. Once again, aesthetic and non-aesthetic.--Wollheim, R. On drawing an object.--Elliott, R. K. Aesthetic theory and the experience of art.--Savile, A. The place of invention in the concept of art.--Bibliography (p. [178]-184).
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 65