Search results for 'Ilona Kemp-Pritchard' (try it on Scholar)

879 found
Sort by:
  1. Duncan Pritchard (2007). Duncan Pritchard, Epistemic Luck. Theoria 73 (2):173-178.score: 180.0
    It is argued that the arguments put forward by Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel in their widely influential exchange on the problem of moral luck are marred by a failure to (i) present a coherent understanding of what is involved in the notion of luck, and (ii) adequately distinguish between the problem of moral luck and the analogue problem of epistemic luck, especially that version of the problem that is traditionally presented by the epistemological sceptic. It is further claimed that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Constance I. Smith & J. Kemp (1959). Mr. J. Kemp and Æsthetic Judgments. Philosophy 34 (128):47 - 49.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Assimina Kaniari, Marina Wallace & Martin Kemp (eds.) (2009). Acts of Seeing: Artists, Scientists and the History of the Visual: A Volume Dedicated to Martin Kemp. Artakt & Zidane Press.score: 180.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ilona Kemp-Pritchard (1981). Peirce on Philosophical Hope and Logical Sentiment. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 42 (1):75-90.score: 87.0
  5. Ilona Kemp-Pritchard (1978). Peirce on Individuation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 14 (2):83 - 100.score: 87.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Duncan Pritchard (2006). What is This Thing Called Knowledge? Routledge.score: 60.0
    What is Knowledge? Where does it come from? Can we know anything at all? This lucid and engaging introduction grapples with these central questions in the theory of knowledge, offering a clear, non-partisan view of the main themes of epistemology. Duncan Pritchard discusses both traditional issues and contemporary ideas in thirteen easily digestible sections which include: *the value of knowledge *the structure of knowledge *virtues and faculties *perception *testimony and memory *induction *scepticism What is this thing called knowledge? contains many (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Gary Kemp (2012). Quine Versus Davidson: Truth, Reference, and Meaning. OUP Oxford.score: 60.0
    Gary Kemp presents a penetrating investigation of key issues in the philosophy of language, by means of a comparative study of two great figures of late twentieth-century philosophy. So far as language and meaning are concerned, Willard Van Orman Quine and Donald Davidson are usually regarded as birds of a feather. The two disagreed in print on various matters over the years, but fundamentally they seem to be in agreement; most strikingly, Davidson's thought experiment of Radical Interpretation looks to be (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Sandra Kemp & Paola Bono (eds.) (1993). The Lonely Mirror: Italian Perspectives on Feminist Theory. Routledge.score: 60.0
    Introduction Without a leg to stand on Sandra Kemp and Paola Bono The project that became The Lonely Mirror had been to edit an international collection of ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gary Kemp (2013). What is This Thing Called Philosophy of Language? Routledge.score: 60.0
    In this clear and carefully structured introduction to the subject Gary Kemp explains the following key topics: the basic nature of philosophy of language and its historical development early arguments concerning the role of meaning, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Martin Kemp (2006). Seen | Unseen: Art, Science, and Intuition From Leonardo to the Hubble Telescope. OUP Oxford.score: 60.0
    Seen | Unseen is a deep, richly illustrated, and erudite analysis of the interconnections between science and the visual arts. Martin Kemp explores the responses of artists, scientists, and their instruments, to the world - ranging from early representations of perspective, to pinhole cameras, particle accelerators and the Hubble telescope. -/- From Leonardo, Durer, and the inventors of photography to contemporary sculptors, and from Galileo and Darwin to Stephen J. Gould, Kemp considers the way in which scientists and artists have (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Anthony Kemp (1991). The Estrangement of the Past: A Study in the Origins of Modern Historical Consciousness. Oxford University Press.score: 60.0
    In this strikingly bold and original work, Kemp argues that the Western idea of time reversed itself between the fourteenth and the eighteenth century from a static and syncretic image of a temporal world in which all time is uniform, the past is the arbiter of truth and all inherited knowledge is eternally viable, and no secrets lie hidden in time waiting to be revealed to a future age; to a dynamic and supersessive model of history in which the past (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. Adam Carter & Duncan Pritchard (2013). Knowledge‐How and Epistemic Luck. Noûs 47 (4).score: 30.0
    Reductive intellectualists (e.g., Stanley & Williamson ; Stanley ; ; Brogaard ; ; ) hold that knowledge-how is a kind of knowledge-that. For this thesis to hold water, it is obviously important that knowledge-how and knowledge-that have the same epistemic properties. In particular, knowledge-how ought to be compatible with epistemic luck to the same extent as knowledge-that. It is argued, contra reductive intellectualism, that knowledge-how is compatible with a species of epistemic luck which is not compatible with knowledge-that, and thus (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. Adam Carter & Duncan Pritchard (2014). Knowledge‐How and Cognitive Achievement. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 88 (1).score: 30.0
    According to reductive intellectualism, knowledge-how just is a kind of propositional knowledge (e.g., Stanley & Williamson 2001; Stanley 2011a, 2011b; Brogaard, 2008a, 2008b, 2009, 2011, 2009, 2011). This proposal has proved controversial because knowledge-how and propositional knowledge do not seem to share the same epistemic properties, particularly with regard to epistemic luck. Here we aim to move the argument forward by offering a positive account of knowledge-how. In particular, we propose a new kind of anti-intellectualism. Unlike neo-Rylean anti-intellectualist views, according (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. J. Adam Carter, Jesper Kallestrup, S. Orestis Palermos & Duncan Pritchard (forthcoming). Varieties of Externalism. Philosophical Issues.score: 30.0
    Our aim is to provide a topography of the relevant philosophical terrain with regard to the possible ways in which knowledge can be conceived of as extended. We begin by charting the different types of internalist and externalist proposals within epistemology, and we critically examine the different formulations of the epistemic internalism/externalism debate they lead to. Next, we turn to the internalism/externalism distinction within philosophy of mind and cognitive science. In light of the above dividing lines, we then examine first (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Duncan Pritchard (2008). Sensitivity, Safety, and Anti-Luck Epistemology. In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    This paper surveys attempts in the recent literature to offer a modal condition on knowledge as a way of resolving the problem of scepticism. In particular, safety-based and sensitivity-based theories of knowledge are considered in detail, along with the anti-sceptical prospects of an explicitly anti-luck epistemology.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Timothy Pritchard (2011). Miracles and Violations. Religious Studies 47 (1):41-58.score: 30.0
    The claim that a miracle is a violation of a law of nature has sometimes been used as part of an a priori argument against the possibility of miracle, on the grounds that a violation is conceptually impossible. I criticize these accounts but also suggest that alternative accounts, when phrased in terms of laws of nature, fail to provide adequate conceptual space for miracles. It is not clear what a ‘violation’ of a law of nature might be, but this is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Duncan Pritchard (2007). Anti-Luck Epistemology. Synthese 158 (3):277 - 297.score: 30.0
    In this paper, I do three things. First, I offer an overview of an anti-luck epistemology, as set out in my book, Epistemic Luck (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2005). Second, I attempt to meet some of the main criticisms that one might level against the key theses that I propose in this work. And finally, third, I sketch some of the ways in which the strategy of anti-luck epistemology can be developed in new directions.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. Kemp (1958). Kant's Examples of the Categorical Imperative. Philosophical Quarterly 8 (30):63-71.score: 30.0
  19. Duncan Pritchard, Contextualism, Scepticism and Warranted Assertibility Manoeuvres.score: 30.0
    Attributer contextualists maintain that the verb 'knows' is context-sensitive in the sense that the truth conditions of a sentence of the form "S knows that p" can be dependent upon the ascriber's context. One natural objection against attributer contextualism is that it confuses the impropriety of certain assertions which ascribe knowledge to agents with the falsity of those assertions. In an influential article, Keith DeRose has defended attributer contextualism against this charge by proposing constraints on what he calls "warranted assertibility (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Duncan Pritchard (2008). Knowledge, Luck and Lotteries. In Vincent Hendricks (ed.), New Waves in Epistemology. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 30.0
    It is a platitude in epistemology to say that knowledge excludes luck. Indeed, if one can show that an epistemological theory allows ‘lucky’ knowledge, then that usually suffices to warrant one in straightforwardly rejecting the view. Even despite the prevalence of this intuition, however, very few commentators have explored what it means to say that knowledge is incompatible with luck. In particular, no commentator, so far as I am aware, has offered an account of what luck is and on this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Duncan Pritchard (2010). Relevant Alternatives, Perceptual Knowledge and Discrimination. Noûs 44 (2):245-268.score: 30.0
    This paper examines the relationship between perceptual knowledge and discrimination in the light of the so-called ‘relevant alternatives’ intuition. It begins by outlining an intuitive relevant alternatives account of perceptual knowledge which incorporates the insight that there is a close connection between perceptual knowledge and the possession of relevant discriminatory abilities. It is argued, however, that in order to resolve certain problems that face this view, it is essential to recognise an important distinction between favouring and discriminating epistemic support that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Duncan Pritchard (2007). Recent Work on Epistemic Value. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):85 - 110.score: 30.0
    Recent discussion in epistemology has seen a huge growth in interest in the topic of epistemic value. In this paper I describe the background to this new movement in epistemology and critically survey the contemporary literature on this topic.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Duncan Pritchard (2010). Cognitive Ability and the Extended Cognition Thesis. Synthese 175 (1):133 - 151.score: 30.0
    This paper explores the ramifications of the extended cognition thesis in the philosophy of mind for contemporary epistemology. In particular, it argues that all theories of knowledge need to accommodate the ability intuition that knowledge involves cognitive ability, but that once this requirement is understood correctly there is no reason why one could not have a conception of cognitive ability that was consistent with the extended cognition thesis. There is thus, surprisingly, a straightforward way of developing our current thinking about (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Duncan Pritchard, Wittgenstein on Scepticism.score: 30.0
    An overview of Wittgenstein’s remarks on scepticism in On Certainty is offered, especially with regard to the notion of a “hinge proposition”. Several possible interpretations of the anti-sceptical import of this text are then critically assessed, with each view situated within the contemporary literature on scepticism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Duncan Pritchard & Jesper Kallestrup (2004). An Argument for the Inconsistency of Content Externalism and Epistemic Internalism. Philosophia 31 (3-4):345-354.score: 30.0
    Whereas a number of recent articles have focussed upon whether the thesis of content externalism is compatible with a certain sort of knowledge that is gained via first-person authority,1 far less attention has been given to the relationship that this thesis bears to the possession of knowledge in general and, in particular, its relation to internalist and externalist epistemologies. Nevertheless, although very few actual arguments have been presented to this end, there does seem to be a shared suspicion that content (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Duncan Pritchard (2004). The Epistemology of Testimony. Philosophical Issues 14 (1):326–348.score: 30.0
    Let us focus on what I take it is the paradigm case of testimony—the intentional transfer of a belief from one agent to another, whether in the usual way via a verbal assertion made by the one agent to the other, or by some other means, such as through a note.1 So, for example, John says to Mary that the house is on fire (or, if you like, ‘texts’ her this message on her phone), and Mary, upon hearing this, forms (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Duncan Pritchard (2012). Wittgenstein and the Groundlessness of Our Believing. Synthese 189 (2):255-272.score: 30.0
    In his final notebooks, published as On Certainty , Wittgenstein offers a distinctive conception of the nature of reasons. Central to this conception is the idea that at the heart of our rational practices are essentially arational commitments. This proposal marks a powerful challenge to the standard picture of the structure of reasons. In particular, it has been thought that this account might offer us a resolution of the traditional scepticism/anti-scepticism debate. It is argued, however, that some standard ways of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Duncan Pritchard (2009). Defusing Epistemic Relativism. Synthese 166 (2):397 - 412.score: 30.0
    This paper explores the question of whether there is an interesting form of specifically epistemic relativism available, a position which can lend support to claims of a broadly relativistic nature but which is not committed to relativism about truth. It is argued that the most plausible rendering of such a view turns out not to be the radical thesis that it is often represented as being.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Duncan Pritchard (2006). Moral and Epistemic Luck. Metaphilosophy 37 (1):1–25.score: 30.0
    It is maintained that the arguments put forward by Bernard Williams and Thomas Nagel in their widely influential exchange on the problem of moral luck are marred by a failure to (i) present a coherent understanding of what is involved in the notion of luck, and (ii) adequately distinguish between the problem of moral luck and the analogue problem of epistemic luck, especially that version of the problem that is traditionally presented by the epistemological sceptic. It is further claimed that (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Duncan Pritchard & Chris Ranalli (2013). Rorty, Williams, and Davidson: Skepticism and Metaepistemology. Humanities 2 (3):351-368.score: 30.0
    We revisit an important exchange on the problem of radical skepticism between Richard Rorty and Michael Williams. In his contribution to this exchange, Rorty defended the kind of transcendental approach to radical skepticism that is offered by Donald Davidson, in contrast to Williams’s Wittgenstein-inspired view. It is argued that the key to evaluating this debate is to understand the particular conception of the radical skeptical problem that is offered in influential work by Barry Stroud, a conception of the skeptical problem (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Duncan Pritchard (2007). How to Be a Neo-Moorean. In Sanford Goldberg (ed.), Internalism and Externalism in Semantics and Epistemology. Oxford University Press. 68--99.score: 30.0
    Much of the recent debate regarding scepticism has focussed on a certain template sceptical argument and a rather restricted set of proposals concerning how one might deal with that argument. Throughout this debate the ‘Moorean’ response to scepticism is often cited as a paradigm example of how one should not respond to the sceptical argument, so conceived. As I argue in this paper, however, there are ways of resurrecting the Moorean response to the sceptic. In particular, I consider the prospects (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Duncan Pritchard (2003). Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Luck. Metaphilosophy 34 (1/2):106--130.score: 30.0
    The recent movement towards virtue–theoretic treatments of epistemological concepts can be understood in terms of the desire to eliminate epistemic luck. Significantly, however, it is argued that the two main varieties of virtue epistemology are responding to different types of epistemic luck. In particular, whilst proponents of reliabilism–based virtue theories have been focusing on the problem of what I call “veritic” epistemic luck, non–reliabilism–based virtue theories have instead been concerned with a very different type of epistemic luck, what I call (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Duncan Pritchard, Contemporary Anti-Scepticism.score: 30.0
    This paper examines the relevance of Wittgenstein’s On Certainty to the contemporary debate regarding the problem of radical scepticism. In particular, it considers two accounts in the recent literature which have seen in Wittgenstein’s remarks on “hinge propositions” in On Certainty the basis for a primarily epistemological anti-sceptical thesis—viz., the inferential contextualism offered by Michael Williams and the ‘unearned warrant’ thesis defended by Crispin Wright. Both positions are shown to be problematic, both as interpretations of Wittgenstein and as anti-sceptical theses. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Duncan Pritchard (2011). Epistemological Disjunctivism and the Basis Problem. Philosophical Issues 21 (1):434-455.score: 30.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Duncan Pritchard (2009). Knowledge, Understanding and Epistemic Value. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (64):19-.score: 30.0
    It is argued that a popular way of accounting for the distinctive value of knowledge by appeal to the distinctive value of cognitive achievements fails because it is a mistake to identify knowledge with cognitive achievements. Nevertheless, it is claimed that understanding, properly conceived, is a type of cognitive achievement, and thus that the distinctive value of cognitive achievements can explain why understanding is of special value.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Duncan Pritchard (2005). Virtue Epistemology and the Acquisition of Knowledge. Philosophical Explorations 8 (3):229 – 243.score: 30.0
    The recent literature on the theory of knowledge has taken a distinctive turn by focusing on the role of the cognitive and intellectual virtues in the acquisition of knowledge. The main contours and motivations for such virtue-theoretic accounts of knowledge are here sketched and it is argued that virtue epistemology in its most plausible form can be regarded as a refined form of reliabilism, and thus a variety of epistemic externalism. Moreover, it is claimed that there is strong empirical support (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Duncan Pritchard (2009). Scepticism and the Possibility of Knowledge. Analysis 69 (2):317-325.score: 30.0
  38. Gary Kemp (2010). Quine: The Challenge of Naturalism. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (2):283-295.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Duncan Pritchard (2005). Epistemic Luck. Clarendon Press.score: 30.0
    Epistemic Luck is the first book to offer a rigorous philosophical examination of the concept of luck and its relationship to knowledge.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jesper Kallestrup & Duncan Pritchard (2012). Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Twin Earth. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):n/a-n/a.score: 30.0
    A popular form of virtue epistemology—defended by such figures as Ernest Sosa, Linda Zagzebski and John Greco—holds that knowledge can be exclusively understood in virtue-theoretic terms. In particular, it holds that there isn't any need for an additional epistemic condition to deal with the problem posed by knowledge-undermining epistemic luck. It is argued that the sustainability of such a proposal is called into question by the possibility of epistemic twin earth cases. In particular, it is argued that such cases demonstrate (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Duncan Pritchard (2008). Radical Scepticism, Epistemic Luck, and Epistemic Value. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 82 (1):19-41.score: 30.0
    It is argued that it is beneficial to view the debate regarding radical scepticism through the lens of epistemic value. In particular, it is claimed that we should regard radical scepticism as aiming to deprive us of an epistemic standing that is of special value to us, and that this methodological constraint on our dealings with radical scepticism potentially has important ramifications for how we assess the success of an anti-sceptical strategy.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Duncan Pritchard (2008). Virtue Epistemology and Epistemic Luck, Revisited. Metaphilosophy 39 (1):66–88.score: 30.0
    In this article I return to an argument that I presented in earlier work to the effect that virtue epistemology is at worse false and at best unmotivated. In the light of recent responses to this argument from such figures as John Greco, Guy Axtell, and Kelly Becker, I here re-state and re-evaluate this argument. In the process the original argument is refined and supplemented in key respects and some of the main charges against it are shown to be unfounded. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Patrick Greenough, Duncan Pritchard & Timothy Williamson (eds.) (2009). Williamson on Knowledge. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    16 leading philosophers offer critical assessments of Timothy Williamson's ground-breaking work on knowledge and its impact on philosophy today.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. R. McKenna & D. Pritchard (2011). The Case for Contextualism: Knowledge, Skepticism, and Context. Philosophical Review 120 (3):455-460.score: 30.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. D. Pritchard (2002). Two Forms of Epistemological Contextualism. Grazer Philosophische Studien 64 (1):19-55.score: 30.0
    The recent popularity of contextualist treatments of the key epistemic concepts has tended to obscure the differences that exist between the various kinds of contextualist theses on offer. The aim of this paper is to contribute towards rectifying this problem by exploring two of the main formulations of the contextualist position currently on offer in the literature—the 'semantic' contextualist thesis put forward by Keith DeRose and David Lewis, and the 'inferential' contextualist thesis advanced by Michael Williams. It is argued that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Duncan Pritchard (2010). The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations. Oxford University Press.score: 30.0
    The value problem -- Unpacking the value problem -- The swamping problem -- fundamental and non-fundamental epistemic goods -- The relevance of epistemic value monism -- Responding to the swamping problem I : the practical response -- Responding to the swamping problem II : the monistic response -- Responding to the swamping problem III : the pluralist response -- Robust virtue epistemology -- Knowledge and achievement -- Interlude : is robust virtue epistemology a reductive theory of knowledge? -- Achievement without (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Duncan Pritchard (2005). Scepticism, Epistemic Luck, and Epistemic Angst. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 83 (2):185 – 205.score: 30.0
    A commonly expressed worry in the contemporary literature on the problem of epistemological scepticism is that there is something deeply intellectually unsatisfying about the dominant anti-sceptical theories. In this paper I outline the main approaches to scepticism and argue that they each fail to capture what is essential to the sceptical challenge because they fail to fully understand the role that the problem of epistemic <span class='Hi'>luck</span> plays in that challenge. I further argue that scepticism is best thought of not (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Michael Brady & Duncan Pritchard (2006). Epistemic Virtues and Virtue Epistemology. Philosophical Studies 130 (1):1--8.score: 30.0
    This paper introduces the articles in this volume, and offers an overview of each piece.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. Starobinski & W. S. Kemp (1966). The Idea of Nostalgia. Diogenes 14 (54):81-103.score: 30.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Duncan Pritchard (2006). McDowellian Neo-Mooreanism. In Fiona Macpherson & Adrian Haddock (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press. 283--310.score: 30.0
    It is claimed that McDowell’s treatment of scepticism offers a potential way of resurrecting the much derided ‘Moorean’ response to scepticism in a fashion that avoids the problems facing classical internalist and externalist construals of neo-Mooreanism. I here evaluate the prospects for a McDowellian neo-Mooreanism and, in doing so, offer further support for the view.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 879