Search results for 'Immaterialism' (try it on Scholar)

157 found
Order:
  1.  63
    S. Seth Bordner (forthcoming). Immaterialism and Common Sense. In Bertil Belfrage & Richard Brook (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Berkeley. Continuum
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  34
    John Russell Roberts (2010). 'Strange Impotence of Men': Immaterialism, Anaemic Agents, and Immanent Causation. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 18 (3):411-431.
  3. A. A. Luce (1945). Berkeley's Immaterialism. New York, Russell & Russell.
  4.  18
    I. C. Tipton (1974). Berkeley--The Philosophy of Immaterialism. Garland Pub..
  5.  18
    Samuel Avery (1995). The Dimensional Structure of Consciousness: A Physical Basis for Immaterialism. Compari.
    Written for both the layman and the professional, this may be the long-awaited revolution in physical science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  20
    M. R. Ayers (1982). Berkeley's Immaterialism and Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:51-69.
    Ever since its first publication critics of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason have been struck by certain strong formal resemblances between transcendental idealism and Berkeley's immaterialism. Both philosophers hold that the sensible world is mind-dependent, and that from this very mind-dependence we can draw a refutation of scepticism of the senses.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  39
    James S. Spiegel (1996). The Theological Orthodoxy of Berkeley's Immaterialism. Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):216-235.
    Ever since George Berkeley first published Principles of Human Knowledge his metaphysics has been opposed by, among others, some Christian philosophers who allege that his ideas fly in the face of orthodox Christian belief. The irony is that Berkeley’s entire professional career is marked by an unwavering commitment to demonstrating the reasonableness of the Christian faith. In fact, Berkeley’s immaterialist metaphysical system can be seen as an apologetic device. In this paper, I inquire into the question whether Berkeley’s immaterialist metaphysics (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  25
    Steven D. Crain (1997). Must a Classical Theist Be an Immaterialist? Religious Studies 33 (1):81-92.
    In this paper I examine two arguments, one by R. A. Oakes and the other by P. A. Byrne, that Berkeley's immaterialism is the only metaphysic consistent with classical theism. I show that not only do Oakes and Byrne fail to demonstrate the incompatibility of physical realism with classical theism, but also that their line of argument reveals a grave inconsistency between the latter and immaterialism. For as they expound Berkeley's metaphysic, it seems incapable of explicating the metaphysical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  11
    Marc A. Hight (2010). How Immaterialism Can Save Your Soul. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 200 (1):109 - 122.
    I argue that Berkeley has reasonable grounds for believing both that (a) the supposition of the existence of material substance leads to atheism and (b) endorsing immaterialism provides a better support for the Christian faith than any rival that posits the existence of matter. Together, those claims lead to the conclusion that if one wants to be a Christian, there is good reason to think that one ought to be an immaterialist. Je montre que Berkeley a raison de croire (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  10
    Howard M. Robinson (1986). 'Abstract Ideas' and Immaterialism. History of European Ideas 7 (6):617-622.
    Berkeley confidently asserts the connection between his attack on abstract ideas and immaterialism, But how the connection works has puzzled modern commentators. I construct an argument resting on the imagist theory of thought which connects anti-ionism and immaterialism and try to show that it is berkeleian. I then suggest that, Without the mistaken imagist theory, A similar and still interesting argument can be constructed to the weaker conclusion that matter is essentially unknowable.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  7
    Marc A. Hight (2010). The Son More Visible: Immaterialism and the Incarnation. Modern Theology 26 (1):120 - 148.
    In this article we argue that an immaterialist ontology -- a metaphysic that denies the existence of material substance -- is more consonant with Christian dogma than any ontology that includes the existence of material substance. We use the philosophy of the famous eighteenth-century Irish immaterialist George Berkeley as a guide while engaging one particularly difficult Christian mystery: the doctrine of the Incarnation of Christ. The goal is to make plausible the claim that, from the analysis of this one example, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Jasper William Reid (2000). Early Eighteenth Century Immaterialism in its Philosophical Context. Dissertation, Princeton University
    In the first quarter of the eighteenth century, four philosophers independently proposed immaterialist theories. Ontologies of this kind had been absent from the philosophical stage for several centuries, and their sudden and widespread revival suggests that there was something about the intellectual milieu at the turn of the seventeenth to the eighteenth century that made a move to immaterialism a natural step to take. This dissertation examines some of the factors which contributed to its revival. ;In this dissertation, immaterialist (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  21
    Christopher G. Timpson (2010). Information, Immaterialism, Instrumentalism: Old and New in Quantum Information. In Alisa Bokulich & Gregg Jaeger (eds.), Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement. Cambridge University Press 208--227.
  14. Jasper Reid (forthcoming). Immaterialism. In Aaron Garrett (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Eighteenth Century Philosophy. Routledge
  15. Sydney C. Rome (1943). The Scottish Refutation of Berkeley's Immaterialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 3 (3):313-325.
  16. D. J. Kalupahana (1970). Dinnāga's Theory of Immaterialism. Philosophy East and West 20 (2):121-128.
  17.  74
    Cornelis de Waal (2006). Having an Idea of Matter: A Peircean Refutation of Berkeleyan Immaterialism. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (2):291-313.
  18.  2
    S. Mark Hamilton (2016). Jonathan Edwards, Hypostasis, Impeccability, and Immaterialism. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 58 (2):206-228.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Neue Zeitschrift für Systematische Theologie und Religionsphilosophie Jahrgang: 58 Heft: 2 Seiten: 206-228.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    M. J. Budd (1970). XI—Materialism and Immaterialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70 (1):197-220.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  49
    Patrick Fleming (2006). Berkeley's Immaterialist Account of Action. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (3):415-429.
    : A number of critics have argued that Berkeley's metaphysics can offer no tenable account of human agency. In this paper I argue that Berkeley does have a coherent account of action. The paper addresses arguments by C.C. W. Taylor, Robert Imlay, and Jonathan Bennett. The paper attempts to show that Berkeley can offer a theory of action, maintain many of our common intuitions about action, and provide a defensible solution to the problem of evil.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  9
    Roland J. Teske (1976). "Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism," by I. C. Tipton. Modern Schoolman 53 (2):229-231.
  22.  30
    Leopold Stubenberg (1990). Divine Ideas: The Cure-All for Berkeley's Immaterialism? Southern Journal of Philosophy 28 (2):221-249.
  23.  32
    Charles J. McCracken (1986). Stages on a Cartesian Road to Immaterialism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 24 (1):19-40.
  24.  30
    Peter Dillard (2011). Two Unsuccessful Arguments for Immaterialism. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (2):269-286.
    I examine two arguments for the conclusion that thinking is not a physical process. James F. Ross argues that thinking is determinate in a manner that nopurely physical process can be. Peter Geach argues that thinking is a basic activity that, unlike basic physical processes, cannot be assigned a precise position in time. I present two objections to Ross’s argument. I then show that even if Geach’s argument avoids these objections, it is vulnerable to two other objections. I conclude that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  17
    Harry M. Bracken (1976). Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism. Journal of the History of Philosophy 14 (2):235-236.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. E. J. Craig (1976). TIPTON, I. C. "Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism". [REVIEW] Mind 85:122.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. A. A. Luce (1944). Immaterialism. Annual Philosophical Lecture, Henriette Herz Trust, British Academy. Philosophy 19 (74):283-284.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Ben Mijuskovic (1987). Contingent Immaterialism: Freedom, Meaning, Time, and Mind. Noûs 21 (2):280-282.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  13
    A. C. Grayling (2005). Berkeley's Argument for Immaterialism. In Kenneth Winkler (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Berkeley. Cambridge University Press 166--189.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  12
    James Collins (1961). The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733. Modern Schoolman 38 (2):163-164.
  31.  32
    N. M. L. Nathan (1991). Mctaggart's Immaterialism. Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):442-456.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  13
    Vilém Flusser (2012). Immaterialism. Philosophy of Photography 2 (2):215-219.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  11
    Rolf Sartorius (1969). A Neglected Aspect of the Relationship Between Berkeley's Theory of Vision and His Immaterialism. American Philosophical Quarterly 6 (4):318 - 323.
  34.  8
    Andrew Loke (2012). Immaterialist, Materialist, and Substance Dualist Accounts of Incarnation. Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 54 (4).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  4
    Francis P. De Maio (1976). Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism by I. C. Tipton. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 25:278-281.
  36.  16
    Robert J. Fogelin (1996). The Intuitive Basis of Berkeley's Immaterialism. History of Philosophy Quarterly 13 (3):331 - 344.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  15
    Michael P. Levine (1986). Cartesian Materialism and Conservation: Berkelean Immaterialism? Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (2):247-259.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  15
    D. G. C. Macnabb (1947). Berkeley's Immaterialism. By A. A. Luce (Thomas Nelson & Sons, Ltd. Price 6s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 22 (81):87-.
  39.  9
    R. F. T. (1959). The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733. Review of Metaphysics 13 (1):185-185.
  40.  8
    William J. Wainwright (1982). Jonathan Edwards, Atoms, and Immaterialism. Idealistic Studies 12 (1):79-89.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  4
    Marco Boffo (2012). Historical Immaterialism: From Immaterial Labour to Cognitive Capitalism. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy 6 (4):256.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  9
    M. J. Budd (1969). Materialism and Immaterialism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 70:197 - 217.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  7
    David M. Brahinsky (1988). Contingent Immaterialism. International Studies in Philosophy 20 (1):96-97.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  4
    G. J. Warnock (1965). The Dialectic of Immaterialism: An Account of the Making of Berkeley's Principles. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 15 (60):264.
  45. Georges Dicker (1982). The Concept of Immediate Perception and Berkeley's Immaterialism. In Colin M. Turbayne (ed.), Berkeley: Critical and Interpretive Essays.
  46. J. C. Tipton (1976). Berkeley: The Philosophy of Immaterialism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (2):277-279.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  5
    G. J. Reid (1984). Identity and Immaterialism. American Philosophical Quarterly 21 (4):367 - 370.
  48.  3
    A. A. Luce (1961). The Early Reception of Berkeley's Immaterialism, 1710-1733. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 11 (44):278.
  49.  6
    A. M. Ritchie (1965). The Dialectic of Immaterialism. [REVIEW] Philosophy 40 (153):235 - 247.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. William A. Shearson (1985). Ben Mijuskovic, Contingent Immaterialism: Meaning, Freedom, Time and Mind Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (3):123-124.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 157