41 found
Sort by:
  1. Ingvar Johansson (forthcoming). Four Kinds of 'Is A'Relation. Applied Ontology: An Introduction, Frankfurt: Ontos.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ingvar Johansson (2013). Constitution as a Relation Within Mathematics. The Monist 96 (1):87-100.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ingvar Johansson (2013). Review: A.W. Moore, The Evolution of Modern Metaphysics: Making Sense of Things. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 14 (1):127-142.
    I find the book about metaphysics under review an important and remarkable book, some of my very critical remarks notwithstanding. It is divided into three parts of seven chapters each. The parts are called “The Early Modern Period” (Descartes, Spinoza, Leibniz, Hume, Kant, Fichte, Hegel), “The Analytic Tradition” (Frege, Early Wittgenstein, Later Wittgenstein, Carnap, Quine, Lewis, Dummett), and “The Non-analytic Tradition” (Nietzsche, Bergson, Husserl, Heidegger, Collingwood, Derrida, Deleuze). As can be seen, Moore has with respect to the third group deleted (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ingvar Johansson (2013). Scattered Exemplification and Many-Place Copulas. Axiomathes 23 (2):235-246.
    Can there be relational universals? If so, how can they be exemplified? A monadic universal is by definition capable of having a scattered spatiotemporal localization of its different exemplifications, but the problem of relational universals is that one single exemplification seems to have to be scattered in the many places where the relata are. The paper argues that it is possible to bite this bullet, and to accept a hitherto un-discussed kind of exemplification relation called ‘scattered exemplification’. It has no (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Ingvar Johansson (2013). The Basic Distinctions in Der Streit. Semiotica 2013 (194):137-157.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ingvar Johansson (2013). The Ideal as Real and as Purely Intentional: Ingarden-Based Reflections. Semiotica 2013 (194):21-37.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Ingvar Johansson (2012). Hume's Ontology. Metaphysica 13 (1):87-105.
    The paper claims that Hume’s philosophy contains an ontology, i.e. an abstract exhaustive classification of what there is. It is argued that Hume believes in the existence of a mind-independent world, and that he has a classification of mind-related entities that contains four top genera: perception, faculty, principle and relation. His ontology is meant to be in conformity with his philosophy of language and epistemology, and vice versa. Therefore, crucial to Hume’s ontology of mind-independent entities is his notion of ‘supposing (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ingvar Johansson (2011). John Searle in the Year 2010—Reviews. Metaphysica 12 (1):73-85.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Ingvar Johansson (2011). Toutes les relations sont internes — la nouvelle version. Philosophiques 38 (1):219-239.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ingvar Johansson (2010). Fictions and the Spatiotemporal World—in the Light of Ingarden. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):81-103.
    The paper is an attempt to take Ingarden’s unfinished critique of idealism one step further. It puts forward a schematic solution to the external-world realist’sproblem of how to explain the fact that we can identify and re-identify fictions, entities that in one sense do not exist. The solution contains three proposals: to accept, with Husserl and Ingarden, that there are universals with intentionality (Husserl’s “intentional essences”), to accept, contra Husserl and Ingarden, an immanent realism for universals, and to accept Ingarden’s (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Ingvar Johansson (2010). Review: Tobias Hansson Wahlberg, Objects in Time. Studies of Persistence in B-Time (2009). [REVIEW] Metaphysica 11 (1):93-94.
  12. Ingvar Johansson (2009). A Little Treatise of Forgiveness and Human Nature. The Monist 92 (4):537-555.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ingvar Johansson (2009). Mathematical Vectors and Physical Vectors. Dialectica 63 (4):433-447.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Ingvar Johansson (2009). Proof of the Existence of Universals—and Roman Ingarden's Ontology. Metaphysica 10 (1):65-87.
    The paper ends with an argument that says: necessarily, if there are finitely spatially extended particulars, then there are monadic universals. Before that, in order to characterize the distinction between particulars and universals, Roman Ingarden’s notions of existential moments and modes (ways) of being are presented, and a new pair of such existential moments is introduced: multiplicity–monadicity. Also, it is argued that there are not only real universals, but instances of universals (tropes) and fictional universals too.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Ingvar Johansson & Niels Lynøe (2009). Medicine and Philosophy: A Twenty-First Century Introduction. Ontos Verlag.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ingvar Johansson (2008). Christer Svennerlind, Moderate Nominalism and Moderate Realism and Pierre Grenon, On Relations. Metaphysica 9 (2):241-246.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Ingvar Johansson (2008). Functions and Shapes in the Light of the International System of Units. Metaphysica 9 (1):93-117.
    Famously, Galilei made the ontological claim that the book of nature is written in the language of mathematics. Probably, if only implicitly, most contemporary natural scientists share his view. This paper, in contradistinction, argues that nature is only partly written in the language of mathematics; partly, it is written in the language of functions and partly in a very simple purely qualitative language, too. During the argumentation, three more specific but in themselves interesting theses are put forward: first (in Section (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ingvar Johansson (2008). Formalizing Common Sense: An Operator-Based Approach to the Tibbles–Tib Problem. Synthese 163 (2):217 - 225.
    The paper argues, that a direct formalization of the way common sense thinks about the numerical identity of enduring entities, requires that traditional predicate logic is developed. If everyday language mirrors the world, then persons, organisms, organs, cells, and ordinary material things can lose some parts but nonetheless remain numerically exactly the same entity. In order to formalize this view, two new logical operators are introduced; and they bring with them some non-standard syntax. One of the operators is called ‘the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ingvar Johansson (2007). Continua in Biological Systems. The Monist 90 (4):499-522.
    We defend the fundamental ontological-pragmatic principle that where there are continua in reality science is often forced to make partly fiat terminological delimitations. In particular, this principle applies when it comes to describing biological organisms, their parts, properties, and relations. Human-made fiat delimitations are indispensable at the level of both individuals and the natural kinds which they instantiate. The kinds of pragmatically based ‘fiatness’ that we describe can create incompatibilities and lack of interoperability even between properly designed ontologies, if not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Ingvar Johansson (2007). How Do Non-Joint Commitments Come Into Being? An Attempt at Cultural Naturalism. In Nikolaos Psarros & Katinka Schulte-Ostermann (eds.), Facets of Sociality. Ontos. 135--150.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ingvar Johansson (2006). Formal Mereology and Ordinary Language-Reply to Varzi. Applied Ontology 1 (2):157-161.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ingvar Johansson (2006). The Four-Category Ontology. A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science – E. Jonathan Lowe. Dialectica 60 (4):513–518.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ingvar Johansson, Bertin Klein & Thomas Roth-Berghofer (eds.) (2006). WSPI 2006: Contributions to the Third International Workshop on Philosophy and Informatics.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ingvar Johansson (2005). Money and Fictions. In Felix Larsson (ed.), Kapten Mnemos Kolumbarium. Philosophical Communications. 73--101.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ingvar Johansson, Barry Smith, Katherine Munn, Nikoloz Tsikolia, Kathleen Elsner, Dominikus Ernst & Dirk Siebert (2005). Functional Anatomy: A Taxonomic Proposal. Acta Biotheoretica 53 (3).
    It is argued that medical science requires a classificatory system that (a) puts functions in the taxonomic center and (b) does justice ontologically to the difference between the processes which are the realizations of functions and the objects which are their bearers. We propose formulae for constructing such a system and describe some of its benefits. The arguments are general enough to be of interest to all the life sciences.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ingvar Johansson (2004). Functions, Function Concepts, and Scales. The Monist 87 (1):96-114.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ingvar Johansson (2004). Truthmaking: A Cognition-Independent Internal Relation with Heterogeneous Relata. In Johann Christian Marek & Maria Elisabeth Reicher (eds.), Experience and Analysis: Papers of the 27th International Wittgenstein Symposium. Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society. 154--56.
    For many assertions, the correspondence theory of truth seems intuitively to give the best account of the difference between truth and falsity, but one of its problems is how to explicate the notions of “correspondence” and “truthmaking”. In conformity with the view of David Armstrong, it is claimed that truthmaking is an internal relation between a truthmaker and a truth(-value-)bearer. The truthbearer (a token proposition) can exist without the truthmaker (an object or a state of affairs), and vice versa, but (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ingvar Johansson (2003). Performatives and Antiperformatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (6):661-702.
    The paper highlights a certain kind of self-falsifying utterance, which I shall call antiperformative assertions, not noted in speech-act theory thus far. By taking such assertions into account, the old question whether explicit performatives have a truth-value can be resolved. I shall show that explicit performatives are in fact self-verifyingly true, but they are not related to propositions the way ordinary assertions are; antiperformatives have the same unusual relation to propositions, but are self-falsifyingly false. Explicit performatives are speech acts performed (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Ingvar Johansson (2003). Review of Georg Meggle, (Ed.), Social Facts & Collective Intentionality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (3).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Ingvar Johansson (2002). Critical Notice of Armstrong's and Lewis' Concepts of Supervenience. SATS: Northern European Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):118-122.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ingvar Johansson (2001). Hartmann's Nonreductive Materialism, Superimposition, and Supervenience. Axiomathes 12 (3-4):195-215.
  32. Ingvar Johansson (2000). Determinables as Universals. The Monist 83 (1):101-121.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Ingvar Johansson (1998). Hume's Surprise and the Logic of Belief Changes. Synthese 117 (2):275-291.
    If the logic of belief changes is extended to cover belief states which contain both factual and normative beliefs, it is easily shown that a change of a factual belief (an 'Is') in a mixed belief state can imply a change of a normative belief (an 'Ought') in the same state. With regard to Hume's so-called 'Is-Ought problem', this means that one has to distinguish its statics from its dynamics. When this is done, it becomes clear that changes of factual (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Ingvar Johansson (1997). The Unnoticed Regional Ontology of Mechanisms. Axiomathes 8 (1):411-428.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Ingvar Johansson (1992). Intentionality and Tendency: How to Make Aristotle Up-to-Date. In. In Kevin Mulligan (ed.), Language, Truth and Ontology. Kluwer. 180--192.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Ingvar Johansson (1991). Pluralism and Rationality in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 21 (4):427-443.
    This article takes it for granted that science is intrinsically social and that competition is part and parcel of science. Four kinds of competition are distinguished and related to four kinds of rationalities: technological, normal scientific, political, and philosophical. It is argued that science as a whole is rational when there is interaction between the different (sub-) rationalities. Science needs not only different disciplines, but a methodological division of labor.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ingvar Johansson (1989). Ontological Investigations: An Inquiry Into the Categories of Nature, Man, and Society. Routledge.
    ONTOLOGY This book is a book about the world. I am concerned with ontology, not merely with language. Many ontological treatises concentrate largely on the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ingvar Johansson (1987). Beyond Objectivism and Relativism. Radical Philosophy 47:13-17.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Ingvar Johansson (1986). Levels of Intension and Theories of Reference. Theoria 52 (1-2):1-15.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Ingvar Johansson (1980). Ceteris Paribus Clauses, Closure Clauses and Falsifiability. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 11 (1):16-22.
    Summary The article argues thatceteris paribus clauses have to be separated from another type of clauses called closure clauses. The former are associated with laws and theories, the latter with test situations of a particular kind. It is also argued that closure clauses, but notceteris paribus clauses, make Popper's falsifiability principle untenable. In that way, it also resolves the quarrel between Popper and Lakatos aboutceteris paribus clauses and falsifiability by saying that both are partly wrong and partly right.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Ingvar Johansson (1975). A Critique of Karl Popper's Methodology. Akad. Förl..
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation