Search results for 'Innate Idea' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Paul M. Pietroski & Stephen Crain (2005). Innate Ideas. In James A. McGilvray (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Chomsky. Cambridge. 164--181.score: 156.0
    Here's one way this chapter could go. After defining the terms 'innate' and 'idea', we say whether Chomsky thinks any ideas are innate -- and if so, which ones. Unfortunately, we don't have any theoretically interesting definitions to offer; and, so far as we know, Chomsky has never said that any ideas are innate. Since saying that would make for a very short chapter, we propose to do something else. Our aim is to locate Chomsky, as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Stephen P. Stich (ed.) (1975). Innate Ideas. University of California Press.score: 156.0
    Introduction: The Idea oflnnateness Philosophical controversies are notoriously long-lived. And in point of venerability the controversy around innate ideas ...
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Tooby, Leda Cosmides & H. Clark Barrett (2005). Resolving the Debate on Innate Ideas: Learnability Constraints and the Evolved Interpenetration of Motivational and Conceptual Functions. In Peter Carruthers, Stephen Laurence & Stephen Stich (eds.), The Innate Mind: Structure and Contents. New York: Oxford University Press New York. 305--337.score: 142.0
    In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.). The innate mind: Structure and content. (pp. 305-337). New York: Oxford University Press.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Noam A. Chomsky (1967). Recent Contributions to the Theory of Innate Ideas. Synthese 17 (March):2-11.score: 130.0
  5. Steve Stewart-Williams (2005). Innate Ideas as a Naturalistic Source of Metaphysical Knowledge. Biology and Philosophy 20 (4):791-814.score: 122.0
    This article starts from the assumption that there are various innate contributions to our view of the world and explores the epistemological implications that follow from this. Specifically, it explores the idea that if certain components of our worldview have an evolutionary origin, this implies that these aspects accurately depict the world. The simple version of the argument for this conclusion is that if an aspect of mind is innate, it must be useful, and the most parsimonious (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Murray Miles (1988). The Idea of Extension: Innate or Adventitious? On R. F. McRae's Interpretation of Descartes. Dialogue 27 (01):15-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Robert L. Armstrong (1969). Cambridge Platonists and Locke on Innate Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 30:191-205.score: 102.0
    The cambridge platonists exemplify the fear that newtonian natural philosophy subverts the status of traditional moral and religious beliefs, Which are strongly supported by the innate idea doctrine since it justifies them independently of the senses and the material universe. Isaac barrow, Friend and teacher of newton, Also employs the doctrine approbatively to support his metaphysics as a science of basic principles that constitute the foundation of natural science. Locke's rejection of the doctrine is analyzed and it is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Russell Roberts, Innate Ideas Without Abstract Ideas: An Essay on Berkeley's Platonism.score: 96.0
    Draft. Berkeley denied the existence of abstract ideas and any faculty of abstraction. At the same time, however, he embraced innate ideas and a faculty of pure intellect. This paper attempts to reconcile the tension between these commitments by offering an interpretation of Berkeley's Platonism.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. M. J. Cain (2004). The Return of the Nativist. Philosophical Explorations 7 (1):1-20.score: 84.0
    Radical Concept Nativism (RCN) is the doctrine that most of our concepts are innate. In this paper I will argue in favour of RCN by developing a speculative account of concept acquisition that has considerable nativist credentials and can be defended against the most familiar anti-nativist objections. The core idea is that we have a whole battery of hard-wired dispositions that determine how we group together objects with which we interact. In having these dispositions we are effectively committed (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. John Rogers, Innate Ideas and the Infinite: The Case of Locke and Descartes.score: 76.0
    Pierre Gassendi, who did not like nonsense, said of the idea of infinity: ‘if someone calls something "infinite" he attributes to a thing which he does not grasp a label which he does not understand’. Gassendi’s is a harsh judgement for, surely, we all do quite cheerfully and successfully use the concept of infinity, and in a variety of contexts. Yet if Gassendi’s judgement is too hard it is easy enough to have sympathy with his claim. For it is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Douglas Greenlee (1972). Locke and the Controversy Over Innate Ideas. Journal of the History of Ideas 33.score: 74.0
    Evidence, For the most part from books I and iv of locke's "essay concerning human understanding", Is presented to show that the issue about innate ideas as understood by locke was not primarily psychological but methodological. Locke's philosophic ire was directed against those who used the doctrine of innate ideas to advocate a close-Minded, As opposed to an open-Minded, Method of inquiry.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Stephen P. Stich (1975). The Idea of Innateness. In , Innate Ideas. University of California Press. 1--22.score: 74.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Nicholas Jolley (1988). Leibniz and Malebranche on Innate Ideas. Philosophical Review 97 (1):71-91.score: 72.0
    This paper seeks to reconstruct an important controversy between leibniz and malebranche over innate ideas. It is argued that this controversy is in some ways more illuminating than the better-Known debate between leibniz and locke, For malebranche's objections to innate ideas raise fundamental questions concerning the status of dispositions and the relationship between logic and psychology. The paper shows that in order to meet malebranche's objections, Leibniz adopts a strategy which is doubly reductionist: ideas are reduced to dispositions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Frederick P. Van De Pitte (1985). Descartes' Innate Ideas. Kant-Studien 76 (1-4):363-384.score: 72.0
    A careful examination of descartes' works shows that innate ideas are not born with the mind, But are generated by (i.E., Born within) the mind. This is descartes' way of talking about empirical concept formation, As well as what the mind can infer from these concepts. Particular examples are examined to provide the material and formal conditions for identifying innate ideas. Descartes forces the transition from medieval to very modern epistemology.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John Shand (2004). Innate Ideas and Immortality in Descartes and Locke. Locke Studies 4:47-58.score: 72.0
    This paper traces the connections between the assertion or denial of innate ideas, and the possibility of the soul being immortal, in the contrasting cases of Descartes and Locke. Descartes and Locke disagree about whether there are innate ideas and the nature of the soul, but they agree that the soul is immortal. The issue explored is which theory of the mind, Descartes's or Locke's, is in the best position to contend that we to survive death, and indeed (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Walbridge (2014). A Response to Seyed N. Mousavian, "Did Suhrawardi Believe in Innate Ideas as A Priori Concepts? A Note". Philosophy East and West 64 (2):481-486.score: 72.0
    I should, I suppose, begin by taking some personal responsibility for this controversy. When my late friend Hossein Ziai and I published our edition and translation of Suhrawardī’s Ḥikmat al-Ishrāq (hereafter Philosophy of Illumination), we chose “innate” as our rendering of fiṭrī. I don’t remember discussing the rendering, and we did not bother to mention it in the glossary. Hossein had used this rendering in his first book, Knowledge and Illumination, stating that “innate ideas serve as the grounds (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Michele Merritt, Minimally Innate Ideas.score: 72.0
    This project provides a detailed examination and critique of current philosophical, linguistic, and cognitive accounts of first language acquisition. In particular, I focus on the concept of "innate" and how it is embraced, marginally utilized, or abandoned altogether in efforts to describe the way that a child comes to be a competent user of a language. A central question that naturally falls out of this general inquiry is therefore what exactly is supposed to be "innate," according to various (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Hilary Putnam (1967). The 'Innateness Hypothesis' and Explanatory Models in Linguistics. Synthese 17 (March):12-22.score: 70.0
  19. Thomas Wasow (1973). The Innateness Hypothesis and Grammatical Relations. Synthese 26 (October):38-52.score: 70.0
  20. Jon Miller (2001). Innate Ideas in Stoicism and Grotius. Grotiana 22 (1):157-175.score: 70.0
    Philosophers have long debated whether any ideas are innate in the human mind and if so, what they might be. The issues here are real and important but it often seems that the discussion of them isn’t. One of the main reasons that these discussions are frequently so frustrating is that the various sides seem to be talking past each other rather than engaging in genuine argument. When this happens, it seems to me that it is usually because the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Diwakar Acharya (2014). On the Śaiva Concept of Innate Impurity (Mala) and the Function of the Rite of Initiation. Journal of Indian Philosophy 42 (1):9-25.score: 66.0
    This paper tries to trace the roots of the Śaiva Mantramārga concept of innate impurity. Since innate impurity is regarded as one of the three bonds fettering bound individual souls, this paper begins with the Pāśupata and early Śaiva views on these bonds. It examines the Buddhist logician Dharmakīrti’s criticism of the Śaiva idea that initiation removes sin, and discusses the Pāśupata concept of sin-cleansing and two different concepts of innate impurity found in two early Śaiva (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sterling P. Lamprecht (1927). Locke's Attack Upon Innate Ideas. Philosophical Review 36 (2):145-165.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Murray Miles (2010). Analytic Method, the Cogito, and Descartes's Argument for the Innateness of the Idea of God. Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 14 (2):289-320.score: 60.0
    The analytic method by which Descartes discovered the first principle of his philosophy—cogito, ergo sum—is a unique cognitive process of direct insight and nonlogical inference. It differs markedly from inductive as well as deductive procedures, but also from older models of the direct noetic apprehension of first principles, notably those of Plato and Aristotle. However, a critical examination of Descartes’s argument for the innateness of the idea of God shows that there are serious obstacles in the way of his (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Giorgio Tonelli (1974). Leibniz on Innate Ideas and the Early Reactions to the Publication of the Nouveaux Essais (1765). Journal of the History of Philosophy 12 (4):437-454.score: 60.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ned Block (ed.) (1981). Readings In Philosophy Of Psychology, V. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.score: 60.0
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and ... V. Influence of imaged pictures and sounds on detection of visual and auditory signals. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anthony Savile (1972). Leibniz's Contribution to the Theory of Innate Ideas. Philosophy 47 (180):113 - 124.score: 60.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Nicholas Rescher (1966). A New Look at the Problem of Innate Ideas. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 17 (3):205-218.score: 60.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Sterling P. Lamprecht (1926). Innate Ideas in the Cambridge Platonists. Philosophical Review 35 (6):553-573.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Stuart C. Brown (ed.) (1974). Philosophy Of Psychology. London,: Macmillan.score: 60.0
  30. J. M. Katz (1966). Innate Ideas. In The Philosophy of Language. Harper & Row.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Howard M. Robinson (1988). A Dualist Perspective on Psychological Development. Philosophical Perspectives 2:119-139.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Schwankl (1973). On the Phenomenology of the Unconscious. Human Context 5:318-329.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Samuel C. Rickless (2009). Marc A. Hight. Idea and Ontology: An Essay in Early Modern Metaphysics of Ideas. [REVIEW] Berkeley Studies 20:22-33.score: 56.0
    Marc A. Hight has given us a well-researched, well-written, analytically rigorous and thoughtprovoking book about the development of idea ontology in the seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries. The book covers a great deal of material, some in significant depth, some not. The figures discussed include Descartes, Malebranche, Arnauld, Locke, Leibniz, Berkeley, and Hume. Some might think it a tall order for anyone to grapple with the central works of these figures on a subject as fundamental as the nature of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Raffaella de Rosa (2000). On Fodor's Claim That Classical Empiricists and Rationalists Agree on the Innateness of Ideas. Protosociology 14:240-269.score: 56.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jesse Prinz, Is Morality Innate?score: 54.0
    Thus declares Francis Hutcheson, expressing a view widespread during the Enlightenment, and throughout the history of philosophy. According to this tradition, we are by nature moral, and ourS concern for good and evil is as natural to us as our capacity to feel pleasure and pain. The link between morality and human nature has been a common theme since ancient times, and, with the rise of modern empirical moral psychology, it remains equally popular today. Evolutionary ethicists, ethologists, developmental psychologists, social (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Helen De Cruz (2007). An Enhanced Argument for Innate Elementary Geometric Knowledge and its Philosophical Implications. In Bart Van Kerkhove (ed.), New perspectives on mathematical practices. Essays in philosophy and history of mathematics. World Scientific.score: 54.0
    The idea that formal geometry derives from intuitive notions of space has appeared in many guises, most notably in Kant’s argument from geometry. Kant claimed that an a priori knowledge of spatial relationships both allows and constrains formal geometry: it serves as the actual source of our cognition of principles of geometry and as a basis for its further cultural development. The development of non-Euclidean geometries, however, seemed to definitely undermine the idea that there is some privileged relationship (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Paul Griffiths, The Distinction Between Innate and Acquired Characteristics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 54.0
    The idea that some characteristics of an organism are explained by the organism's intrinsic nature, whilst others reflect the influence of the environment is an ancient one. It has even been argued that this distinction is itself part of the evolved psychology of the human species. The distinction played an important role in the history of philosophy as the locus of the dispute between Rationalism and Empiricism discussed in another entry in this encyclopedia. This entry, however, focuses on twentieth-century (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Bat-Ami Bar On (1987). Could There Be a Humean Sex-Neutral General Idea of Man? Philosophy Research Archives 13:367-377.score: 54.0
    In this paper I suggest that the Humean male and Humean female of Hume’s Treatise would have different mental lives due to a great extent to what Hume takes to be the socio-culture in place. Specifically, I show that the Humean male would be incapable but the Humean female would be capable of forming a Humean sex-neutral general idea of man. The Humean male’s inability is not innate but the result of the trauma he experiences when discovering sexuality, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Seyed N. Mousavian (2014). Did Suhrawardi Believe in Innate Ideas as A Priori Concepts? A Note. Philosophy East and West 64 (2):473-480.score: 52.0
    In a past issue of Philosophy East and West (Aminrazavi 2003), Mehdi Aminrazavi, developing his ideas expressed earlier in Suhrawardi and the School of Illumination (Aminrazavi 1997), attempted to argue “that Ibn Sīnā’s peripatetic orientation and Suhrawardī’s ishrāqī perspective have both maintained and adhered to the same epistemological framework while the philosophical language in which their respective epistemologies are discussed is different” (Aminrazavi 2003, p. 203). I disagree; however, this is not the point I am going to address in this (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. S. B. Drury (1980). John Locke: Natural Law and Innate Ideas. Dialogue 19 (04):531-545.score: 50.0
  41. Harry M. Bracken (1967). Innate Ideas—Then and Now. Dialogue 6 (03):334-346.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Timothy McGrew (1992). Unraveling Innate Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3):307 - 317.score: 50.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Deborah Boyle (2000). Descartes on Innate Ideas. Modern Schoolman 78 (1):35-51.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Daniel E. Flage & Clarence A. Bonnen (1992). Descartes and the Epistemology of Innate Ideas. History of Philosophy Quarterly 9 (1):19 - 33.score: 50.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Byron Kaldis (2011). Leibniz' Argument for Innate Ideas. In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. 281--289.score: 50.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Benjamin Hill (2010). Deborah Boyle, Descartes on Innate Ideas. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 30 (4):242-245.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Desmond M. Clarke (1975). Innate Ideas. Philosophical Studies 24:52-63.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Roger Gallie (1997). Reid: Conception, Representation and Innate Ideas. Hume Studies 23 (2):315-336.score: 50.0
  49. Murray Miles (1988). McRae on Innate Ideas: A Rejoinder. Dialogue 27 (01):29-.score: 50.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. E. S. S. (1975). Linguistic Relativity Versus Innate Ideas. Review of Metaphysics 29 (1):143-144.score: 50.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000