Search results for 'Intentionality (Philosophy' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. John R. Searle (1983). Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind. Cambridge University Press.
    John Searle's Speech Acts and Expression and Meaning developed a highly original and influential approach to the study of language. But behind both works lay the assumption that the philosophy of language is in the end a branch of the philosophy of the mind: speech acts are forms of human action and represent just one example of the mind's capacity to relate the human organism to the world. The present book is concerned with these biologically fundamental capacities, and, though third (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   434 citations  
  2.  42
    Daniel Anderson Arnold (2012). Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. Columbia University Press.
    Aiming to complicate this story, Dan Arnold confronts a significant obstacle to popular attempts at harmonizing classical Buddhist and modern scientific thought: since most Indian Buddhists believe that the mental continuum is uninterrupted ..
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  3.  6
    Rick Repetti (2015). Christian Coseru, Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy. Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 35 (4):191-193.
    This work focuses on a narrow Buddhist epistemological tradition that begins with the Abhidharma philosopher Vasubandhu’s analyses of perception and is developed by Dignāga, Dharmakīrti, Kamalaśīla, and Śāntarakṣita. Coseru explains how Buddhist epistemology evolved in dialogue with competing conceptions internal to Buddhism and against orthodox Indian philosophies, particularly Nyāya and Mīmāṃsā. Coseru’s main argument is that although widespread interpretations of Buddhist epistemology are foundationalist, a more useful way to understand it is as a form of phenomenology consistent with enactivism and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  78
    Antti Saaristo (2006). There is No Escape From Philosophy: Collective Intentionality and Empirical Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (1):40-66.
    This article examines two empirical research traditions—experimental economics and the social identity approach in social psychology—that may be seen as attempts to falsify and verify the theory of collective intentionality, respectively. The article argues that both approaches fail to settle the issue. However, this is not necessarily due to the alleged immaturity of the social sciences but, possibly, to the philosophical nature of intentionality and intentional action. The article shows how broadly Davidsonian action theory, including Hacking’s notion of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  62
    Nam-In Lee (2000). Practical Intentionality and Transcendental Phenomenology as a Practical Philosophy. Husserl Studies 17 (1):49-63.
    This paper will deal with the problem of practical intentionality in the transcendental phenomenology of Husserl. First, through an analysis of a passage found in Logical Investigations, I will show Husserl''s earlier position with respect to the problem of practical intentionality. I will then go on to critically assess this position and, with reference to some of Husserl''s works written after the 1920''s, prove that every intentionality should be regarded as a practical intentionality. Correspondingly, transcendental phenomenology (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Rebecca Copenhaver (2006). Thomas Reid's Philosophy of Mind: Consciousness and Intentionality. Philosophy Compass 1 (3):279-289.
    Thomas Reid’s epistemological ambitions are decisively at the center of his work. However, if we take such ambitions to be the whole story, we are apt to overlook the theory of mind that Reid develops and deploys against the theory of ideas. Reid’s philosophy of mind is sophisticated and strikingly contemporary, and has, until recently, been lost in the shadow of his other philosophical accomplishments. Here I survey some aspects of Reid’s theory of mind that I find most interesting. I (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  12
    Amit Chaturvedi (2014). Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy by Christian Coseru (Review). Philosophy East and West 64 (2):506-513.
    In Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy, Christian Coseru makes the innovative and ambitious argument that the project of Indian Buddhist epistemology, as represented by thinkers in the Yogācāra tradition of Dignāga and Dharmakīrti, is continuous in many of its methods and conclusions with the phenomenological theories of Edmund Husserl and Maurice Merleau-Ponty, as well as with recent naturalistic approaches in epistemology and the philosophy of mind. In Coseru’s reading, Buddhism shares with phenomenology the attitude that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Carl N. Still (2016). Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy Ed. By Gyula Klima. Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):337-338.
    The fifteen essays in this volume represent the state of the art when it comes to the contemporary study of medieval philosophy of mind. The contributors are well-established scholars in the field who build on their previous work, and most advance an original argument in these essays. The focus is on western Christian philosophers and theologians from the thirteenth and fourteenth centuries and “the intricacies and varieties of the conceptual relationships among intentionality, cognition, and mental representation” in their thought. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Dan Arnold (2014). Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. Cup.
    Premodern Buddhists are sometimes characterized as veritable "mind scientists" whose insights anticipate modern research on the brain and mind. Aiming to complicate this story, Dan Arnold confronts a significant obstacle to popular attempts at harmonizing classical Buddhist and modern scientific thought: since most Indian Buddhists held that the mental continuum is uninterrupted by death, they would have no truck with the idea that everything about the mental can be explained in terms of brain events. Nevertheless, a predominant stream of Indian (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10.  27
    Deborah L. Black (2010). Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy. Quaestio 10 (1):65-81.
    It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of (...) and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of “intentions” to a neglected passage from Avicenna’s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as “intentions”, and I explore the implications of Averroes’s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  4
    Andreas Vrahimis (2015). The Intentionality of Speech Acts: A Confrontation Between Ordinary Language Philosophy, Phenomenology, and Deconstruction? The Intentionality of Speech Acts: A Confrontation Between Ordinary Language Philosophy, Phenomenology, and Deconstruction? 23 (4):584-594.
  12. Dan Arnold (2012). Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. Cup.
    Premodern Buddhists are sometimes characterized as veritable "mind scientists" whose insights anticipate modern research on the brain and mind. Aiming to complicate this story, Dan Arnold confronts a significant obstacle to popular attempts at harmonizing classical Buddhist and modern scientific thought: since most Indian Buddhists held that the mental continuum is uninterrupted by death, they would have no truck with the idea that everything about the mental can be explained in terms of brain events. Nevertheless, a predominant stream of Indian (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Gyula Klima (2015). Intentionality, Cognition and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy. Fordham University Press.
    It is supposed to be common knowledge about the history of ideas that one of the few medieval philosophical contributions preserved in modern philosophical thought is the idea that mental phenomena are distinguished from physical phenomena by their intentionality, their directedness toward some object. As is usually the case with such commonplaces about the history of ideas, this claim is not quite true. Medieval philosophers routinely described ordinary physical phenomena, such as reflections in mirrors or sounds in the air, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  44
    Christian Coseru (2012). Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
    What turns the continuous flow of experience into perceptually distinct objects? Can our verbal descriptions unambiguously capture what it is like to see, hear, or feel? How might we reason about the testimony that perception alone discloses? Christian Coseru proposes a rigorous and highly original way to answer these questions by developing a framework for understanding perception as a mode of apprehension that is intentionally constituted, pragmatically oriented, and causally effective. By engaging with recent discussions in phenomenology and analytic philosophy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  15. John McDowell (1992). Meaning and Intentionality in Wittgenstein's Later Philosophy. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 17 (1):40-52.
  16.  15
    Philip Hugly & Charles Sayward (1996). Intentionality and Truth: An Essay on the Philosophy of Arthur Prior. Kluwer.
    This book says Prior claims: (1) that a sentence never names; (2) what a sentence says cannot be otherwise signified; and (3) that a sentence says what it says whatever the type of its occurrence; (4) and that quantifications binding sentential variables are neither eliminable, substitutional, nor referential. The book develops and defends (1)-(3). It also defends (4) against the sorts of strictures on quantification of such philosophers as Quine and Davidson.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  17.  99
    Richard Menary (2006). Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative: Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.
    This collection is a much-needed remedy to the confusion about which varieties of enactivism are robust yet viable rejections of traditional representionalism...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  18.  42
    Bronwyn Finnigan (2015). Review of Dan Arnold's "Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind". [REVIEW] Journal of Religion 95 (1):143-146.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Richard Rorty (1994). Consciousness, Intentionality, and the Philosophy of Mind. In Richard Warner & Tadeusz Szubka (eds.), The Mind-Body Problem: A Guide to the Current Debate. Cambridge: Blackwell
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  40
    Norman R. Gall (2000). John D. Greenwood, Ed., the Future of Folk Psychology: Intentionality and Cognitive Science; Scott M. Christensen and Dale R. Turner, Eds., Folk Psychology and the Philosophy of Mind. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 10 (3):416-423.
  21. Hector-Neri Castañeda (1971). Intentionality, Minds, and Perception Discussions on Contemporary Philosophy, a Symposium. Wayne State University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. J. McIntosh (ed.) (2001). Naturalism, Evolution, and Intentionality (Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Volume 27). University of Calgary Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. David Snelling (2001). Philosophy, Psychoanalysis, and the Origins of Meaning Pre-Reflective Intentionality in the Psychoanalytic View of the Mind. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Graham Priest (2005). Towards Non-Being: The Logic and Metaphysics of Intentionality. Oxford University Press.
    Graham Priest presents a ground-breaking account of the semantics of intentional language--verbs such as "believes," "fears," "seeks," or "imagines." Towards Non-Being proceeds in terms of objects that may be either existent or non-existent, at worlds that may be either possible or impossible. The book will be of central interest to anyone who is concerned with intentionality in the philosophy of mind or philosophy of language, the metaphysics of existence and identity, the philosophy of fiction, the philosophy of mathematics, or (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   43 citations  
  25.  9
    Nicole Wyatt (forthcoming). Intentionality, Cognition, and Mental Representation in Medieval Philosophy, Edited by Gyula Klima. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-1.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Dan Arnold (2009). Svasamvitti as Methodological Solipsism: Narrow Content and the Problem of Intentionality in Buddhist Philosophy of Mind. In Mario D'Amato, Jay L. Garfield & Tom J. F. Tillemans (eds.), Pointing at the Moon: Buddhism, Logic, Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  79
    Victor Caston, Intentionality in Ancient Philosophy. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  36
    Lionel Shapiro (2013). Intentionality Bifurcated: A Lesson From Early Modern Philosophy? In Martin Lenz & Anik Waldow (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Early Modern Philosophy: Nature and Norms in Thought. Springer
    This paper examines the pressures leading two very different Early Modern philosophers, Descartes and Locke, to invoke two ways in which thought is directed at objects. According to both philosophers, I argue, the same idea can simultaneously count as “of” two different objects—in two different senses of the phrase ‘idea of’. One kind of intentional directedness is invoked in answering the question What is it to think that thus-and-so? The other kind is invoked in answering the question What accounts for (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  9
    Richard E. Aquila (1985). "Intentionality: An Essay in the Philosophy of Mind" by John R. Searle. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46 (1):159.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. Dan Arnold (2009). Dharmakırti and Dharmottara on the Intentionality of Perception: Selections From Nyayabindu (an Epitome of Philosophy). In Jay Garfield & William Edelgass (eds.), Buddhist Philosophy: Essential Readings. OUP Usa 186--196.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  22
    Mark Siderits (2013). Dan Arnold: Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind. [REVIEW] International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 74 (2):237-241.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Peter B. Raabe (2002). David Snelling, Philosophy, Psychoanalysis and the Origins of Meaning: Pre-Reflective Intentionality in the Psychoanalytic View of the Mind Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 22 (2):149-151.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  2
    Sonia Kamińska (2014). Two Views on Intentionality, Immortality, and the Self in Brentano’s Philosophy of Mind. Polish Journal of Philosophy 8 (2):25-42.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  19
    Robert Sokolowski (1992). Husserl and Analytic Philosophy and Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):725-730.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  14
    Robert Sokolowski (1992). Review: Review Essay: Husserl and Analytic Philosophy and Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52 (3):725 - 730.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  2
    Yujian Zheng, Unconscious Intentionality and the Status of Normativity in Searle's Philosophy : With Comparative Reference to Traditional Chinese Thought.
    This anthology investigates how Searle’s philosophy and Chinese philosophy can jointly contribute to the common philosophical enterprise and shows how such comparative methodology of constructive engagement is important in philosophical inquiry.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  1
    Jonathan C. Gold (2014). A Review of Brains, Buddhas, and Believing: The Problem of Intentionality in Classical Buddhist and Cognitive-Scientific Philosophy of Mind by Dan Arnold. [REVIEW] Philosophy East and West 64 (4):1048-1057.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. John C. Carney (2004). On the Relationship Between Intentionality and Alienation in Sartre's Political Philosophy. Dissertation, New School University
    This dissertation is a definition of Sartre's theory of alienation through an explication of his concept of Intentionality. The analysis begins with Sartre's concept of "nothingness." It explicates this concept first, through a study of Sartre's early article on Intentionality, and then the larger work, Transcendence of the Ego. It then provides a detailed account of Sartre's realism. The three-fold relationship of nothingness, realism and the doctrine of Intentionality comprise the core elements of Sartre's concept of realism. (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Noel Carrol (2006). Philosophy and Drama: Performance, Interpretation, and Intentionality. In David Krasner & David Z. Saltz (eds.), Staging Philosophy: Intersections of Theater, Performance, and Philosophy. University of Michigan Press 104--21.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  70
    Christoph Lumer & Sandro Nannini (2007). Intentionality, Deliberation and Autonomy: The Action-Theoretic Basis of Practical Philosophy. Ashgate Publishing.
    Many important thinkers in the philosophical tradition, like Aristotle or Hume, have used an explicit theory of action as the basis of their respective normative theories of practical rationality and morality. The idea behind this architecture of theories is that action theory can inform us about the origin, bonds, reach and limits of practical reason. The aim of this book is to revive this direct connection between action theory and practical philosophy, in particular to provide systematic action-theoretical underpinnings for the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  19
    Thomas Szanto & Dermot Moran (2015). Introduction: Empathy and Collective Intentionality—The Social Philosophy of Edith Stein. Human Studies 38 (4):445-461.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  9
    Anand Jayprakash Vaidya (2015). Proximality and Meditative Knowledge: A Review Discussion of Christian Coseru, Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy, Oxford University Press 2012, ISBN: 978-0199843381, Hb, Cxvi + 352 Pp. [REVIEW] Sophia 54 (2):221-225.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  4
    Andreas Vrahimis (2015). The Intentionality of Speech Acts: A Confrontation Between Ordinary Language Philosophy, Phenomenology, and Deconstruction? International Journal of Philosophical Studies 23 (4):584-594.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  13
    Jan Westerhoff (2013). Perceiving Reality: Consciousness, Intentionality, and Cognition in Buddhist Philosophy, by Christian Coseru. Mind 122 (488):1069-1075.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch & E. Thompson (2007). Almang, J.(2007). Intentionality and Intersubjectivity. Goteborg, Sweden: Gote-Borg Universitet, 210 Pp., ISBN 978-91-7346-583-0. Grahek, N.(2007). Feeling Pain and Being in Pain . Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press, 181 Pp., ISBN 0-262-07283-0, $30.00 (Cloth). Grossman, N.(2003). Healing the Mind: The Philosophy of Spinoza Adapted For. [REVIEW] Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 38:317.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  8
    Joseph F. Collins (1944). Intentionality in the Philosophy of Avicenna. Modern Schoolman 21 (4):204-215.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  8
    D. Lubiszewski (2009). Are Enactivists Radical? Book Review Of: Richard Menary (Ed.) (2006) Radical Enactivism: Intentionality, Phenomenology and Narrative. Focus on the Philosophy of Daniel D. Hutto. [REVIEW] Constructivist Foundations 4 (3):170 - 171.
    Summary: What makes Hutto's account special is his commitment to the rejection of content, a point where he becomes a real radical. The book is not just another book about enactivism but it is an enactive book for everyone written by an enactivist.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Elena Băltuţă (2009). Remarks on Thomas Aquinas’s Philosophy of Mind: Intentionality. Chôra 7:315-332.
    Im Folgenden werde ich einige der möglichen Interpretationen der thomistischen Intentionalitätstheorie darstellen. Zuerst werde ich die Mechanismen der menschlichen Erkenntnis und der Beziehung zwischen phantasmata, species sensibile und species intelligibile bei Thomas von Aquin beschreiben. Danachwerde ich die verschiedenen Interpretationen des Problems der Intentionalität bei Thomas darstellen; genauer gesagt geht es um drei reduktive Interpretationenund eine nicht-reduktive. Am Ende dieses Beitrags werde ich mich für eine dieser Interpretationen entscheiden und meine Gründe dafür angeben.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    A. R. E. (1967). Intentionality, Minds, and Perception: Discussions on Contemporary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):384-384.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  2
    Claude Gandelman (1982). Philosophy as a Sign-Producing Activity: The Metastable Gestalt of Intentionality. Semiotica 39 (1-2):287.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000