Search results for 'Interactionism' (try it on Scholar)

234 found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Thomas E. Ludwig (1997). Selves and Brains: Tracing a Path Between Interactionism and Materialism. Philosophical Psychology 10 (4):489-495.score: 24.0
    A dialog between Donald MacKay and Mario Bunge, printed in the journal Neuroscience over the course of two years beginning in 1977, provides a conscise summary of MacKay's views on the mind-body relationship. In this dialog, MacKay contrasts the dualistic interactionism theory of Popper and Eccles with Bunge's emergentist materialism theory, and then builds a case for a third alternative based on the notion of mental events embodied in, but not identical to, brain events. Although neuroscience has made tremendous (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Patricia M. Burbank & Diane C. Martins (2010). Symbolic Interactionism and Critical Perspective: Divergent or Synergistic? Nursing Philosophy 11 (1):25-41.score: 24.0
    Throughout their history, symbolic interactionism and critical perspective have been viewed as divergent theoretical perspectives with different philosophical underpinnings. A review of their historical and philosophical origins reveals both points of divergence and areas of convergence. Their underlying philosophies of science and views of human freedom are different as is their level of focus with symbolic interactionism having a micro perspective and critical perspective using a macro perspective. This micro/macro difference is reflected in the divergence of their major (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joseph Margolis (1966). Objectivism and Interactionism. Philosophy of Science 33 (June):118-123.score: 24.0
    The views of linguistic analysts and objectivists are explored with regard to the question of interactionism. It is argued that the admission of a logical difference between explanation by cause and explanation by motive cannot disqualify causal explanations of human action, cannot be construed as challenging the competence of science, and cannot count against interactionism. It is also argued that objectivist programs for eliminating mentalistic concepts either implicitly admit interactionism or cannot distinguish relevantly between interactionism and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Tammy L. MacLean (2008). Framing and Organizational Misconduct: A Symbolic Interactionist Study. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):3 - 16.score: 24.0
    This study expands theoretical understanding of organizational misconduct through qualitative analysis of widespread deceptive sales practices at a large U.S. life insurance company. Adopting a symbolic interactionist perspective, this research describes how a set of taken-for-granted interpretive frames located in the organization’s culture created a worldview through which deceptive sales practices were seen as normal, acceptable, routine operating procedure. The findings from this study extend and modify the dominant theoretical ‘pressure/opportunity’ model of organizational misconduct by proposing that the process engine (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Vivian Bohl & Wouter van den Bos (2012). Toward an Integrative Account of Social Cognition: Marrying Theory of Mind and Interactionism to Study the Interplay of Type 1 and Type 2 Processes. [REVIEW] Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 24.0
    Traditional theory of mind (ToM) accounts for social cognition have been at the basis of most studies in the social cognitive neurosciences. However, in recent years, the need to go beyond traditional ToM accounts for understanding real life social interactions has become all the more pressing. At the same time it remains unclear whether alternative accounts, such as interactionism, can yield a sufficient description and explanation of social interactions. We argue that instead of considering ToM and interactionism as (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Hanne De Jaegher & Ezequiel Di Paolo (2012). Enactivism is Not Interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 24.0
  7. Ezequiel Di Paolo Hanne De Jaegher (2012). Enactivism is Not Interactionism. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 6.score: 24.0
  8. Edward W. Averill & Bernard Keating (1981). Does Interactionism Violate a Law of Classical Physics? Mind 90 (January):102-7.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Laird Addis (1984). Parallelism, Interactionism, and Causation. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 9 (1):329-344.score: 21.0
    One may gather from the arguments of two of the last papers published before his death that J. L. Mackie held the following three theses concerning the mind/body problem : (1) There is a distinct realm of mental properties, so a dualism of properties at least is true and materialism false.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Howard D. Roelofs (1955). A Case for Dualism and Interactionism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (June):451-76.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Eugene O. Mills (1997). Interactionism and Physicality. Ratio 10 (2):169-83.score: 21.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Thomas Natsoulas (1987). Roger W. Sperry's Monist Interactionism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 8:1-21.score: 21.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Bonnie Berry (2008). Interactionism and Animal Aesthetics: A Theory of Reflected Social Power. Society and Animals 16 (1):75-89.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Beloff (1976). Mind-Body Interactionism in Light of the Parapsychological Evidence. Theoria to Theory 10 (May):125-37.score: 21.0
  15. Larry R. Vandervert (1991). A Measurable and Testable Brain-Based Emergent Interactionism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 201:201-219.score: 21.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Vadim V. Vasilyev (2009). The Hard Problem of Consciousness and Two Arguments for Interactionism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):514-526.score: 18.0
    The paper begins with a restatement of Chalmers's "hard problem of consciousness". It is suggested that an interactionist approach is one of the possible solutions of this problem. Some fresh arguments against the identity theory and epiphenomenalism as main rivals of interactionism are developed. One of these arguments has among its colloraries a denial of local supervenience, although not of the causal closure principle. As a result of these considerations a version of "local interactionism" (compatible with causal closure) (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Christopher D. Horvath (2000). Interactionism and Innateness in the Evolutionary Study of Human Nature. Biology and Philosophy 15 (3):321-337.score: 18.0
    While most researchers who use evolutionary theory to investigatehuman nature especially human sexuality describe themselves as ``interactionists'', there is no clear consensus on the meaning of thisterm in this context. By interactionism most people in the fieldmean something like, both nature and nurture ``count'' in thedevelopment of human psychology and behavior. Nevertheless, themultidisciplinary nature of evolutionary psychology results in a widevariety of interpretations of this general claim. Today, mostdebates within evolutionary psychology about the innateness of agiven behavioral characteristic or (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Michael (2011). Interactionism and Mindreading. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (3):559-578.score: 18.0
    In recent years, a number of theorists have developed approaches to social cognition that highlight the centrality of social interaction as opposed to mindreading (e.g. Gallagher and Zahavi 2008 ; Gallagher 2001 , 2007 , 2008 ; Hobson 2002 ; Reddy 2008 ; Hutto 2004 ; De Jaegher 2009 ; De Jaegher and Di Paolo 2007 ; Fuchs and De Jaegher 2009 ; De Jaegher et al. 2010 ). There are important differences among these approaches, as I will discuss, but (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Piet Strydom (2006). Intersubjectivity – Interactionist or Discursive? Reflections on Habermas’ Critique of Brandom. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (2):155-172.score: 18.0
    This article argues that there is a marked ambivalence in Habermas’ concept of intersubjectivity in that he wavers between an interactionist and a discursive understanding. This ambivalence is demonstrated with reference to his recent critique of Robert Brandom's normative pragmatic theory of discursive practice. Although Habermas is a leading theorist of discourse as an epistemically steered process, he allows his interpretation of Brandom's theory as suffering from objective idealism to compel him to recoil from discourse and to defend a purely (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Vadim V. Vasilyev (2009). “The Hard Problem of Consciousness” and Two Arguments for Interactionism. Faith and Philosophy 26 (5):514-526.score: 18.0
    The paper begins with a restatement of Chalmers’s “hard problem of consciousness.” It is suggested that an interactionist approach is one of the possible solutions of this problem. Some fresh arguments against the identity theory and epiphenomenalism as main rivals of interactionism are developed. One of these arguments has among its corollaries a denial of local supervenience, although not of the causal closure principle. As a result of these considerations a version of “local interactionism” (compatible with causal closure) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Garry Young (2011). Beliefs, Experiences and Misplaced Being: An Interactionist Account of Delusional Misidentification. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 10 (2):195-215.score: 18.0
    This paper contrasts an interactionist account of delusional misidentification with more traditional one- and two-stage models. Unlike the unidirectional nature of these more traditional models, in which the aetiology of the disorder is said to progress from a neurological disruption via an anomalous experience to a delusional belief, the interactionist account posits the interaction of top-down and bottom-up processes to better explain the maintenance of the delusional belief. In addition, it places a greater emphasis on the patient’s underlying phenomenal experience (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Alexa Schriempf (2001). (Re)Fusing the Amputated Body: An Interactionist Bridge for Feminism and Disability. Hypatia 16 (4):53-79.score: 18.0
    : Disabled women's issues, experiences, and embodiments have been misunderstood, if not largely ignored, by feminist as well as mainstream disability theorists. The reason for this, I argue, is embedded in the use of materialist and constructivist approaches to bodies that do not recognize the interaction between "sex" and "gender" and "impairment" and "disability" as material-semiotic. Until an interactionist paradigm is taken up, we will not be able to uncover fully the intersection between sexist and ableist biases (among others) that (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Bryan Church, James C. Gaa, S. M. Khalid Nainar & Mohamed M. Shehata (2005). Experimental Evidence Relating to the Person-Situation Interactionist Model of Ethical Decision Making. Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (3):363-383.score: 18.0
    According to a widely credited model in the business ethics literature, ethical decisions are a function of two kinds of factors, personal(individual) and situational, and these factors interact with each other. According to a contrary view of decision making that is widely held in some areas of business research, individuals’ decisions about ethical issues (and subsequent actions) are purely a function of their self-interest.The laboratory experiment reported in this paper provides a test of the person-situation interactionist model, using the general (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Lou E. Pelton, Jhinuk Chowdhury & Scott J. Vitell (1999). A Framework for the Examination of Relational Ethics: An Interactionist Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 19 (3):241 - 253.score: 18.0
    Despite the widespread agreement that the ontology of the marketing discipline is exchange, marketing ethics researchers have largely adopted a monadic viewpoint of ethical decision making. In this research, an interactionist approach is adopted in order to introduce a dyadic perspective of un/ethical decision making. The dyadic model includes each channel member's individual, situational and decision process factors linked by relationalism, an emerging paradigm in marketing channels. Relationalism is represented as a discriminating variable between perceived ethical dilemma and decision behaviour. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Irene Rafanell (2013). Micro‐Situational Foundations of Social Structure: An Interactionist Exploration of Affective Sanctioning. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43 (2):181-204.score: 18.0
    Micro-interaction dynamics of affective sanctioning have been widely acknowledged but rarely related to the emergence of social phenomena. This paper aims to highlight the constitutive force of interaction activity by critically analysing two sociological models, Bourdieu's theory of practice and Barnes's Performative Theory of Social Institutions (PTSI). Such a comparison allows me to reveal two differing models of social phenomena currently operating in sociological debates: an extrinsic structuralist model which tacitly conveys macro-structural phenomena as prior and determinant of individuals and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karl R. Popper & John C. Eccles (1977). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism. Springer.score: 15.0
    Physical and chemical processes may act upon the mind; and when we are writing a difficult letter, our mind acts upon our body and, through a chain of physical...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Marco Mazzone (2010). Intentions in Spoken Communication. Strong and Weak Interactionist Perspectives. In M. Pettorino, F. Albano Leoni, I. Chiari, F. M. Dovetto & A. Giannini (eds.), Spoken Communication between Symbolics and Deixis. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Frank Jackson (1980). Interactionism Revived? Philosophy of Social Science 10 (September):316-23.score: 15.0
  29. Lonnie Athens (2007). Radical Interactionism: Going Beyond Mead. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (2):137–165.score: 15.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert C. Richardson (1982). The 'Scandal' of Cartesian Interactionism. Mind 91 (January):20-37.score: 15.0
  31. Karl R. Popper (forthcoming). Language and the Body-Mind Problem: A Restatement of Interactionism. Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Philosophy.score: 15.0
    It is not a paper on linguistic analysis (the analysis of word-usages). For I completely reject the claim of certain language analysts that the source of philosophical difficulties is to be found in the misuse of language. No doubt some people talk nonsense, but I claim (a) that there does not exist a logical or language-analytical method of detecting philosophical nonsense (which, by the way, does not stop short of the ranks of logicians, language analysts and semanticists); (b) that the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Robert A. Larmer (1986). Mind-Body Interactionism and the Conservation of Energy. International Philosophical Quarterly 26 (September):277-85.score: 15.0
    One of the major reasons underlying the widespread rejection of the theory that the mind is an immaterial substance distinct from the body, But which nevertheless acts on the body, Is that it is felt that such a theory commits one to denying the principle of the conservation of energy. My aim in this article is to assess the strength of this objection. My thesis is that the usual replies are inadequate, But--Strong as this objection appears--Some important logical distinctions have (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Kieran Bonner (1994). Hermeneutics and Symbolic Interactionism: The Problem of Solipsism. [REVIEW] Human Studies 17 (2):225 - 249.score: 15.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Eugene O. Mills (1996). Interactionism and Overdetermination. American Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1):105-115.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. D. L. Wilson (1999). Mind-Brain Interactionism and the Violation of Physical Laws. Journal of Consciousness Studies 6 (8-9):8-9.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jeroen Van Rooijen (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.score: 15.0
  37. I. Hanzel (2011). Beyond Blumer and Symbolic Interactionism: The Qualitative-Quantitative Issue in Social Theory and Methodology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (3):303-326.score: 15.0
    The article analysis the views approaching quantitative and qualitative methods in social sciences as separable or irreconcilable. First, we characterize these views and show how they deal with this divide and how they view the aspects of the latter. Next, we identify the works of Herbert Blumer as the basis of that divide and subject them to an analysis. Finally, by means of categories like quantity, quality, and measure, we show that the qualitative-quantitative divide is based on a wrong approach (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Robert N. McCauley & E. Thomas Lawson, Interactionism and the Non Obviousness of Scientific Theories.score: 15.0
    Levine's discussion of Rethinking Religion (1990) and "Crisis of Conscience, Riddle of Identity" (1993) includes some rash charges, some useful comments, and some profound misunderstandings. The latter, especially, reveal areas where we need to clarify and further defend our claims. In the second section we shall discuss the epistemological and methodological issues that Levine raises. Then we shall turn in the third section to theoretical and substantive matters. In fact, Levine remains almost completely silent on substantive matters (except to say (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Arthur O. Lovejoy (1920). Pragmatism as Interactionism. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 17 (22):589-596.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. G. YounG (2008). Capgras Delusion: An Interactionist Model. Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):863-876.score: 15.0
  41. Lonnie Athens (2010). Human Subordination From a Radical Interactionist's Perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 40 (3):339-368.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Susan Leigh Star (1998). 13 Working Together: Symbolic Interactionism, Activity Theory, and Information Systems. In Yrjo Engeström & David Middleton (eds.), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge University Press.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Godfrey Vesey (1979). The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism By Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977, Xvi + 597 Pp., 66 Figs., £9.40. [REVIEW] Philosophy 54 (208):249-.score: 15.0
  44. Jeroen Rooijevann (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.score: 15.0
  45. Jeroen Van Rooijen (1987). Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87 - 92.score: 15.0
  46. Stephen Woolpert (1982). Book Review:Essential Interactionism: On the Intelligibility of Prejudice. Barry Glassner. [REVIEW] Ethics 93 (1):186-.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stanislas Dehaene & Jean-Pierre Changeux (1988). Selectionist Mechanisms: A Framework for Interactionism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (4):633.score: 15.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Efrat Tseëlon (1991). Women and the Private Domain: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 21 (1):111–124.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. E. R. Maccormac (1983). Book Reviews : Essential Interactionism: On the Intelligibility of Prejudice. By Barry Glassner. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1980. Pp. Xvi + 185. $20.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 13 (3):391-393.score: 15.0
  50. William H. Foddy (1981). Obscenity Reactions: Toward a Symbolic Interactionist Explanation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 11 (2):125–146.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 234