4 found
Order:
See also:
Profile: Jon Olafsson (University of Iceland)
  1.  16
    Jón Ólafsson (2010). Pragmatism and Social Hope: Deepening Democracy in Global Contexts (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (4):641-645.
    At the end of her book, Pragmatism and Social Hope, Judith Green asks why one should want to spend time on expanding opportunities for participation in democratic governance (248). The reason, according to her, is a desire that a "deeper rationality of human spirit" would direct decision-making in the world. We are currently captives of economic/military/political rationality, according to her. Only through participatory democracy, or "second-strand democracy" can the spell be broken (195). Although this does not become apparent until one (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Jón Ólafsson (2010). Pragmatism and Social Hope: Deepening Democracy in Global Contexts By Judith M. Green. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (4):641-645.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Jón Ólafsson (2009). Andóf, ágreiningur og áróður: Greinar um heimspeki. Háskólinn Á Bifröst.
    This is a book about politics, culture, and political culture from a philosophical perspective. Its title translates as Dissidence, conflict and propaganda: Papers in philosophy. It includes 13 articles, written over the last eight years. Most are revised versions of previously published papers, but four articles (chapters 2, 3, 5, and 13) are printed here for the first time. As well, the book includes a series of photographs, which offer a perspective on changes in Russian society over two decades, from (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Jon Olafsson (2000). Conflict and Method: An Essay on Dewey. Dissertation, Columbia University
    This is a study of John Dewey's philosophy based on three interrelated themes. I maintain, first, that the best understanding of Deweys work is achieved by a Peircean reading. On that reading Deweys philosophy is partly interpreted through the conceptual framework provided by C. S. Peirce. Second, I argue that a detailed grasp of Dewey's theory of inquiry is essential for a convincing assessment of his philosophical views. Third, I show that Dewey's theory of inquiry creates a common context for (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography