127 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Jonathan E. Adler [81]Jonathan Adler [14]Jacob Adler [13]J. E. Adler [4]
Joseph A. Adler [4]Judith Adler [3]Jonathan H. Adler [2]J. Adler [2]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

  1. Jerry Adler & John Carey, Enigmas of Evolution.
    n 1902, 70 million years after it tripped lightly through the Mesozoic forests in search of meat, the skeleton of a 20-foothightyrannosaurus was dynamited out of a sandstone bluff near Hell Creek, Mont. Wrapped in burlap and plaster and shipped back to New York, the bones were painstakingly reassembled by fossil curator Barnum Brown of the American Museum of Natural History. It was there, one day in 1947, that they happened to scare the bejesus out of 5-year-old Stephen Jay Gould. (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Judith Adler (forthcoming). Innovative Art and Obsolescent Artists. Social Research.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Owen J. Flanagan Jr & Jonathan E. Adler (forthcoming). Impartiality and Particularity. Social Research.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jacob Adler (2013). The Strange Case of the Missing Title Page: An Investigation in Spinozistic Bibliography. Intellectual History Review 23 (2):259-262.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jonathan Adler (2013). Are Conductive Arguments Possible? Argumentation 27 (3):245-257.
    Conductive Arguments are held to be defeasible, non-conclusive, and neither inductive nor deductive (Blair and Johnson in Conductive argument: An overlooked type of defeasible reasoning. College, London, 2011). Of the different kinds of Conductive Arguments, I am concerned only with those for which it is claimed that countervailing considerations detract from the support for the conclusion, complimentary to the positive reasons increasing that support. Here’s an example from Wellman (Challenge and response: justification in ethics. Southern Illinois University Press, Chicago, 1971): (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joseph A. Adler (2013). Wang, Robin R., Yinyang: The Way of Heaven and Earth in Chinese Thought and Culture. [REVIEW] Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 12 (4):561-565.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. E. Adler (2012). Pragmatic Encroachment, Methods and Contextualism. Analysis 72 (3):526-534.
    Defence of conditions to withdraw an assertion that require evidence or epistemic reasons that the assertion is not true or warranted. (Adler, J. 2006. Withdrawal and contextualism. Analysis 66: 280–85) The defence replies to the claim that better methods justify withdrawal without meeting that requirement and without pragmatic encroachment.
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jacob Adler (2012). Joseph Solomon Delmedigo: Student of Galileo, Teacher of Spinoza. Intellectual History Review 23 (1):141-157.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jonathan E. Adler (2012). Contextualism and Fallibility: Pragmatic Encroachment, Possibility, and Strength of Epistemic Position. Synthese 188 (2):247-272.
    A critique of conversational epistemic contextualism focusing initially on why pragmatic encroachment for knowledge is to be avoided. The data for pragmatic encroachment by way of greater costs of error and the complementary means to raise standards of introducing counter-possibilities are argued to be accountable for by prudence, fallibility and pragmatics. This theme is sharpened by a contrast in recommendations: holding a number of factors constant, when allegedly higher standards for knowing hold, invariantists still recommend assertion (action), while contextualists do (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jonathan H. Adler (2012). Is the Common Law a Free-Market Solution to Pollution? Critical Review 24 (1):61-85.
    Whereas conventional analyses characterize environmental problems as examples of market failure, proponents of free-market environmentalism (FME) consider the problem to be a lack of markets and, in particular, a lack of enforceable and exchangeable property rights. Enforcing property rights alleviates disputes about, as well as the overuse of, most natural resources. FME diagnoses of pollution are much weaker, however. Most FME proponents suggest that common-law tort suits can adequately protect private property and ecological resources from pollution. Yet such claims have (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jonathan E. Adler (2011). Bryan Frances, Scepticism Comes Alive. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):506-520.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jonathan E. Adler (2011). Review Essay: Bryan Frances, Scepticism Comes Alive. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (2):506-520.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jonathan E. Adler (2009). Another Argument for the Knowledge Norm. Analysis 69 (3):407-411.
  14. Jonathan E. Adler (2009). Review of Sanford C. Goldberg, Anti-Individualism: Mind and Language, Knowledge and Justification. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2009 (1).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jonathan E. Adler (2009). Resisting the Force of Argument. Journal of Philosophy 106 (6):339-364.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jonathan E. Adler (2009). Why Fallibility has Not Mattered and How It Could. In Harvey Siegel (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Oxford University Press. 83.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jonathan H. Adler (2009). Taking Property Rights Seriously: The Case of Climate Change. Social Philosophy and Policy 26 (2):296-316.
    The dominant approach to environmental policy endorsed by conservative and libertarian policy thinkers, so-called (FME), is grounded in the recognition and protection of property rights in environmental resources. Despite this normative commitment to property rights, most self-described FME advocates adopt a utilitarian, welfare-maximization approach to climate change policy, arguing that the costs of mitigation measures could outweigh the costs of climate change itself. Yet even if anthropogenic climate change is decidedly less than catastrophic, human-induced climate change is likely to contribute (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. J. E. Adler (2008). Philosophical Foundations. In Jonathan Eric Adler & Lance J. Rips (eds.), Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge University Press. 1--34.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jacob Adler (2008). JS Delmedigo as Teacher of Spinoza: The Case of Noncomplex Propositions. Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 16:177-183.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jonathan Adler, Epistemological Problems of Testimony. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jonathan E. Adler (2008). Conversation is the Folks' Epistemology. Philosophical Forum 39 (3):337-348.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jonathan E. Adler (2008). Presupposition, Attention, and Why Questions. In Jonathan Eric Adler & Lance J. Rips (eds.), Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge University Press. 748--764.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jonathan E. Adler (2008). Surprise. Educational Theory 58 (2):149-173.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jonathan E. Adler (2008). Sticks and Stones: A Reply to Warren. Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):639-655.
  25. Jonathan Eric Adler & Lance J. Rips (eds.) (2008). Reasoning: Studies of Human Inference and its Foundations. Cambridge University Press.
    This interdisciplinary work is a collection of major essays on reasoning: deductive, inductive, abductive, belief revision, defeasible (non-monotonic), cross cultural, conversational, and argumentative. They are each oriented toward contemporary empirical studies. The book focuses on foundational issues, including paradoxes, fallacies, and debates about the nature of rationality, the traditional modes of reasoning, as well as counterfactual and causal reasoning. It also includes chapters on the interface between reasoning and other forms of thought. In general, this last set of essays represents (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jonathan Adler & Iakovos Vasiliou (2008). Inferring Character From Reasoning: The Example of Euthyphro. American Philosophical Quarterly 45 (1):43 - 56.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Joseph Adler (2008). Divination and Sacrifice in Song Neo-Confucianism. In Jeffrey L. Richey (ed.), Teaching Confucianism. Oxford University Press. 55--82.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Joseph A. Adler (2008). Zhu XI's Spiritual Practice as the Basis of His Central Philosophical Concepts. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 7 (1):57-79.
    The argument is that (1) the spiritual crisis that Zhu Xi discussed with Zhang Shi 張栻 (1133–1180) and the other “gentlemen of Hunan” from about 1167 to 1169, which was resolved by an understanding of what we might call the interpenetration of the mind’s stillness and activity (dong-jing 動靜) or equilibrium and harmony (zhong-he 中和), (2) led directly to his realization that Zhou Dunyi’s thought provided a cosmological basis for that resolution, and (3) this in turn led Zhu Xi to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Michel Serres & Judith Adler (2008). Feux Et Signaux de Brume. Substance 37 (2):110-131.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. J. E. Adler (2007). Asymmetrical Analogical Arguments. Argumentation 21 (1):83-92.
    Analogies must be symmetric. If a is like b, then b is like a. So if a has property R, and if R is within the scope of the analogy, then b (probably) has R. However, analogical arguments generally single out, or depend upon, only one of a or b to serve as the basis for the inference. In this respect, analogical arguments are directed by an asymmetry. I defend the importance of this neglected – even when explicitly mentioned – (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jonathan Adler (2007). Argumentation and Distortion. Episteme 4 (3):382-401.
    Why is there so much misrepresentation of arguments in public forums? Standard explanations, such as self-interested biases, are insufficient. An additional part of the explanation is our commitment to, or belief in, norms that disallow responses that amount to no firm judgment, as contrasted with definite agreement or disagreement. In disallowing no-firm-judgment responses, these norms deny not only degrees of support or dissent and a variety of ways of suspending judgment, but also indifference. Since these norms leave us with only (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jonathan E. Adler & Bradley Armour-Garb (2007). Moore's Paradox and the Transparency of Belief. In Mitchell S. Green & John N. Williams (eds.), Moore's Paradox: New Essays on Belief, Rationality, and the First Person. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jacob Adler (2006). J. S. Delmedigo and the Liquid-in-Glass Thermometer. Annals of Science 54 (3):293-299.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jonathan E. Adler (2006). Withdrawal and Contextualism. Analysis 66 (4):280–285.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jonathan Eric Adler (2006). Confidence in Argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (2):225-257.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jonathan E. Adler (2005). Diversity, Social Inquiries, and Epistemic Virtues. Veritas 50 (4).
    A teoria das virtudes epistêmicas (VE) sustenta que as virtudes dos agentes, tais como a imparcialidade ou a permeabilidade intelectual, ao invés de crenças específicas, devem estar no centro da avaliação epistêmica, e que os indivíduos que possuem essas virtudes estão mais bem-posicionados epistemicamente do que se não as tivessem, ou, pior ainda, do que se tivessem os vícios correspondentes: o preconceito, o dogmatismo, ou a impermeabilidade intelectual. Eu argumento que a teoria VE padece de um grave defeito, porque fracassa (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Jonathan E. Adler (2005). Epistemic Justification. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (3):739-742.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jonathan E. Adler (2005). Reliabilist Justification (or Knowledge) as a Good Truth-Ratio. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):445–458.
    Fair lotteries offer familiar ways to pose a number of epistemological problems, prominently those of closure and of scepticism. Although these problems apply to many epistemological positions, in this paper I develop a variant of a lottery case to raise a difficulty with the reliabilist's fundamental claim that justification or knowledge is to be analyzed as a high truth-ratio (of the relevant belief-forming processes). In developing the difficulty broader issues are joined including fallibility and the relation of reliability to understanding.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jonathan E. Adler (2005). William James and What Cannot Be Believed. The Harvard Review of Philosophy 13 (1):65-79.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Jonathan E. Adler (2004). Shedding Dialectical Tiers: A Social-Epistemic View. [REVIEW] Argumentation 18 (3):279-293.
    Is there a duty to respond to objections in order to present a good argument? Ralph Johnson argues that there is such a duty, which he refers to as the ‘dialectical tier’ of an argument. I deny the (alleged) duty primarily on grounds that it would exert too great a demand on arguers, harming argumentation practices. The valuable aim of responding to objections, which Johnson’s dialectical tier is meant to satisfy, can be achieved in better ways, as argumentation is a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Jonathan E. Adler, Martin Benjamin, James P. Cadello, Steven M. Cahn, Joan C. Callahan, Jo A. Chern, Stephen H. Daniel, Juli Eflin, Carrie Figdor, Newton Garver, Theodore A. Gracyk, Lawrence H. Hinman, Eugene Kelly, David Martens, Michael Martin, John McCumber, John J. McDermott, Marshall Missner, Kathleen Dean Moore, Ronald Moore, Louis P. Pojman, Anthony Weston, Merold Westphal, V. Alan White & Celia Wolf-Devine (2004). Teaching Philosophy: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Suggestions. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Jonathan Adler (2003). The Revisability Paradox. Philosophical Forum 34 (3-4):383–390.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Joseph A. Adler (2003). Varieties of Spiritual Experience: Shen in Neo-Confucian Discourse. In Weiming Tu & Mary Evelyn Tucker (eds.), Confucian Spirituality. Crossroad Pub. Company. 2--120.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. J. Adler (2002). Belief's Own Ethics. MIT Press.
    In this book Jonathan Adler offers a strengthened version of evidentialism, arguing that the ethics of belief should be rooted in the concept of belief--that...
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jonathan E. Adler (2002). Akratic Believing? Philosophical Studies 110 (1):1 - 27.
    Davidson's account of weakness of will depends upon a parallel that he draws between practical and theoretical reasoning. I argue that the parallel generates a misleading picture of theoretical reasoning. Once the misleading picture is corrected, I conclude that the attempt to model akratic belief on Davidson's account of akratic action cannot work. The arguments that deny the possibility of akratic belief also undermine, more generally, various attempts to assimilate theoretical to practical reasoning.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Jonathan E. Adler (2002). Conundrums of Belief Self-Control. The Monist 85 (3):456-467.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jonathan E. Adler (2002). Review of Renee Elio (Ed.), Common Sense, Reasoning, and Rationality. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2002 (11).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jonathan Adler & Michael Levin (2002). Is the Generality Problem Too General? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):87-97.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. E. Adler (2000). In Defense of Radical Empiricism: Essays and Lectures. Philosophical Review 109 (3):453-456.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 127