13 found
Sort by:
  1. J. Alberto Coffa (1986). Invitación a la lectura de Bolzano. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 12 (2):131.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. J. Alberto Coffa (1981). Russell and Kant. Synthese 46 (2):247 - 263.
  3. J. Alberto Coffa (1980). Russell as a Platonic Dialogue: The Matter of Denoting. Synthese 45 (1):43 - 70.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. J. Alberto Coffa (1979). Idea de la relatividad. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 5 (3):195.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. J. Alberto Coffa (1979). The Humble Origins of Russell's Paradox. Russell 33:31.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. Alberto Coffa (1977). Probabilities: Reasonable or True? Philosophy of Science 44 (2):186-198.
    Hempel's high probability requirement asserts that any rationally acceptable answer to the question 'Why did event X occur?' must offer information which shows that X was to be expected at least with reasonable probability. Salmon rejected this requirement in his S-R model. This led to a series of paradoxical consequences, such as the assertion that an explanation of an event can both lower its probability and make it arbitrarily low, and the assertion that the explanation of an outcome would have (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. Alberto Coffa (1976). Carnap's Sprachanschauung Circa 1932. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1976:205 - 241.
  8. J. Alberto Coffa (1976). Reply to Harnatt. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 7 (2):357-358.
    Summary Canfield and Lehrer argued in [1] that it is impossible to predict an event deductively from given laws and initial conditions. In [2] I showed (1) that there are counterexamples to C&L's claim, (2) that their argument was based on an assumption which they failed to recognize, let alone support (the assumption that there are ‘rejectible’ facts), (3) that if certain simple conditions on predictability were granted, it could be shown that C&L's tacit assumption is false. In a recent (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. Alberto Coffa (1976). Tragedia o sainete de Ludwig Wittgenstein. Revista Latinoamericana de Filosofia 2 (3):257.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. J. Alberto Coffa (1975). Dos concepciones de la elucidación filosófica. Critica 7 (21):43 - 67.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. J. Alberto Coffa (1974). Hempel's Ambiguity. Synthese 28 (2):141 - 163.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. Alberto Coffa (1972). Notas para un esquema de la filosofia de la ciencia contemporanea. Critica 6 (16/17):15 - 56.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. Alberto Coffa (1972). Randomness and Knowledge. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1972:103 - 115.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation