You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.

Search results for 'J. Douglas Peters' (try it on Scholar)

978 found
Sort by:
  1. J. Douglas Peters & Jeanette C. Peraino (1984). Malpractice in Hospitals: Ten Theories for Direct Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (6):254-259.score: 870.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.score: 810.0
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Research: Objections and Obligations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246.score: 810.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1985). Peer Review: Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):747.score: 810.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Judith Boss, Giordano Bruno, Vere Chappell, John Cottingham, Peter A. Danielson, Rene Descartes, Thomas Douglas, John Finis, R. J. Hollingdale & Vittorio Hösle (1999). Boss, Judith and James M. Nuzum. Teaching Philosophy 22 (2):237.score: 430.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. J. Conrad, V. Crapanzano, M. Crick, J. Cripps, M. David, J. Derrida, N. B. Dirks, T. Docherty, N. Dorian & M. Douglas (1997). Collard, J. 54 Comito, T. 198 Condor, J. 205n2 Condry, E. 87-8, 90, 91. In Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Lorna Hockey & Andrew H. Dawson (eds.), After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. Routledge. 264.score: 420.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.score: 420.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Leslie A. Muray, Kevin Sharpe Leslie van Gelder, Wesley J. Wildman, Nancy R. Howell, Karl E. Peters, Walter B. Gulick & J. van Huyssteen (2007). A Conversation on J. Wentzel van Huyssteen's Gifford Lectures. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 28 (3):299-432.score: 420.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. E. N. J. Peters (1983). Political and Legal Studies: Volume I, Politeia, and Volume II, Studies in American Constitutional Law. By Joseph F. Costanzo S.J. West Hanover, Massachusetts. The Christopher Publishing House; 1982. [REVIEW] American Journal of Jurisprudence 28 (1):240-248.score: 420.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..score: 300.0
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Michael J. Wood & Karen M. Douglas (2013). “What About Building 7?” A Social Psychological Study of Online Discussion of 9/11 Conspiracy Theories. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 280.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. A. J. Cronin, J. Douglas & S. Sacks (2012). Licenced to Transplant: UK Overkill on EU Organ Directive Provides Golden Opportunity for Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):593-595.score: 280.0
    Progress in transplantation outcomes depends on continuing research into both donor and recipient factors that may enhance graft and patient survival. A system of licencing for transplantation research, introduced by the Human Tissue Act 2004, which separates it from the transplantation process (then exempt from licencing), has damaged this vital activity by a combination of inflexible interpretation of the 2004 Act and fear of criminal liability on the part of researchers. Now, following the European Union (EU) Directive (2010) on standards (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. A. McGeoch & H. N. Peters (1933). An All-or-None Characteristic in the Elimination of Errors During the Learning of a Stylus Maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (4):504.score: 280.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Carol G. Kelley, Amy R. Lipson, Barbara J. Daly & Sara L. Douglas (2006). Use of Advance Directives in the Chronically Critically Ill. Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 8 (2):42-47.score: 280.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. T. Douglas & J. Savulescu (2010). Synthetic Biology and the Ethics of Knowledge. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):687-693.score: 240.0
    Synthetic biologists aim to generate biological organisms according to rational design principles. Their work may have many beneficial applications, but it also raises potentially serious ethical concerns. In this article, we consider what attention the discipline demands from bioethicists. We argue that the most important issue for ethicists to examine is the risk that knowledge from synthetic biology will be misused, for example, in biological terrorism or warfare. To adequately address this concern, bioethics will need to broaden its scope, contemplating (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. A. J. Douglas (2010). Democratic Darkness and Adorno's Redemptive Criticism. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (7):819-836.score: 240.0
    Adorno’s critical theory aims to open space for the expression of alternative futures, but its insistence on dialectical reflection encourages at the same time our sustained attentiveness to the psychic and material constraints that may prevent the very possibilities we imagine. In this article, I argue that dialectical reflection signals a location at which transcendental claims enter our thinking and that, for Adorno, such reflection provides a locus for a critically animating interplay between rhetorical figurations of darkness and redemption, or (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. Nanoethics 2 (1).score: 240.0
    Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. R. S. Peters & J. P. White (1969). The Philosopher's Contribution to Educational Research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 1 (2):1–15.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Christian J. Peters (2000). Genetic Engineering in Agriculture: Who Stands to Benefit? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):313-327.score: 240.0
    The use of genetic engineering inagriculture has been the source of much debate. Todate, arguments have focused most strongly on thepotential human health risks, the flow of geneticmaterial to related species, and ecologicalconsequences. Little attention appears to have beengiven to a more fundamental concern, namely, who willbe the beneficiaries of this technology?Given the prevalence of chronic hunger and thestark economics of farming, it is arguable thatfarmers and the hungry should be the mainbeneficiaries of agricultural research. However, theapplication of genetic engineering (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. B. A., C. W. Valentine, G. Galloway, G. G., J. Solomon, R. R. Marett, John Edgar, B. Bosanquet, F. Peters, D. L. Murray, T. E., J. Field, J. Waterlow, A. E. Taylor & A. W. Benn (1911). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 20 (1):426-444.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Phillipa Foot, P. T. Geach, W. Mays, T. A. Goudge, R. Peters & G. J. Warnock (1954). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 63 (250):270-286.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Rafaële J. C. Huntjens, Albert Postma, Liesbeth Woertman, Onno van Der Hart & Madelon L. Peters (2005). Procedural Memory in Dissociative Identity Disorder: When Can Inter-Identity Amnesia Be Truly Established?☆. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):377-389.score: 240.0
  23. A. M. Quinton, P. H. Nowell-Smith, William Kneale, Stephen Toulmin, T. R. Miles, P. F. Strawson, D. W. Hamlyn, J. Harrison, Richard Robinson, A. C. Crombie, R. Peters, E. C. Mossner, A. M. Honoré & W. J. Rees (1954). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 63 (252):546-576.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard Peters (1967). Hobbes's System of Ideas. By J. W. N. Watkins. (Hutchinson, 1965. Pp. 192. Price 15s.)Hobbes Studies. Edited by Keith C. Brown. (Blackwell, 1965. Pp. 300. Price 37s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 42 (160):177-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Paul A. Morgan & Scott J. Peters (2006). The Foundations of Planetary Agrarianism. Thomas Berry and Liberty Hyde Bailey. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 19 (5):443-468.score: 240.0
    The challenge of pursuing sustainability in agriculture is often viewed as mainly or wholly technical in nature, requiring the reform of farming methods and the development and adoption of alternative technologies. Likewise, the purpose of sustainability is frequently cast in utilitarian terms, as a means of protecting a valuable resource (i.e., soil) and of satisfying market demands for healthy, tasty food. Paul B. Thompson has argued that the embrace of these views by many in the consumer/environmental movement enables easy co-optation (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. M. L. Peters, S. A. Uyterlinde, J. Consemulder & O. van der Hart (1998). Apparent Amnesia on Experimental Memory Tests in Dissociative Identity Disorder: An Exploratory Study. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1):27-41.score: 240.0
    Dissociative identity disorder (DID; called multiple personality disorder in DSMIII-R) is a psychiatric condition in which two or more identity states recurrently take control of the person's behavior. A characteristic feature of DID is the occurrence of apparently severe amnestic symptoms. This paper is concerned with experimental research of memory function in DID and focuses on between-identity transfer of newly learned neutral material. Previous studies on this subject are reviewed and a pilot study with four subjects is described. This study (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. P. F. Strawson, H. J. Paton, H. L. A. Hart, Richard Robinson, A. C. Lloyd, R. Rhees, J. L. Spilsbury, Dorothy Emmet, George E. Hughes, D. R. Cousin, Basil Mitchell, Richard Peters, B. A. Farrell, Antony Flew, J. O. Urmson, O. P. Wood & Jonathan Cohen (1951). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 60 (238):265-295.score: 240.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Richard Peters & J. P. Hancox (1973). Curriculum Material. Journal of Moral Education 3 (1):413-416.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. H. H. Price, David Pears, William Kneale, Max Black, A. F. Peters, George E. Hughes, Margaret Macdonald, G. J. Warnock, T. D. Weldon, R. F. Holland, H. D. Lewis, Antony Flew, W. G. Maclagan, J. Harrison, Richard Wollheim, P. L. Heath, Donald Nicholl, Patrick Gardiner & Ernest Gellner (1951). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 60 (240):550-583.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Richard Robinson, F. W. Thomas, W. J. H. Sprott, D. J. McCracken, Martha Kneale, C. Lewy, H. B. Acton, William Kneale, R. J. Spilsbury, John Arthur Passmore, P. H. Nowell-Smith, C. H. Whiteley, S. Hampshire, Margaret Macdonald & Richard Peters (1949). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 58 (212):246-275.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Robert L. Browning & Herman J. Peters (1960). On the Philosophical Neutrality of Counselors. Educational Theory 10 (2):142-147.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. F. Douglas & A. J. Cronin (2010). Requested Allocation of a Deceased Donor Organ: Laws and Misconceptions. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (6):321-321.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. A. J. Peters (1965). Published Sources for the Study of Contemporary British Further Education (Continued). British Journal of Educational Studies 13 (2):170 - 187.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. J. Peters (1963). The Changing Idea of Technical Education. British Journal of Educational Studies 11 (2):142 - 166.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. A. E. Douglas (1967). James J. Murphy: Quintilian on the Early Education of the Citizen-Orator. Pp. Xxx + 122. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965. Paper, $1.45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (01):106-.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. A. E. Douglas (1985). Seneca's Troades Elaine Fantham: Seneca's Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Xii + 412. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. £31.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):33-34.score: 240.0
  37. Dr J. W. M. Peters (1967). Church and Faith in Holland. Heythrop Journal 8 (4):388–397.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Scott J. Peters (2010). Democracy and Higher Education: Traditions and Stories of Civic Engagement. Michigan State University Press.score: 240.0
  39. J. F. Douglas, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & A. J. Cronin (2011). Transplant Research and Deceased Donors: Laws, Licences and Fear of Liability. Clinical Ethics 6 (3):140-145.score: 160.0
    Transplantation research on samples and organs from deceased donors in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is under threat. The key problems relate to difficulties encountered in gaining consent for research projects, as distinct from consent to donation for clinical transplantation. They are due partly to the terms of the Human Tissue Act 2004 (the 2004 Act), and partly to its interpretation by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA). They include excessive interaction with donor representatives regarding ‘informed consent’ to research projects, uncertainty (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. R. S. Peters, J. McCracken & J. O. Urmson (1952). Symposium: Motives and Causes. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 26:139 - 194.score: 160.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. A. J. Cronin, M. L. Rose, J. H. Dark & J. F. Douglas (2011). British Transplant Research Endangered by the Human Tissue Act. Journal of Medical Ethics 37 (8):512-514.score: 160.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Andrew J. Douglas (2013). C.L.R. James and the Struggle for Humanism. Constellations 20 (1):85-101.score: 160.0
  43. Wilhelm S. Peters (1968). I. Kants Verhältnis Zu J.H.Lambert. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):448-453.score: 160.0
  44. Sharon J. Durfy & June A. Peters (forthcoming). Case Study: For the Benefit of All. Hastings Center Report.score: 160.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. J. A. J. Peters (1957). Matter and Form in Metaphysics. New Scholasticism 31 (4):447-483.score: 160.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).score: 160.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney (1985). Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:129-153.score: 160.0
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Robert J. Douglas (1979). The Hippocampus and its Apparent Migration to the Parietal Lobe. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (4):498-499.score: 160.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. A. E. Douglas & M. J. Lossau (1966). Untersuchungen Zur Antiken Demosthenesexegese. Journal of Hellenic Studies 86:190.score: 160.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Stephen R. Carpenter, E. Virginia Armbrust, Peter W. Arzberger, F. Stuart Chapin, James J. Elser, Edward J. Hackett, Anthony R. Ives, Peter M. Kareiva, Mathew A. Leibold, Per Lundberg, Marc Mangel, Nirav Merchant, William W. Murdoch, Margaret A. Palmer, Debra P. C. Peters, Steward T. A. Pickett, Kathleen K. Smith, Diana H. Wall & Ann S. Zimmerman (2009). Accelerate Synthesis in Ecology and Environmental Sciences. Bioscience 59 (8):699-701.score: 160.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 978