Search results for 'J. Douglas Peters' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  37
    Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Practices of Psychological Journals: The Fate of Published Articles, Submitted Again. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):187-195.
    A growing interest in and concern about the adequacy and fairness of modern peer-review practices in publication and funding are apparent across a wide range of scientific disciplines. Although questions about reliability, accountability, reviewer bias, and competence have been raised, there has been very little direct research on these variables.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   150 citations  
  2.  5
    J. Douglas Peters & Jeanette C. Peraino (1984). Malpractice in Hospitals: Ten Theories for Direct Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 12 (6):254-259.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. J. Douglas Peters & Jeanette C. Peraino (1984). Malpractice in Hospitals: Ten Theories for Direct Liability. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 12 (6):254-259.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1982). Peer-Review Research: Objections and Obligations. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 5 (2):246.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  1
    Douglas P. Peters & Stephen J. Ceci (1985). Peer Review: Beauty is in the Eye of the Beholder. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8 (4):747.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    E. N. J. Peters (1983). Political and Legal Studies: Volume I, Politeia, and Volume II, Studies in American Constitutional Law. By Joseph F. Costanzo S.J. West Hanover, Massachusetts. The Christopher Publishing House; 1982. [REVIEW] American Journal of Jurisprudence 28 (1):240-248.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. J. Conrad, V. Crapanzano, M. Crick, J. Cripps, M. David, J. Derrida, N. B. Dirks, T. Docherty, N. Dorian & M. Douglas (1997). Collard, J. 54 Comito, T. 198 Condor, J. 205n2 Condry, E. 87-8, 90, 91. In Andrew Dawson, Jennifer Lorna Hockey & Andrew H. Dawson (eds.), After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. Routledge 264.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. J. Douglas (2006). Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen," The Myth of Atomism,". Review of Metaphysics 59:843-70.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Leslie A. Muray, Kevin Sharpe Leslie van Gelder, Wesley J. Wildman, Nancy R. Howell, Karl E. Peters, Walter B. Gulick & J. van Huyssteen (2007). A Conversation on J. Wentzel van Huyssteen's Gifford Lectures. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 28 (3):299-432.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  19
    Richard Peters (1967). Hobbes's System of Ideas. By J. W. N. Watkins. (Hutchinson, 1965. Pp. 192. Price 15s.)Hobbes Studies. Edited by Keith C. Brown. (Blackwell, 1965. Pp. 300. Price 37s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 42 (160):177-.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  5
    A. E. Douglas (1985). Seneca's Troades Elaine Fantham: Seneca's Troades. A Literary Introduction with Text, Introduction and Commentary. Pp. Xii + 412. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1983. £31.60. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 35 (01):33-34.
  12.  5
    A. E. Douglas (1967). James J. Murphy: Quintilian on the Early Education of the Citizen-Orator. Pp. Xxx + 122. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Co., 1965. Paper, $1.45. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 17 (1):106.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  5
    Wilhelm S. Peters (1968). I. kants verhältnis zu J.h.Lambert. Kant-Studien 59 (1-4):448-453.
  14.  3
    R. P. Peters (1961). Desegregation and the Law. By Albert P. Blaustein and Clarence Clyde Ferguson Jr. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press, 1957. Pp. XIV, 333. $5.00. [REVIEW] American Journal of Jurisprudence 6 (1):171-172.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Richard Peters (1967). WATKINS, J. W. N.-"Hobbes's System of Ideas". [REVIEW] Philosophy 42:177.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Donald G. Douglas (1973). Philosophers on Rhetoric: Traditional and Emerging Views. Skokie, Ill.,National Textbook Co..
    Johnstone, H. W., Jr. Rhetoric and communication in philosophy.--Smith, C. R. and Douglas, D. G. Philosophical principles in the traditional and emerging views of rhetoric.--Wallace, K. R. Bacon's conception of rhetoric.--Thonssen, L. W. Thomas Hobbes's philosophy of speech.--Walter, O. M., Jr. Descartes on reasoning.--Douglas, D. G. Spinoza and the methodology of reflective knowledge in persuasion.--Howell, W. S. John Locke and the new rhetoric.--Doering, J. F. David Hume on oratory.--Douglas, D. G. A neo-Kantian approach to the epistomology of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. J. A. J. Peters (1951). Over den oorsprong Van het woord. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 13 (2):163-208.
    La parole est l'entre-deux qui sépare et unit moi et le monde, moi et toi, moi et moi-même. On se demande quelle est la relation entre moi et ma parole, si la parole découle de l'essence même de mon être. Une analyse phénoménologique, qui partirait du dialogue comme d'un donné indubitable, ne suffit pas tout à fait, puisqu'il il s'agit d'un sens éventuel du dialogue pour le tout de mon être. Il faut donc aborder la question d'un point de vue (...)
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  4
    Sarah Chan, Peter J. Donovan, Thomas Douglas, Christopher Gyngell, John Harris, Robin Lovell-Badge, Debra J. H. Mathews & Alan Regenberg (2015). Genome Editing Technologies and Human Germline Genetic Modification: The Hinxton Group Consensus Statement. American Journal of Bioethics 15 (12):42-47.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  5
    A. J. Cronin, J. Douglas & S. Sacks (2012). Licenced to Transplant: UK Overkill on EU Organ Directive Provides Golden Opportunity for Research. Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (10):593-595.
    Progress in transplantation outcomes depends on continuing research into both donor and recipient factors that may enhance graft and patient survival. A system of licencing for transplantation research, introduced by the Human Tissue Act 2004, which separates it from the transplantation process (then exempt from licencing), has damaged this vital activity by a combination of inflexible interpretation of the 2004 Act and fear of criminal liability on the part of researchers. Now, following the European Union (EU) Directive (2010) on standards (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  3
    J. A. McGeoch & H. N. Peters (1933). An All-or-None Characteristic in the Elimination of Errors During the Learning of a Stylus Maze. Journal of Experimental Psychology 16 (4):504.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Carol G. Kelley, Amy R. Lipson, Barbara J. Daly & Sara L. Douglas (2006). Use of Advance Directives in the Chronically Critically Ill. Jona's Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation 8 (2):42-47.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Michael J. Wood & Karen M. Douglas (2015). Online Communication as a Window to Conspiracist Worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. J. G. York & Michael A. Peters (eds.) (2011). Leo Strauss, Education, and Political Thought. Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.
    This collection by some of the leading scholars of Strauss's work is the first devoted to Strauss's thought regarding education. It seeks to address his conception of education as it applies to a range of his most important concepts, such as his views on the importance of revelation, his critique of modern democracy and the importance of modern classical education.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  8
    Anita Bandrowski, Ryan Brinkman, Mathias Brochhausen, Matthew H. Brush, Bill Bug, Marcus C. Chibucos, Kevin Clancy, Mélanie Courtot, Dirk Derom, Michel Dumontier, Liju Fan, Jennifer Fostel, Gilberto Fragoso, Frank Gibson, Alejandra Gonzalez-Beltran, Melissa A. Haendel, Yongqun He, Mervi Heiskanen, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Mark Jensen, Yu Lin, Allyson L. Lister, Phillip Lord, James Malone, Elisabetta Manduchi, Monnie McGee, Norman Morrison, James A. Overton, Helen Parkinson, Bjoern Peters, Philippe Rocca-Serra, Alan Ruttenberg, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, Richard H. Scheuermann, Daniel Schober, Barry Smith, Larisa N. Soldatova, Christian J. Stoeckert, Chris F. Taylor, Carlo Torniai, Jessica A. Turner, Randi Vita, Patricia L. Whetzel & Jie Zheng (2016). The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations. PLoS ONE 11 (4):e0154556.
    The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations (OBI) is an ontology that provides terms with precisely defined meanings to describe all aspects of how investigations in the biological and medical domains are conducted. OBI re-uses ontologies that provide a representation of biomedical knowledge from the Open Biological and Biomedical Ontologies (OBO) project and adds the ability to describe how this knowledge was derived. We here describe the state of OBI and several applications that are using it, such as adding semantic expressivity to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  41
    T. Douglas & J. Savulescu (2010). Synthetic Biology and the Ethics of Knowledge. Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (11):687-693.
    Synthetic biologists aim to generate biological organisms according to rational design principles. Their work may have many beneficial applications, but it also raises potentially serious ethical concerns. In this article, we consider what attention the discipline demands from bioethicists. We argue that the most important issue for ethicists to examine is the risk that knowledge from synthetic biology will be misused, for example, in biological terrorism or warfare. To adequately address this concern, bioethics will need to broaden its scope, contemplating (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  26. A. M. Quinton, P. H. Nowell-Smith, William Kneale, Stephen Toulmin, T. R. Miles, P. F. Strawson, D. W. Hamlyn, J. Harrison, Richard Robinson, A. C. Crombie, R. Peters, E. C. Mossner, A. M. Honoré & W. J. Rees (1954). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 63 (252):546-576.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  85
    Andrew J. Douglas (2013). C.L.R. James and the Struggle for Humanism. Constellations 20 (1):85-101.
  28. M. A. Peters, J. D. Marshall & P. Smeyers (2001). Nietzsche's Legacy for Education Past and Present Values.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  29. Jefferson W. Tester, Elisabeth M. Drake, Michael J. Driscoll, Michael W. Golay & William A. Peters (2012). Sustainable Energy: Choosing Among Options. The MIT Press.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  20
    E. Corazza, H. Douglas, J. L. Dowell, J. Franklin, A. S. Gillies, S. C. Goldberg, D. K. Heikes, C. Liu, C. Ortiz Hill & M. W. Pelczar (2004). Cling, AD, 101. Synthese 137 (477).
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  90
    P. F. Strawson, H. J. Paton, H. L. A. Hart, Richard Robinson, A. C. Lloyd, R. Rhees, J. L. Spilsbury, Dorothy Emmet, George E. Hughes, D. R. Cousin, Basil Mitchell, Richard Peters, B. A. Farrell, Antony Flew, J. O. Urmson, O. P. Wood & Jonathan Cohen (1951). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 60 (238):265-295.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  13
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Disease, Normality, and Current Pharmacological Moral Modification. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):135-137.
  33.  7
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (2015). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Thinking and Reasoning 22 (1):57-77.
    We hypothesised that belief in conspiracy theories would be predicted by the general tendency to attribute agency and intentionality where it is unlikely to exist. We further hypothesised that this tendency would explain the relationship between education level and belief in conspiracy theories, where lower levels of education have been found to be associated with higher conspiracy belief. In Study 1 participants were more likely to agree with a range of conspiracy theories if they also tended to attribute intentionality and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  89
    B. A., C. W. Valentine, G. Galloway, G. G., J. Solomon, R. R. Marett, John Edgar, B. Bosanquet, F. Peters, D. L. Murray, T. E., J. Field, J. Waterlow, A. E. Taylor & A. W. Benn (1911). New Books. [REVIEW] Mind 20 (1):426-444.
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  12
    K. J. Peters (1995). The Captivating Question. Semiotics:120-126.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  16
    M. L. Peters, S. A. Uyterlinde, J. Consemulder & O. van der Hart (1998). Apparent Amnesia on Experimental Memory Tests in Dissociative Identity Disorder: An Exploratory Study. Consciousness and Cognition 7 (1):27-41.
    Dissociative identity disorder (DID; called multiple personality disorder in DSMIII-R) is a psychiatric condition in which two or more identity states recurrently take control of the person's behavior. A characteristic feature of DID is the occurrence of apparently severe amnestic symptoms. This paper is concerned with experimental research of memory function in DID and focuses on between-identity transfer of newly learned neutral material. Previous studies on this subject are reviewed and a pilot study with four subjects is described. This study (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  9
    Neil Levy, Thomas Douglas, Guy Kahane, Sylvia Terbeck, Philip J. Cowen, Miles Hewstone & Julian Savulescu (2014). Are You Morally Modified?: The Moral Effects of Widely Used Pharmaceuticals. Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 21 (2):111-125.
  38.  4
    M. A. Peters & J. Reveley (2015). Noosphere Rising: Internet-Based Collective Intelligence, Creative Labour, and Social Production. Thesis Eleven 130 (1):3-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  18
    Rafaële J. C. Huntjens, Albert Postma, Liesbeth Woertman, Onno van Der Hart & Madelon L. Peters (2005). Procedural Memory in Dissociative Identity Disorder: When Can Inter-Identity Amnesia Be Truly Established?☆. Consciousness and Cognition 14 (2):377-389.
    In a serial reaction time task, procedural memory was examined in Dissociative Identity Disorder . Thirty-one DID patients were tested for inter-identity transfer of procedural learning and their memory performance was compared with 25 normal controls and 25 controls instructed to simulate DID. Results of patients seemed to indicate a pattern of inter-identity amnesia. Simulators, however, were able to mimic a pattern of inter-identity amnesia, rendering the results of patients impossible to interpret as either a pattern of amnesia or a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40.  7
    Rachel J. Anderson, Lien Peters & Stephen A. Dewhurst (2015). Episodic Elaboration: Investigating the Structure of Retrieved Past Events and Imagined Future Events. Consciousness and Cognition 33:112-124.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  7
    J. W. B. Douglas & J. M. Blomfield (1957). Maternal Employment and the Welfare of Children: An Account of a Survey in Progress. The Eugenics Review 49 (2):69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  3
    J. Peters (2015). Hegel's Naturalism: Mind, Nature, and the Final Ends of Life, by Terry Pinkard. Mind 124 (496):1356-1359.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  20
    R. S. Peters & J. P. White (1969). The Philosopher's Contribution to Educational Research. Educational Philosophy and Theory 1 (2):1–15.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  44.  5
    Andrew J. Douglas (2011). In a Milieu of Scarcity: Sartre and the Limits of Political Imagination. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (3):354.
  45.  12
    Joseph J. Peters (1944). The Sources of Life. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 19 (3):569-570.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  11
    Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney (1985). Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined. Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:129-153.
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  4
    Solomon H. Katz, William Lesher, Karl E. Peters, Charles C. Dickinson Iii, Stephen Modell, Jane M. Bengtson, Richard Busse, Willem B. Drees, Kim Eighmy & David J. Ernat (2011). Patrons—Philip Hefner Fund. Zygon 47 (1):653-654.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Karen M. Douglas, Robbie M. Sutton, Mitchell J. Callan, Rael J. Dawtry & Annelie J. Harvey (forthcoming). Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories. Someone is Pulling the Strings: Hypersensitive Agency Detection and Belief in Conspiracy Theories:1-21.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  29
    E. Marchant Gary, J. Sylvester Douglas & W. Abbott Kenneth (2008). Risk Management Principles for Nanotechnology. NanoEthics 2 (1).
    Risk management of nanotechnology is challenged by the enormous uncertainties about the risks, benefits, properties, and future direction of nanotechnology applications. Because of these uncertainties, traditional risk management principles such as acceptable risk, cost–benefit analysis, and feasibility are unworkable, as is the newest risk management principle, the precautionary principle. Yet, simply waiting for these uncertainties to be resolved before undertaking risk management efforts would not be prudent, in part because of the growing public concerns about nanotechnology driven by risk perception (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  30
    Christian J. Peters (2000). Genetic Engineering in Agriculture: Who Stands to Benefit? [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 13 (3-4):313-327.
    The use of genetic engineering inagriculture has been the source of much debate. Todate, arguments have focused most strongly on thepotential human health risks, the flow of geneticmaterial to related species, and ecologicalconsequences. Little attention appears to have beengiven to a more fundamental concern, namely, who willbe the beneficiaries of this technology?Given the prevalence of chronic hunger and thestark economics of farming, it is arguable thatfarmers and the hungry should be the mainbeneficiaries of agricultural research. However, theapplication of genetic engineering (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000