15 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Joel Katzav [15]J. Katzav [2]
See also:
Profile: Joel Katzav (Eindhoven University of Technology)
  1. Joel Katzav (2014). The Epistemology of Climate Models and Some of its Implications for Climate Science and the Philosophy of Science. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46:228-238.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Joel Katzav (2013). Dispositions, Causes, Persistence As Is, and General Relativity. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):41 - 57.
    I argue that, on a dispositionalist account of causation and indeed on any other view of causation according to which causation is a real relation, general relativity (GR) does not give causal principles a role in explaining phenomena. In doing so, I bring out a surprisingly substantial constraint on adequate views about the explanations and ontology of GR, namely the requirement that such views show how GR can explain motion that is free of disturbing influences.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Joel Katzav (2013). Hybrid Models, Climate Models, and Inference to the Best Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (1):107-129.
    I examine the warrants we have in light of the empirical successes of a kind of model I call ‘hybrid models’, a kind that includes climate models among its members. I argue that these warrants’ strengths depend on inferential virtues that are not just explanatory virtues, contrary to what would be the case if inference to the best explanation (IBE) provided the warrants. I also argue that the warrants in question, unlike those IBE provides, guide inferences only to model implications (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Joel Katzav (2013). Severe Testing of Climate Change Hypotheses. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 44 (4):433-441.
  5. Joel Katzav, Henk A. Dijkstra & A. T. J. de Laat (2012). Assessing Climate Model Projections: State of the Art and Philosophical Reflections. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 43 (4):258-276.
    The present paper draws on climate science and the philosophy of science in order to evaluate climate-model-based approaches to assessing climate projections. We analyze the difficulties that arise in such assessment and outline criteria of adequacy for approaches to it. In addition, we offer a critical overview of the approaches used in the IPCC working group one fourth report, including the confidence building, Bayesian and likelihood approaches. Finally, we consider approaches that do not feature in the IPCC reports, including three (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Joel Katzav (2008). The Second-Order Property View of Existence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):486-496.
    Abstract: In this paper, I examine the current case against the second-order property view of existence through a discussion of Colin McGinn's up to date statement of this case. I conclude that the second-order property view of existence remains viable.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Joel Katzav (2005). Ellis on the Limitations of Dispositionalism. Analysis 65 (285):92–94.
    FIRST PARAGRAPH I have argued that dispositionalism is incompatible with the Principle of Least Action (PLA) (Katzav 2004). In ‘Katzav on the Limitations of Dispositionalism,’ Brian Ellis responds, arguing that while naïve dispositionalism is incompatible with the PLA, sophisticated dispositionalism is not. Naive dispositionalism, according to Ellis, is the view that the world is ultimately something like a conglomerate of objects and their dispositions, and that, therefore, dispositions are the ultimate ontological units that explain events. Sophisticated dispositionalism, according to Ellis, (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Joel Katzav (2005). On What Powers Cannot Do. Dialectica 59 (3):331–345.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. Katzav & C. A. Reed (2004). On Argumentation Schemes and the Natural Classification of Arguments. Argumentation 18 (2):239-259.
    We develop conceptions of arguments and of argument types that will, by serving as the basis for developing a natural classification of arguments, benefit work in artificial intelligence. Focusing only on arguments construed as the semantic entities that are the outcome of processes of reasoning, we outline and clarify our view that an argument is a proposition that represents a fact as both conveying some other fact and as doing so wholly. Further, we outline our view that, with respect to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Joel Katzav (2004). Dispositions and the Principle of Least Action. Analysis 64 (3):206–214.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Joel Katzav (2004). Horwich on Meaning and Use. Ratio 17 (2):159–175.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Joel Katzav (2002). Humean Metaphysics. Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):59-73.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Joel Katzav (2002). Identity, Nature, and Ground. Philosophical Topics 30 (1):167-187.
  14. Joel Katzav (1998). Riggs on Strong Justification. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (4):631 – 639.
    In 'The Weakness of Strong Justification' Wayne Riggs claims that the requirement that justified beliefs be truth conducive (likely to be true) is not always compatible with the requirement that they be epistemically responsible (arrived at in an epistemically responsible manner)1. He supports this claim by criticising Alvin Goldman's view that if a belief is strongly justified, it is also epistemically responsible. In light of this, Riggs recommends that we develop two independent conceptions of justification, one that insists upon the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Craig Dilworth & J. Katzav (1997). The Metaphysics of Science: An Account of Modern Science in Terms of Principles, Laws, and Theories. Annals of Science 54 (3):315-315.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation